2026-09.1 record

Which project tools did AI tools name? 22-23 Sep 2026 record

Name: The Absence Index, September 2026
Published: 2026-09-23
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Most named checked vendor

97 of 150 valid answers named Asana

97 of 150 valid answers, 64.7% (Wilson 95% interval 56.7% to 71.9%)

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09, version 2026-09.1. Method v1.1. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695

Systems for planning, assigning, tracking, coordinating, and reporting on work across projects.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Vendor-selection source dates: 2026-08-28. The Index measures observed naming, not service quality or product merit.

Commissioned engagement: no.

Source Map · Dispute policy · Explore the buyer questions

Discuss this category's evidence

Criteria Maps

Observed buyer requirements before the first vendor in source answers captured on 22 and 23 September 2026. 150 valid source answers from 150 scheduled runs. These observations are separate from the original Index release figures.

Each vendor figure uses the median across the five most named vendors in the frozen category release, including zero counts. Adjacency compares distinct source answers for the same criterion; page coverage compares criteria for the same page state. Medians are descriptive and have no confidence interval.

Prepared by the Broadcastwell team. Team review: in progress. Zero analyst verified criteria.

The AI written RFP; Study DOI 10.5281/zenodo.23271935. Source DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695. CC BY 4.0.

Observed source answer frequencies. Wilson intervals describe the calculation, not independent population inference. Repeated runs are not independent performance tests. Page comparisons cover only the dated page and stated scope. An unstated claim is not an absent product feature.

Any named company may request one no-cost re-run at index@broadcastwell.com; both results are published.

Fix one answer, $490. Every figure comes from the published method, v1.1.

Read the full list of observed buyer requirements.

Fit with stated team needs or workflows
37 of 150; 24.7%; Wilson 95% interval 18.5% to 32.1%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 4: 3 of 3 runs; ChatGPT, 5: 2 of 3 runs; ChatGPT, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, 2: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, 6: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 4: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 5: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 6: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 6: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 1: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 2: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 7: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|1|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|1|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|1|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|2|Claude|1; project_management|2|Claude|2; project_management|2|Claude|3; project_management|2|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|4|ChatGPT|1; project_management|4|ChatGPT|2; project_management|4|ChatGPT|3; project_management|4|Perplexity|1; project_management|4|Perplexity|2; project_management|5|ChatGPT|2; project_management|5|ChatGPT|3; project_management|5|Perplexity|1; project_management|5|Perplexity|3; project_management|6|Claude|1; project_management|6|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|6|Perplexity|1; project_management|6|Perplexity|2; project_management|6|Perplexity|3; project_management|7|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|7|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Claude|1; project_management|9|Claude|2; project_management|9|Claude|3; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|1; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|9|Perplexity|1; project_management|9|Perplexity|2; project_management|9|Perplexity|3
https://planisware.com/resources/selecting-tool/what-best-project-management-vendors-comparison: 3 source answers; https://productive.io/blog/best-project-management-software/: 2 source answers; https://resources.rework.com/guides/choosing-software/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 3 source answers; https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-project-management-software-for-professional-services-reviewed/: 1 source answers; https://www.atlassian.com/work-management/project-management/cloud-based-project-management: 1 source answers; https://www.bigtime.net/blogs/project-management-software-for-professional-services/: 2 source answers; https://www.celoxis.com/article/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 2 source answers; https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/guideline-evaluate-project-management-software-4629: 2 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-comparison-guide/: 3 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-requirements-checklist-needs-assessment/: 1 source answers; https://www.projektron.de/en/blog/details/choosing-project-management-software-3643/: 2 source answers; https://www.psohub.com/blog/best-project-management-software: 2 source answers; No source shown: 31 source answers
- Airtable: 5 of 150; 3.3%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Category median 12 of 150; 8.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|4|ChatGPT|1; project_management|4|ChatGPT|2; project_management|4|ChatGPT|3; project_management|4|Perplexity|1; project_management|4|Perplexity|2
  https://asana.com/resources/best-project-management-software: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://dzone.com/articles/the-8-best-excel-alternatives-for-project-manageme: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://tadabase.io/blog/best-spreadsheet-alternatives: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.airtable.com/articles/best-project-management-tools: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%; https://www.airtable.com/articles/project-management-workflow?utm_source=openai: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.airtable.com/solutions/project-management?utm_source=openai: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.jotform.com/blog/excel-alternative/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Asana: 15 of 150; 10.0%; Wilson 95% interval 6.2% to 15.8%. Category median 12 of 150; 8.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|1|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|1|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|1|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|2|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|4|ChatGPT|1; project_management|4|ChatGPT|2; project_management|4|ChatGPT|3; project_management|4|Perplexity|1; project_management|4|Perplexity|2; project_management|5|ChatGPT|2; project_management|5|ChatGPT|3; project_management|5|Perplexity|1; project_management|5|Perplexity|3; project_management|7|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|7|Google AI Mode|3
  https://asana.com/features/project-management?utm_source=openai: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://asana.com/resources/best-project-management-software: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://doitify.com/planning/project-management-software-for-distributed-teams/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://help.asana.com/s/article/managing-tasks-and-dependencies-with-timeline?language=en_US&utm_source=openai: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://ones.com/blog/7-project-management-software-picks-that-replace-spreadsheets/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://startupik.com/best-project-management-tools-for-distributed-teams/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%; https://wfhtoolkit.com/blog/project-management-distributed-teams/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.airtable.com/articles/best-project-management-tools: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%; No source shown: 6 of 150; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.8% to 8.5%. Category median 5 of 150; 3.3%
- Basecamp: 4 of 150; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Category median 12 of 150; 8.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|5|ChatGPT|2; project_management|5|ChatGPT|3; project_management|5|Perplexity|1; project_management|5|Perplexity|3
  https://basecamp.com/features?utm_source=openai: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://startupik.com/best-project-management-tools-for-distributed-teams/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%; https://trackstack.tech/en/best-project-management-tools-remote-teams-2026/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.rock.so/blog/project-management-software-remote-teams: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- BigTime: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 12 of 150; 8.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Perplexity|2
  https://www.bigtime.net/blogs/project-management-software-for-professional-services/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Celoxis: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 12 of 150; 8.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|2|Claude|1; project_management|2|Claude|2; project_management|2|Claude|3
  No source shown: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 5 of 150; 3.3%
- ClickUp: 12 of 150; 8.0%; Wilson 95% interval 4.6% to 13.5%. Category median 12 of 150; 8.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|1|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|1|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|1|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|2|Claude|1; project_management|2|Claude|2; project_management|2|Claude|3; project_management|2|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|4|Perplexity|1; project_management|4|Perplexity|2; project_management|5|Perplexity|1; project_management|5|Perplexity|3; project_management|7|Google AI Mode|2
  https://doitify.com/planning/project-management-software-for-distributed-teams/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://ones.com/blog/7-project-management-software-picks-that-replace-spreadsheets/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://ones.com/blog/9-project-management-online-apps-that-replace-spreadsheets-in-2026/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://startupik.com/best-project-management-tools-for-distributed-teams/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%; https://tadabase.io/blog/best-spreadsheet-alternatives: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://trackstack.tech/en/best-project-management-tools-remote-teams-2026/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.airtable.com/articles/best-project-management-tools: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%; https://www.conbersa.ai/blog/best-spreadsheet-alternatives: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; No source shown: 8 of 150; 5.3%; Wilson 95% interval 2.7% to 10.2%. Category median 5 of 150; 3.3%
- Jira: 12 of 150; 8.0%; Wilson 95% interval 4.6% to 13.5%. Category median 12 of 150; 8.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|1|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|1|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|1|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|4|ChatGPT|1; project_management|4|ChatGPT|2; project_management|4|ChatGPT|3; project_management|4|Perplexity|1; project_management|5|ChatGPT|2; project_management|5|ChatGPT|3; project_management|5|Perplexity|1; project_management|5|Perplexity|3; project_management|7|Google AI Mode|3
  https://asana.com/resources/best-project-management-software: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://confluence.atlassian.com/jirasoftware/jira-software-overview-1688898119.html?utm_source=openai: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://editorialge.com/best-project-management-tools-for-remote-teams/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://startupik.com/best-project-management-tools-for-distributed-teams/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%; https://support.atlassian.com/jira-software-cloud/docs/start-a-new-software-project-for-your-team/?utm_source=openai: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://trackstack.tech/en/best-project-management-tools-remote-teams-2026/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.airtable.com/articles/best-project-management-tools: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%; https://www.atlassian.com/agile/kanban/?utm_source=openai: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/agile?utm_source=openai: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/guides/boards/overview?utm_source=openai: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; No source shown: 4 of 150; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Category median 5 of 150; 3.3%
- Kantata: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 12 of 150; 8.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Claude|1; project_management|6|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 5 of 150; 3.3%
- Microsoft Project: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 12 of 150; 8.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|7|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|7|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 5 of 150; 3.3%
- Notion: 9 of 150; 6.0%; Wilson 95% interval 3.2% to 11.0%. Category median 12 of 150; 8.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|4|ChatGPT|1; project_management|4|ChatGPT|2; project_management|4|ChatGPT|3; project_management|4|Perplexity|1; project_management|4|Perplexity|2; project_management|5|ChatGPT|2; project_management|5|ChatGPT|3; project_management|5|Perplexity|1; project_management|5|Perplexity|3
  https://asana.com/resources/best-project-management-software: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://editorialge.com/best-project-management-tools-for-remote-teams/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://ones.com/blog/7-project-management-software-picks-that-replace-spreadsheets/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://ones.com/blog/9-project-management-online-apps-that-replace-spreadsheets-in-2026/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://startupik.com/best-project-management-tools-for-distributed-teams/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%; https://wfhtoolkit.com/blog/project-management-distributed-teams/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.conbersa.ai/blog/best-spreadsheet-alternatives: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.jotform.com/blog/excel-alternative/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.notion.com/en-gb/help/guides/getting-started-with-projects-and-tasks?utm_source=openai: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.notion.com/help/guides/accomplish-more-with-connected-project-management?utm_source=openai: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.notion.com/nb/help/guides/accomplish-more-with-connected-project-management?utm_source=openai: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.notion.com/product/projects: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.rock.so/blog/project-management-software-remote-teams: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- PSOhub: 4 of 150; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Category median 12 of 150; 8.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Claude|1; project_management|6|Perplexity|1; project_management|6|Perplexity|2; project_management|6|Perplexity|3
  https://www.psohub.com/blog/best-project-management-software: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 5 of 150; 3.3%
- Productive: 5 of 150; 3.3%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Category median 12 of 150; 8.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|2|Claude|1; project_management|2|Claude|3; project_management|6|Perplexity|1; project_management|6|Perplexity|2; project_management|6|Perplexity|3
  https://productive.io/blog/best-project-management-software/: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://productive.io/blog/project-management-software-for-professional-services/: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; No source shown: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 5 of 150; 3.3%
- Scoro: 6 of 150; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.8% to 8.5%. Category median 12 of 150; 8.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|2|Claude|1; project_management|2|Claude|2; project_management|2|Claude|3; project_management|2|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|6|Claude|1; project_management|7|Google AI Mode|2
  No source shown: 6 of 150; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.8% to 8.5%. Category median 5 of 150; 3.3%
- Smartsheet: 7 of 150; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.3%. Category median 12 of 150; 8.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|1|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|1|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|1|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|2|Claude|2; project_management|4|Perplexity|1; project_management|4|Perplexity|2; project_management|7|Google AI Mode|3
  https://www.airtable.com/articles/best-project-management-tools: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%; https://www.celoxis.com/article/microsoft-project-alternatives: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.jotform.com/blog/excel-alternative/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://zapier.com/blog/best-spreadsheet-excel-alternative/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; No source shown: 5 of 150; 3.3%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Category median 5 of 150; 3.3%
- Teamwork: 10 of 150; 6.7%; Wilson 95% interval 3.7% to 11.8%. Category median 12 of 150; 8.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|2|Claude|1; project_management|2|Claude|2; project_management|2|Claude|3; project_management|2|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|6|Claude|1; project_management|6|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|6|Perplexity|1; project_management|6|Perplexity|2; project_management|6|Perplexity|3; project_management|7|Google AI Mode|2
  https://monday.com/blog/project-management/project-management-software/: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://project-management.com/top-10-project-management-software/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; No source shown: 7 of 150; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.3%. Category median 5 of 150; 3.3%
- Trello: 9 of 150; 6.0%; Wilson 95% interval 3.2% to 11.0%. Category median 12 of 150; 8.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|4|ChatGPT|1; project_management|4|ChatGPT|2; project_management|4|ChatGPT|3; project_management|4|Perplexity|1; project_management|4|Perplexity|2; project_management|5|ChatGPT|2; project_management|5|ChatGPT|3; project_management|5|Perplexity|1; project_management|5|Perplexity|3
  https://asana.com/resources/best-project-management-software: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://ones.com/blog/7-project-management-software-picks-that-replace-spreadsheets/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://ones.com/blog/9-project-management-online-apps-that-replace-spreadsheets-in-2026/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://trackstack.tech/en/best-project-management-tools-remote-teams-2026/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://trello.com/en/guide/enterprise/advanced-features?utm_source=openai: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://trello.com/en/guide/trello-101?utm_source=openai: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://trello.com/tour: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.airtable.com/articles/best-project-management-tools: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%; https://www.rock.so/blog/project-management-software-remote-teams: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Workzone: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 12 of 150; 8.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Claude|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 5 of 150; 3.3%
- Wrike: 7 of 150; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.3%. Category median 12 of 150; 8.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|2|Claude|1; project_management|2|Claude|2; project_management|2|Claude|3; project_management|6|Perplexity|1; project_management|6|Perplexity|2; project_management|6|Perplexity|3; project_management|7|Google AI Mode|3
  https://productive.io/blog/project-management-software-for-professional-services/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best-project-management-software: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.wrike.com/professional-services-guide/professional-services-software-for-project-management/: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; No source shown: 4 of 150; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Category median 5 of 150; 3.3%
- monday AI Workspace: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 12 of 150; 8.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|2|Claude|3
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 5 of 150; 3.3%
- monday.com: 12 of 150; 8.0%; Wilson 95% interval 4.6% to 13.5%. Category median 12 of 150; 8.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|1|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|1|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|1|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|2|Claude|1; project_management|2|Claude|2; project_management|2|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|4|Perplexity|1; project_management|4|Perplexity|2; project_management|5|Perplexity|1; project_management|5|Perplexity|3; project_management|7|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|7|Google AI Mode|3
  https://asana.com/resources/best-project-management-software: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://doitify.com/planning/project-management-software-for-distributed-teams/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://editorialge.com/best-project-management-tools-for-remote-teams/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://ones.com/blog/7-project-management-software-picks-that-replace-spreadsheets/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://ones.com/blog/9-project-management-online-apps-that-replace-spreadsheets-in-2026/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://trackstack.tech/en/best-project-management-tools-remote-teams-2026/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://wfhtoolkit.com/blog/project-management-distributed-teams/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.airtable.com/articles/best-project-management-tools: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%; https://www.rock.so/blog/project-management-software-remote-teams: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; No source shown: 8 of 150; 5.3%; Wilson 95% interval 2.7% to 10.2%. Category median 5 of 150; 3.3%
Scalability as needs grow
18 of 150; 12.0%; Wilson 95% interval 7.7% to 18.2%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 3: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 3: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 4: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|3|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|3|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|3|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|3|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|4|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Claude|1; project_management|9|Claude|2; project_management|9|Claude|3; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|9|Perplexity|1; project_management|9|Perplexity|2; project_management|9|Perplexity|3
https://planisware.com/resources/selecting-tool/what-best-project-management-vendors-comparison: 3 source answers; https://resources.rework.com/guides/choosing-software/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 3 source answers; https://www.celoxis.com/article/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 3 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-comparison-guide/: 3 source answers; https://www.projektron.de/en/blog/details/choosing-project-management-software-3643/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 15 source answers
- Asana: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|3|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Kanbanize: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- monday.com: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|3|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|3|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|3|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Reporting functionality
17 of 150; 11.3%; Wilson 95% interval 7.2% to 17.4%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 4: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 3: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 6: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|3|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|4|Perplexity|3; project_management|6|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Claude|1; project_management|9|Claude|2; project_management|9|Claude|3; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|1; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|9|Perplexity|1; project_management|9|Perplexity|2; project_management|9|Perplexity|3
https://planisware.com/project-portfolio-management-software-buyers-guide: 1 source answers; https://planisware.com/resources/selecting-tool/what-best-project-management-vendors-comparison: 3 source answers; https://resources.rework.com/guides/choosing-software/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 3 source answers; https://tadabase.io/blog/best-spreadsheet-alternatives: 1 source answers; https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/features/project-tracking-software: 1 source answers; https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/features/project-tracking-software?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.celoxis.com/article/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 1 source answers; https://www.jotform.com/blog/excel-alternative/: 1 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-comparison-guide/: 3 source answers; https://www.projektron.de/en/blog/details/choosing-project-management-software-3643/: 1 source answers; https://www.workzone.com/blog/project-management-software-for-teams-using-spreadsheets/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 11 source answers
- ClickUp: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Smartsheet: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|3|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|4|Perplexity|3
  https://www.airtable.com/articles/best-project-management-tools: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.celoxis.com/article/microsoft-project-alternatives: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.jotform.com/blog/excel-alternative/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://zapier.com/blog/best-spreadsheet-excel-alternative/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Zoho: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- monday.com: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Ease of use and adoption
16 of 150; 10.7%; Wilson 95% interval 6.7% to 16.6%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 7: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|7|Google AI Overviews|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Claude|1; project_management|9|Claude|2; project_management|9|Claude|3; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|1; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|9|Perplexity|1; project_management|9|Perplexity|2; project_management|9|Perplexity|3
https://asana.com/resources/project-management-software-buyers-guide: 1 source answers; https://planisware.com/resources/selecting-tool/what-best-project-management-vendors-comparison: 3 source answers; https://resources.rework.com/guides/choosing-software/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 3 source answers; https://www.celoxis.com/article/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 2 source answers; https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/guideline-evaluate-project-management-software-4629: 2 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-comparison-guide/: 3 source answers; https://www.projektron.de/en/blog/details/choosing-project-management-software-3643/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 13 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Full ownership costs including implementation and add ons
15 of 150; 10.0%; Wilson 95% interval 6.2% to 15.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Claude|1; project_management|9|Claude|2; project_management|9|Claude|3; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|1; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|9|Perplexity|1; project_management|9|Perplexity|2; project_management|9|Perplexity|3
https://planisware.com/resources/selecting-tool/what-best-project-management-vendors-comparison: 3 source answers; https://resources.rework.com/guides/choosing-software/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 3 source answers; https://www.celoxis.com/article/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 2 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-comparison-guide/: 3 source answers; https://www.projektron.de/en/blog/details/choosing-project-management-software-3643/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 12 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Working connections to existing business systems
15 of 150; 10.0%; Wilson 95% interval 6.2% to 15.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Claude|1; project_management|9|Claude|2; project_management|9|Claude|3; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|1; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|9|Perplexity|1; project_management|9|Perplexity|2; project_management|9|Perplexity|3
https://planisware.com/resources/selecting-tool/what-best-project-management-vendors-comparison: 3 source answers; https://resources.rework.com/guides/choosing-software/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 3 source answers; https://www.celoxis.com/article/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 1 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-comparison-guide/: 3 source answers; https://www.projektron.de/en/blog/details/choosing-project-management-software-3643/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 12 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Product or vendor security
14 of 150; 9.3%; Wilson 95% interval 5.6% to 15.1%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 3: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|3|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Claude|1; project_management|9|Claude|2; project_management|9|Claude|3; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|9|Perplexity|1; project_management|9|Perplexity|2; project_management|9|Perplexity|3
https://planisware.com/resources/selecting-tool/what-best-project-management-vendors-comparison: 3 source answers; https://resources.rework.com/guides/choosing-software/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 3 source answers; https://www.celoxis.com/article/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 1 source answers; https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/choosing-secure-and-verifiable-technologies?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2024-10/ICT%20SCRM%20Task%20Force%20Software%20Acquisition%20Guide%20Fact%20Sheet%20%28508%29.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/pdm24050-software-acquisition-guide-for-government-enterprise-consumersv2-508c.pdf?emrc=c1e13b: 1 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-comparison-guide/: 3 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-evaluation-scorecard-vendor-matrix/: 2 source answers; https://www.projektron.de/en/blog/details/choosing-project-management-software-3643/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 8 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Manageable complexity or administrative effort
12 of 150; 8.0%; Wilson 95% interval 4.6% to 13.5%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 1: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 3: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 4: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|1|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|3|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|3|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|3|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|4|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|1; project_management|9|Perplexity|1; project_management|9|Perplexity|2
https://asana.com/resources/project-management-software-buyers-guide: 1 source answers; https://planisware.com/resources/selecting-tool/what-best-project-management-vendors-comparison: 1 source answers; https://resources.rework.com/guides/choosing-software/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 2 source answers; https://www.atlassian.com/work-management/project-management/cloud-based-project-management: 1 source answers; https://www.celoxis.com/article/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 1 source answers; https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/guideline-evaluate-project-management-software-4629: 1 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-comparison-guide/: 2 source answers; No source shown: 9 source answers
- Asana: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|1|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|3|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|4|Google AI Mode|2
  No source shown: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Trello: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Mode|2
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- monday.com: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|1|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|3|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Task dependencies
12 of 150; 8.0%; Wilson 95% interval 4.6% to 13.5%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 7: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 4: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|7|Google AI Overviews|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|9|Perplexity|1; project_management|9|Perplexity|3
https://resources.rework.com/guides/choosing-software/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 2 source answers; https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/features/project-tracking-software: 1 source answers; https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/features/project-tracking-software?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.celoxis.com/article/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 1 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-comparison-guide/: 2 source answers; https://www.projektron.de/en/blog/details/choosing-project-management-software-3643/: 2 source answers; No source shown: 8 source answers
- Smartsheet: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|7|Google AI Overviews|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Applicable compliance requirements
11 of 150; 7.3%; Wilson 95% interval 4.1% to 12.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|Claude|1; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|9|Perplexity|1; project_management|9|Perplexity|2; project_management|9|Perplexity|3
https://planisware.com/resources/selecting-tool/what-best-project-management-vendors-comparison: 3 source answers; https://resources.rework.com/guides/choosing-software/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 3 source answers; https://www.celoxis.com/article/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 1 source answers; https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2024-10/ICT%20SCRM%20Task%20Force%20Software%20Acquisition%20Guide%20Fact%20Sheet%20%28508%29.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-evaluation-scorecard-vendor-matrix/: 2 source answers; https://www.projektron.de/en/blog/details/choosing-project-management-software-3643/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 7 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Customer support
11 of 150; 7.3%; Wilson 95% interval 4.1% to 12.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Claude|1; project_management|9|Claude|2; project_management|9|Claude|3; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|9|Perplexity|1; project_management|9|Perplexity|2; project_management|9|Perplexity|3
https://planisware.com/resources/selecting-tool/what-best-project-management-vendors-comparison: 3 source answers; https://resources.rework.com/guides/choosing-software/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 3 source answers; https://www.celoxis.com/article/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 1 source answers; https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/assisting-small-and-medium-sized-businesses-assess-vendors-and-suppliers-fact-sheet?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2024-10/ICT%20SCRM%20Task%20Force%20Software%20Acquisition%20Guide%20Fact%20Sheet%20%28508%29.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/guideline-evaluate-project-management-software-4629: 1 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-comparison-guide/: 3 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-requirements-checklist-needs-assessment/: 1 source answers; https://www.projektron.de/en/blog/details/choosing-project-management-software-3643/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 6 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Team collaboration
11 of 150; 7.3%; Wilson 95% interval 4.1% to 12.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 4: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 3: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 1: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 3: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 4: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|1|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|1|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|3|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|3|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|3|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|3|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|4|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|4|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|4|Perplexity|3; project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2
https://tadabase.io/blog/best-spreadsheet-alternatives: 1 source answers; https://www.jotform.com/blog/excel-alternative/: 1 source answers; https://www.workzone.com/blog/project-management-software-for-teams-using-spreadsheets/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 10 source answers
- Airtable: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|4|Perplexity|3
  https://asana.com/resources/best-project-management-software: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://dzone.com/articles/the-8-best-excel-alternatives-for-project-manageme: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://tadabase.io/blog/best-spreadsheet-alternatives: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.airtable.com/articles/best-project-management-tools: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.jotform.com/blog/excel-alternative/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Asana: 8 of 150; 5.3%; Wilson 95% interval 2.7% to 10.2%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|1|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|1|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|3|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|3|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|3|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|4|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|4|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|4|Perplexity|3
  https://asana.com/resources/best-project-management-software: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://ones.com/blog/9-project-management-online-apps-that-replace-spreadsheets-in-2026/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%; https://tadabase.io/blog/best-spreadsheet-alternatives: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.conbersa.ai/blog/best-spreadsheet-alternatives: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; No source shown: 7 of 150; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.3%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%
- Basecamp: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%
- ClickUp: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|4|Perplexity|3
  https://asana.com/resources/best-project-management-software: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://ones.com/blog/9-project-management-online-apps-that-replace-spreadsheets-in-2026/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%; https://tadabase.io/blog/best-spreadsheet-alternatives: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.conbersa.ai/blog/best-spreadsheet-alternatives: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%
- Smartsheet: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|3|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|4|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%
- Wrike: 4 of 150; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|3|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|3|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|3|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|4|Perplexity|3
  https://ones.com/blog/7-project-management-software-picks-that-replace-spreadsheets/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://ones.com/blog/9-project-management-online-apps-that-replace-spreadsheets-in-2026/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%; https://www.airtable.com/articles/best-project-management-tools: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.projectmanager.com/blog/best-smartsheet-alternatives: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; No source shown: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%
- monday.com: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|3|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|3|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%
Access controls
10 of 150; 6.7%; Wilson 95% interval 3.7% to 11.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|9|Perplexity|1; project_management|9|Perplexity|2; project_management|9|Perplexity|3
https://planisware.com/resources/selecting-tool/what-best-project-management-vendors-comparison: 3 source answers; https://resources.rework.com/guides/choosing-software/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 3 source answers; https://www.celoxis.com/article/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 1 source answers; https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2024-10/ICT%20SCRM%20Task%20Force%20Software%20Acquisition%20Guide%20Fact%20Sheet%20%28508%29.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-evaluation-scorecard-vendor-matrix/: 2 source answers; https://www.projektron.de/en/blog/details/choosing-project-management-software-3643/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 6 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Clear task ownership or assignment
10 of 150; 6.7%; Wilson 95% interval 3.7% to 11.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 5: 3 of 3 runs; ChatGPT, 7: 2 of 3 runs; ChatGPT, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 5: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|5|ChatGPT|1; project_management|5|ChatGPT|2; project_management|5|ChatGPT|3; project_management|5|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|5|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|7|ChatGPT|2; project_management|7|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3
https://www.atlassian.com/work-management/project-management/cloud-based-project-management: 1 source answers; No source shown: 9 source answers
- Asana: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|5|ChatGPT|2; project_management|5|ChatGPT|3; project_management|7|ChatGPT|2
  https://asana.com/features/project-management?utm_source=openai: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://asana.com/pricing?utm_source=openai: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- monday.com: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|7|ChatGPT|3
  https://support.monday.com/hc/en-us/articles/360010166559-Resource-management-with-Workload?utm_source=openai: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Workflow automation
10 of 150; 6.7%; Wilson 95% interval 3.7% to 11.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 4: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 4: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 4: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|4|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|4|Google AI Overviews|1; project_management|4|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|4|Perplexity|1; project_management|4|Perplexity|3; project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Perplexity|1
https://resources.rework.com/guides/choosing-software/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 1 source answers; https://tadabase.io/blog/best-spreadsheet-alternatives: 1 source answers; https://www.jotform.com/blog/excel-alternative/: 1 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-comparison-guide/: 1 source answers; https://www.projektron.de/en/blog/details/choosing-project-management-software-3643/: 1 source answers; https://www.workzone.com/blog/project-management-software-for-teams-using-spreadsheets/: 2 source answers; No source shown: 7 source answers
- Airtable: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Overviews|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Smartsheet: 4 of 150; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Overviews|1; project_management|4|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|4|Perplexity|1; project_management|4|Perplexity|3
  https://www.airtable.com/articles/best-project-management-tools: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.celoxis.com/article/microsoft-project-alternatives: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.jotform.com/blog/excel-alternative/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://zapier.com/blog/best-spreadsheet-excel-alternative/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; No source shown: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- monday.com: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|4|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|4|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Activity audit logs
9 of 150; 6.0%; Wilson 95% interval 3.2% to 11.0%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Claude|1; project_management|9|Claude|2; project_management|9|Claude|3; project_management|9|Perplexity|1; project_management|9|Perplexity|2; project_management|9|Perplexity|3
https://planisware.com/resources/selecting-tool/what-best-project-management-vendors-comparison: 3 source answers; https://resources.rework.com/guides/choosing-software/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 3 source answers; https://www.celoxis.com/article/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 1 source answers; https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2024-10/ICT%20SCRM%20Task%20Force%20Software%20Acquisition%20Guide%20Fact%20Sheet%20%28508%29.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-evaluation-scorecard-vendor-matrix/: 2 source answers; https://www.projektron.de/en/blog/details/choosing-project-management-software-3643/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 5 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Data encryption
9 of 150; 6.0%; Wilson 95% interval 3.2% to 11.0%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Claude|1; project_management|9|Claude|2; project_management|9|Claude|3; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|3
https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2024-10/ICT%20SCRM%20Task%20Force%20Software%20Acquisition%20Guide%20Fact%20Sheet%20%28508%29.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; No source shown: 8 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Milestone tracking
9 of 150; 6.0%; Wilson 95% interval 3.2% to 11.0%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Claude|3; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|9|Perplexity|1; project_management|9|Perplexity|3
https://resources.rework.com/guides/choosing-software/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 2 source answers; https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/features/project-tracking-software?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.celoxis.com/article/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 1 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-comparison-guide/: 2 source answers; https://www.projektron.de/en/blog/details/choosing-project-management-software-3643/: 2 source answers; No source shown: 6 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Portfolio and cross project oversight
9 of 150; 6.0%; Wilson 95% interval 3.2% to 11.0%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 3: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|3|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Claude|1; project_management|9|Claude|2; project_management|9|Claude|3; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|9|Perplexity|1; project_management|9|Perplexity|3
https://planisware.com/project-portfolio-management-software-buyers-guide: 1 source answers; https://planisware.com/resources/selecting-tool/what-best-project-management-vendors-comparison: 2 source answers; https://resources.rework.com/guides/choosing-software/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 2 source answers; https://www.atlassian.com/jira/solutions/planning?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.atlassian.com/project-management-software: 1 source answers; https://www.atlassian.com/work-management/project-management/cloud-based-project-management: 1 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-comparison-guide/: 2 source answers; No source shown: 5 source answers
- Asana: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|3|Google AI Mode|2
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Project scheduling
9 of 150; 6.0%; Wilson 95% interval 3.2% to 11.0%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 7: 1 of 3 runs; ChatGPT, 9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 7: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|7|ChatGPT|3; project_management|7|Google AI Overviews|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Claude|1; project_management|9|Claude|2; project_management|9|Claude|3; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|3
https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/features/project-tracking-software?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; No source shown: 8 source answers
- Asana: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|7|Google AI Overviews|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Smartsheet: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|7|Google AI Overviews|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- monday.com: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|7|ChatGPT|3
  https://support.monday.com/hc/en-us/articles/360010166559-Resource-management-with-Workload?utm_source=openai: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Training resources and user documentation
9 of 150; 6.0%; Wilson 95% interval 3.2% to 11.0%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Claude|1; project_management|9|Claude|2; project_management|9|Claude|3; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|9|Perplexity|1; project_management|9|Perplexity|2; project_management|9|Perplexity|3
https://planisware.com/resources/selecting-tool/what-best-project-management-vendors-comparison: 3 source answers; https://resources.rework.com/guides/choosing-software/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 3 source answers; https://www.celoxis.com/article/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 1 source answers; https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/guideline-evaluate-project-management-software-4629: 1 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-requirements-checklist-needs-assessment/: 1 source answers; https://www.projektron.de/en/blog/details/choosing-project-management-software-3643/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 6 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Approval workflows
8 of 150; 5.3%; Wilson 95% interval 2.7% to 10.2%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, 6: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|6|Claude|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|9|Perplexity|2; project_management|9|Perplexity|3
https://www.atlassian.com/work-management/project-management/cloud-based-project-management: 1 source answers; https://www.celoxis.com/article/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 1 source answers; https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/guideline-evaluate-project-management-software-4629: 2 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-comparison-guide/: 2 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-requirements-checklist-needs-assessment/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 5 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Documented data storage location
8 of 150; 5.3%; Wilson 95% interval 2.7% to 10.2%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Claude|1; project_management|9|Claude|2; project_management|9|Claude|3; project_management|9|Perplexity|1; project_management|9|Perplexity|2; project_management|9|Perplexity|3
https://planisware.com/resources/selecting-tool/what-best-project-management-vendors-comparison: 3 source answers; https://resources.rework.com/guides/choosing-software/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 3 source answers; https://www.celoxis.com/article/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 1 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-evaluation-scorecard-vendor-matrix/: 2 source answers; https://www.projektron.de/en/blog/details/choosing-project-management-software-3643/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 5 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Task progress tracking
8 of 150; 5.3%; Wilson 95% interval 2.7% to 10.2%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 4: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 10: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 4: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 6: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 3: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 4: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 6: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|10|Perplexity|3; project_management|3|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|4|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|4|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|4|Perplexity|3; project_management|6|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|6|Google AI Overviews|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3
https://tadabase.io/blog/best-spreadsheet-alternatives: 1 source answers; https://www.atlassian.com/project-management-software: 1 source answers; https://www.celoxis.com/article/agile-project-management-with-celoxis: 1 source answers; https://www.celoxis.com/article/best-project-management-tools-usa: 1 source answers; https://www.jotform.com/blog/excel-alternative/: 1 source answers; https://www.octave.com/products/project-performance/sequence: 1 source answers; https://www.workzone.com/blog/project-management-software-for-teams-using-spreadsheets/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 5 source answers
- Airtable: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|4|Perplexity|3
  https://asana.com/resources/best-project-management-software: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://dzone.com/articles/the-8-best-excel-alternatives-for-project-manageme: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://tadabase.io/blog/best-spreadsheet-alternatives: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.airtable.com/articles/best-project-management-tools: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.jotform.com/blog/excel-alternative/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Trello: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- monday.com: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Time tracking
8 of 150; 5.3%; Wilson 95% interval 2.7% to 10.2%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, 6: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 6: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 6: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 6: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|6|Claude|1; project_management|6|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|6|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|6|Google AI Overviews|1; project_management|6|Perplexity|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|1
https://productive.io/blog/best-project-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://www.bigtime.net/blogs/project-management-software-for-professional-services/: 1 source answers; https://www.psohub.com/blog/best-project-management-software: 1 source answers; No source shown: 7 source answers
- BigTime: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Claude|1; project_management|6|Perplexity|1
  https://www.bigtime.net/blogs/project-management-software-for-professional-services/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- PSOhub: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Perplexity|1
  https://www.psohub.com/blog/best-project-management-software: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Productive: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Overviews|1; project_management|6|Perplexity|1
  https://productive.io/blog/best-project-management-software/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://productive.io/blog/project-management-software-for-professional-services/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Scoro: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Claude|1; project_management|6|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Teamwork: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|6|Perplexity|1
  https://monday.com/blog/project-management/project-management-software/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Wrike: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Perplexity|1
  https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best-project-management-software: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.wrike.com/professional-services-guide/professional-services-software-for-project-management/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Zoho: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Zoho Projects: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Mode|2
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Cost appropriate to budget and team size
7 of 150; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.3%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, 2: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 3: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|2|Claude|1; project_management|2|Claude|2; project_management|2|Claude|3; project_management|3|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|2
No source shown: 7 source answers
- ClickUp: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|3|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Mobile device access
7 of 150; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.3%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Claude|1; project_management|9|Claude|2; project_management|9|Claude|3; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 7 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Project budget or cost tracking
7 of 150; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.3%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, 6: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 6: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|6|Claude|1; project_management|6|Perplexity|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|3
https://productive.io/blog/best-project-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-project-management-software-for-professional-services-reviewed/: 1 source answers; https://www.atlassian.com/project-management-software: 1 source answers; https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/features/project-tracking-software: 1 source answers; https://www.bigtime.net/blogs/project-management-software-for-professional-services/: 1 source answers; https://www.psohub.com/blog/best-project-management-software: 1 source answers; No source shown: 5 source answers
- BigTime: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Claude|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Productive: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Perplexity|2
  https://productive.io/blog/best-project-management-software/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://productive.io/blog/project-management-software-for-professional-services/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Scoro: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Claude|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Single sign on
7 of 150; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.3%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|9|Perplexity|1; project_management|9|Perplexity|2; project_management|9|Perplexity|3
https://planisware.com/resources/selecting-tool/what-best-project-management-vendors-comparison: 3 source answers; https://resources.rework.com/guides/choosing-software/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 3 source answers; https://www.celoxis.com/article/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 1 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-evaluation-scorecard-vendor-matrix/: 2 source answers; https://www.projektron.de/en/blog/details/choosing-project-management-software-3643/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 4 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Support for required agile, sequential or hybrid methods
7 of 150; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.3%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|1; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|2
https://www.atlassian.com/work-management/project-management/cloud-based-project-management: 1 source answers; No source shown: 6 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Evaluation access, demonstration or documented evaluation evidence
7 of 150; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.3%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Claude|1; project_management|9|Claude|2; project_management|9|Claude|3; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|1
https://www.atlassian.com/jira/solutions/planning?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.atlassian.com/project-management-software: 1 source answers; https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/features/project-tracking-software: 1 source answers; https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/features/project-tracking-software?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.atlassian.com/work-management/project-management/cloud-based-project-management: 2 source answers; https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2024-07/PDM24050%20Software%20Acquisition%20Guide%20for%20Government%20Enterprise%20ConsumersV2_508c.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; No source shown: 4 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Workload tracking or visibility
7 of 150; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.3%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 6: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|9|Perplexity|1; project_management|9|Perplexity|2; project_management|9|Perplexity|3
https://planisware.com/project-portfolio-management-software-buyers-guide: 1 source answers; https://planisware.com/resources/selecting-tool/what-best-project-management-vendors-comparison: 3 source answers; https://resources.rework.com/guides/choosing-software/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 3 source answers; https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/features/project-tracking-software?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-comparison-guide/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers
- Wrike: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Overviews|2
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- monday.com: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Overviews|2
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Capacity planning or visibility
6 of 150; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.8% to 8.5%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, 6: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 6: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 7: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 6: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|6|Claude|1; project_management|6|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|6|Google AI Overviews|1; project_management|7|Google AI Overviews|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|1
No source shown: 6 source answers
- Asana: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|7|Google AI Overviews|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%
- ClickUp: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Overviews|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%
- Productive: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Overviews|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%
- Smartsheet: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Overviews|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%
- Teamwork: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Mode|2
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%
Fit with required planning depth or operating style
5 of 150; 3.3%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Perplexity, 7: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 7: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 7: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|7|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|7|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|7|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|7|Perplexity|1; project_management|7|Perplexity|3
https://asana.com/resources/best-project-planning-software: 1 source answers; https://project-management.com/top-10-project-management-software/: 2 source answers; https://www.celoxis.com/article/project-management-software-comparison: 2 source answers; https://www.proofhub.com/articles/project-management-app-comparison: 1 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers
- Adobe Workfront: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 4 of 150; 2.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|7|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%
- Asana: 5 of 150; 3.3%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Category median 4 of 150; 2.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|7|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|7|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|7|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|7|Perplexity|1; project_management|7|Perplexity|3
  https://academy.smu.edu.sg/insights/project-management-software: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%; https://asana.com/resources/best-project-management-software: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://asana.com/resources/best-project-planning-software: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%; No source shown: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%
- Celoxis: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 4 of 150; 2.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|7|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|7|Perplexity|1; project_management|7|Perplexity|3
  https://www.celoxis.com/article/project-management-software-comparison: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.scoro.com/blog/best-project-management-software-list/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%
- ClickUp: 5 of 150; 3.3%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Category median 4 of 150; 2.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|7|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|7|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|7|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|7|Perplexity|1; project_management|7|Perplexity|3
  https://project-management.com/top-10-project-management-software/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.softwaresuggest.com/project-management-software: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.stackfield.com/blog/project-managementsoftware-compared-75: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.wrike.com/project-management-guide/faq/what-are-project-management-tools/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; No source shown: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%
- Jira: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 4 of 150; 2.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|7|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|7|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|7|Perplexity|3
  https://academy.smu.edu.sg/insights/project-management-software: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%; https://asana.com/resources/best-project-planning-software: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%; No source shown: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%
- Microsoft Project: 5 of 150; 3.3%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Category median 4 of 150; 2.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|7|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|7|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|7|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|7|Perplexity|1; project_management|7|Perplexity|3
  https://www.bigtime.net/blogs/best-project-management-software/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.celoxis.com/article/project-management-software-comparison: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.kanbanchi.com/blog/project-management-tools-and-software-worth-using-in: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.projektron.de/en/blog/details/project-management-software-comparison-3669/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; No source shown: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%
- Motion: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 4 of 150; 2.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|7|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%
- Notion: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 4 of 150; 2.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|7|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%
- Scoro: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 4 of 150; 2.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|7|Perplexity|3
  https://www.proofhub.com/articles/project-management-app-comparison: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Smartsheet: 4 of 150; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Category median 4 of 150; 2.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|7|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|7|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|7|Perplexity|1; project_management|7|Perplexity|3
  https://academy.smu.edu.sg/insights/project-management-software: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%; https://asana.com/resources/best-project-management-software: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://asana.com/resources/best-project-planning-software: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%; https://www.celoxis.com/article/project-management-software-comparison: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.kanbanchi.com/blog/project-management-tools-and-software-worth-using-in: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; No source shown: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%
- Teamwork: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 4 of 150; 2.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|7|Perplexity|3
  https://academy.smu.edu.sg/insights/project-management-software: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%
- Trello: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 4 of 150; 2.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|7|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|7|Perplexity|1
  https://asana.com/resources/best-project-management-software: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://asana.com/resources/best-project-planning-software: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%; No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%
- Wrike: 4 of 150; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Category median 4 of 150; 2.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|7|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|7|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|7|Perplexity|1; project_management|7|Perplexity|3
  https://asana.com/resources/best-project-planning-software: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%; https://logo.com/guides/best-project-management: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.wrike.com/project-management-guide/faq/what-are-project-management-tools/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; No source shown: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%
- monday.com: 5 of 150; 3.3%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Category median 4 of 150; 2.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|7|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|7|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|7|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|7|Perplexity|1; project_management|7|Perplexity|3
  https://academy.smu.edu.sg/insights/project-management-software: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%; https://asana.com/resources/best-project-planning-software: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%; https://project-management.com/top-10-project-management-software/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.softwaresuggest.com/project-management-software: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; No source shown: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 2 of 150; 1.3%
Implementation support or effort
5 of 150; 3.3%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|9|Perplexity|1; project_management|9|Perplexity|2; project_management|9|Perplexity|3
https://planisware.com/resources/selecting-tool/what-best-project-management-vendors-comparison: 3 source answers; https://resources.rework.com/guides/choosing-software/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 3 source answers; https://www.celoxis.com/article/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 1 source answers; https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/guideline-evaluate-project-management-software-4629: 1 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-comparison-guide/: 3 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-requirements-checklist-needs-assessment/: 1 source answers; https://www.projektron.de/en/blog/details/choosing-project-management-software-3643/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Real time collaboration
5 of 150; 3.3%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Perplexity, 4: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 4: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 4: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|4|Google AI Overviews|1; project_management|4|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|4|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|4|Perplexity|1
https://www.workzone.com/blog/project-management-software-for-teams-using-spreadsheets/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 4 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Resource management
5 of 150; 3.3%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 3: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 3: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|3|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|3|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|3|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|3|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3
https://www.atlassian.com/project-management-software: 1 source answers; No source shown: 4 source answers
- Celoxis: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|3|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Smartsheet: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|3|Google AI Mode|2
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Wrike: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|3|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|3|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|3|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Centralized project information and shared visibility
4 of 150; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, 5: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 6: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 1: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 6: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|1|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|5|Claude|1; project_management|6|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|6|Google AI Overviews|1
No source shown: 4 source answers
- Asana: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|5|Claude|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%
- ClickUp: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|1|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|5|Claude|1
  No source shown: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%
- Scoro: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|6|Google AI Overviews|1
  No source shown: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%
- Wrike: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|5|Claude|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%
- monday.com: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Mode|2
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%
Clear subscription package and pricing scope
4 of 150; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 4 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Clear visual presentation of work
4 of 150; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Overviews, 4: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 4: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 5: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|4|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|4|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|5|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 4 source answers
- Miro: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|5|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Trello: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|4|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|5|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- monday.com: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|4|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|5|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Configurable reports and dashboards
4 of 150; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Overviews, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|2
No source shown: 4 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Forecasting
4 of 150; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|Perplexity|2; project_management|9|Perplexity|3
https://planisware.com/project-portfolio-management-software-buyers-guide: 1 source answers; https://planisware.com/resources/selecting-tool/what-best-project-management-vendors-comparison: 2 source answers; https://resources.rework.com/guides/choosing-software/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 2 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-comparison-guide/: 2 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Gantt chart planning
4 of 150; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 4: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|9|Claude|1; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|2
No source shown: 4 source answers
- ClickUp: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Mode|2
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Kanban boards
4 of 150; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 4: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|4|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|9|Claude|1; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 4 source answers
- Airtable: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Mode|2
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Kanbanize: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Trello: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|4|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Multiple visual planning views
4 of 150; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 4: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Overviews|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|9|Perplexity|1
https://resources.rework.com/guides/choosing-software/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 1 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-comparison-guide/: 1 source answers; https://www.projektron.de/en/blog/details/choosing-project-management-software-3643/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers
- Airtable: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Overviews|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Asana: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Overviews|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Project planning
4 of 150; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 7: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 4: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|7|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|Perplexity|2; project_management|9|Perplexity|3
https://www.celoxis.com/article/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 1 source answers; https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/guideline-evaluate-project-management-software-4629: 2 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-comparison-guide/: 2 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-requirements-checklist-needs-assessment/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers
- Asana: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|7|ChatGPT|1
  https://help.asana.com/s/article/managing-tasks-and-dependencies-with-timeline?language=en_US&utm_source=openai: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- ClickUp: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|7|ChatGPT|1
  https://clickup.com/features/gantt-chart-view?utm_source=openai: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Jira: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|7|ChatGPT|1
  https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/guides/advanced-roadmaps/overview?utm_source=openai: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Microsoft Planner / Project desktop: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|7|ChatGPT|1
  https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/planner/microsoft-planner-plans-and-pricing: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Smartsheet: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|7|ChatGPT|1
  https://www.smartsheet.com/pricing: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Wrike: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|7|ChatGPT|1
  https://www.wrike.com/price/?utm_source=openai: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- monday.com: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 150; 0.7%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|7|ChatGPT|1
  https://monday.com/pricing: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Project profitability visibility
4 of 150; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, 6: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 6: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 6: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|6|Claude|1; project_management|6|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|6|Perplexity|1; project_management|6|Perplexity|2
https://productive.io/blog/best-project-management-software/: 2 source answers; https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-project-management-software-for-professional-services-reviewed/: 1 source answers; https://www.bigtime.net/blogs/project-management-software-for-professional-services/: 2 source answers; https://www.psohub.com/blog/best-project-management-software: 2 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers
- BigTime: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Claude|1; project_management|6|Perplexity|1; project_management|6|Perplexity|2
  https://www.bigtime.net/blogs/project-management-software-for-professional-services/: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Scoro: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Claude|1; project_management|6|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Teamwork: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Perplexity|2
  https://monday.com/blog/project-management/project-management-software/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://project-management.com/top-10-project-management-software/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Project visibility
4 of 150; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, 5: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 4: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 6: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|4|Perplexity|1; project_management|5|Claude|1; project_management|6|Perplexity|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3
https://productive.io/blog/best-project-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-project-management-software-for-professional-services-reviewed/: 1 source answers; https://www.bigtime.net/blogs/project-management-software-for-professional-services/: 1 source answers; https://www.psohub.com/blog/best-project-management-software: 1 source answers; https://www.workzone.com/blog/project-management-software-for-teams-using-spreadsheets/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers
- Asana: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|5|Claude|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- PSOhub: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Perplexity|2
  https://www.psohub.com/blog/best-project-management-software: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- monday.com: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|5|Claude|1; project_management|6|Perplexity|2
  https://project-management.com/top-10-project-management-software/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.techrepublic.com/article/project-management-software/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Real time progress and reporting data
4 of 150; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Overviews, 9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|1; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|2
No source shown: 4 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Resource planning
4 of 150; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, 6: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 6: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 10: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 3: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|10|Perplexity|3; project_management|3|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|6|Claude|1; project_management|6|Perplexity|1
https://productive.io/blog/best-project-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://www.bigtime.net/blogs/project-management-software-for-professional-services/: 1 source answers; https://www.celoxis.com/article/agile-project-management-with-celoxis: 1 source answers; https://www.celoxis.com/article/best-project-management-tools-usa: 1 source answers; https://www.octave.com/products/project-performance/sequence: 1 source answers; https://www.psohub.com/blog/best-project-management-software: 1 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers
- BigTime: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Perplexity|1
  https://www.bigtime.net/blogs/project-management-software-for-professional-services/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Kantata: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Claude|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Productive: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Perplexity|1
  https://productive.io/blog/best-project-management-software/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://productive.io/blog/project-management-software-for-professional-services/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Scoro: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Claude|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Task management
4 of 150; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, 9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|Claude|1; project_management|9|Claude|2; project_management|9|Claude|3; project_management|9|Perplexity|1
https://resources.rework.com/guides/choosing-software/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 1 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-comparison-guide/: 1 source answers; https://www.projektron.de/en/blog/details/choosing-project-management-software-3643/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Ability to change subscription plans as needs change
3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, 9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|Claude|1; project_management|9|Claude|2; project_management|9|Claude|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Accessible project context
3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 5: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|5|ChatGPT|1; project_management|5|ChatGPT|2; project_management|5|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
- Basecamp: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|5|ChatGPT|1; project_management|5|ChatGPT|2; project_management|5|ChatGPT|3
  https://basecamp.com/features: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://basecamp.com/features?utm_source=openai: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Notion: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|5|ChatGPT|1; project_management|5|ChatGPT|2; project_management|5|ChatGPT|3
  https://www.notion.com/en-gb/help/guides/getting-started-with-projects-and-tasks?utm_source=openai: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.notion.com/nb/help/guides/accomplish-more-with-connected-project-management?utm_source=openai: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Accessible user interfaces
3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Asynchronous communication or updates
3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Overviews, 5: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 5: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|5|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|5|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|5|Google AI Overviews|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
- Basecamp: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|5|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|5|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|5|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Notion: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|5|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Asynchronous written updates and accessible project context
3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 5: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|5|ChatGPT|1; project_management|5|ChatGPT|2; project_management|5|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
- Asana: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|5|ChatGPT|1
  https://help.asana.com/s/article/project-progress-and-status-updates?nocache=https%3A%2F%2Fhelp.asana.com%2Fs%2Farticle%2Fproject-progress-and-status-updates%3Flanguage%3Dnl_NL&utm_source=openai: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Basecamp: 3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|5|ChatGPT|1; project_management|5|ChatGPT|2; project_management|5|ChatGPT|3
  https://basecamp.com/features: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://basecamp.com/features?utm_source=openai: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Automated reporting
3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|Claude|2; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|1
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Backup and recovery arrangements
3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3
https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/assisting-small-and-medium-sized-businesses-assess-vendors-and-suppliers-fact-sheet?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2024-10/ICT%20SCRM%20Task%20Force%20Software%20Acquisition%20Guide%20Fact%20Sheet%20%28508%29.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Contract and exit terms
3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3
https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2024-07/PDM24050%20Software%20Acquisition%20Guide%20for%20Government%20Enterprise%20ConsumersV2_508c.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Critical path scheduling
3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|2
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Data retention and deletion policies
3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3
https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2024-07/PDM24050%20Software%20Acquisition%20Guide%20for%20Government%20Enterprise%20ConsumersV2_508c.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Defined integration error handling
3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Demonstrated connections to required systems
3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Deployment options suited to security and operational requirements
3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, 9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|Claude|1; project_management|9|Claude|2; project_management|9|Claude|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Document and file sharing
3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Financial management capabilities
3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, 9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|Claude|1; project_management|9|Claude|2; project_management|9|Claude|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Notifications or alerts
3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 4: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|2
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Product customization
3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|9|Perplexity|3
https://resources.rework.com/guides/choosing-software/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 1 source answers; https://www.celoxis.com/article/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 1 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-comparison-guide/: 1 source answers; https://www.projektron.de/en/blog/details/choosing-project-management-software-3643/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Resource plans update when task assignments change
3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, 9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|Claude|1; project_management|9|Claude|2; project_management|9|Claude|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Reusable project and workflow templates
3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Schedule baselines and comparisons
3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Support for different departmental working styles
3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, 1: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|1|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|1|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|1|Google AI Mode|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
- Asana: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|1|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|1|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- monday.com: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|1|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Time and billable hour tracking
3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, 6: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 2: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|2|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|6|Claude|1; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|1
No source shown: 3 source answers
- Scoro: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Claude|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Teamwork: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|2|Google AI Mode|2
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Usable data export
3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3
https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2024-07/PDM24050%20Software%20Acquisition%20Guide%20for%20Government%20Enterprise%20ConsumersV2_508c.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Visibility of time allocated to individuals across projects
3 of 150; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, 9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|Claude|1; project_management|9|Claude|2; project_management|9|Claude|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
API access
2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Perplexity, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|Google AI Mode|3; project_management|9|Perplexity|3
https://resources.rework.com/guides/choosing-software/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 1 source answers; https://www.celoxis.com/article/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 1 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-comparison-guide/: 1 source answers; https://www.projektron.de/en/blog/details/choosing-project-management-software-3643/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
API access and supported connectors
2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Access to project documents
2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Centralized work tracking
2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Overviews, 5: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|5|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|5|Google AI Overviews|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
- Basecamp: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|5|Google AI Overviews|2
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- ClickUp: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|5|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Notion: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|5|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- monday.com: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|5|Google AI Overviews|2
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Client facing project status visibility
2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Overviews, 6: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 6: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|6|Google AI Overviews|2
No source shown: 2 source answers
- Teamwork: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Mode|2
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Zoho Projects: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Mode|2
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- monday.com: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Mode|2
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Comparable customer references and vendor evidence
2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2
https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/assisting-small-and-medium-sized-businesses-assess-vendors-and-suppliers-fact-sheet?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Controlled client and external collaborator access
2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Defined synchronization direction
2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Disclosed API and automation usage limits
2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Evidence supporting vendor claims
2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, 9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|Claude|1; project_management|9|Claude|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
External collaboration
2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Fit with preferred visual or textual work layouts
2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Overviews, 4: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 2: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|2|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|4|Google AI Overviews|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
- Airtable: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- ClickUp: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|2|Google AI Mode|2
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Notion: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Smartsheet: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Trello: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- monday.com: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|2|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|4|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Multifactor authentication
2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Notifications and configurable update controls
2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|2; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Prediction of project risks
2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 10: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|10|Perplexity|3; project_management|9|Claude|2
https://www.celoxis.com/article/agile-project-management-with-celoxis: 1 source answers; https://www.celoxis.com/article/best-project-management-tools-usa: 1 source answers; https://www.octave.com/products/project-performance/sequence: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Project progress tracking
2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, 4: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|4|Google AI Mode|2
No source shown: 2 source answers
- Asana: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- monday.com: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Real time dashboards
2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Overviews, 6: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Overviews|2; project_management|6|Google AI Overviews|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
- ClickUp: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Overviews|2
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- monday.com: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Resource allocation
2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 6: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Mode|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3
https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/features/project-tracking-software: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Resource capacity and availability
2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 7: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|7|ChatGPT|2; project_management|7|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
- ClickUp: 2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|7|ChatGPT|2; project_management|7|ChatGPT|3
  https://clickup.com/features: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://clickup.com/solutions/capacity-planning?utm_source=openai: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Resource visibility
2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Perplexity, 6: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, 6: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Overviews|3; project_management|6|Perplexity|2
https://productive.io/blog/best-project-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-project-management-software-for-professional-services-reviewed/: 1 source answers; https://www.bigtime.net/blogs/project-management-software-for-professional-services/: 1 source answers; https://www.psohub.com/blog/best-project-management-software: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers
- BigTime: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Perplexity|2
  https://www.bigtime.net/blogs/project-management-software-for-professional-services/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Kantata: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- PSOhub: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Perplexity|2
  https://www.psohub.com/blog/best-project-management-software: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Productive: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Perplexity|2
  https://productive.io/blog/best-project-management-software/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://productive.io/blog/project-management-software-for-professional-services/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- monday.com: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Searchable project information and documents
2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Service availability commitments
2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Perplexity|3
https://planisware.com/resources/selecting-tool/what-best-project-management-vendors-comparison: 1 source answers; https://resources.rework.com/guides/choosing-software/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 1 source answers; https://www.celoxis.com/article/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 1 source answers; https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2024-10/ICT%20SCRM%20Task%20Force%20Software%20Acquisition%20Guide%20Fact%20Sheet%20%28508%29.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.projektron.de/en/blog/details/choosing-project-management-software-3643/: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Task commenting
2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Task creation and progress tracking
2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|3; project_management|9|Perplexity|3
https://resources.rework.com/guides/choosing-software/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 1 source answers; https://www.celoxis.com/article/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 1 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-comparison-guide/: 1 source answers; https://www.projektron.de/en/blog/details/choosing-project-management-software-3643/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Tested AI outputs, human control and data use restrictions
2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|2
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Vulnerability remediation and ongoing security maintenance
2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1; project_management|9|ChatGPT|3
https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2024-10/ICT%20SCRM%20Task%20Force%20Software%20Acquisition%20Guide%20Fact%20Sheet%20%28508%29.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/pdm24050-software-acquisition-guide-for-government-enterprise-consumersv2-508c.pdf?emrc=c1e13b: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Workload and capacity planning
2 of 150; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Overviews, 9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|Google AI Mode|2; project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
AI data handling and administrative controls
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
API or native connector availability
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Perplexity, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|Perplexity|1
https://planisware.com/resources/selecting-tool/what-best-project-management-vendors-comparison: 1 source answers; https://resources.rework.com/guides/choosing-software/project-management-software-evaluation-criteria: 1 source answers; https://www.pmworld360.com/project-management-software-comparison-guide/: 1 source answers; https://www.projektron.de/en/blog/details/choosing-project-management-software-3643/: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Accountability for work
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, 5: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|5|Claude|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Centralized documentation
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, 5: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|5|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
- Basecamp: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|5|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- ClickUp: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|5|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Notion: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|5|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Centralized team activity feeds
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Cross project dependencies
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Cross team collaboration
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Data migration
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Data ownership and control
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|2
https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2024-07/PDM24050%20Software%20Acquisition%20Guide%20for%20Government%20Enterprise%20ConsumersV2_508c.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Defined synchronization direction and transferred data
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Defined transferred fields and attachments
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Financial metrics
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, 6: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
- Scoro: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Smartsheet: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Fit with the preferred balance of task customization, financial tracking or visual simplicity
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, 2: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|2|Google AI Mode|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
- Asana: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|2|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- ClickUp: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|2|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Teamwork: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|2|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- monday.com: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|2|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Incident notification procedures
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|3
https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2024-10/ICT%20SCRM%20Task%20Force%20Software%20Acquisition%20Guide%20Fact%20Sheet%20%28508%29.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Incident response procedures
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|2
https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/assisting-small-and-medium-sized-businesses-assess-vendors-and-suppliers-fact-sheet?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Invoicing or financial follow through
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, 6: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|6|Claude|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
- Scoro: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Claude|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Planning people by availability, skills and competing assignments
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 7: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|7|ChatGPT|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Prediction of project outcomes
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, 7: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|7|Claude|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Project budget forecasting
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Overviews, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Project progress reporting
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Perplexity, 10: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|10|Perplexity|3
https://www.celoxis.com/article/agile-project-management-with-celoxis: 1 source answers; https://www.celoxis.com/article/best-project-management-tools-usa: 1 source answers; https://www.octave.com/products/project-performance/sequence: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Real time collaborative editing
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Real time project visibility
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, 4: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|4|Google AI Mode|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Recurring work scheduling
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Reduction of delivery risk
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, 6: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|6|Claude|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Reliable performance at expected project volumes
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|Google AI Mode|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Resource workload, availability and capacity planning
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Overviews, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|Google AI Overviews|2
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Service availability commitments and outage history
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Subscription billing frequency
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|Claude|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Task comments and mentions
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Tasks linked to time, resource allocation and financial metrics
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, 6: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Time visibility
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Perplexity, 6: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|6|Perplexity|2
https://productive.io/blog/best-project-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-project-management-software-for-professional-services-reviewed/: 1 source answers; https://www.bigtime.net/blogs/project-management-software-for-professional-services/: 1 source answers; https://www.psohub.com/blog/best-project-management-software: 1 source answers
- BigTime: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Perplexity|2
  https://www.bigtime.net/blogs/project-management-software-for-professional-services/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- PSOhub: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Perplexity|2
  https://www.psohub.com/blog/best-project-management-software: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Productive: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Perplexity|2
  https://productive.io/blog/best-project-management-software/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://productive.io/blog/project-management-software-for-professional-services/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Teamwork: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Perplexity|2
  https://monday.com/blog/project-management/project-management-software/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://project-management.com/top-10-project-management-software/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
- Wrike: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Perplexity|2
  https://productive.io/blog/project-management-software-for-professional-services/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best-project-management-software: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%; https://www.wrike.com/professional-services-guide/professional-services-software-for-project-management/: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
User provisioning and administration
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Visibility of delivery bottlenecks
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, 6: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
- Wrike: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers project_management|6|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 150; 0.0%
Workload forecasting
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Workload planning and resource availability
1 of 150; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, 9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers project_management|9|ChatGPT|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

Download complete category evidence · Download manifest and source hashes

Full checked set, sorted by observed counts, not a ranking.
Vendor	Named	Vendor domain cited
Asana	97 of 150 valid answers, 64.7% (Wilson 95% interval 56.7% to 71.9%)	42 of 150 valid answers, 28.0% (Wilson 95% interval 21.4% to 35.7%)
ClickUp	80 of 150 valid answers, 53.3% (Wilson 95% interval 45.4% to 61.1%)	13 of 150 valid answers, 8.7% (Wilson 95% interval 5.1% to 14.3%)
Jira	63 of 150 valid answers, 42.0% (Wilson 95% interval 34.4% to 50.0%)	24 of 150 valid answers, 16.0% (Wilson 95% interval 11.0% to 22.7%)
Smartsheet	54 of 150 valid answers, 36.0% (Wilson 95% interval 28.8% to 43.9%)	7 of 150 valid answers, 4.7% (Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.3%)
Wrike	54 of 150 valid answers, 36.0% (Wilson 95% interval 28.8% to 43.9%)	34 of 150 valid answers, 22.7% (Wilson 95% interval 16.7% to 30.0%)
Trello	32 of 150 valid answers, 21.3% (Wilson 95% interval 15.5% to 28.6%)	6 of 150 valid answers, 4.0% (Wilson 95% interval 1.8% to 8.5%)
monday.com	26 of 150 valid answers, 17.3% (Wilson 95% interval 12.1% to 24.2%)	21 of 150 valid answers, 14.0% (Wilson 95% interval 9.3% to 20.5%)
Basecamp	18 of 150 valid answers, 12.0% (Wilson 95% interval 7.7% to 18.2%)	3 of 150 valid answers, 2.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%)
Airtable	13 of 150 valid answers, 8.7% (Wilson 95% interval 5.1% to 14.3%)	6 of 150 valid answers, 4.0% (Wilson 95% interval 1.8% to 8.5%)
Notion	6 of 150 valid answers, 4.0% (Wilson 95% interval 1.8% to 8.5%)	6 of 150 valid answers, 4.0% (Wilson 95% interval 1.8% to 8.5%)

Pair-specific question and engine records

The comparison records are collected here. Each disclosure contains the full dated counts for its pair or alternatives question. Open a disclosure to read its evidence; the text is present without JavaScript.

Jira and Asana

Project management · September 2026

Jira and Asana in the observed answers

Jira appears in 63 of 150 answers about project management; Asana appears in 97 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Jira and Asana have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22 and 2026-09-23. Jira record · Asana record · Project management checked set.

Jira beside Asana

Jira and Asana totals
Measure	Jira	Asana
Named	63/150; 42.0% (95% CI 34.4 to 50.0)	97/150; 64.7% (95% CI 56.7 to 71.9)
Own domain cited	24/150; 16.0% (95% CI 11.0 to 22.7)	42/150; 28.0% (95% CI 21.4 to 35.7)

Jira / Asana: question 1

What is the best project management software for a cross-functional team?

Jira: 11/15; 73.3% (95% CI 48.0 to 89.1). Asana: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Jira and Asana on 1
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Jira / Asana / ChatGPT	Jira: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Claude	Jira: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Perplexity	Jira: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Jira: 2 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Google AI Mode	Jira: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Jira / Asana: question 2

Which project management platform is best for coordinating several concurrent client projects?

Jira: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

Jira and Asana on 2
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Jira / Asana / ChatGPT	Jira: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Claude	Jira: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Perplexity	Jira: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Jira: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Google AI Mode	Jira: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Jira / Asana: question 3

What are the top project management tools for a mid-market organization?

Jira: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8). Asana: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Jira and Asana on 3
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Jira / Asana / ChatGPT	Jira: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Claude	Jira: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Perplexity	Jira: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Jira: 2 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Google AI Mode	Jira: 2 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Jira / Asana: question 4

What are good alternatives to a spreadsheet-based project management process?

Jira: 8/15; 53.3% (95% CI 30.1 to 75.2). Asana: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Jira and Asana on 4
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Jira / Asana / ChatGPT	Jira: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Claude	Jira: 1 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Perplexity	Jira: 2 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Jira: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Google AI Mode	Jira: 2 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Jira / Asana: question 5

Which project management options work well for a distributed team?

Jira: 11/15; 73.3% (95% CI 48.0 to 89.1). Asana: 13/15; 86.7% (95% CI 62.1 to 96.3).

Jira and Asana on 5
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Jira / Asana / ChatGPT	Jira: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Claude	Jira: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Perplexity	Jira: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Jira: 1 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Google AI Mode	Jira: 1 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.

Jira / Asana: question 6

What project management software should a services business consider when project visibility is poor?

Jira: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Asana: 5/15; 33.3% (95% CI 15.2 to 58.3).

Jira and Asana on 6
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Jira / Asana / ChatGPT	Jira: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Claude	Jira: 1 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Perplexity	Jira: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Jira: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Google AI Mode	Jira: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.

Jira / Asana: question 7

How do the main project management platforms compare for planning and resource coordination?

Jira: 9/15; 60.0% (95% CI 35.7 to 80.2). Asana: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Jira and Asana on 7
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Jira / Asana / ChatGPT	Jira: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Claude	Jira: 2 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Perplexity	Jira: 1 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Jira: 2 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Google AI Mode	Jira: 1 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Jira / Asana: question 8

Which project management approach is better for teams using both agile and structured planning?

Jira: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Asana: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

Jira and Asana on 8
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Jira / Asana / ChatGPT	Jira: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Claude	Jira: 1 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Perplexity	Jira: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Jira: 1 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Google AI Mode	Jira: 1 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.

Jira / Asana: question 9

What should a buyer evaluate in project management software?

Jira: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0). Asana: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

Jira and Asana on 9
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Jira / Asana / ChatGPT	Jira: 3 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Claude	Jira: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Perplexity	Jira: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Jira: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Google AI Mode	Jira: 1 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.

Jira / Asana: question 10

How can a project team use project management software to improve delivery predictability?

Jira: 6/15; 40.0% (95% CI 19.8 to 64.3). Asana: 6/15; 40.0% (95% CI 19.8 to 64.3).

Jira and Asana on 10
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Jira / Asana / ChatGPT	Jira: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Claude	Jira: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Perplexity	Jira: 1 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Jira: 2 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.
Jira / Asana / Google AI Mode	Jira: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Jira's own-domain citation count is 24 of 150; Asana's is 42 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Project management · Exact Project management buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Smartsheet and Asana

Project management · September 2026

Smartsheet and Asana in the observed answers

Smartsheet appears in 54 of 150 answers about project management; Asana appears in 97 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Smartsheet and Asana have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22 and 2026-09-23. Smartsheet record · Asana record · Project management checked set.

Smartsheet beside Asana

Smartsheet and Asana totals
Measure	Smartsheet	Asana
Named	54/150; 36.0% (95% CI 28.8 to 43.9)	97/150; 64.7% (95% CI 56.7 to 71.9)
Own domain cited	7/150; 4.7% (95% CI 2.3 to 9.3)	42/150; 28.0% (95% CI 21.4 to 35.7)

Smartsheet / Asana: question 1

What is the best project management software for a cross-functional team?

Smartsheet: 7/15; 46.7% (95% CI 24.8 to 69.9). Asana: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Smartsheet and Asana on 1
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Smartsheet / Asana / ChatGPT	Smartsheet: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Claude	Smartsheet: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Perplexity	Smartsheet: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Smartsheet: 1 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Google AI Mode	Smartsheet: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Smartsheet / Asana: question 2

Which project management platform is best for coordinating several concurrent client projects?

Smartsheet: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). Asana: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

Smartsheet and Asana on 2
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Smartsheet / Asana / ChatGPT	Smartsheet: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Claude	Smartsheet: 1 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Perplexity	Smartsheet: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Smartsheet: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Google AI Mode	Smartsheet: 1 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Smartsheet / Asana: question 3

What are the top project management tools for a mid-market organization?

Smartsheet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0). Asana: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Smartsheet and Asana on 3
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Smartsheet / Asana / ChatGPT	Smartsheet: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Claude	Smartsheet: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Perplexity	Smartsheet: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Smartsheet: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Google AI Mode	Smartsheet: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Smartsheet / Asana: question 4

What are good alternatives to a spreadsheet-based project management process?

Smartsheet: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8). Asana: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Smartsheet and Asana on 4
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Smartsheet / Asana / ChatGPT	Smartsheet: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Claude	Smartsheet: 3 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Perplexity	Smartsheet: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Smartsheet: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Google AI Mode	Smartsheet: 1 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Smartsheet / Asana: question 5

Which project management options work well for a distributed team?

Smartsheet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 13/15; 86.7% (95% CI 62.1 to 96.3).

Smartsheet and Asana on 5
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Smartsheet / Asana / ChatGPT	Smartsheet: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Claude	Smartsheet: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Perplexity	Smartsheet: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Smartsheet: 0 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Google AI Mode	Smartsheet: 0 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.

Smartsheet / Asana: question 6

What project management software should a services business consider when project visibility is poor?

Smartsheet: 7/15; 46.7% (95% CI 24.8 to 69.9). Asana: 5/15; 33.3% (95% CI 15.2 to 58.3).

Smartsheet and Asana on 6
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Smartsheet / Asana / ChatGPT	Smartsheet: 1 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Claude	Smartsheet: 3 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Perplexity	Smartsheet: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Smartsheet: 1 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Google AI Mode	Smartsheet: 2 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.

Smartsheet / Asana: question 7

How do the main project management platforms compare for planning and resource coordination?

Smartsheet: 13/15; 86.7% (95% CI 62.1 to 96.3). Asana: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Smartsheet and Asana on 7
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Smartsheet / Asana / ChatGPT	Smartsheet: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Claude	Smartsheet: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Perplexity	Smartsheet: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Smartsheet: 2 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Google AI Mode	Smartsheet: 2 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Smartsheet / Asana: question 8

Which project management approach is better for teams using both agile and structured planning?

Smartsheet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

Smartsheet and Asana on 8
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Smartsheet / Asana / ChatGPT	Smartsheet: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Claude	Smartsheet: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Perplexity	Smartsheet: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Smartsheet: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Google AI Mode	Smartsheet: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.

Smartsheet / Asana: question 9

What should a buyer evaluate in project management software?

Smartsheet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

Smartsheet and Asana on 9
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Smartsheet / Asana / ChatGPT	Smartsheet: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Claude	Smartsheet: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Perplexity	Smartsheet: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Smartsheet: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Google AI Mode	Smartsheet: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.

Smartsheet / Asana: question 10

How can a project team use project management software to improve delivery predictability?

Smartsheet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 6/15; 40.0% (95% CI 19.8 to 64.3).

Smartsheet and Asana on 10
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Smartsheet / Asana / ChatGPT	Smartsheet: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Claude	Smartsheet: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Perplexity	Smartsheet: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Smartsheet: 0 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.
Smartsheet / Asana / Google AI Mode	Smartsheet: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Smartsheet's own-domain citation count is 7 of 150; Asana's is 42 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Project management · Exact Project management buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

monday.com and Asana

Project management · September 2026

monday.com and Asana in the observed answers

monday.com appears in 26 of 150 answers about project management; Asana appears in 97 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

monday.com and Asana have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22 and 2026-09-23. monday.com record · Asana record · Project management checked set.

monday.com beside Asana

monday.com and Asana totals
Measure	monday.com	Asana
Named	26/150; 17.3% (95% CI 12.1 to 24.2)	97/150; 64.7% (95% CI 56.7 to 71.9)
Own domain cited	21/150; 14.0% (95% CI 9.3 to 20.5)	42/150; 28.0% (95% CI 21.4 to 35.7)

monday.com / Asana: question 1

What is the best project management software for a cross-functional team?

monday.com: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Asana: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

monday.com and Asana on 1
Engine and pair	Naming observations
monday.com / Asana / ChatGPT	monday.com: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Claude	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Perplexity	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Google AI Overviews	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Google AI Mode	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

monday.com / Asana: question 2

Which project management platform is best for coordinating several concurrent client projects?

monday.com: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Asana: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

monday.com and Asana on 2
Engine and pair	Naming observations
monday.com / Asana / ChatGPT	monday.com: 1 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Claude	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Perplexity	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Google AI Overviews	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Google AI Mode	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

monday.com / Asana: question 3

What are the top project management tools for a mid-market organization?

monday.com: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0). Asana: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

monday.com and Asana on 3
Engine and pair	Naming observations
monday.com / Asana / ChatGPT	monday.com: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Claude	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Perplexity	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Google AI Overviews	monday.com: 1 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Google AI Mode	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

monday.com / Asana: question 4

What are good alternatives to a spreadsheet-based project management process?

monday.com: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0). Asana: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

monday.com and Asana on 4
Engine and pair	Naming observations
monday.com / Asana / ChatGPT	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Claude	monday.com: 3 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Perplexity	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Google AI Overviews	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Google AI Mode	monday.com: 1 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

monday.com / Asana: question 5

Which project management options work well for a distributed team?

monday.com: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 13/15; 86.7% (95% CI 62.1 to 96.3).

monday.com and Asana on 5
Engine and pair	Naming observations
monday.com / Asana / ChatGPT	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Claude	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Perplexity	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Google AI Overviews	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Google AI Mode	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.

monday.com / Asana: question 6

What project management software should a services business consider when project visibility is poor?

monday.com: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Asana: 5/15; 33.3% (95% CI 15.2 to 58.3).

monday.com and Asana on 6
Engine and pair	Naming observations
monday.com / Asana / ChatGPT	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Claude	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Perplexity	monday.com: 2 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Google AI Overviews	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Google AI Mode	monday.com: 1 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.

monday.com / Asana: question 7

How do the main project management platforms compare for planning and resource coordination?

monday.com: 8/15; 53.3% (95% CI 30.1 to 75.2). Asana: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

monday.com and Asana on 7
Engine and pair	Naming observations
monday.com / Asana / ChatGPT	monday.com: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Claude	monday.com: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Perplexity	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Google AI Overviews	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Google AI Mode	monday.com: 2 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

monday.com / Asana: question 8

Which project management approach is better for teams using both agile and structured planning?

monday.com: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

monday.com and Asana on 8
Engine and pair	Naming observations
monday.com / Asana / ChatGPT	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Claude	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Perplexity	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Google AI Overviews	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Google AI Mode	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.

monday.com / Asana: question 9

What should a buyer evaluate in project management software?

monday.com: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Asana: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

monday.com and Asana on 9
Engine and pair	Naming observations
monday.com / Asana / ChatGPT	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Claude	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Perplexity	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Google AI Overviews	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Google AI Mode	monday.com: 1 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.

monday.com / Asana: question 10

How can a project team use project management software to improve delivery predictability?

monday.com: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). Asana: 6/15; 40.0% (95% CI 19.8 to 64.3).

monday.com and Asana on 10
Engine and pair	Naming observations
monday.com / Asana / ChatGPT	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Claude	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Perplexity	monday.com: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Google AI Overviews	monday.com: 1 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.
monday.com / Asana / Google AI Mode	monday.com: 1 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

monday.com's own-domain citation count is 21 of 150; Asana's is 42 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Project management · Exact Project management buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

ClickUp and Asana

Project management · September 2026

ClickUp and Asana in the observed answers

ClickUp appears in 80 of 150 answers about project management; Asana appears in 97 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

ClickUp and Asana have different naming counts on 7 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 3 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22 and 2026-09-23. ClickUp record · Asana record · Project management checked set.

ClickUp beside Asana

ClickUp and Asana totals
Measure	ClickUp	Asana
Named	80/150; 53.3% (95% CI 45.4 to 61.1)	97/150; 64.7% (95% CI 56.7 to 71.9)
Own domain cited	13/150; 8.7% (95% CI 5.1 to 14.3)	42/150; 28.0% (95% CI 21.4 to 35.7)

ClickUp / Asana: question 1

What is the best project management software for a cross-functional team?

ClickUp: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0). Asana: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

ClickUp and Asana on 1
Engine and pair	Naming observations
ClickUp / Asana / ChatGPT	ClickUp: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Claude	ClickUp: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Perplexity	ClickUp: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Google AI Overviews	ClickUp: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Google AI Mode	ClickUp: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

ClickUp / Asana: question 2

Which project management platform is best for coordinating several concurrent client projects?

ClickUp: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0). Asana: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

ClickUp and Asana on 2
Engine and pair	Naming observations
ClickUp / Asana / ChatGPT	ClickUp: 1 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Claude	ClickUp: 3 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Perplexity	ClickUp: 2 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Google AI Overviews	ClickUp: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Google AI Mode	ClickUp: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

ClickUp / Asana: question 3

What are the top project management tools for a mid-market organization?

ClickUp: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8). Asana: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

ClickUp and Asana on 3
Engine and pair	Naming observations
ClickUp / Asana / ChatGPT	ClickUp: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Claude	ClickUp: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Perplexity	ClickUp: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Google AI Overviews	ClickUp: 2 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Google AI Mode	ClickUp: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

ClickUp / Asana: question 4

What are good alternatives to a spreadsheet-based project management process?

ClickUp: 9/15; 60.0% (95% CI 35.7 to 80.2). Asana: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

ClickUp and Asana on 4
Engine and pair	Naming observations
ClickUp / Asana / ChatGPT	ClickUp: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Claude	ClickUp: 2 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Perplexity	ClickUp: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Google AI Overviews	ClickUp: 1 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Google AI Mode	ClickUp: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

ClickUp / Asana: question 5

Which project management options work well for a distributed team?

ClickUp: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8). Asana: 13/15; 86.7% (95% CI 62.1 to 96.3).

ClickUp and Asana on 5
Engine and pair	Naming observations
ClickUp / Asana / ChatGPT	ClickUp: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Claude	ClickUp: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Perplexity	ClickUp: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Google AI Overviews	ClickUp: 2 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Google AI Mode	ClickUp: 2 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.

ClickUp / Asana: question 6

What project management software should a services business consider when project visibility is poor?

ClickUp: 5/15; 33.3% (95% CI 15.2 to 58.3). Asana: 5/15; 33.3% (95% CI 15.2 to 58.3).

ClickUp and Asana on 6
Engine and pair	Naming observations
ClickUp / Asana / ChatGPT	ClickUp: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Claude	ClickUp: 1 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Perplexity	ClickUp: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Google AI Overviews	ClickUp: 3 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Google AI Mode	ClickUp: 1 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.

ClickUp / Asana: question 7

How do the main project management platforms compare for planning and resource coordination?

ClickUp: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8). Asana: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

ClickUp and Asana on 7
Engine and pair	Naming observations
ClickUp / Asana / ChatGPT	ClickUp: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Claude	ClickUp: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Perplexity	ClickUp: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Google AI Overviews	ClickUp: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Google AI Mode	ClickUp: 2 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

ClickUp / Asana: question 8

Which project management approach is better for teams using both agile and structured planning?

ClickUp: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

ClickUp and Asana on 8
Engine and pair	Naming observations
ClickUp / Asana / ChatGPT	ClickUp: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Claude	ClickUp: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Perplexity	ClickUp: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Google AI Overviews	ClickUp: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Google AI Mode	ClickUp: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.

ClickUp / Asana: question 9

What should a buyer evaluate in project management software?

ClickUp: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

ClickUp and Asana on 9
Engine and pair	Naming observations
ClickUp / Asana / ChatGPT	ClickUp: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Claude	ClickUp: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Perplexity	ClickUp: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Google AI Overviews	ClickUp: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Google AI Mode	ClickUp: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.

ClickUp / Asana: question 10

How can a project team use project management software to improve delivery predictability?

ClickUp: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Asana: 6/15; 40.0% (95% CI 19.8 to 64.3).

ClickUp and Asana on 10
Engine and pair	Naming observations
ClickUp / Asana / ChatGPT	ClickUp: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Claude	ClickUp: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Perplexity	ClickUp: 1 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Google AI Overviews	ClickUp: 0 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.
ClickUp / Asana / Google AI Mode	ClickUp: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

ClickUp's own-domain citation count is 13 of 150; Asana's is 42 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Project management · Exact Project management buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Notion and Asana

Project management · September 2026

Notion and Asana in the observed answers

Notion appears in 6 of 150 answers about project management; Asana appears in 97 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Notion and Asana have different naming counts on 10 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 0 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22 and 2026-09-23. Notion record · Asana record · Project management checked set.

Notion beside Asana

Notion and Asana totals
Measure	Notion	Asana
Named	6/150; 4.0% (95% CI 1.8 to 8.5)	97/150; 64.7% (95% CI 56.7 to 71.9)
Own domain cited	6/150; 4.0% (95% CI 1.8 to 8.5)	42/150; 28.0% (95% CI 21.4 to 35.7)

Notion / Asana: question 1

What is the best project management software for a cross-functional team?

Notion: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Notion and Asana on 1
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Notion / Asana / ChatGPT	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Claude	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Perplexity	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Google AI Mode	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Notion / Asana: question 2

Which project management platform is best for coordinating several concurrent client projects?

Notion: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

Notion and Asana on 2
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Notion / Asana / ChatGPT	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Claude	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Perplexity	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Google AI Mode	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Notion / Asana: question 3

What are the top project management tools for a mid-market organization?

Notion: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Notion and Asana on 3
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Notion / Asana / ChatGPT	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Claude	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Perplexity	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Google AI Mode	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Notion / Asana: question 4

What are good alternatives to a spreadsheet-based project management process?

Notion: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Asana: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Notion and Asana on 4
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Notion / Asana / ChatGPT	Notion: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Claude	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Perplexity	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Google AI Mode	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Notion / Asana: question 5

Which project management options work well for a distributed team?

Notion: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Asana: 13/15; 86.7% (95% CI 62.1 to 96.3).

Notion and Asana on 5
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Notion / Asana / ChatGPT	Notion: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Claude	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Perplexity	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Google AI Mode	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.

Notion / Asana: question 6

What project management software should a services business consider when project visibility is poor?

Notion: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 5/15; 33.3% (95% CI 15.2 to 58.3).

Notion and Asana on 6
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Notion / Asana / ChatGPT	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Claude	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Perplexity	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Google AI Mode	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.

Notion / Asana: question 7

How do the main project management platforms compare for planning and resource coordination?

Notion: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Notion and Asana on 7
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Notion / Asana / ChatGPT	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Claude	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Perplexity	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Google AI Mode	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Notion / Asana: question 8

Which project management approach is better for teams using both agile and structured planning?

Notion: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

Notion and Asana on 8
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Notion / Asana / ChatGPT	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Claude	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Perplexity	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Google AI Mode	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.

Notion / Asana: question 9

What should a buyer evaluate in project management software?

Notion: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

Notion and Asana on 9
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Notion / Asana / ChatGPT	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Claude	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Perplexity	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Google AI Mode	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.

Notion / Asana: question 10

How can a project team use project management software to improve delivery predictability?

Notion: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 6/15; 40.0% (95% CI 19.8 to 64.3).

Notion and Asana on 10
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Notion / Asana / ChatGPT	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Claude	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Perplexity	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.
Notion / Asana / Google AI Mode	Notion: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Notion's own-domain citation count is 6 of 150; Asana's is 42 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Project management · Exact Project management buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Airtable and Asana

Project management · September 2026

Airtable and Asana in the observed answers

Airtable appears in 13 of 150 answers about project management; Asana appears in 97 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Airtable and Asana have different naming counts on 10 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 0 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22 and 2026-09-23. Airtable record · Asana record · Project management checked set.

Airtable beside Asana

Airtable and Asana totals
Measure	Airtable	Asana
Named	13/150; 8.7% (95% CI 5.1 to 14.3)	97/150; 64.7% (95% CI 56.7 to 71.9)
Own domain cited	6/150; 4.0% (95% CI 1.8 to 8.5)	42/150; 28.0% (95% CI 21.4 to 35.7)

Airtable / Asana: question 1

What is the best project management software for a cross-functional team?

Airtable: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Airtable and Asana on 1
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Airtable / Asana / ChatGPT	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Claude	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Perplexity	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Google AI Mode	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Airtable / Asana: question 2

Which project management platform is best for coordinating several concurrent client projects?

Airtable: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

Airtable and Asana on 2
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Airtable / Asana / ChatGPT	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Claude	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Perplexity	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Google AI Mode	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Airtable / Asana: question 3

What are the top project management tools for a mid-market organization?

Airtable: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Airtable and Asana on 3
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Airtable / Asana / ChatGPT	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Claude	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Perplexity	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Google AI Mode	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Airtable / Asana: question 4

What are good alternatives to a spreadsheet-based project management process?

Airtable: 13/15; 86.7% (95% CI 62.1 to 96.3). Asana: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Airtable and Asana on 4
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Airtable / Asana / ChatGPT	Airtable: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Claude	Airtable: 3 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Perplexity	Airtable: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Airtable: 2 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Google AI Mode	Airtable: 2 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Airtable / Asana: question 5

Which project management options work well for a distributed team?

Airtable: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 13/15; 86.7% (95% CI 62.1 to 96.3).

Airtable and Asana on 5
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Airtable / Asana / ChatGPT	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Claude	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Perplexity	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Google AI Mode	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.

Airtable / Asana: question 6

What project management software should a services business consider when project visibility is poor?

Airtable: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 5/15; 33.3% (95% CI 15.2 to 58.3).

Airtable and Asana on 6
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Airtable / Asana / ChatGPT	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Claude	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Perplexity	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Google AI Mode	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.

Airtable / Asana: question 7

How do the main project management platforms compare for planning and resource coordination?

Airtable: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Airtable and Asana on 7
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Airtable / Asana / ChatGPT	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Claude	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Perplexity	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Google AI Mode	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Airtable / Asana: question 8

Which project management approach is better for teams using both agile and structured planning?

Airtable: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

Airtable and Asana on 8
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Airtable / Asana / ChatGPT	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Claude	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Perplexity	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Google AI Mode	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.

Airtable / Asana: question 9

What should a buyer evaluate in project management software?

Airtable: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

Airtable and Asana on 9
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Airtable / Asana / ChatGPT	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Claude	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Perplexity	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Google AI Mode	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.

Airtable / Asana: question 10

How can a project team use project management software to improve delivery predictability?

Airtable: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 6/15; 40.0% (95% CI 19.8 to 64.3).

Airtable and Asana on 10
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Airtable / Asana / ChatGPT	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Claude	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Perplexity	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.
Airtable / Asana / Google AI Mode	Airtable: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Airtable's own-domain citation count is 6 of 150; Asana's is 42 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Project management · Exact Project management buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Wrike and Asana

Project management · September 2026

Wrike and Asana in the observed answers

Wrike appears in 54 of 150 answers about project management; Asana appears in 97 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Wrike and Asana have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22 and 2026-09-23. Wrike record · Asana record · Project management checked set.

Wrike beside Asana

Wrike and Asana totals
Measure	Wrike	Asana
Named	54/150; 36.0% (95% CI 28.8 to 43.9)	97/150; 64.7% (95% CI 56.7 to 71.9)
Own domain cited	34/150; 22.7% (95% CI 16.7 to 30.0)	42/150; 28.0% (95% CI 21.4 to 35.7)

Wrike / Asana: question 1

What is the best project management software for a cross-functional team?

Wrike: 8/15; 53.3% (95% CI 30.1 to 75.2). Asana: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Wrike and Asana on 1
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Wrike / Asana / ChatGPT	Wrike: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Claude	Wrike: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Perplexity	Wrike: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Wrike: 2 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Google AI Mode	Wrike: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Wrike / Asana: question 2

Which project management platform is best for coordinating several concurrent client projects?

Wrike: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0). Asana: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

Wrike and Asana on 2
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Wrike / Asana / ChatGPT	Wrike: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Claude	Wrike: 3 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Perplexity	Wrike: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Wrike: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Google AI Mode	Wrike: 1 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Wrike / Asana: question 3

What are the top project management tools for a mid-market organization?

Wrike: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0). Asana: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Wrike and Asana on 3
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Wrike / Asana / ChatGPT	Wrike: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Claude	Wrike: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Perplexity	Wrike: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Wrike: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Google AI Mode	Wrike: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Wrike / Asana: question 4

What are good alternatives to a spreadsheet-based project management process?

Wrike: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Asana: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Wrike and Asana on 4
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Wrike / Asana / ChatGPT	Wrike: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Claude	Wrike: 1 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Perplexity	Wrike: 2 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Wrike: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Google AI Mode	Wrike: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Wrike / Asana: question 5

Which project management options work well for a distributed team?

Wrike: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Asana: 13/15; 86.7% (95% CI 62.1 to 96.3).

Wrike and Asana on 5
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Wrike / Asana / ChatGPT	Wrike: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Claude	Wrike: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Perplexity	Wrike: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Wrike: 0 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Google AI Mode	Wrike: 0 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.

Wrike / Asana: question 6

What project management software should a services business consider when project visibility is poor?

Wrike: 9/15; 60.0% (95% CI 35.7 to 80.2). Asana: 5/15; 33.3% (95% CI 15.2 to 58.3).

Wrike and Asana on 6
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Wrike / Asana / ChatGPT	Wrike: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Claude	Wrike: 2 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Perplexity	Wrike: 3 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Wrike: 2 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Google AI Mode	Wrike: 2 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.

Wrike / Asana: question 7

How do the main project management platforms compare for planning and resource coordination?

Wrike: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0). Asana: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Wrike and Asana on 7
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Wrike / Asana / ChatGPT	Wrike: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Claude	Wrike: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Perplexity	Wrike: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Wrike: 2 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Google AI Mode	Wrike: 1 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Wrike / Asana: question 8

Which project management approach is better for teams using both agile and structured planning?

Wrike: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

Wrike and Asana on 8
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Wrike / Asana / ChatGPT	Wrike: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Claude	Wrike: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Perplexity	Wrike: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Wrike: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Google AI Mode	Wrike: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.

Wrike / Asana: question 9

What should a buyer evaluate in project management software?

Wrike: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

Wrike and Asana on 9
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Wrike / Asana / ChatGPT	Wrike: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Claude	Wrike: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Perplexity	Wrike: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Wrike: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Google AI Mode	Wrike: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.

Wrike / Asana: question 10

How can a project team use project management software to improve delivery predictability?

Wrike: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 6/15; 40.0% (95% CI 19.8 to 64.3).

Wrike and Asana on 10
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Wrike / Asana / ChatGPT	Wrike: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Claude	Wrike: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Perplexity	Wrike: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Wrike: 0 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.
Wrike / Asana / Google AI Mode	Wrike: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Wrike's own-domain citation count is 34 of 150; Asana's is 42 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Project management · Exact Project management buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Basecamp and Asana

Project management · September 2026

Basecamp and Asana in the observed answers

Basecamp appears in 18 of 150 answers about project management; Asana appears in 97 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Basecamp and Asana have different naming counts on 10 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 0 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22 and 2026-09-23. Basecamp record · Asana record · Project management checked set.

Basecamp beside Asana

Basecamp and Asana totals
Measure	Basecamp	Asana
Named	18/150; 12.0% (95% CI 7.7 to 18.2)	97/150; 64.7% (95% CI 56.7 to 71.9)
Own domain cited	3/150; 2.0% (95% CI 0.7 to 5.7)	42/150; 28.0% (95% CI 21.4 to 35.7)

Basecamp / Asana: question 1

What is the best project management software for a cross-functional team?

Basecamp: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Basecamp and Asana on 1
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Basecamp / Asana / ChatGPT	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Claude	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Perplexity	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Google AI Mode	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Basecamp / Asana: question 2

Which project management platform is best for coordinating several concurrent client projects?

Basecamp: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

Basecamp and Asana on 2
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Basecamp / Asana / ChatGPT	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Claude	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Perplexity	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Google AI Mode	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Basecamp / Asana: question 3

What are the top project management tools for a mid-market organization?

Basecamp: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). Asana: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Basecamp and Asana on 3
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Basecamp / Asana / ChatGPT	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Claude	Basecamp: 2 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Perplexity	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Google AI Mode	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Basecamp / Asana: question 4

What are good alternatives to a spreadsheet-based project management process?

Basecamp: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Asana: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Basecamp and Asana on 4
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Basecamp / Asana / ChatGPT	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Claude	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Perplexity	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Google AI Mode	Basecamp: 1 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Basecamp / Asana: question 5

Which project management options work well for a distributed team?

Basecamp: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0). Asana: 13/15; 86.7% (95% CI 62.1 to 96.3).

Basecamp and Asana on 5
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Basecamp / Asana / ChatGPT	Basecamp: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Claude	Basecamp: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Perplexity	Basecamp: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Basecamp: 3 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Google AI Mode	Basecamp: 3 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.

Basecamp / Asana: question 6

What project management software should a services business consider when project visibility is poor?

Basecamp: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 5/15; 33.3% (95% CI 15.2 to 58.3).

Basecamp and Asana on 6
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Basecamp / Asana / ChatGPT	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Claude	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Perplexity	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Google AI Mode	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.

Basecamp / Asana: question 7

How do the main project management platforms compare for planning and resource coordination?

Basecamp: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Basecamp and Asana on 7
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Basecamp / Asana / ChatGPT	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Claude	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Perplexity	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Google AI Mode	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Basecamp / Asana: question 8

Which project management approach is better for teams using both agile and structured planning?

Basecamp: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

Basecamp and Asana on 8
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Basecamp / Asana / ChatGPT	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Claude	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Perplexity	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Google AI Mode	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.

Basecamp / Asana: question 9

What should a buyer evaluate in project management software?

Basecamp: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

Basecamp and Asana on 9
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Basecamp / Asana / ChatGPT	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Claude	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Perplexity	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Google AI Mode	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.

Basecamp / Asana: question 10

How can a project team use project management software to improve delivery predictability?

Basecamp: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 6/15; 40.0% (95% CI 19.8 to 64.3).

Basecamp and Asana on 10
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Basecamp / Asana / ChatGPT	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Claude	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Perplexity	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.
Basecamp / Asana / Google AI Mode	Basecamp: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Basecamp's own-domain citation count is 3 of 150; Asana's is 42 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Project management · Exact Project management buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Trello and Asana

Project management · September 2026

Trello and Asana in the observed answers

Trello appears in 32 of 150 answers about project management; Asana appears in 97 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Trello and Asana have different naming counts on 10 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 0 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22 and 2026-09-23. Trello record · Asana record · Project management checked set.

Trello beside Asana

Trello and Asana totals
Measure	Trello	Asana
Named	32/150; 21.3% (95% CI 15.5 to 28.6)	97/150; 64.7% (95% CI 56.7 to 71.9)
Own domain cited	6/150; 4.0% (95% CI 1.8 to 8.5)	42/150; 28.0% (95% CI 21.4 to 35.7)

Trello / Asana: question 1

What is the best project management software for a cross-functional team?

Trello: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Trello and Asana on 1
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Trello / Asana / ChatGPT	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Claude	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Perplexity	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Google AI Mode	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Trello / Asana: question 2

Which project management platform is best for coordinating several concurrent client projects?

Trello: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

Trello and Asana on 2
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Trello / Asana / ChatGPT	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Claude	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Perplexity	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Google AI Mode	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Trello / Asana: question 3

What are the top project management tools for a mid-market organization?

Trello: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Trello and Asana on 3
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Trello / Asana / ChatGPT	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Claude	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Perplexity	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Google AI Mode	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Trello / Asana: question 4

What are good alternatives to a spreadsheet-based project management process?

Trello: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8). Asana: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Trello and Asana on 4
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Trello / Asana / ChatGPT	Trello: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Claude	Trello: 1 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Perplexity	Trello: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Trello: 1 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Google AI Mode	Trello: 2 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Trello / Asana: question 5

Which project management options work well for a distributed team?

Trello: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0). Asana: 13/15; 86.7% (95% CI 62.1 to 96.3).

Trello and Asana on 5
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Trello / Asana / ChatGPT	Trello: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Claude	Trello: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Perplexity	Trello: 3 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Trello: 3 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Google AI Mode	Trello: 3 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.

Trello / Asana: question 6

What project management software should a services business consider when project visibility is poor?

Trello: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Asana: 5/15; 33.3% (95% CI 15.2 to 58.3).

Trello and Asana on 6
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Trello / Asana / ChatGPT	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Claude	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Perplexity	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Google AI Mode	Trello: 1 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.

Trello / Asana: question 7

How do the main project management platforms compare for planning and resource coordination?

Trello: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0). Asana: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Trello and Asana on 7
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Trello / Asana / ChatGPT	Trello: 1 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Claude	Trello: 1 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Perplexity	Trello: 1 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Trello: 1 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Google AI Mode	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Trello / Asana: question 8

Which project management approach is better for teams using both agile and structured planning?

Trello: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). Asana: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

Trello and Asana on 8
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Trello / Asana / ChatGPT	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Claude	Trello: 1 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Perplexity	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Trello: 1 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Google AI Mode	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.

Trello / Asana: question 9

What should a buyer evaluate in project management software?

Trello: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

Trello and Asana on 9
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Trello / Asana / ChatGPT	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Claude	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Perplexity	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Google AI Mode	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.

Trello / Asana: question 10

How can a project team use project management software to improve delivery predictability?

Trello: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Asana: 6/15; 40.0% (95% CI 19.8 to 64.3).

Trello and Asana on 10
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Trello / Asana / ChatGPT	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Claude	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 0 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Perplexity	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 1 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Google AI Overviews	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 2 of 3.
Trello / Asana / Google AI Mode	Trello: 0 of 3; Asana: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Trello's own-domain citation count is 6 of 150; Asana's is 42 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Project management · Exact Project management buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

The ten buyer questions

Each question was put to every engine 3 times on the stated dates. Counts are over valid answers to the exact question.

What is the best project management software for a cross-functional team?

Question 1. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: best option.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPT Perplexity Claude

Which project management platform is best for coordinating several concurrent client projects?

Question 2. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: specific workflow.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPT Perplexity Claude

What are the top project management tools for a mid-market organization?

Question 3. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: top tools.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPT Perplexity Claude

What are good alternatives to a spreadsheet-based project management process?

Question 4. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: alternative.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPT Perplexity Claude

Which project management options work well for a distributed team?

Question 5. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: best option.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPT Perplexity Claude

What project management software should a services business consider when project visibility is poor?

Question 6. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: specific workflow.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPT Perplexity Claude

How do the main project management platforms compare for planning and resource coordination?

Question 7. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: buyer evaluation.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPT Perplexity Claude

Which project management approach is better for teams using both agile and structured planning?

Question 8. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: buyer evaluation.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPT Perplexity Claude

What should a buyer evaluate in project management software?

Question 9. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: buyer evaluation.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPT Perplexity Claude

How can a project team use project management software to improve delivery predictability?

Question 10. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: specific workflow.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPT Perplexity Claude

The ten buyer questions

Compared with Asana

Release and method

Release: 2026-09, version 2026-09.1
Published: 2026-09-23
Answer capture dates: 2026-09-22 to 2026-09-23
Source capture dates: 2026-08-28
Engines: ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode
Configuration: 10 fixed target questions, 5 engines, 3 repeats. No controls were run for this category.
Method version: v1.1
Excluded answers: 0 target answers excluded; exact reasons are listed. No controls were run for this category.
Commissioned engagement: No commissioned engagement is declared for this category.

Exact names and listed aliases are matched without case sensitivity at word boundaries. Plain word names require a listed qualifier nearby in the same sentence or the canonical domain among cited URLs. A vendor citation counts only when that answer also names the vendor under this rule.

Answer text for releases before 2026-09 was not retained. For release 2026-09 and later, the full answer text is kept and published in the release's Zenodo deposit and on the receipt pages, except Perplexity, where the method keeps a scored excerpt of at most 60 words and the share link.

Download and cite

Release JSON · Category CSV · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695

How to cite: Broadcastwell. The Absence Index, Project management, version 2026-09.1. Permanent record. CC BY 4.0 with attribution to Broadcastwell.

About this page

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

This public record reports the checked set, fixed questions and stated dates. Claim a vendor page, file a dispute or ask for a re-run, or read the dispute policy and log.

Read this page as JSON · Dataset and page metadata

Which project tools did AI tools name? 22-23 Sep 2026 record

Criteria Maps

Fit with stated team needs or workflows

Scalability as needs grow

Reporting functionality

Ease of use and adoption

Full ownership costs including implementation and add ons

Working connections to existing business systems

Product or vendor security

Manageable complexity or administrative effort

Task dependencies

Applicable compliance requirements

Customer support

Team collaboration

Access controls

Clear task ownership or assignment

Workflow automation

Activity audit logs

Data encryption

Milestone tracking

Portfolio and cross project oversight

Project scheduling

Training resources and user documentation

Approval workflows

Documented data storage location

Task progress tracking

Time tracking

Cost appropriate to budget and team size

Mobile device access

Project budget or cost tracking

Single sign on

Support for required agile, sequential or hybrid methods

Evaluation access, demonstration or documented evaluation evidence

Workload tracking or visibility

Capacity planning or visibility

Fit with required planning depth or operating style

Implementation support or effort

Real time collaboration

Resource management

Centralized project information and shared visibility

Clear subscription package and pricing scope

Clear visual presentation of work

Configurable reports and dashboards

Forecasting

Gantt chart planning

Kanban boards

Multiple visual planning views

Project planning

Project profitability visibility

Project visibility

Real time progress and reporting data

Resource planning

Task management

Ability to change subscription plans as needs change

Accessible project context

Accessible user interfaces

Asynchronous communication or updates

Asynchronous written updates and accessible project context

Automated reporting

Backup and recovery arrangements

Contract and exit terms

Critical path scheduling

Data retention and deletion policies

Defined integration error handling

Demonstrated connections to required systems

Deployment options suited to security and operational requirements

Document and file sharing

Financial management capabilities

Notifications or alerts

Product customization

Resource plans update when task assignments change

Reusable project and workflow templates

Schedule baselines and comparisons

Support for different departmental working styles

Time and billable hour tracking

Usable data export

Visibility of time allocated to individuals across projects

API access

API access and supported connectors

Access to project documents