Broadcastwell Fix one answer, $490
Menu

2026-09.1 record

Which vet software did AI tools name? 22 Sep 2026 record

Most named checked vendor

115 of 149 valid answers named ezyVet

115 of 149 valid answers, 77.2% (Wilson 95% interval 69.8% to 83.2%)

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09, version 2026-09.1. Method v1.1. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695

The system of record a veterinary clinic uses for scheduling, medical records, billing, inventory, and client communication. Buyers call it vet practice management software or veterinary PIMS (practice information management system).

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Vendor-selection source dates: 2026-09-21. The Index measures observed naming, not service quality or product merit.

Commissioned engagement: no.

Source Map · Dispute policy · Explore the buyer questions

Discuss this category's evidence

Criteria Maps

Observed buyer requirements before the first vendor in source answers captured on 22 and 23 September 2026. 149 valid source answers from 150 scheduled runs. These observations are separate from the original Index release figures.

Each vendor figure uses the median across the five most named vendors in the frozen category release, including zero counts. Adjacency compares distinct source answers for the same criterion; page coverage compares criteria for the same page state. Medians are descriptive and have no confidence interval.

Prepared by the Broadcastwell team. Team review: in progress. Zero analyst verified criteria.

The AI written RFP; Study DOI 10.5281/zenodo.23271935. Source DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695. CC BY 4.0.

Observed source answer frequencies. Wilson intervals describe the calculation, not independent population inference. Repeated runs are not independent performance tests. Page comparisons cover only the dated page and stated scope. An unstated claim is not an absent product feature.

Any named company may request one no-cost re-run at index@broadcastwell.com; both results are published.

Fix one answer, $490. Every figure comes from the published method, v1.1.

Read the full list of observed buyer requirements.

  1. Cloud based operation

    21 of 149; 14.1%; Wilson 95% interval 9.4% to 20.6%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q2: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q1: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q2: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q1: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q2: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Overviews|1; veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Overviews|3; veterinary-practice-management|q1|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Overviews|1; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Overviews|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://co.vet/post/veterinary-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://heyjodie.com/en-us/guides/best-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://todaysveterinarypractice.com/technology/veterinary-practice-software-technology-part-1/: 3 source answers; https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 1 source answers; https://www.ezyvet.com/blog/features-to-look-for-when-buying-veterinary-practice-management-software: 3 source answers; No source shown: 17 source answers

    • DaySmart Vet: 11 of 149; 7.4%; Wilson 95% interval 4.2% to 12.7%. Category median 5 of 149; 3.4%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Overviews|1; veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Overviews|3; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Overviews|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3

      No source shown: 11 of 149; 7.4%; Wilson 95% interval 4.2% to 12.7%. Category median 5 of 149; 3.4%

    • Digitail: 8 of 149; 5.4%; Wilson 95% interval 2.7% to 10.2%. Category median 5 of 149; 3.4%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q1|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Overviews|1

      https://digitail.com/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; No source shown: 7 of 149; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.4%. Category median 5 of 149; 3.4%

    • Hippo Manager: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 5 of 149; 3.4%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|3

      No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 5 of 149; 3.4%

    • IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Category median 5 of 149; 3.4%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Overviews|3

      No source shown: 5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Category median 5 of 149; 3.4%

    • NectarVet: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 5 of 149; 3.4%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 5 of 149; 3.4%

    • Provet Cloud: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 5 of 149; 3.4%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 5 of 149; 3.4%

    • Shepherd: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 5 of 149; 3.4%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Overviews|1

      No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 5 of 149; 3.4%

    • ezyVet: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 5 of 149; 3.4%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Mode|2

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 5 of 149; 3.4%

  2. Ease of use

    21 of 149; 14.1%; Wilson 95% interval 9.4% to 20.6%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q1: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q2: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q2: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Overviews|1; veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Overviews|3; veterinary-practice-management|q1|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Mode|1; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Overviews|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://co.vet/post/veterinary-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://heyjodie.com/en-us/guides/best-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 1 source answers; https://www.aaha.org/trends-magazine/publications/view-from-the-board-considerations-for-choosing-veterinary-practice-management-software/?utm_source=openai: 3 source answers; https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 3 source answers; https://www.vetport.com/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-softwares: 2 source answers; No source shown: 14 source answers

    • DaySmart Vet: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 2 of 149; 1.3%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Overviews|1

      No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 2 of 149; 1.3%

    • IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Category median 2 of 149; 1.3%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Overviews|1; veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Overviews|3; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Mode|1; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Overviews|1

      No source shown: 5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Category median 2 of 149; 1.3%

    • Shepherd: 4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Category median 2 of 149; 1.3%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q1|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Mode|1; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Overviews|1

      https://bittsi.com/blog/post/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://co.vet/post/veterinary-software-comparison/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 2 of 149; 1.3%

    • ezyVet: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 2 of 149; 1.3%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Mode|2

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 2 of 149; 1.3%

  3. Electronic medical records

    17 of 149; 11.4%; Wilson 95% interval 7.2% to 17.5%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q2: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://co.vet/post/vet-clinic-software/: 1 source answers; https://digitalhealth.folio3.com/blog/top-11-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 3 source answers; https://todaysveterinarypractice.com/technology/veterinary-practice-software-technology-part-1/: 1 source answers; https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 1 source answers; https://waitwellsoftware.com/resources/articles/best-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 2 source answers; https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 3 source answers; https://www.provet.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 3 source answers; https://www.softwareadvice.com/veterinary/: 3 source answers; https://www.vetport.com/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-softwares: 2 source answers; No source shown: 14 source answers

    • Hippo Manager: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|2

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|3

      No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • NectarVet: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  4. Inventory tracking

    17 of 149; 11.4%; Wilson 95% interval 7.2% to 17.5%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q3: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q10: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q3|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q3|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 3 source answers; https://waitwellsoftware.com/resources/articles/best-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 3 source answers; https://www.provet.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 3 source answers; https://www.softwareadvice.com/veterinary/: 3 source answers; https://www.vetport.com/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-softwares: 2 source answers; No source shown: 14 source answers

    • Shepherd: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|2

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • Vetspire: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|2

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  5. Billing and invoicing

    16 of 149; 10.7%; Wilson 95% interval 6.7% to 16.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q2: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 3 source answers; https://waitwellsoftware.com/resources/articles/best-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 3 source answers; https://www.provet.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 3 source answers; https://www.softwareadvice.com/veterinary/: 3 source answers; https://www.vetport.com/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-softwares: 2 source answers; No source shown: 13 source answers

    • IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|2

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  6. Working connections to existing practice systems

    15 of 149; 10.1%; Wilson 95% interval 6.2% to 15.9%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q2: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q1|Perplexity|3; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://co.vet/post/veterinary-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://heyjodie.com/en-us/guides/best-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://software.idexx.com/resources/blog/8-practice-management-software-must-haves-for-specialists: 3 source answers; https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 2 source answers; https://waitwellsoftware.com/resources/articles/best-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://www.aaha.org/trends-magazine/publications/view-from-the-board-considerations-for-choosing-veterinary-practice-management-software/?utm_source=openai: 3 source answers; https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 3 source answers; https://www.provet.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 3 source answers; https://www.raftlabs.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 1 source answers; https://www.softwareadvice.com/veterinary/: 2 source answers; https://www.veterical.com/blog/en/essential-features-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 2 source answers; https://www.vetport.com/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-softwares: 2 source answers; https://www.vetsoftwarehub.com/article/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026: 1 source answers; No source shown: 8 source answers

    • IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Mode|2

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • ezyVet: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Mode|2

      No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  7. Laboratory and diagnostic system connections

    14 of 149; 9.4%; Wilson 95% interval 5.7% to 15.2%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q3: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q3|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q3|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://software.idexx.com/resources/blog/8-practice-management-software-must-haves-for-specialists: 3 source answers; https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 2 source answers; https://waitwellsoftware.com/resources/articles/best-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://www.aaha.org/trends-magazine/publications/view-from-the-board-considerations-for-choosing-veterinary-practice-management-software/?utm_source=openai: 3 source answers; https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 3 source answers; https://www.provet.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 3 source answers; https://www.softwareadvice.com/veterinary/: 2 source answers; https://www.vetport.com/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-softwares: 2 source answers; No source shown: 8 source answers

    • IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q3|Google AI Mode|3

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • ezyVet: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q3|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q3|Google AI Mode|3

      No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  8. SOAP notes or SOAP charting templates

    14 of 149; 9.4%; Wilson 95% interval 5.7% to 15.2%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q2: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Overviews|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://co.vet/post/vet-clinic-software/: 1 source answers; https://digitalhealth.folio3.com/blog/top-11-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 3 source answers; https://todaysveterinarypractice.com/technology/veterinary-practice-software-technology-part-1/: 1 source answers; https://waitwellsoftware.com/resources/articles/best-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 2 source answers; https://www.provet.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 3 source answers; No source shown: 11 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  9. Appointment scheduling

    13 of 149; 8.7%; Wilson 95% interval 5.2% to 14.4%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 1 source answers; https://waitwellsoftware.com/resources/articles/best-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 3 source answers; https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 3 source answers; https://www.provet.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 3 source answers; https://www.softwareadvice.com/veterinary/: 3 source answers; https://www.vetport.com/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-softwares: 2 source answers; No source shown: 10 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  10. Low stock and reorder alerts

    13 of 149; 8.7%; Wilson 95% interval 5.2% to 14.4%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 3 source answers; https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 3 source answers; https://www.provet.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 3 source answers; No source shown: 10 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  11. Two way text messaging

    13 of 149; 8.7%; Wilson 95% interval 5.2% to 14.4%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 3 source answers; https://waitwellsoftware.com/resources/articles/best-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 3 source answers; https://www.provet.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 3 source answers; https://www.softwareadvice.com/veterinary/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 10 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  12. Automated appointment and follow up reminders

    11 of 149; 7.4%; Wilson 95% interval 4.2% to 12.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://waitwellsoftware.com/resources/articles/best-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 3 source answers; https://www.provet.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 3 source answers; https://www.softwareadvice.com/veterinary/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 8 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  13. Capacity for growth in staff, sites or clinical operations

    11 of 149; 7.4%; Wilson 95% interval 4.2% to 12.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q1: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q10: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|1; veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Mode|1; veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Overviews|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://lupapets.com/us/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-systems-in-2026/: 1 source answers; https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 3 source answers; https://www.softwareadvice.com/veterinary/: 1 source answers; https://www.vetport.com/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-softwares: 1 source answers; No source shown: 8 source answers

    • Provet Cloud: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Overviews|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • Vetspire: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • ezyVet: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|1; veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Mode|1; veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Mode|2

      No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  14. Fit with practice type or operating needs

    11 of 149; 7.4%; Wilson 95% interval 4.2% to 12.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q1: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q1|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q1|Perplexity|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://co.vet/post/veterinary-management-software/: 2 source answers; https://heyjodie.com/en-us/guides/best-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 2 source answers; https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 4 source answers; https://waitwellsoftware.com/resources/articles/best-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://www.aaha.org/trends-magazine/publications/view-from-the-board-considerations-for-choosing-veterinary-practice-management-software/?utm_source=openai: 2 source answers; https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 3 source answers; https://www.provet.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 3 source answers; https://www.raftlabs.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 2 source answers; https://www.softwareadvice.com/veterinary/: 3 source answers; https://www.veterical.com/blog/en/essential-features-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 3 source answers; https://www.vetport.com/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-softwares: 4 source answers; https://www.vetsoftwarehub.com/article/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026: 2 source answers; No source shown: 4 source answers

  15. Full adoption and operating costs including add ons

    11 of 149; 7.4%; Wilson 95% interval 4.2% to 12.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://www.aaha.org/trends-magazine/publications/view-from-the-board-considerations-for-choosing-veterinary-practice-management-software/?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.veterical.com/blog/en/essential-features-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 3 source answers; https://www.vetport.com/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-softwares: 3 source answers; No source shown: 7 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  16. Online client appointment booking

    11 of 149; 7.4%; Wilson 95% interval 4.2% to 12.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://waitwellsoftware.com/resources/articles/best-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 3 source answers; https://www.provet.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 3 source answers; https://www.softwareadvice.com/veterinary/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 8 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  17. Purchasing and supplier ordering workflows

    11 of 149; 7.4%; Wilson 95% interval 4.2% to 12.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 3 source answers; https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 3 source answers; https://www.provet.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 3 source answers; No source shown: 8 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  18. Reporting and analytics

    11 of 149; 7.4%; Wilson 95% interval 4.2% to 12.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 3 source answers; https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 8 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  19. Staff training resources

    11 of 149; 7.4%; Wilson 95% interval 4.2% to 12.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://www.aaha.org/trends-magazine/march-2022/ts-software-switch/?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.aaha.org/trends-magazine/publications/view-from-the-board-considerations-for-choosing-veterinary-practice-management-software/?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 3 source answers; https://www.vetport.com/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-softwares: 3 source answers; No source shown: 6 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  20. Configurable SOAP notes and templates

    10 of 149; 6.7%; Wilson 95% interval 3.7% to 11.9%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3

    No source shown: 10 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  21. Connected or centralized practice workflows

    10 of 149; 6.7%; Wilson 95% interval 3.7% to 11.9%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q2: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q1|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://co.vet/post/veterinary-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://heyjodie.com/en-us/guides/best-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 2 source answers; https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 1 source answers; https://www.provet.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 1 source answers; https://www.softwareadvice.com/veterinary/: 1 source answers; https://www.vetport.com/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-softwares: 1 source answers; No source shown: 7 source answers

    • Digitail: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q1|Perplexity|2

      https://digitail.com/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • NectarVet: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • Shepherd: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|2

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  22. Customer support

    10 of 149; 6.7%; Wilson 95% interval 3.7% to 11.9%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://www.aaha.org/trends-magazine/march-2022/ts-software-switch/?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.aaha.org/trends-magazine/publications/view-from-the-board-considerations-for-choosing-veterinary-practice-management-software/?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 2 source answers; https://www.veterical.com/blog/en/essential-features-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://www.vetport.com/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-softwares: 2 source answers; No source shown: 6 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  23. Remote access to practice records and operations

    10 of 149; 6.7%; Wilson 95% interval 3.7% to 11.9%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://todaysveterinarypractice.com/technology/veterinary-practice-software-technology-part-1/: 3 source answers; https://www.ezyvet.com/blog/features-to-look-for-when-buying-veterinary-practice-management-software: 3 source answers; No source shown: 7 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  24. Capture of clinical charges

    9 of 149; 6.0%; Wilson 95% interval 3.2% to 11.1%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q10: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 3 source answers; https://waitwellsoftware.com/resources/articles/best-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 1 source answers; https://www.provet.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 3 source answers; https://www.softwareadvice.com/veterinary/: 3 source answers; https://www.vetport.com/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-softwares: 1 source answers; No source shown: 6 source answers

    • ezyVet: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|3

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  25. Client communication

    9 of 149; 6.0%; Wilson 95% interval 3.2% to 11.1%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q10: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 3 source answers; https://waitwellsoftware.com/resources/articles/best-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 3 source answers; https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 3 source answers; https://www.provet.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 3 source answers; https://www.softwareadvice.com/veterinary/: 3 source answers; https://www.vetport.com/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-softwares: 2 source answers; No source shown: 6 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  26. Data backups

    9 of 149; 6.0%; Wilson 95% interval 3.2% to 11.1%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=957322&utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.cisa.gov/small-and-medium-sized-business-resources?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 4 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  27. Demonstrations or hands on workflow testing

    9 of 149; 6.0%; Wilson 95% interval 3.2% to 11.1%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://www.aaha.org/trends-magazine/publications/view-from-the-board-considerations-for-choosing-veterinary-practice-management-software/?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.veterical.com/blog/en/essential-features-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 3 source answers; https://www.vetport.com/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-softwares: 3 source answers; No source shown: 5 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  28. Imaging system connections

    9 of 149; 6.0%; Wilson 95% interval 3.2% to 11.1%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://software.idexx.com/resources/blog/8-practice-management-software-must-haves-for-specialists: 3 source answers; https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 1 source answers; https://waitwellsoftware.com/resources/articles/best-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://www.aaha.org/trends-magazine/publications/view-from-the-board-considerations-for-choosing-veterinary-practice-management-software/?utm_source=openai: 3 source answers; https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 3 source answers; https://www.provet.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 3 source answers; https://www.softwareadvice.com/veterinary/: 1 source answers; https://www.vetport.com/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-softwares: 1 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  29. Limited setup or operational complexity

    9 of 149; 6.0%; Wilson 95% interval 3.2% to 11.1%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Perplexity, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q2: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q1: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q2: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Mode|1; veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q1|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Mode|1; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Overviews|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|1

    https://co.vet/post/veterinary-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://heyjodie.com/en-us/guides/best-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 1 source answers; https://www.raftlabs.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 1 source answers; https://www.vetport.com/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-softwares: 1 source answers; https://www.vetsoftwarehub.com/article/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026: 1 source answers; No source shown: 8 source answers

  30. Payment processing

    9 of 149; 6.0%; Wilson 95% interval 3.2% to 11.1%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://software.idexx.com/resources/blog/8-practice-management-software-must-haves-for-specialists: 1 source answers; https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 3 source answers; https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 1 source answers; https://www.provet.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 3 source answers; https://www.softwareadvice.com/veterinary/: 2 source answers; No source shown: 6 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  31. Digital treatment or inpatient sheets

    8 of 149; 5.4%; Wilson 95% interval 2.7% to 10.2%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q10: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q3: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q10: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|1; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Overviews|1; veterinary-practice-management|q3|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3

    No source shown: 8 source answers

    • Instinct: 5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|1; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Overviews|1; veterinary-practice-management|q3|Google AI Mode|3

      No source shown: 5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  32. Protection of patient, client and business data

    8 of 149; 5.4%; Wilson 95% interval 2.7% to 10.2%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://www.aaha.org/resources/2021-aaha-avma-telehealth-guidelines-for-small-animal-practice/security/: 1 source answers; https://www.aaha.org/wp-content/uploads/globalassets/02-guidelines/telehealth/2021-aaha-avma-telehealth-guidelines.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  33. Client access through a portal or app

    7 of 149; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.4%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 3 source answers; https://waitwellsoftware.com/resources/articles/best-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 3 source answers; https://www.provet.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 3 source answers; https://www.softwareadvice.com/veterinary/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 4 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  34. Defined support availability

    7 of 149; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.4%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://www.aaha.org/trends-magazine/march-2022/ts-software-switch/?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 2 source answers; https://www.vetport.com/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-softwares: 2 source answers; No source shown: 4 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  35. Access controls

    6 of 149; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.9% to 8.5%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q3: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q3|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 2 source answers; No source shown: 4 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  36. Activity audit logs

    6 of 149; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.9% to 8.5%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://www.cisa.gov/small-and-medium-sized-business-resources?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  37. Clinical whiteboards

    6 of 149; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.9% to 8.5%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q10: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q10: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q3: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q10: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|1; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Overviews|1; veterinary-practice-management|q3|Google AI Mode|3

    No source shown: 6 source answers

    • Covetrus Pulse: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Claude|3

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • Instinct: 6 of 149; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.9% to 8.5%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|1; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Overviews|1; veterinary-practice-management|q3|Google AI Mode|3

      No source shown: 6 of 149; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.9% to 8.5%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • ezyVet: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Claude|3

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  38. Fast implementation or adoption

    6 of 149; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.9% to 8.5%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Overviews, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q2: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q2: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Overviews|1; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Mode|1; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Overviews|3

    No source shown: 6 source answers

    • Digitail: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 149; 0.7%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Mode|3

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 149; 0.7%

    • IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 149; 0.7%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Mode|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 149; 0.7%

    • Shepherd: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 1 of 149; 0.7%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Overviews|3

      No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 1 of 149; 0.7%

    • Vetspire: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 149; 0.7%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Mode|3

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 1 of 149; 0.7%

  39. Medication and supply expiration tracking

    6 of 149; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.9% to 8.5%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2

    No source shown: 6 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  40. Mobile device access and workflows

    6 of 149; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.9% to 8.5%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2

    https://todaysveterinarypractice.com/technology/veterinary-practice-software-technology-part-1/: 1 source answers; https://www.aaha.org/trends-magazine/publications/view-from-the-board-considerations-for-choosing-veterinary-practice-management-software/?utm_source=openai: 2 source answers; https://www.ezyvet.com/blog/features-to-look-for-when-buying-veterinary-practice-management-software: 1 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  41. Practice specific configuration

    6 of 149; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.9% to 8.5%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3

    https://www.aaha.org/trends-magazine/publications/view-from-the-board-considerations-for-choosing-veterinary-practice-management-software/?utm_source=openai: 3 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  42. Data encryption

    5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://www.cisa.gov/small-and-medium-sized-business-resources?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  43. Data migration assistance

    5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 3 source answers; https://www.vetport.com/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-softwares: 3 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  44. Implementation and launch assistance

    5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://www.aaha.org/trends-magazine/march-2022/ts-software-switch/?utm_source=openai: 2 source answers; https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 2 source answers; https://www.vetport.com/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-softwares: 2 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  45. Real time inventory visibility

    5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 3 source answers; https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 3 source answers; https://www.provet.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 3 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  46. Role based access controls

    5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q3: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q3|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2

    https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=957322&utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.cisa.gov/small-and-medium-sized-business-resources?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  47. Service availability

    5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3

    https://www.aaha.org/wp-content/uploads/globalassets/02-guidelines/telehealth/2021-aaha-avma-telehealth-guidelines.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; No source shown: 4 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  48. Treatment estimates

    5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3

    No source shown: 5 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  49. Management of an appointment waiting list

    4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://waitwellsoftware.com/resources/articles/best-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 3 source answers; https://www.provet.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 3 source answers; https://www.softwareadvice.com/veterinary/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  50. Client or appointment reminders

    4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 2 source answers; https://waitwellsoftware.com/resources/articles/best-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 2 source answers; https://www.provet.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 2 source answers; https://www.softwareadvice.com/veterinary/: 2 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  51. Digital client forms

    4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2

    https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 1 source answers; https://waitwellsoftware.com/resources/articles/best-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://www.provet.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 1 source answers; https://www.softwareadvice.com/veterinary/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  52. Discharge and home care instructions

    4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3

    No source shown: 4 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  53. High acuity care workflows

    4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q10: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q10: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q10: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|1; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Overviews|1

    No source shown: 4 source answers

    • Instinct: 4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|1; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Overviews|1

      No source shown: 4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • Vetspire: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|3

      No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  54. Usable data export

    4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://www.eunoiaconsultingco.com/blog/veterinary-pms-data-migration-due-diligence: 1 source answers; https://www.veterical.com/blog/en/essential-features-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 2 source answers; https://www.vetport.com/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-softwares: 2 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  55. Accessible patient medical histories

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  56. Active user community and forums

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3

    No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  57. Appointment calendars for staff and other resources

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  58. Automated appointment scheduling

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q2: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Claude|3

    No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  59. Automatic saving of clinical notes

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3

    No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  60. Clarity about integration costs

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  61. Clinical team communication and handoffs

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q10: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q3: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q10: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q3|Google AI Mode|2

    No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  62. Communication about service outages

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3

    No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  63. Concurrent staff work in a patient chart

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3

    No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  64. Control over secondary uses of practice data

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  65. Cost appropriate to practice budget

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Perplexity, q1: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q2: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q1|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q1|Perplexity|3; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Overviews|1

    https://co.vet/post/veterinary-management-software/: 2 source answers; https://heyjodie.com/en-us/guides/best-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 2 source answers; https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 2 source answers; https://www.raftlabs.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 2 source answers; https://www.vetport.com/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-softwares: 1 source answers; https://www.vetsoftwarehub.com/article/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026: 2 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers

  66. Data export fees

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3

    https://www.eunoiaconsultingco.com/blog/veterinary-pms-data-migration-due-diligence: 1 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  67. Demonstration of integration behavior

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  68. Financial or operating reports

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2

    No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  69. Integration correctly matches the patient record

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  70. Limited administrative workload

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Overviews, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q2: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Overviews|3; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Mode|3

    No source shown: 3 source answers

    • Digitail: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Mode|3

      No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • Vetspire: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Mode|3

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  71. Multi location practice administration

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Overviews, q10: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q10: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|1; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Overviews|1

    No source shown: 3 source answers

    • Provet Cloud: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|1; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Overviews|1

      No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • Vetspire: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|1; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Overviews|1

      No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • ezyVet: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|1; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|3

      No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  72. Multifactor authentication

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3

    https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=957322&utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.aaha.org/wp-content/uploads/globalassets/02-guidelines/telehealth/2021-aaha-avma-telehealth-guidelines.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.cisa.gov/small-and-medium-sized-business-resources?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  73. Ongoing product development

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3

    No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  74. Ongoing software updates

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Claude|3

    No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  75. Prescription and medication workflows

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://co.vet/post/vet-clinic-software/: 1 source answers; https://digitalhealth.folio3.com/blog/top-11-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 1 source answers; https://www.provet.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 2 source answers; https://www.softwareadvice.com/veterinary/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  76. Treatment planning

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://co.vet/post/vet-clinic-software/: 1 source answers; https://digitalhealth.folio3.com/blog/top-11-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 3 source answers; https://todaysveterinarypractice.com/technology/veterinary-practice-software-technology-part-1/: 1 source answers; https://waitwellsoftware.com/resources/articles/best-veterinary-practice-management-software/: 2 source answers; https://www.provet.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  77. Test migration and validation before go live

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3

    https://www.eunoiaconsultingco.com/blog/veterinary-pms-data-migration-due-diligence: 1 source answers; https://www.ezyvet.com/implementation-onboarding?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  78. Usable workflows during an internet or service outage

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  79. Access to data during or after cancellation

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3

    https://www.eunoiaconsultingco.com/blog/veterinary-pms-data-migration-due-diligence: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  80. Automation of repetitive practice work

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Overviews, q2: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Overviews|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    • DaySmart Vet: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Overviews|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • Digitail: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Overviews|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  81. Batch tracking or controlled drug tracking

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Perplexity, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 2 source answers; https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 2 source answers; https://www.provet.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  82. Clarity about subscription pricing

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  83. Cloud operation unless offline access is required

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q1: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q1|Claude|1; veterinary-practice-management|q1|Claude|2

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  84. Consolidated reporting across practices

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Mode, q10: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|1; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|2

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    • Shepherd: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|2

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  85. Controlled substance logs and tracking

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1

    https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 1 source answers; https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 1 source answers; https://www.provet.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  86. DICOM imaging connections

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  87. Data recovery procedures

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2

    https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=957322&utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  88. Defined migration record scope

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3

    https://www.eunoiaconsultingco.com/blog/veterinary-pms-data-migration-due-diligence: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  89. Defined restoration time

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  90. Deposits and refunds

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  91. Efficient client and patient intake

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q10: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q10: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|2

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    • Vetspire: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|2

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • ezyVet: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Claude|3

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  92. Export of underlying records or data

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  93. Future price increases

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  94. Individual user accounts

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3

    https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=957322&utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.cisa.gov/small-and-medium-sized-business-resources?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  95. Inventory deductions when medications are dispensed

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  96. Mobile or offline access where required by the practice

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Perplexity, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://todaysveterinarypractice.com/technology/veterinary-practice-software-technology-part-1/: 2 source answers; https://www.ezyvet.com/blog/features-to-look-for-when-buying-veterinary-practice-management-software: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  97. Multiple provider calendars

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  98. Performance under busy or concurrent workloads

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Mode, q3: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q3|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q3|Google AI Mode|3

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    • ezyVet: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q3|Google AI Mode|2; veterinary-practice-management|q3|Google AI Mode|3

      No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  99. Real time clinical status visibility

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q10: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q10: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Claude|3; veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Overviews|1

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    • Covetrus Pulse: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Claude|3

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • Instinct: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Claude|3

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  100. Responsibility for integration failures

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  101. Shared patient records across locations

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  102. Support escalation path

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2

    https://www.aaha.org/trends-magazine/march-2022/ts-software-switch/?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  103. Tested restoration of backed up data

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2

    https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=957322&utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  104. Traceable changes to clinical records

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  105. AI documentation or automated client follow ups

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  106. Automatic inventory deductions from recorded activity

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  107. Batch and lot tracking

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  108. Cancellation conditions

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  109. Charge capture for completed services and dispensed medications

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  110. Client communications filed in the medical record

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  111. Communication with referring clinicians

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  112. Configurable clinical templates

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  113. Contract conditions

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  114. Data export delivery time

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  115. Data export terms

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  116. Defined data exchange direction and timing

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  117. Defined direction of data exchange

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  118. Defined potential data loss during recovery

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  119. Deposits, refunds and partial payments

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  120. Digital body mapping

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  121. Expected support response times

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  122. Financial reporting aligned with veterinary accounting categories

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1

    https://www.aaha.org/resources/chart-of-accounts/?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  123. Handling of integration failures

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  124. Inpatient and hospitalization tracking

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  125. Inventory barcode support

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|2

    https://vetclinictech.com/best-veterinary-practice-management-software-2026/: 1 source answers; https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 1 source answers; https://www.provet.com/blog/best-veterinary-practice-management-software: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  126. Inventory visibility across locations

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Mode, q10: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q10|Google AI Mode|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  127. Low implementation costs

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Mode, q2: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q2|Google AI Mode|2

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  128. Low upfront hardware costs

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Mode, q1: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q1|Google AI Mode|2

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  129. Online prescription refill requests

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  130. Pet owner mobile app

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  131. Predictive billing to reduce missed charges

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  132. Recurring appointment scheduling

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  133. Renewal conditions

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  134. Report export

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  135. Required features available at evaluation time

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  136. Responsibility for migration accuracy or errors

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|2

    https://www.aaha.org/trends-magazine/march-2022/ts-software-switch/?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  137. Responsive customer support

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://www.myhospitalnow.com/blog/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-software-features-pros-cons-comparison/: 1 source answers; https://www.vetport.com/top-10-veterinary-practice-management-softwares: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  138. Testing of backups

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|3

    https://www.cisa.gov/small-and-medium-sized-business-resources?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  139. Usable export of complete medical records and attachments

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers veterinary-practice-management|q9|ChatGPT|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

Download complete category evidence · Download manifest and source hashes

Full checked set, sorted by observed counts, not a ranking.
VendorNamedVendor domain cited
ezyVet115 of 149 valid answers, 77.2% (Wilson 95% interval 69.8% to 83.2%)35 of 149 valid answers, 23.5% (Wilson 95% interval 17.4% to 30.9%)
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo)90 of 149 valid answers, 60.4% (Wilson 95% interval 52.4% to 67.9%)31 of 149 valid answers, 20.8% (Wilson 95% interval 15.1% to 28.0%)
Digitail67 of 149 valid answers, 45.0% (Wilson 95% interval 37.2% to 53.0%)0 of 149 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)
DaySmart Vet57 of 149 valid answers, 38.3% (Wilson 95% interval 30.8% to 46.3%)11 of 149 valid answers, 7.4% (Wilson 95% interval 4.2% to 12.7%)
Shepherd56 of 149 valid answers, 37.6% (Wilson 95% interval 30.2% to 45.6%)34 of 149 valid answers, 22.8% (Wilson 95% interval 16.8% to 30.2%)
Provet54 of 149 valid answers, 36.2% (Wilson 95% interval 29.0% to 44.2%)29 of 149 valid answers, 19.5% (Wilson 95% interval 13.9% to 26.6%)
Covetrus Pulse45 of 149 valid answers, 30.2% (Wilson 95% interval 23.4% to 38.0%)8 of 149 valid answers, 5.4% (Wilson 95% interval 2.7% to 10.2%)
AVImark33 of 149 valid answers, 22.1% (Wilson 95% interval 16.2% to 29.5%)1 of 149 valid answers, 0.7% (Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%)
Vetspire29 of 149 valid answers, 19.5% (Wilson 95% interval 13.9% to 26.6%)3 of 149 valid answers, 2.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%)
Instinct25 of 149 valid answers, 16.8% (Wilson 95% interval 11.6% to 23.6%)23 of 149 valid answers, 15.4% (Wilson 95% interval 10.5% to 22.1%)
ImproMed11 of 149 valid answers, 7.4% (Wilson 95% interval 4.2% to 12.7%)0 of 149 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)
Vetport9 of 149 valid answers, 6.0% (Wilson 95% interval 3.2% to 11.1%)5 of 149 valid answers, 3.4% (Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%)
VIA6 of 149 valid answers, 4.0% (Wilson 95% interval 1.9% to 8.5%)3 of 149 valid answers, 2.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%)
NaVetor4 of 149 valid answers, 2.7% (Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%)0 of 149 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)
VetBadger3 of 149 valid answers, 2.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%)0 of 149 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)
IntraVet2 of 149 valid answers, 1.3% (Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%)0 of 149 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)
ClienTrax0 of 149 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)0 of 149 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)
Onward Vet0 of 149 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)0 of 149 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)
VetlinkPRO0 of 149 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)0 of 149 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)

Pair-specific question and engine records

The comparison records are collected here. Each disclosure contains the full dated counts for its pair or alternatives question. Open a disclosure to read its evidence; the text is present without JavaScript.

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) and ezyVet

Veterinary practice management software · September 2026

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) and ezyVet in the observed answers

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) appears in 90 of 149 answers about veterinary practice management software; ezyVet appears in 115 of 149.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) and ezyVet have different naming counts on 8 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 2 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) record · ezyVet record · Veterinary practice management software checked set.

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) beside ezyVet

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) and ezyVet totals
MeasureIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo)ezyVet
Named90/149; 60.4% (95% CI 52.4 to 67.9)115/149; 77.2% (95% CI 69.8 to 83.2)
Own domain cited31/149; 20.8% (95% CI 15.1 to 28.0)35/149; 23.5% (95% CI 17.4 to 30.9)

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet: question q1

what is the best veterinary practice management software for a new clinic

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 5/15; 33.3% (95% CI 15.2 to 58.3). ezyVet: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) and ezyVet on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / ChatGPTIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / ClaudeIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / PerplexityIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 2 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / Google AI ModeIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet: question q2

what is the best vet practice management software for a small 1 to 3 doctor practice

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 13/14; 92.9% (95% CI 68.5 to 98.7). ezyVet: 7/14; 50.0% (95% CI 26.8 to 73.2).

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) and ezyVet on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / ChatGPTIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 2 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / ClaudeIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / PerplexityIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 3 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 2 of 2; ezyVet: 1 of 2.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / Google AI ModeIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 3 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet: question q3

what is the best veterinary software for a large multi doctor hospital

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 11/15; 73.3% (95% CI 48.0 to 89.1). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) and ezyVet on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / ChatGPTIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / ClaudeIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / PerplexityIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / Google AI ModeIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet: question q4

what are the best alternatives to IDEXX Cornerstone

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) and ezyVet on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / ChatGPTIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / ClaudeIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / PerplexityIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / Google AI ModeIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet: question q5

what are the best alternatives to ezyVet

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) and ezyVet on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / ChatGPTIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / ClaudeIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / PerplexityIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / Google AI ModeIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Covetrus Pulse

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 9/15; 60.0% (95% CI 35.7 to 80.2). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) and ezyVet on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / ChatGPTIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / ClaudeIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / PerplexityIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / Google AI ModeIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet: question q7

ezyVet vs Cornerstone, which is better for a growing practice

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) and ezyVet on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / ChatGPTIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / ClaudeIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / PerplexityIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / Google AI ModeIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet: question q8

Shepherd vs Digitail for a small animal clinic

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0). ezyVet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) and ezyVet on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / ChatGPTIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / ClaudeIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 1 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / PerplexityIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / Google AI ModeIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 3 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet: question q9

what should I look for in veterinary practice management software

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) and ezyVet on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / ChatGPTIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / ClaudeIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / PerplexityIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / Google AI ModeIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet: question q10

best vet software for a multi location emergency hospital

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) and ezyVet on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / ChatGPTIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / ClaudeIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / PerplexityIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ezyVet / Google AI ModeIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo)'s own-domain citation count is 31 of 149; ezyVet's is 35 of 149. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Veterinary practice management software · Exact Veterinary practice management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Covetrus Pulse and ezyVet

Veterinary practice management software · September 2026

Covetrus Pulse and ezyVet in the observed answers

Covetrus Pulse appears in 45 of 149 answers about veterinary practice management software; ezyVet appears in 115 of 149.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Covetrus Pulse and ezyVet have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Covetrus Pulse record · ezyVet record · Veterinary practice management software checked set.

Covetrus Pulse beside ezyVet

Covetrus Pulse and ezyVet totals
MeasureCovetrus PulseezyVet
Named45/149; 30.2% (95% CI 23.4 to 38.0)115/149; 77.2% (95% CI 69.8 to 83.2)
Own domain cited8/149; 5.4% (95% CI 2.7 to 10.2)35/149; 23.5% (95% CI 17.4 to 30.9)

Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet: question q1

what is the best veterinary practice management software for a new clinic

Covetrus Pulse: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). ezyVet: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Covetrus Pulse and ezyVet on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / ChatGPTCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / ClaudeCovetrus Pulse: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / PerplexityCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / Google AI ModeCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet: question q2

what is the best vet practice management software for a small 1 to 3 doctor practice

Covetrus Pulse: 0/14; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 21.5). ezyVet: 7/14; 50.0% (95% CI 26.8 to 73.2).

Covetrus Pulse and ezyVet on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / ChatGPTCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / ClaudeCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / PerplexityCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 2; ezyVet: 1 of 2.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / Google AI ModeCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.

Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet: question q3

what is the best veterinary software for a large multi doctor hospital

Covetrus Pulse: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Covetrus Pulse and ezyVet on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / ChatGPTCovetrus Pulse: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / ClaudeCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / PerplexityCovetrus Pulse: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / Google AI ModeCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet: question q4

what are the best alternatives to IDEXX Cornerstone

Covetrus Pulse: 9/15; 60.0% (95% CI 35.7 to 80.2). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Covetrus Pulse and ezyVet on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / ChatGPTCovetrus Pulse: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / ClaudeCovetrus Pulse: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / PerplexityCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsCovetrus Pulse: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / Google AI ModeCovetrus Pulse: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet: question q5

what are the best alternatives to ezyVet

Covetrus Pulse: 13/15; 86.7% (95% CI 62.1 to 96.3). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Covetrus Pulse and ezyVet on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / ChatGPTCovetrus Pulse: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / ClaudeCovetrus Pulse: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / PerplexityCovetrus Pulse: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsCovetrus Pulse: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / Google AI ModeCovetrus Pulse: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Covetrus Pulse

Covetrus Pulse: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Covetrus Pulse and ezyVet on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / ChatGPTCovetrus Pulse: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / ClaudeCovetrus Pulse: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / PerplexityCovetrus Pulse: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsCovetrus Pulse: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / Google AI ModeCovetrus Pulse: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet: question q7

ezyVet vs Cornerstone, which is better for a growing practice

Covetrus Pulse: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Covetrus Pulse and ezyVet on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / ChatGPTCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / ClaudeCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / PerplexityCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / Google AI ModeCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet: question q8

Shepherd vs Digitail for a small animal clinic

Covetrus Pulse: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). ezyVet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Covetrus Pulse and ezyVet on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / ChatGPTCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / ClaudeCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / PerplexityCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsCovetrus Pulse: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / Google AI ModeCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.

Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet: question q9

what should I look for in veterinary practice management software

Covetrus Pulse: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

Covetrus Pulse and ezyVet on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / ChatGPTCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / ClaudeCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / PerplexityCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / Google AI ModeCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.

Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet: question q10

best vet software for a multi location emergency hospital

Covetrus Pulse: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Covetrus Pulse and ezyVet on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / ChatGPTCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / ClaudeCovetrus Pulse: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / PerplexityCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / Google AI ModeCovetrus Pulse: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Covetrus Pulse's own-domain citation count is 8 of 149; ezyVet's is 35 of 149. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Veterinary practice management software · Exact Veterinary practice management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

AVImark and ezyVet

Veterinary practice management software · September 2026

AVImark and ezyVet in the observed answers

AVImark appears in 33 of 149 answers about veterinary practice management software; ezyVet appears in 115 of 149.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

AVImark and ezyVet have different naming counts on 10 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 0 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. AVImark record · ezyVet record · Veterinary practice management software checked set.

AVImark beside ezyVet

AVImark and ezyVet totals
MeasureAVImarkezyVet
Named33/149; 22.1% (95% CI 16.2 to 29.5)115/149; 77.2% (95% CI 69.8 to 83.2)
Own domain cited1/149; 0.7% (95% CI 0.1 to 3.7)35/149; 23.5% (95% CI 17.4 to 30.9)

AVImark / ezyVet: question q1

what is the best veterinary practice management software for a new clinic

AVImark: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). ezyVet: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

AVImark and ezyVet on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
AVImark / ezyVet / ChatGPTAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / ClaudeAVImark: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / PerplexityAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsAVImark: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / Google AI ModeAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

AVImark / ezyVet: question q2

what is the best vet practice management software for a small 1 to 3 doctor practice

AVImark: 0/14; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 21.5). ezyVet: 7/14; 50.0% (95% CI 26.8 to 73.2).

AVImark and ezyVet on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
AVImark / ezyVet / ChatGPTAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / ClaudeAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / PerplexityAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsAVImark: 0 of 2; ezyVet: 1 of 2.
AVImark / ezyVet / Google AI ModeAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.

AVImark / ezyVet: question q3

what is the best veterinary software for a large multi doctor hospital

AVImark: 6/15; 40.0% (95% CI 19.8 to 64.3). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

AVImark and ezyVet on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
AVImark / ezyVet / ChatGPTAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / ClaudeAVImark: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / PerplexityAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / Google AI ModeAVImark: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

AVImark / ezyVet: question q4

what are the best alternatives to IDEXX Cornerstone

AVImark: 9/15; 60.0% (95% CI 35.7 to 80.2). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

AVImark and ezyVet on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
AVImark / ezyVet / ChatGPTAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / ClaudeAVImark: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / PerplexityAVImark: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsAVImark: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / Google AI ModeAVImark: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

AVImark / ezyVet: question q5

what are the best alternatives to ezyVet

AVImark: 7/15; 46.7% (95% CI 24.8 to 69.9). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

AVImark and ezyVet on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
AVImark / ezyVet / ChatGPTAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / ClaudeAVImark: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / PerplexityAVImark: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / Google AI ModeAVImark: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

AVImark / ezyVet: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Covetrus Pulse

AVImark: 5/15; 33.3% (95% CI 15.2 to 58.3). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

AVImark and ezyVet on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
AVImark / ezyVet / ChatGPTAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / ClaudeAVImark: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / PerplexityAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsAVImark: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / Google AI ModeAVImark: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

AVImark / ezyVet: question q7

ezyVet vs Cornerstone, which is better for a growing practice

AVImark: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

AVImark and ezyVet on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
AVImark / ezyVet / ChatGPTAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / ClaudeAVImark: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / PerplexityAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / Google AI ModeAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

AVImark / ezyVet: question q8

Shepherd vs Digitail for a small animal clinic

AVImark: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). ezyVet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

AVImark and ezyVet on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
AVImark / ezyVet / ChatGPTAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / ClaudeAVImark: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / PerplexityAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / Google AI ModeAVImark: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.

AVImark / ezyVet: question q9

what should I look for in veterinary practice management software

AVImark: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

AVImark and ezyVet on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
AVImark / ezyVet / ChatGPTAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / ClaudeAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / PerplexityAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / Google AI ModeAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.

AVImark / ezyVet: question q10

best vet software for a multi location emergency hospital

AVImark: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

AVImark and ezyVet on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
AVImark / ezyVet / ChatGPTAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / ClaudeAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / PerplexityAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
AVImark / ezyVet / Google AI ModeAVImark: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

AVImark's own-domain citation count is 1 of 149; ezyVet's is 35 of 149. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Veterinary practice management software · Exact Veterinary practice management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

ImproMed and ezyVet

Veterinary practice management software · September 2026

ImproMed and ezyVet in the observed answers

ImproMed appears in 11 of 149 answers about veterinary practice management software; ezyVet appears in 115 of 149.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

ImproMed and ezyVet have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. ImproMed record · ezyVet record · Veterinary practice management software checked set.

ImproMed beside ezyVet

ImproMed and ezyVet totals
MeasureImproMedezyVet
Named11/149; 7.4% (95% CI 4.2 to 12.7)115/149; 77.2% (95% CI 69.8 to 83.2)
Own domain cited0/149; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)35/149; 23.5% (95% CI 17.4 to 30.9)

ImproMed / ezyVet: question q1

what is the best veterinary practice management software for a new clinic

ImproMed: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

ImproMed and ezyVet on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
ImproMed / ezyVet / ChatGPTImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / ClaudeImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / PerplexityImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / Google AI ModeImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

ImproMed / ezyVet: question q2

what is the best vet practice management software for a small 1 to 3 doctor practice

ImproMed: 0/14; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 21.5). ezyVet: 7/14; 50.0% (95% CI 26.8 to 73.2).

ImproMed and ezyVet on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
ImproMed / ezyVet / ChatGPTImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / ClaudeImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / PerplexityImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsImproMed: 0 of 2; ezyVet: 1 of 2.
ImproMed / ezyVet / Google AI ModeImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.

ImproMed / ezyVet: question q3

what is the best veterinary software for a large multi doctor hospital

ImproMed: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

ImproMed and ezyVet on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
ImproMed / ezyVet / ChatGPTImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / ClaudeImproMed: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / PerplexityImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsImproMed: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / Google AI ModeImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

ImproMed / ezyVet: question q4

what are the best alternatives to IDEXX Cornerstone

ImproMed: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

ImproMed and ezyVet on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
ImproMed / ezyVet / ChatGPTImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / ClaudeImproMed: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / PerplexityImproMed: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / Google AI ModeImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

ImproMed / ezyVet: question q5

what are the best alternatives to ezyVet

ImproMed: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

ImproMed and ezyVet on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
ImproMed / ezyVet / ChatGPTImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / ClaudeImproMed: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / PerplexityImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / Google AI ModeImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

ImproMed / ezyVet: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Covetrus Pulse

ImproMed: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

ImproMed and ezyVet on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
ImproMed / ezyVet / ChatGPTImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / ClaudeImproMed: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / PerplexityImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / Google AI ModeImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

ImproMed / ezyVet: question q7

ezyVet vs Cornerstone, which is better for a growing practice

ImproMed: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

ImproMed and ezyVet on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
ImproMed / ezyVet / ChatGPTImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / ClaudeImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / PerplexityImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / Google AI ModeImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

ImproMed / ezyVet: question q8

Shepherd vs Digitail for a small animal clinic

ImproMed: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

ImproMed and ezyVet on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
ImproMed / ezyVet / ChatGPTImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / ClaudeImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / PerplexityImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / Google AI ModeImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.

ImproMed / ezyVet: question q9

what should I look for in veterinary practice management software

ImproMed: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

ImproMed and ezyVet on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
ImproMed / ezyVet / ChatGPTImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / ClaudeImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / PerplexityImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / Google AI ModeImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.

ImproMed / ezyVet: question q10

best vet software for a multi location emergency hospital

ImproMed: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

ImproMed and ezyVet on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
ImproMed / ezyVet / ChatGPTImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / ClaudeImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / PerplexityImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsImproMed: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ImproMed / ezyVet / Google AI ModeImproMed: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

ImproMed's own-domain citation count is 0 of 149; ezyVet's is 35 of 149. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Veterinary practice management software · Exact Veterinary practice management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Provet and ezyVet

Veterinary practice management software · September 2026

Provet and ezyVet in the observed answers

Provet appears in 54 of 149 answers about veterinary practice management software; ezyVet appears in 115 of 149.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Provet and ezyVet have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Provet record · ezyVet record · Veterinary practice management software checked set.

Provet beside ezyVet

Provet and ezyVet totals
MeasureProvetezyVet
Named54/149; 36.2% (95% CI 29.0 to 44.2)115/149; 77.2% (95% CI 69.8 to 83.2)
Own domain cited29/149; 19.5% (95% CI 13.9 to 26.6)35/149; 23.5% (95% CI 17.4 to 30.9)

Provet / ezyVet: question q1

what is the best veterinary practice management software for a new clinic

Provet: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). ezyVet: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Provet and ezyVet on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
Provet / ezyVet / ChatGPTProvet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / ClaudeProvet: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / PerplexityProvet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsProvet: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeProvet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Provet / ezyVet: question q2

what is the best vet practice management software for a small 1 to 3 doctor practice

Provet: 1/14; 7.1% (95% CI 1.3 to 31.5). ezyVet: 7/14; 50.0% (95% CI 26.8 to 73.2).

Provet and ezyVet on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
Provet / ezyVet / ChatGPTProvet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / ClaudeProvet: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / PerplexityProvet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsProvet: 0 of 2; ezyVet: 1 of 2.
Provet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeProvet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.

Provet / ezyVet: question q3

what is the best veterinary software for a large multi doctor hospital

Provet: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Provet and ezyVet on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
Provet / ezyVet / ChatGPTProvet: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / ClaudeProvet: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / PerplexityProvet: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsProvet: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeProvet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Provet / ezyVet: question q4

what are the best alternatives to IDEXX Cornerstone

Provet: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Provet and ezyVet on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
Provet / ezyVet / ChatGPTProvet: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / ClaudeProvet: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / PerplexityProvet: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsProvet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeProvet: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Provet / ezyVet: question q5

what are the best alternatives to ezyVet

Provet: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Provet and ezyVet on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
Provet / ezyVet / ChatGPTProvet: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / ClaudeProvet: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / PerplexityProvet: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsProvet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeProvet: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Provet / ezyVet: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Covetrus Pulse

Provet: 6/15; 40.0% (95% CI 19.8 to 64.3). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Provet and ezyVet on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
Provet / ezyVet / ChatGPTProvet: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / ClaudeProvet: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / PerplexityProvet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsProvet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeProvet: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Provet / ezyVet: question q7

ezyVet vs Cornerstone, which is better for a growing practice

Provet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Provet and ezyVet on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
Provet / ezyVet / ChatGPTProvet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / ClaudeProvet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / PerplexityProvet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsProvet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeProvet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Provet / ezyVet: question q8

Shepherd vs Digitail for a small animal clinic

Provet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Provet and ezyVet on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
Provet / ezyVet / ChatGPTProvet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / ClaudeProvet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / PerplexityProvet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsProvet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeProvet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.

Provet / ezyVet: question q9

what should I look for in veterinary practice management software

Provet: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). ezyVet: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

Provet and ezyVet on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
Provet / ezyVet / ChatGPTProvet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / ClaudeProvet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / PerplexityProvet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsProvet: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeProvet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.

Provet / ezyVet: question q10

best vet software for a multi location emergency hospital

Provet: 13/15; 86.7% (95% CI 62.1 to 96.3). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Provet and ezyVet on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
Provet / ezyVet / ChatGPTProvet: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / ClaudeProvet: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / PerplexityProvet: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsProvet: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Provet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeProvet: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Provet's own-domain citation count is 29 of 149; ezyVet's is 35 of 149. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Veterinary practice management software · Exact Veterinary practice management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Shepherd and ezyVet

Veterinary practice management software · September 2026

Shepherd and ezyVet in the observed answers

Shepherd appears in 56 of 149 answers about veterinary practice management software; ezyVet appears in 115 of 149.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Shepherd and ezyVet have different naming counts on 10 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 0 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Shepherd record · ezyVet record · Veterinary practice management software checked set.

Shepherd beside ezyVet

Shepherd and ezyVet totals
MeasureShepherdezyVet
Named56/149; 37.6% (95% CI 30.2 to 45.6)115/149; 77.2% (95% CI 69.8 to 83.2)
Own domain cited34/149; 22.8% (95% CI 16.8 to 30.2)35/149; 23.5% (95% CI 17.4 to 30.9)

Shepherd / ezyVet: question q1

what is the best veterinary practice management software for a new clinic

Shepherd: 5/15; 33.3% (95% CI 15.2 to 58.3). ezyVet: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Shepherd and ezyVet on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
Shepherd / ezyVet / ChatGPTShepherd: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / ClaudeShepherd: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / PerplexityShepherd: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsShepherd: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / Google AI ModeShepherd: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Shepherd / ezyVet: question q2

what is the best vet practice management software for a small 1 to 3 doctor practice

Shepherd: 6/14; 42.9% (95% CI 21.4 to 67.4). ezyVet: 7/14; 50.0% (95% CI 26.8 to 73.2).

Shepherd and ezyVet on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
Shepherd / ezyVet / ChatGPTShepherd: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / ClaudeShepherd: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / PerplexityShepherd: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsShepherd: 2 of 2; ezyVet: 1 of 2.
Shepherd / ezyVet / Google AI ModeShepherd: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.

Shepherd / ezyVet: question q3

what is the best veterinary software for a large multi doctor hospital

Shepherd: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Shepherd and ezyVet on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
Shepherd / ezyVet / ChatGPTShepherd: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / ClaudeShepherd: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / PerplexityShepherd: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsShepherd: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / Google AI ModeShepherd: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Shepherd / ezyVet: question q4

what are the best alternatives to IDEXX Cornerstone

Shepherd: 9/15; 60.0% (95% CI 35.7 to 80.2). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Shepherd and ezyVet on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
Shepherd / ezyVet / ChatGPTShepherd: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / ClaudeShepherd: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / PerplexityShepherd: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsShepherd: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / Google AI ModeShepherd: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Shepherd / ezyVet: question q5

what are the best alternatives to ezyVet

Shepherd: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Shepherd and ezyVet on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
Shepherd / ezyVet / ChatGPTShepherd: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / ClaudeShepherd: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / PerplexityShepherd: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsShepherd: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / Google AI ModeShepherd: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Shepherd / ezyVet: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Covetrus Pulse

Shepherd: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Shepherd and ezyVet on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
Shepherd / ezyVet / ChatGPTShepherd: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / ClaudeShepherd: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / PerplexityShepherd: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsShepherd: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / Google AI ModeShepherd: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Shepherd / ezyVet: question q7

ezyVet vs Cornerstone, which is better for a growing practice

Shepherd: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Shepherd and ezyVet on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
Shepherd / ezyVet / ChatGPTShepherd: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / ClaudeShepherd: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / PerplexityShepherd: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsShepherd: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / Google AI ModeShepherd: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Shepherd / ezyVet: question q8

Shepherd vs Digitail for a small animal clinic

Shepherd: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8). ezyVet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Shepherd and ezyVet on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
Shepherd / ezyVet / ChatGPTShepherd: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / ClaudeShepherd: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / PerplexityShepherd: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsShepherd: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / Google AI ModeShepherd: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.

Shepherd / ezyVet: question q9

what should I look for in veterinary practice management software

Shepherd: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

Shepherd and ezyVet on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
Shepherd / ezyVet / ChatGPTShepherd: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / ClaudeShepherd: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / PerplexityShepherd: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsShepherd: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / Google AI ModeShepherd: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.

Shepherd / ezyVet: question q10

best vet software for a multi location emergency hospital

Shepherd: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Shepherd and ezyVet on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
Shepherd / ezyVet / ChatGPTShepherd: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / ClaudeShepherd: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / PerplexityShepherd: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsShepherd: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Shepherd / ezyVet / Google AI ModeShepherd: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Shepherd's own-domain citation count is 34 of 149; ezyVet's is 35 of 149. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Veterinary practice management software · Exact Veterinary practice management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Digitail and ezyVet

Veterinary practice management software · September 2026

Digitail and ezyVet in the observed answers

Digitail appears in 67 of 149 answers about veterinary practice management software; ezyVet appears in 115 of 149.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Digitail and ezyVet have different naming counts on 10 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 0 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Digitail record · ezyVet record · Veterinary practice management software checked set.

Digitail beside ezyVet

Digitail and ezyVet totals
MeasureDigitailezyVet
Named67/149; 45.0% (95% CI 37.2 to 53.0)115/149; 77.2% (95% CI 69.8 to 83.2)
Own domain cited0/149; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)35/149; 23.5% (95% CI 17.4 to 30.9)

Digitail / ezyVet: question q1

what is the best veterinary practice management software for a new clinic

Digitail: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0). ezyVet: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Digitail and ezyVet on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
Digitail / ezyVet / ChatGPTDigitail: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / ClaudeDigitail: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / PerplexityDigitail: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsDigitail: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / Google AI ModeDigitail: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Digitail / ezyVet: question q2

what is the best vet practice management software for a small 1 to 3 doctor practice

Digitail: 9/14; 64.3% (95% CI 38.8 to 83.7). ezyVet: 7/14; 50.0% (95% CI 26.8 to 73.2).

Digitail and ezyVet on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
Digitail / ezyVet / ChatGPTDigitail: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / ClaudeDigitail: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / PerplexityDigitail: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsDigitail: 1 of 2; ezyVet: 1 of 2.
Digitail / ezyVet / Google AI ModeDigitail: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.

Digitail / ezyVet: question q3

what is the best veterinary software for a large multi doctor hospital

Digitail: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Digitail and ezyVet on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
Digitail / ezyVet / ChatGPTDigitail: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / ClaudeDigitail: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / PerplexityDigitail: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsDigitail: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / Google AI ModeDigitail: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Digitail / ezyVet: question q4

what are the best alternatives to IDEXX Cornerstone

Digitail: 8/15; 53.3% (95% CI 30.1 to 75.2). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Digitail and ezyVet on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
Digitail / ezyVet / ChatGPTDigitail: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / ClaudeDigitail: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / PerplexityDigitail: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsDigitail: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / Google AI ModeDigitail: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Digitail / ezyVet: question q5

what are the best alternatives to ezyVet

Digitail: 11/15; 73.3% (95% CI 48.0 to 89.1). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Digitail and ezyVet on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
Digitail / ezyVet / ChatGPTDigitail: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / ClaudeDigitail: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / PerplexityDigitail: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsDigitail: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / Google AI ModeDigitail: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Digitail / ezyVet: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Covetrus Pulse

Digitail: 7/15; 46.7% (95% CI 24.8 to 69.9). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Digitail and ezyVet on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
Digitail / ezyVet / ChatGPTDigitail: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / ClaudeDigitail: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / PerplexityDigitail: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsDigitail: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / Google AI ModeDigitail: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Digitail / ezyVet: question q7

ezyVet vs Cornerstone, which is better for a growing practice

Digitail: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Digitail and ezyVet on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
Digitail / ezyVet / ChatGPTDigitail: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / ClaudeDigitail: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / PerplexityDigitail: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsDigitail: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / Google AI ModeDigitail: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Digitail / ezyVet: question q8

Shepherd vs Digitail for a small animal clinic

Digitail: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0). ezyVet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Digitail and ezyVet on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
Digitail / ezyVet / ChatGPTDigitail: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / ClaudeDigitail: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / PerplexityDigitail: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsDigitail: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / Google AI ModeDigitail: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.

Digitail / ezyVet: question q9

what should I look for in veterinary practice management software

Digitail: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). ezyVet: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

Digitail and ezyVet on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
Digitail / ezyVet / ChatGPTDigitail: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / ClaudeDigitail: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / PerplexityDigitail: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsDigitail: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / Google AI ModeDigitail: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.

Digitail / ezyVet: question q10

best vet software for a multi location emergency hospital

Digitail: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Digitail and ezyVet on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
Digitail / ezyVet / ChatGPTDigitail: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / ClaudeDigitail: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / PerplexityDigitail: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsDigitail: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Digitail / ezyVet / Google AI ModeDigitail: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Digitail's own-domain citation count is 0 of 149; ezyVet's is 35 of 149. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Veterinary practice management software · Exact Veterinary practice management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

DaySmart Vet and ezyVet

Veterinary practice management software · September 2026

DaySmart Vet and ezyVet in the observed answers

DaySmart Vet appears in 57 of 149 answers about veterinary practice management software; ezyVet appears in 115 of 149.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

DaySmart Vet and ezyVet have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. DaySmart Vet record · ezyVet record · Veterinary practice management software checked set.

DaySmart Vet beside ezyVet

DaySmart Vet and ezyVet totals
MeasureDaySmart VetezyVet
Named57/149; 38.3% (95% CI 30.8 to 46.3)115/149; 77.2% (95% CI 69.8 to 83.2)
Own domain cited11/149; 7.4% (95% CI 4.2 to 12.7)35/149; 23.5% (95% CI 17.4 to 30.9)

DaySmart Vet / ezyVet: question q1

what is the best veterinary practice management software for a new clinic

DaySmart Vet: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8). ezyVet: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

DaySmart Vet and ezyVet on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / ChatGPTDaySmart Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / ClaudeDaySmart Vet: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / PerplexityDaySmart Vet: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsDaySmart Vet: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeDaySmart Vet: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

DaySmart Vet / ezyVet: question q2

what is the best vet practice management software for a small 1 to 3 doctor practice

DaySmart Vet: 14/14; 100.0% (95% CI 78.5 to 100.0). ezyVet: 7/14; 50.0% (95% CI 26.8 to 73.2).

DaySmart Vet and ezyVet on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / ChatGPTDaySmart Vet: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / ClaudeDaySmart Vet: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / PerplexityDaySmart Vet: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsDaySmart Vet: 2 of 2; ezyVet: 1 of 2.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeDaySmart Vet: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.

DaySmart Vet / ezyVet: question q3

what is the best veterinary software for a large multi doctor hospital

DaySmart Vet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

DaySmart Vet and ezyVet on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / ChatGPTDaySmart Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / ClaudeDaySmart Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / PerplexityDaySmart Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsDaySmart Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeDaySmart Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

DaySmart Vet / ezyVet: question q4

what are the best alternatives to IDEXX Cornerstone

DaySmart Vet: 5/15; 33.3% (95% CI 15.2 to 58.3). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

DaySmart Vet and ezyVet on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / ChatGPTDaySmart Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / ClaudeDaySmart Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / PerplexityDaySmart Vet: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsDaySmart Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeDaySmart Vet: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

DaySmart Vet / ezyVet: question q5

what are the best alternatives to ezyVet

DaySmart Vet: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

DaySmart Vet and ezyVet on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / ChatGPTDaySmart Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / ClaudeDaySmart Vet: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / PerplexityDaySmart Vet: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsDaySmart Vet: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeDaySmart Vet: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

DaySmart Vet / ezyVet: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Covetrus Pulse

DaySmart Vet: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

DaySmart Vet and ezyVet on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / ChatGPTDaySmart Vet: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / ClaudeDaySmart Vet: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / PerplexityDaySmart Vet: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsDaySmart Vet: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeDaySmart Vet: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

DaySmart Vet / ezyVet: question q7

ezyVet vs Cornerstone, which is better for a growing practice

DaySmart Vet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

DaySmart Vet and ezyVet on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / ChatGPTDaySmart Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / ClaudeDaySmart Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / PerplexityDaySmart Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsDaySmart Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeDaySmart Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

DaySmart Vet / ezyVet: question q8

Shepherd vs Digitail for a small animal clinic

DaySmart Vet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

DaySmart Vet and ezyVet on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / ChatGPTDaySmart Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / ClaudeDaySmart Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / PerplexityDaySmart Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsDaySmart Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeDaySmart Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.

DaySmart Vet / ezyVet: question q9

what should I look for in veterinary practice management software

DaySmart Vet: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). ezyVet: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

DaySmart Vet and ezyVet on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / ChatGPTDaySmart Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / ClaudeDaySmart Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / PerplexityDaySmart Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsDaySmart Vet: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeDaySmart Vet: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.

DaySmart Vet / ezyVet: question q10

best vet software for a multi location emergency hospital

DaySmart Vet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

DaySmart Vet and ezyVet on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / ChatGPTDaySmart Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / ClaudeDaySmart Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / PerplexityDaySmart Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsDaySmart Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
DaySmart Vet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeDaySmart Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

DaySmart Vet's own-domain citation count is 11 of 149; ezyVet's is 35 of 149. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Veterinary practice management software · Exact Veterinary practice management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

NaVetor and ezyVet

Veterinary practice management software · September 2026

NaVetor and ezyVet in the observed answers

NaVetor appears in 4 of 149 answers about veterinary practice management software; ezyVet appears in 115 of 149.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

NaVetor and ezyVet have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. NaVetor record · ezyVet record · Veterinary practice management software checked set.

NaVetor beside ezyVet

NaVetor and ezyVet totals
MeasureNaVetorezyVet
Named4/149; 2.7% (95% CI 1.0 to 6.7)115/149; 77.2% (95% CI 69.8 to 83.2)
Own domain cited0/149; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)35/149; 23.5% (95% CI 17.4 to 30.9)

NaVetor / ezyVet: question q1

what is the best veterinary practice management software for a new clinic

NaVetor: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

NaVetor and ezyVet on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
NaVetor / ezyVet / ChatGPTNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / ClaudeNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / PerplexityNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / Google AI ModeNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

NaVetor / ezyVet: question q2

what is the best vet practice management software for a small 1 to 3 doctor practice

NaVetor: 0/14; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 21.5). ezyVet: 7/14; 50.0% (95% CI 26.8 to 73.2).

NaVetor and ezyVet on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
NaVetor / ezyVet / ChatGPTNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / ClaudeNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / PerplexityNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsNaVetor: 0 of 2; ezyVet: 1 of 2.
NaVetor / ezyVet / Google AI ModeNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.

NaVetor / ezyVet: question q3

what is the best veterinary software for a large multi doctor hospital

NaVetor: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

NaVetor and ezyVet on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
NaVetor / ezyVet / ChatGPTNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / ClaudeNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / PerplexityNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / Google AI ModeNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

NaVetor / ezyVet: question q4

what are the best alternatives to IDEXX Cornerstone

NaVetor: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

NaVetor and ezyVet on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
NaVetor / ezyVet / ChatGPTNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / ClaudeNaVetor: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / PerplexityNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / Google AI ModeNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

NaVetor / ezyVet: question q5

what are the best alternatives to ezyVet

NaVetor: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

NaVetor and ezyVet on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
NaVetor / ezyVet / ChatGPTNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / ClaudeNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / PerplexityNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / Google AI ModeNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

NaVetor / ezyVet: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Covetrus Pulse

NaVetor: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

NaVetor and ezyVet on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
NaVetor / ezyVet / ChatGPTNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / ClaudeNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / PerplexityNaVetor: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / Google AI ModeNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

NaVetor / ezyVet: question q7

ezyVet vs Cornerstone, which is better for a growing practice

NaVetor: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

NaVetor and ezyVet on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
NaVetor / ezyVet / ChatGPTNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / ClaudeNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / PerplexityNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / Google AI ModeNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

NaVetor / ezyVet: question q8

Shepherd vs Digitail for a small animal clinic

NaVetor: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

NaVetor and ezyVet on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
NaVetor / ezyVet / ChatGPTNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / ClaudeNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / PerplexityNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / Google AI ModeNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.

NaVetor / ezyVet: question q9

what should I look for in veterinary practice management software

NaVetor: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

NaVetor and ezyVet on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
NaVetor / ezyVet / ChatGPTNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / ClaudeNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / PerplexityNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / Google AI ModeNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.

NaVetor / ezyVet: question q10

best vet software for a multi location emergency hospital

NaVetor: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

NaVetor and ezyVet on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
NaVetor / ezyVet / ChatGPTNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / ClaudeNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / PerplexityNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
NaVetor / ezyVet / Google AI ModeNaVetor: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

NaVetor's own-domain citation count is 0 of 149; ezyVet's is 35 of 149. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Veterinary practice management software · Exact Veterinary practice management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

IntraVet and ezyVet

Veterinary practice management software · September 2026

IntraVet and ezyVet in the observed answers

IntraVet appears in 2 of 149 answers about veterinary practice management software; ezyVet appears in 115 of 149.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

IntraVet and ezyVet have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. IntraVet record · ezyVet record · Veterinary practice management software checked set.

IntraVet beside ezyVet

IntraVet and ezyVet totals
MeasureIntraVetezyVet
Named2/149; 1.3% (95% CI 0.4 to 4.8)115/149; 77.2% (95% CI 69.8 to 83.2)
Own domain cited0/149; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)35/149; 23.5% (95% CI 17.4 to 30.9)

IntraVet / ezyVet: question q1

what is the best veterinary practice management software for a new clinic

IntraVet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

IntraVet and ezyVet on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
IntraVet / ezyVet / ChatGPTIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / ClaudeIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / PerplexityIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

IntraVet / ezyVet: question q2

what is the best vet practice management software for a small 1 to 3 doctor practice

IntraVet: 0/14; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 21.5). ezyVet: 7/14; 50.0% (95% CI 26.8 to 73.2).

IntraVet and ezyVet on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
IntraVet / ezyVet / ChatGPTIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / ClaudeIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / PerplexityIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsIntraVet: 0 of 2; ezyVet: 1 of 2.
IntraVet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.

IntraVet / ezyVet: question q3

what is the best veterinary software for a large multi doctor hospital

IntraVet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

IntraVet and ezyVet on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
IntraVet / ezyVet / ChatGPTIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / ClaudeIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / PerplexityIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

IntraVet / ezyVet: question q4

what are the best alternatives to IDEXX Cornerstone

IntraVet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

IntraVet and ezyVet on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
IntraVet / ezyVet / ChatGPTIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / ClaudeIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / PerplexityIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

IntraVet / ezyVet: question q5

what are the best alternatives to ezyVet

IntraVet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

IntraVet and ezyVet on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
IntraVet / ezyVet / ChatGPTIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / ClaudeIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / PerplexityIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

IntraVet / ezyVet: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Covetrus Pulse

IntraVet: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

IntraVet and ezyVet on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
IntraVet / ezyVet / ChatGPTIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / ClaudeIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / PerplexityIntraVet: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

IntraVet / ezyVet: question q7

ezyVet vs Cornerstone, which is better for a growing practice

IntraVet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

IntraVet and ezyVet on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
IntraVet / ezyVet / ChatGPTIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / ClaudeIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / PerplexityIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

IntraVet / ezyVet: question q8

Shepherd vs Digitail for a small animal clinic

IntraVet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

IntraVet and ezyVet on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
IntraVet / ezyVet / ChatGPTIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / ClaudeIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / PerplexityIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.

IntraVet / ezyVet: question q9

what should I look for in veterinary practice management software

IntraVet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

IntraVet and ezyVet on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
IntraVet / ezyVet / ChatGPTIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / ClaudeIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / PerplexityIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.

IntraVet / ezyVet: question q10

best vet software for a multi location emergency hospital

IntraVet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

IntraVet and ezyVet on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
IntraVet / ezyVet / ChatGPTIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / ClaudeIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / PerplexityIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
IntraVet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeIntraVet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

IntraVet's own-domain citation count is 0 of 149; ezyVet's is 35 of 149. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Veterinary practice management software · Exact Veterinary practice management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Vetspire and ezyVet

Veterinary practice management software · September 2026

Vetspire and ezyVet in the observed answers

Vetspire appears in 29 of 149 answers about veterinary practice management software; ezyVet appears in 115 of 149.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Vetspire and ezyVet have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Vetspire record · ezyVet record · Veterinary practice management software checked set.

Vetspire beside ezyVet

Vetspire and ezyVet totals
MeasureVetspireezyVet
Named29/149; 19.5% (95% CI 13.9 to 26.6)115/149; 77.2% (95% CI 69.8 to 83.2)
Own domain cited3/149; 2.0% (95% CI 0.7 to 5.8)35/149; 23.5% (95% CI 17.4 to 30.9)

Vetspire / ezyVet: question q1

what is the best veterinary practice management software for a new clinic

Vetspire: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). ezyVet: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Vetspire and ezyVet on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
Vetspire / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / ClaudeVetspire: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / PerplexityVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetspire: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Vetspire / ezyVet: question q2

what is the best vet practice management software for a small 1 to 3 doctor practice

Vetspire: 1/14; 7.1% (95% CI 1.3 to 31.5). ezyVet: 7/14; 50.0% (95% CI 26.8 to 73.2).

Vetspire and ezyVet on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
Vetspire / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / ClaudeVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / PerplexityVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetspire: 0 of 2; ezyVet: 1 of 2.
Vetspire / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetspire: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.

Vetspire / ezyVet: question q3

what is the best veterinary software for a large multi doctor hospital

Vetspire: 9/15; 60.0% (95% CI 35.7 to 80.2). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Vetspire and ezyVet on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
Vetspire / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetspire: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / ClaudeVetspire: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / PerplexityVetspire: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetspire: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetspire: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Vetspire / ezyVet: question q4

what are the best alternatives to IDEXX Cornerstone

Vetspire: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Vetspire and ezyVet on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
Vetspire / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / ClaudeVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / PerplexityVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetspire: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Vetspire / ezyVet: question q5

what are the best alternatives to ezyVet

Vetspire: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Vetspire and ezyVet on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
Vetspire / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetspire: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / ClaudeVetspire: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / PerplexityVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetspire: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Vetspire / ezyVet: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Covetrus Pulse

Vetspire: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Vetspire and ezyVet on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
Vetspire / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / ClaudeVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / PerplexityVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Vetspire / ezyVet: question q7

ezyVet vs Cornerstone, which is better for a growing practice

Vetspire: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Vetspire and ezyVet on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
Vetspire / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / ClaudeVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / PerplexityVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Vetspire / ezyVet: question q8

Shepherd vs Digitail for a small animal clinic

Vetspire: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Vetspire and ezyVet on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
Vetspire / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / ClaudeVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / PerplexityVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.

Vetspire / ezyVet: question q9

what should I look for in veterinary practice management software

Vetspire: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). ezyVet: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

Vetspire and ezyVet on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
Vetspire / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / ClaudeVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / PerplexityVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetspire: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.

Vetspire / ezyVet: question q10

best vet software for a multi location emergency hospital

Vetspire: 11/15; 73.3% (95% CI 48.0 to 89.1). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Vetspire and ezyVet on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
Vetspire / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetspire: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / ClaudeVetspire: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / PerplexityVetspire: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetspire: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetspire / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetspire: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Vetspire's own-domain citation count is 3 of 149; ezyVet's is 35 of 149. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Veterinary practice management software · Exact Veterinary practice management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

ClienTrax and ezyVet

Veterinary practice management software · September 2026

ClienTrax and ezyVet in the observed answers

ClienTrax appears in 0 of 149 answers about veterinary practice management software; ezyVet appears in 115 of 149.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

ClienTrax and ezyVet have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. ClienTrax record · ezyVet record · Veterinary practice management software checked set.

ClienTrax beside ezyVet

ClienTrax and ezyVet totals
MeasureClienTraxezyVet
Named0/149; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)115/149; 77.2% (95% CI 69.8 to 83.2)
Own domain cited0/149; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)35/149; 23.5% (95% CI 17.4 to 30.9)

ClienTrax / ezyVet: question q1

what is the best veterinary practice management software for a new clinic

ClienTrax: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

ClienTrax and ezyVet on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
ClienTrax / ezyVet / ChatGPTClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / ClaudeClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / PerplexityClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / Google AI ModeClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

ClienTrax / ezyVet: question q2

what is the best vet practice management software for a small 1 to 3 doctor practice

ClienTrax: 0/14; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 21.5). ezyVet: 7/14; 50.0% (95% CI 26.8 to 73.2).

ClienTrax and ezyVet on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
ClienTrax / ezyVet / ChatGPTClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / ClaudeClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / PerplexityClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsClienTrax: 0 of 2; ezyVet: 1 of 2.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / Google AI ModeClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.

ClienTrax / ezyVet: question q3

what is the best veterinary software for a large multi doctor hospital

ClienTrax: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

ClienTrax and ezyVet on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
ClienTrax / ezyVet / ChatGPTClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / ClaudeClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / PerplexityClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / Google AI ModeClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

ClienTrax / ezyVet: question q4

what are the best alternatives to IDEXX Cornerstone

ClienTrax: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

ClienTrax and ezyVet on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
ClienTrax / ezyVet / ChatGPTClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / ClaudeClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / PerplexityClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / Google AI ModeClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

ClienTrax / ezyVet: question q5

what are the best alternatives to ezyVet

ClienTrax: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

ClienTrax and ezyVet on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
ClienTrax / ezyVet / ChatGPTClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / ClaudeClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / PerplexityClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / Google AI ModeClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

ClienTrax / ezyVet: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Covetrus Pulse

ClienTrax: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

ClienTrax and ezyVet on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
ClienTrax / ezyVet / ChatGPTClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / ClaudeClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / PerplexityClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / Google AI ModeClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

ClienTrax / ezyVet: question q7

ezyVet vs Cornerstone, which is better for a growing practice

ClienTrax: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

ClienTrax and ezyVet on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
ClienTrax / ezyVet / ChatGPTClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / ClaudeClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / PerplexityClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / Google AI ModeClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

ClienTrax / ezyVet: question q8

Shepherd vs Digitail for a small animal clinic

ClienTrax: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

ClienTrax and ezyVet on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
ClienTrax / ezyVet / ChatGPTClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / ClaudeClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / PerplexityClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / Google AI ModeClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.

ClienTrax / ezyVet: question q9

what should I look for in veterinary practice management software

ClienTrax: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

ClienTrax and ezyVet on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
ClienTrax / ezyVet / ChatGPTClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / ClaudeClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / PerplexityClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / Google AI ModeClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.

ClienTrax / ezyVet: question q10

best vet software for a multi location emergency hospital

ClienTrax: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

ClienTrax and ezyVet on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
ClienTrax / ezyVet / ChatGPTClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / ClaudeClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / PerplexityClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
ClienTrax / ezyVet / Google AI ModeClienTrax: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

ClienTrax's own-domain citation count is 0 of 149; ezyVet's is 35 of 149. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Veterinary practice management software · Exact Veterinary practice management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Instinct and ezyVet

Veterinary practice management software · September 2026

Instinct and ezyVet in the observed answers

Instinct appears in 25 of 149 answers about veterinary practice management software; ezyVet appears in 115 of 149.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Instinct and ezyVet have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Instinct record · ezyVet record · Veterinary practice management software checked set.

Instinct beside ezyVet

Instinct and ezyVet totals
MeasureInstinctezyVet
Named25/149; 16.8% (95% CI 11.6 to 23.6)115/149; 77.2% (95% CI 69.8 to 83.2)
Own domain cited23/149; 15.4% (95% CI 10.5 to 22.1)35/149; 23.5% (95% CI 17.4 to 30.9)

Instinct / ezyVet: question q1

what is the best veterinary practice management software for a new clinic

Instinct: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). ezyVet: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Instinct and ezyVet on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
Instinct / ezyVet / ChatGPTInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / ClaudeInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / PerplexityInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsInstinct: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / Google AI ModeInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Instinct / ezyVet: question q2

what is the best vet practice management software for a small 1 to 3 doctor practice

Instinct: 0/14; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 21.5). ezyVet: 7/14; 50.0% (95% CI 26.8 to 73.2).

Instinct and ezyVet on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
Instinct / ezyVet / ChatGPTInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / ClaudeInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / PerplexityInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsInstinct: 0 of 2; ezyVet: 1 of 2.
Instinct / ezyVet / Google AI ModeInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.

Instinct / ezyVet: question q3

what is the best veterinary software for a large multi doctor hospital

Instinct: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Instinct and ezyVet on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
Instinct / ezyVet / ChatGPTInstinct: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / ClaudeInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / PerplexityInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / Google AI ModeInstinct: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Instinct / ezyVet: question q4

what are the best alternatives to IDEXX Cornerstone

Instinct: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Instinct and ezyVet on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
Instinct / ezyVet / ChatGPTInstinct: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / ClaudeInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / PerplexityInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / Google AI ModeInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Instinct / ezyVet: question q5

what are the best alternatives to ezyVet

Instinct: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Instinct and ezyVet on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
Instinct / ezyVet / ChatGPTInstinct: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / ClaudeInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / PerplexityInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / Google AI ModeInstinct: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Instinct / ezyVet: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Covetrus Pulse

Instinct: 6/15; 40.0% (95% CI 19.8 to 64.3). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Instinct and ezyVet on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
Instinct / ezyVet / ChatGPTInstinct: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / ClaudeInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / PerplexityInstinct: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsInstinct: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / Google AI ModeInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Instinct / ezyVet: question q7

ezyVet vs Cornerstone, which is better for a growing practice

Instinct: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Instinct and ezyVet on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
Instinct / ezyVet / ChatGPTInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / ClaudeInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / PerplexityInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / Google AI ModeInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Instinct / ezyVet: question q8

Shepherd vs Digitail for a small animal clinic

Instinct: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Instinct and ezyVet on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
Instinct / ezyVet / ChatGPTInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / ClaudeInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / PerplexityInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / Google AI ModeInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.

Instinct / ezyVet: question q9

what should I look for in veterinary practice management software

Instinct: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

Instinct and ezyVet on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
Instinct / ezyVet / ChatGPTInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / ClaudeInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / PerplexityInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / Google AI ModeInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.

Instinct / ezyVet: question q10

best vet software for a multi location emergency hospital

Instinct: 9/15; 60.0% (95% CI 35.7 to 80.2). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Instinct and ezyVet on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
Instinct / ezyVet / ChatGPTInstinct: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / ClaudeInstinct: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / PerplexityInstinct: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsInstinct: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Instinct / ezyVet / Google AI ModeInstinct: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Instinct's own-domain citation count is 23 of 149; ezyVet's is 35 of 149. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Veterinary practice management software · Exact Veterinary practice management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

VetBadger and ezyVet

Veterinary practice management software · September 2026

VetBadger and ezyVet in the observed answers

VetBadger appears in 3 of 149 answers about veterinary practice management software; ezyVet appears in 115 of 149.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

VetBadger and ezyVet have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. VetBadger record · ezyVet record · Veterinary practice management software checked set.

VetBadger beside ezyVet

VetBadger and ezyVet totals
MeasureVetBadgerezyVet
Named3/149; 2.0% (95% CI 0.7 to 5.8)115/149; 77.2% (95% CI 69.8 to 83.2)
Own domain cited0/149; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)35/149; 23.5% (95% CI 17.4 to 30.9)

VetBadger / ezyVet: question q1

what is the best veterinary practice management software for a new clinic

VetBadger: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

VetBadger and ezyVet on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
VetBadger / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / ClaudeVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / PerplexityVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

VetBadger / ezyVet: question q2

what is the best vet practice management software for a small 1 to 3 doctor practice

VetBadger: 0/14; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 21.5). ezyVet: 7/14; 50.0% (95% CI 26.8 to 73.2).

VetBadger and ezyVet on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
VetBadger / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / ClaudeVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / PerplexityVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetBadger: 0 of 2; ezyVet: 1 of 2.
VetBadger / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.

VetBadger / ezyVet: question q3

what is the best veterinary software for a large multi doctor hospital

VetBadger: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

VetBadger and ezyVet on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
VetBadger / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / ClaudeVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / PerplexityVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

VetBadger / ezyVet: question q4

what are the best alternatives to IDEXX Cornerstone

VetBadger: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

VetBadger and ezyVet on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
VetBadger / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / ClaudeVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / PerplexityVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

VetBadger / ezyVet: question q5

what are the best alternatives to ezyVet

VetBadger: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

VetBadger and ezyVet on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
VetBadger / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / ClaudeVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / PerplexityVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

VetBadger / ezyVet: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Covetrus Pulse

VetBadger: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

VetBadger and ezyVet on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
VetBadger / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / ClaudeVetBadger: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / PerplexityVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

VetBadger / ezyVet: question q7

ezyVet vs Cornerstone, which is better for a growing practice

VetBadger: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

VetBadger and ezyVet on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
VetBadger / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / ClaudeVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / PerplexityVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

VetBadger / ezyVet: question q8

Shepherd vs Digitail for a small animal clinic

VetBadger: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

VetBadger and ezyVet on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
VetBadger / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / ClaudeVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / PerplexityVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.

VetBadger / ezyVet: question q9

what should I look for in veterinary practice management software

VetBadger: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

VetBadger and ezyVet on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
VetBadger / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / ClaudeVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / PerplexityVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.

VetBadger / ezyVet: question q10

best vet software for a multi location emergency hospital

VetBadger: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

VetBadger and ezyVet on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
VetBadger / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / ClaudeVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / PerplexityVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetBadger / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetBadger: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

VetBadger's own-domain citation count is 0 of 149; ezyVet's is 35 of 149. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Veterinary practice management software · Exact Veterinary practice management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Vetport and ezyVet

Veterinary practice management software · September 2026

Vetport and ezyVet in the observed answers

Vetport appears in 9 of 149 answers about veterinary practice management software; ezyVet appears in 115 of 149.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Vetport and ezyVet have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Vetport record · ezyVet record · Veterinary practice management software checked set.

Vetport beside ezyVet

Vetport and ezyVet totals
MeasureVetportezyVet
Named9/149; 6.0% (95% CI 3.2 to 11.1)115/149; 77.2% (95% CI 69.8 to 83.2)
Own domain cited5/149; 3.4% (95% CI 1.4 to 7.6)35/149; 23.5% (95% CI 17.4 to 30.9)

Vetport / ezyVet: question q1

what is the best veterinary practice management software for a new clinic

Vetport: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Vetport and ezyVet on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
Vetport / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / ClaudeVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / PerplexityVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Vetport / ezyVet: question q2

what is the best vet practice management software for a small 1 to 3 doctor practice

Vetport: 2/14; 14.3% (95% CI 4.0 to 39.9). ezyVet: 7/14; 50.0% (95% CI 26.8 to 73.2).

Vetport and ezyVet on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
Vetport / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / ClaudeVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / PerplexityVetport: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetport: 0 of 2; ezyVet: 1 of 2.
Vetport / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.

Vetport / ezyVet: question q3

what is the best veterinary software for a large multi doctor hospital

Vetport: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Vetport and ezyVet on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
Vetport / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / ClaudeVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / PerplexityVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Vetport / ezyVet: question q4

what are the best alternatives to IDEXX Cornerstone

Vetport: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Vetport and ezyVet on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
Vetport / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / ClaudeVetport: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / PerplexityVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Vetport / ezyVet: question q5

what are the best alternatives to ezyVet

Vetport: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Vetport and ezyVet on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
Vetport / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / ClaudeVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / PerplexityVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Vetport / ezyVet: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Covetrus Pulse

Vetport: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Vetport and ezyVet on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
Vetport / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / ClaudeVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / PerplexityVetport: 2 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Vetport / ezyVet: question q7

ezyVet vs Cornerstone, which is better for a growing practice

Vetport: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Vetport and ezyVet on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
Vetport / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / ClaudeVetport: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / PerplexityVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetport: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Vetport / ezyVet: question q8

Shepherd vs Digitail for a small animal clinic

Vetport: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Vetport and ezyVet on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
Vetport / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / ClaudeVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / PerplexityVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.

Vetport / ezyVet: question q9

what should I look for in veterinary practice management software

Vetport: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

Vetport and ezyVet on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
Vetport / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / ClaudeVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / PerplexityVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.

Vetport / ezyVet: question q10

best vet software for a multi location emergency hospital

Vetport: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Vetport and ezyVet on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
Vetport / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / ClaudeVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / PerplexityVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Vetport / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetport: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Vetport's own-domain citation count is 5 of 149; ezyVet's is 35 of 149. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Veterinary practice management software · Exact Veterinary practice management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Onward Vet and ezyVet

Veterinary practice management software · September 2026

Onward Vet and ezyVet in the observed answers

Onward Vet appears in 0 of 149 answers about veterinary practice management software; ezyVet appears in 115 of 149.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Onward Vet and ezyVet have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Onward Vet record · ezyVet record · Veterinary practice management software checked set.

Onward Vet beside ezyVet

Onward Vet and ezyVet totals
MeasureOnward VetezyVet
Named0/149; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)115/149; 77.2% (95% CI 69.8 to 83.2)
Own domain cited0/149; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)35/149; 23.5% (95% CI 17.4 to 30.9)

Onward Vet / ezyVet: question q1

what is the best veterinary practice management software for a new clinic

Onward Vet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Onward Vet and ezyVet on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
Onward Vet / ezyVet / ChatGPTOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / ClaudeOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / PerplexityOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Onward Vet / ezyVet: question q2

what is the best vet practice management software for a small 1 to 3 doctor practice

Onward Vet: 0/14; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 21.5). ezyVet: 7/14; 50.0% (95% CI 26.8 to 73.2).

Onward Vet and ezyVet on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
Onward Vet / ezyVet / ChatGPTOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / ClaudeOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / PerplexityOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsOnward Vet: 0 of 2; ezyVet: 1 of 2.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.

Onward Vet / ezyVet: question q3

what is the best veterinary software for a large multi doctor hospital

Onward Vet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Onward Vet and ezyVet on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
Onward Vet / ezyVet / ChatGPTOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / ClaudeOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / PerplexityOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Onward Vet / ezyVet: question q4

what are the best alternatives to IDEXX Cornerstone

Onward Vet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Onward Vet and ezyVet on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
Onward Vet / ezyVet / ChatGPTOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / ClaudeOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / PerplexityOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Onward Vet / ezyVet: question q5

what are the best alternatives to ezyVet

Onward Vet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Onward Vet and ezyVet on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
Onward Vet / ezyVet / ChatGPTOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / ClaudeOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / PerplexityOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Onward Vet / ezyVet: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Covetrus Pulse

Onward Vet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Onward Vet and ezyVet on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
Onward Vet / ezyVet / ChatGPTOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / ClaudeOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / PerplexityOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Onward Vet / ezyVet: question q7

ezyVet vs Cornerstone, which is better for a growing practice

Onward Vet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Onward Vet and ezyVet on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
Onward Vet / ezyVet / ChatGPTOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / ClaudeOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / PerplexityOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Onward Vet / ezyVet: question q8

Shepherd vs Digitail for a small animal clinic

Onward Vet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Onward Vet and ezyVet on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
Onward Vet / ezyVet / ChatGPTOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / ClaudeOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / PerplexityOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.

Onward Vet / ezyVet: question q9

what should I look for in veterinary practice management software

Onward Vet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

Onward Vet and ezyVet on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
Onward Vet / ezyVet / ChatGPTOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / ClaudeOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / PerplexityOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.

Onward Vet / ezyVet: question q10

best vet software for a multi location emergency hospital

Onward Vet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Onward Vet and ezyVet on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
Onward Vet / ezyVet / ChatGPTOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / ClaudeOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / PerplexityOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
Onward Vet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeOnward Vet: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Onward Vet's own-domain citation count is 0 of 149; ezyVet's is 35 of 149. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Veterinary practice management software · Exact Veterinary practice management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

VetlinkPRO and ezyVet

Veterinary practice management software · September 2026

VetlinkPRO and ezyVet in the observed answers

VetlinkPRO appears in 0 of 149 answers about veterinary practice management software; ezyVet appears in 115 of 149.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

VetlinkPRO and ezyVet have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. VetlinkPRO record · ezyVet record · Veterinary practice management software checked set.

VetlinkPRO beside ezyVet

VetlinkPRO and ezyVet totals
MeasureVetlinkPROezyVet
Named0/149; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)115/149; 77.2% (95% CI 69.8 to 83.2)
Own domain cited0/149; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)35/149; 23.5% (95% CI 17.4 to 30.9)

VetlinkPRO / ezyVet: question q1

what is the best veterinary practice management software for a new clinic

VetlinkPRO: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

VetlinkPRO and ezyVet on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / ClaudeVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / PerplexityVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

VetlinkPRO / ezyVet: question q2

what is the best vet practice management software for a small 1 to 3 doctor practice

VetlinkPRO: 0/14; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 21.5). ezyVet: 7/14; 50.0% (95% CI 26.8 to 73.2).

VetlinkPRO and ezyVet on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / ClaudeVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / PerplexityVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetlinkPRO: 0 of 2; ezyVet: 1 of 2.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.

VetlinkPRO / ezyVet: question q3

what is the best veterinary software for a large multi doctor hospital

VetlinkPRO: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

VetlinkPRO and ezyVet on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / ClaudeVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / PerplexityVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

VetlinkPRO / ezyVet: question q4

what are the best alternatives to IDEXX Cornerstone

VetlinkPRO: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

VetlinkPRO and ezyVet on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / ClaudeVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / PerplexityVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

VetlinkPRO / ezyVet: question q5

what are the best alternatives to ezyVet

VetlinkPRO: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

VetlinkPRO and ezyVet on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / ClaudeVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / PerplexityVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

VetlinkPRO / ezyVet: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Covetrus Pulse

VetlinkPRO: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

VetlinkPRO and ezyVet on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / ClaudeVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / PerplexityVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

VetlinkPRO / ezyVet: question q7

ezyVet vs Cornerstone, which is better for a growing practice

VetlinkPRO: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

VetlinkPRO and ezyVet on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / ClaudeVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / PerplexityVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

VetlinkPRO / ezyVet: question q8

Shepherd vs Digitail for a small animal clinic

VetlinkPRO: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

VetlinkPRO and ezyVet on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / ClaudeVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / PerplexityVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.

VetlinkPRO / ezyVet: question q9

what should I look for in veterinary practice management software

VetlinkPRO: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

VetlinkPRO and ezyVet on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / ClaudeVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / PerplexityVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.

VetlinkPRO / ezyVet: question q10

best vet software for a multi location emergency hospital

VetlinkPRO: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

VetlinkPRO and ezyVet on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / ChatGPTVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / ClaudeVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / PerplexityVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VetlinkPRO / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVetlinkPRO: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

VetlinkPRO's own-domain citation count is 0 of 149; ezyVet's is 35 of 149. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Veterinary practice management software · Exact Veterinary practice management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

VIA and ezyVet

Veterinary practice management software · September 2026

VIA and ezyVet in the observed answers

VIA appears in 6 of 149 answers about veterinary practice management software; ezyVet appears in 115 of 149.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

VIA and ezyVet have different naming counts on 10 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 0 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. VIA record · ezyVet record · Veterinary practice management software checked set.

VIA beside ezyVet

VIA and ezyVet totals
MeasureVIAezyVet
Named6/149; 4.0% (95% CI 1.9 to 8.5)115/149; 77.2% (95% CI 69.8 to 83.2)
Own domain cited3/149; 2.0% (95% CI 0.7 to 5.8)35/149; 23.5% (95% CI 17.4 to 30.9)

VIA / ezyVet: question q1

what is the best veterinary practice management software for a new clinic

VIA: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

VIA and ezyVet on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
VIA / ezyVet / ChatGPTVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / ClaudeVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / PerplexityVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

VIA / ezyVet: question q2

what is the best vet practice management software for a small 1 to 3 doctor practice

VIA: 0/14; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 21.5). ezyVet: 7/14; 50.0% (95% CI 26.8 to 73.2).

VIA and ezyVet on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
VIA / ezyVet / ChatGPTVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / ClaudeVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / PerplexityVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVIA: 0 of 2; ezyVet: 1 of 2.
VIA / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.

VIA / ezyVet: question q3

what is the best veterinary software for a large multi doctor hospital

VIA: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

VIA and ezyVet on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
VIA / ezyVet / ChatGPTVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / ClaudeVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / PerplexityVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVIA: 3 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

VIA / ezyVet: question q4

what are the best alternatives to IDEXX Cornerstone

VIA: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

VIA and ezyVet on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
VIA / ezyVet / ChatGPTVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / ClaudeVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / PerplexityVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

VIA / ezyVet: question q5

what are the best alternatives to ezyVet

VIA: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

VIA and ezyVet on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
VIA / ezyVet / ChatGPTVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / ClaudeVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / PerplexityVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVIA: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

VIA / ezyVet: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Covetrus Pulse

VIA: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

VIA and ezyVet on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
VIA / ezyVet / ChatGPTVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / ClaudeVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / PerplexityVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

VIA / ezyVet: question q7

ezyVet vs Cornerstone, which is better for a growing practice

VIA: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

VIA and ezyVet on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
VIA / ezyVet / ChatGPTVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / ClaudeVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / PerplexityVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

VIA / ezyVet: question q8

Shepherd vs Digitail for a small animal clinic

VIA: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). ezyVet: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

VIA and ezyVet on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
VIA / ezyVet / ChatGPTVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / ClaudeVIA: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / PerplexityVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVIA: 1 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.

VIA / ezyVet: question q9

what should I look for in veterinary practice management software

VIA: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

VIA and ezyVet on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
VIA / ezyVet / ChatGPTVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / ClaudeVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / PerplexityVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 0 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 2 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 1 of 3.

VIA / ezyVet: question q10

best vet software for a multi location emergency hospital

VIA: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). ezyVet: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

VIA and ezyVet on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
VIA / ezyVet / ChatGPTVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / ClaudeVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / PerplexityVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.
VIA / ezyVet / Google AI ModeVIA: 0 of 3; ezyVet: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

VIA's own-domain citation count is 3 of 149; ezyVet's is 35 of 149. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Veterinary practice management software · Exact Veterinary practice management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

IDEXX Cornerstone alternatives

Veterinary practice management software · captured 2026-09-22

When the question asks for IDEXX Cornerstone alternatives

IDEXX Cornerstone alternatives: 12 other checked vendors were named across 15 valid answers.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Exact wording: what are the best alternatives to IDEXX Cornerstone.

IDEXX Cornerstone remained in 15 of 15 valid answers, 100.0% (Wilson 95% interval 79.6% to 100.0%).

6 of 19 checked vendors were never named for this exact question. That observation applies to 15 valid answers, rather than to all future answers.

Question record for IDEXX Cornerstone · Veterinary practice management software checked set.

IDEXX Cornerstone alternatives: ezyVet

ezyVet: 15 of 15 valid answers, 100.0% (Wilson 95% interval 79.6% to 100.0%).

IDEXX Cornerstone alternatives naming ezyVet
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
IDEXX Cornerstone / ezyVet / ChatGPTezyVet named in 3 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / ezyVet / ClaudeezyVet named in 3 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / ezyVet / PerplexityezyVet named in 3 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsezyVet named in 3 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / ezyVet / Google AI ModeezyVet named in 3 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.

ezyVet across the category questions.

IDEXX Cornerstone alternatives: IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo)

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 15 of 15 valid answers, 100.0% (Wilson 95% interval 79.6% to 100.0%).

IDEXX Cornerstone alternatives naming IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo)
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
IDEXX Cornerstone / IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ChatGPTIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) named in 3 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ClaudeIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) named in 3 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / PerplexityIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) named in 3 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / Google AI OverviewsIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) named in 3 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / Google AI ModeIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) named in 3 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) across the category questions.

IDEXX Cornerstone alternatives: Provet

Provet: 10 of 15 valid answers, 66.7% (Wilson 95% interval 41.7% to 84.8%).

IDEXX Cornerstone alternatives naming Provet
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
IDEXX Cornerstone / Provet / ChatGPTProvet named in 3 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / Provet / ClaudeProvet named in 3 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / Provet / PerplexityProvet named in 3 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / Provet / Google AI OverviewsProvet named in 0 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / Provet / Google AI ModeProvet named in 1 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.

Provet across the category questions.

IDEXX Cornerstone alternatives: AVImark

AVImark: 9 of 15 valid answers, 60.0% (Wilson 95% interval 35.7% to 80.2%).

IDEXX Cornerstone alternatives naming AVImark
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
IDEXX Cornerstone / AVImark / ChatGPTAVImark named in 0 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / AVImark / ClaudeAVImark named in 3 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / AVImark / PerplexityAVImark named in 2 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / AVImark / Google AI OverviewsAVImark named in 3 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / AVImark / Google AI ModeAVImark named in 1 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.

AVImark across the category questions.

IDEXX Cornerstone alternatives: Covetrus Pulse

Covetrus Pulse: 9 of 15 valid answers, 60.0% (Wilson 95% interval 35.7% to 80.2%).

IDEXX Cornerstone alternatives naming Covetrus Pulse
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
IDEXX Cornerstone / Covetrus Pulse / ChatGPTCovetrus Pulse named in 3 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / Covetrus Pulse / ClaudeCovetrus Pulse named in 3 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / Covetrus Pulse / PerplexityCovetrus Pulse named in 0 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / Covetrus Pulse / Google AI OverviewsCovetrus Pulse named in 1 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / Covetrus Pulse / Google AI ModeCovetrus Pulse named in 2 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.

Covetrus Pulse across the category questions.

IDEXX Cornerstone alternatives: Shepherd

Shepherd: 9 of 15 valid answers, 60.0% (Wilson 95% interval 35.7% to 80.2%).

IDEXX Cornerstone alternatives naming Shepherd
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
IDEXX Cornerstone / Shepherd / ChatGPTShepherd named in 3 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / Shepherd / ClaudeShepherd named in 1 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / Shepherd / PerplexityShepherd named in 1 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / Shepherd / Google AI OverviewsShepherd named in 3 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / Shepherd / Google AI ModeShepherd named in 1 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.

Shepherd across the category questions.

IDEXX Cornerstone alternatives: Digitail

Digitail: 8 of 15 valid answers, 53.3% (Wilson 95% interval 30.1% to 75.2%).

IDEXX Cornerstone alternatives naming Digitail
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
IDEXX Cornerstone / Digitail / ChatGPTDigitail named in 1 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / Digitail / ClaudeDigitail named in 3 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / Digitail / PerplexityDigitail named in 2 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / Digitail / Google AI OverviewsDigitail named in 1 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / Digitail / Google AI ModeDigitail named in 1 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.

Digitail across the category questions.

IDEXX Cornerstone alternatives: DaySmart Vet

DaySmart Vet: 5 of 15 valid answers, 33.3% (Wilson 95% interval 15.2% to 58.3%).

IDEXX Cornerstone alternatives naming DaySmart Vet
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
IDEXX Cornerstone / DaySmart Vet / ChatGPTDaySmart Vet named in 0 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / DaySmart Vet / ClaudeDaySmart Vet named in 0 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / DaySmart Vet / PerplexityDaySmart Vet named in 3 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / DaySmart Vet / Google AI OverviewsDaySmart Vet named in 0 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / DaySmart Vet / Google AI ModeDaySmart Vet named in 2 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.

DaySmart Vet across the category questions.

IDEXX Cornerstone alternatives: ImproMed

ImproMed: 3 of 15 valid answers, 20.0% (Wilson 95% interval 7.0% to 45.2%).

IDEXX Cornerstone alternatives naming ImproMed
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
IDEXX Cornerstone / ImproMed / ChatGPTImproMed named in 0 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / ImproMed / ClaudeImproMed named in 1 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / ImproMed / PerplexityImproMed named in 2 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / ImproMed / Google AI OverviewsImproMed named in 0 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / ImproMed / Google AI ModeImproMed named in 0 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.

ImproMed across the category questions.

IDEXX Cornerstone alternatives: Vetport

Vetport: 3 of 15 valid answers, 20.0% (Wilson 95% interval 7.0% to 45.2%).

IDEXX Cornerstone alternatives naming Vetport
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
IDEXX Cornerstone / Vetport / ChatGPTVetport named in 0 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / Vetport / ClaudeVetport named in 3 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / Vetport / PerplexityVetport named in 0 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / Vetport / Google AI OverviewsVetport named in 0 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / Vetport / Google AI ModeVetport named in 0 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.

Vetport across the category questions.

IDEXX Cornerstone alternatives: Instinct

Instinct: 2 of 15 valid answers, 13.3% (Wilson 95% interval 3.7% to 37.9%).

IDEXX Cornerstone alternatives naming Instinct
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
IDEXX Cornerstone / Instinct / ChatGPTInstinct named in 2 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / Instinct / ClaudeInstinct named in 0 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / Instinct / PerplexityInstinct named in 0 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / Instinct / Google AI OverviewsInstinct named in 0 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / Instinct / Google AI ModeInstinct named in 0 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.

Instinct across the category questions.

IDEXX Cornerstone alternatives: NaVetor

NaVetor: 2 of 15 valid answers, 13.3% (Wilson 95% interval 3.7% to 37.9%).

IDEXX Cornerstone alternatives naming NaVetor
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
IDEXX Cornerstone / NaVetor / ChatGPTNaVetor named in 0 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / NaVetor / ClaudeNaVetor named in 2 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / NaVetor / PerplexityNaVetor named in 0 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / NaVetor / Google AI OverviewsNaVetor named in 0 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / NaVetor / Google AI ModeNaVetor named in 0 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.

NaVetor across the category questions.

IDEXX Cornerstone alternatives: Vetspire

Vetspire: 1 of 15 valid answers, 6.7% (Wilson 95% interval 1.2% to 29.8%).

IDEXX Cornerstone alternatives naming Vetspire
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
IDEXX Cornerstone / Vetspire / ChatGPTVetspire named in 0 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / Vetspire / ClaudeVetspire named in 0 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / Vetspire / PerplexityVetspire named in 0 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / Vetspire / Google AI OverviewsVetspire named in 0 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.
IDEXX Cornerstone / Vetspire / Google AI ModeVetspire named in 1 of 3 valid IDEXX Cornerstone-alternatives answers.

Vetspire across the category questions.

IDEXX Cornerstone alternatives and the checked set

Not named in this question: ClienTrax, IntraVet, Onward Vet, VetBadger, VetlinkPRO, VIA. Each has 0 of 15 valid answers for this exact wording.

A question naming IDEXX Cornerstone already directs attention toward that product. Read its category discovery questions before comparing this answer with an unbranded shortlist.

Veterinary practice management software source mix. The full IDEXX Cornerstone answers remain in the release deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

ezyVet alternatives

Veterinary practice management software · captured 2026-09-22

When the question asks for ezyVet alternatives

ezyVet alternatives: 11 other checked vendors were named across 15 valid answers.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Exact wording: what are the best alternatives to ezyVet.

ezyVet remained in 15 of 15 valid answers, 100.0% (Wilson 95% interval 79.6% to 100.0%).

7 of 19 checked vendors were never named for this exact question. That observation applies to 15 valid answers, rather than to all future answers.

Question record for ezyVet · Veterinary practice management software checked set.

ezyVet alternatives: ezyVet

ezyVet: 15 of 15 valid answers, 100.0% (Wilson 95% interval 79.6% to 100.0%).

ezyVet alternatives naming ezyVet
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
ezyVet / ezyVet / ChatGPTezyVet named in 3 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / ezyVet / ClaudeezyVet named in 3 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / ezyVet / PerplexityezyVet named in 3 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsezyVet named in 3 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / ezyVet / Google AI ModeezyVet named in 3 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.

ezyVet across the category questions.

ezyVet alternatives: IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo)

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 14 of 15 valid answers, 93.3% (Wilson 95% interval 70.2% to 98.8%).

ezyVet alternatives naming IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo)
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
ezyVet / IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ChatGPTIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) named in 3 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ClaudeIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) named in 3 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / PerplexityIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) named in 3 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / Google AI OverviewsIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) named in 2 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / Google AI ModeIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) named in 3 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) across the category questions.

ezyVet alternatives: Covetrus Pulse

Covetrus Pulse: 13 of 15 valid answers, 86.7% (Wilson 95% interval 62.1% to 96.3%).

ezyVet alternatives naming Covetrus Pulse
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
ezyVet / Covetrus Pulse / ChatGPTCovetrus Pulse named in 1 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / Covetrus Pulse / ClaudeCovetrus Pulse named in 3 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / Covetrus Pulse / PerplexityCovetrus Pulse named in 3 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / Covetrus Pulse / Google AI OverviewsCovetrus Pulse named in 3 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / Covetrus Pulse / Google AI ModeCovetrus Pulse named in 3 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.

Covetrus Pulse across the category questions.

ezyVet alternatives: DaySmart Vet

DaySmart Vet: 12 of 15 valid answers, 80.0% (Wilson 95% interval 54.8% to 93.0%).

ezyVet alternatives naming DaySmart Vet
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
ezyVet / DaySmart Vet / ChatGPTDaySmart Vet named in 0 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / DaySmart Vet / ClaudeDaySmart Vet named in 3 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / DaySmart Vet / PerplexityDaySmart Vet named in 3 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / DaySmart Vet / Google AI OverviewsDaySmart Vet named in 3 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / DaySmart Vet / Google AI ModeDaySmart Vet named in 3 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.

DaySmart Vet across the category questions.

ezyVet alternatives: Digitail

Digitail: 11 of 15 valid answers, 73.3% (Wilson 95% interval 48.0% to 89.1%).

ezyVet alternatives naming Digitail
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
ezyVet / Digitail / ChatGPTDigitail named in 3 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / Digitail / ClaudeDigitail named in 3 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / Digitail / PerplexityDigitail named in 3 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / Digitail / Google AI OverviewsDigitail named in 2 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / Digitail / Google AI ModeDigitail named in 0 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.

Digitail across the category questions.

ezyVet alternatives: Provet

Provet: 10 of 15 valid answers, 66.7% (Wilson 95% interval 41.7% to 84.8%).

ezyVet alternatives naming Provet
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
ezyVet / Provet / ChatGPTProvet named in 3 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / Provet / ClaudeProvet named in 3 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / Provet / PerplexityProvet named in 3 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / Provet / Google AI OverviewsProvet named in 0 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / Provet / Google AI ModeProvet named in 1 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.

Provet across the category questions.

ezyVet alternatives: Shepherd

Shepherd: 10 of 15 valid answers, 66.7% (Wilson 95% interval 41.7% to 84.8%).

ezyVet alternatives naming Shepherd
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
ezyVet / Shepherd / ChatGPTShepherd named in 3 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / Shepherd / ClaudeShepherd named in 3 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / Shepherd / PerplexityShepherd named in 0 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / Shepherd / Google AI OverviewsShepherd named in 1 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / Shepherd / Google AI ModeShepherd named in 3 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.

Shepherd across the category questions.

ezyVet alternatives: AVImark

AVImark: 7 of 15 valid answers, 46.7% (Wilson 95% interval 24.8% to 69.9%).

ezyVet alternatives naming AVImark
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
ezyVet / AVImark / ChatGPTAVImark named in 0 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / AVImark / ClaudeAVImark named in 3 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / AVImark / PerplexityAVImark named in 1 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / AVImark / Google AI OverviewsAVImark named in 0 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / AVImark / Google AI ModeAVImark named in 3 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.

AVImark across the category questions.

ezyVet alternatives: Instinct

Instinct: 4 of 15 valid answers, 26.7% (Wilson 95% interval 10.9% to 52.0%).

ezyVet alternatives naming Instinct
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
ezyVet / Instinct / ChatGPTInstinct named in 3 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / Instinct / ClaudeInstinct named in 0 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / Instinct / PerplexityInstinct named in 0 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / Instinct / Google AI OverviewsInstinct named in 0 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / Instinct / Google AI ModeInstinct named in 1 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.

Instinct across the category questions.

ezyVet alternatives: Vetspire

Vetspire: 3 of 15 valid answers, 20.0% (Wilson 95% interval 7.0% to 45.2%).

ezyVet alternatives naming Vetspire
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
ezyVet / Vetspire / ChatGPTVetspire named in 1 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / Vetspire / ClaudeVetspire named in 1 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / Vetspire / PerplexityVetspire named in 0 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / Vetspire / Google AI OverviewsVetspire named in 1 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / Vetspire / Google AI ModeVetspire named in 0 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.

Vetspire across the category questions.

ezyVet alternatives: ImproMed

ImproMed: 2 of 15 valid answers, 13.3% (Wilson 95% interval 3.7% to 37.9%).

ezyVet alternatives naming ImproMed
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
ezyVet / ImproMed / ChatGPTImproMed named in 0 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / ImproMed / ClaudeImproMed named in 2 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / ImproMed / PerplexityImproMed named in 0 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / ImproMed / Google AI OverviewsImproMed named in 0 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / ImproMed / Google AI ModeImproMed named in 0 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.

ImproMed across the category questions.

ezyVet alternatives: VIA

VIA: 1 of 15 valid answers, 6.7% (Wilson 95% interval 1.2% to 29.8%).

ezyVet alternatives naming VIA
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
ezyVet / VIA / ChatGPTVIA named in 0 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / VIA / ClaudeVIA named in 0 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / VIA / PerplexityVIA named in 0 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / VIA / Google AI OverviewsVIA named in 0 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.
ezyVet / VIA / Google AI ModeVIA named in 1 of 3 valid ezyVet-alternatives answers.

VIA across the category questions.

ezyVet alternatives and the checked set

Not named in this question: ClienTrax, IntraVet, NaVetor, Onward Vet, VetBadger, VetlinkPRO, Vetport. Each has 0 of 15 valid answers for this exact wording.

A question naming ezyVet already directs attention toward that product. Read its category discovery questions before comparing this answer with an unbranded shortlist.

Veterinary practice management software source mix. The full ezyVet answers remain in the release deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Covetrus Pulse alternatives

Veterinary practice management software · captured 2026-09-22

When the question asks for Covetrus Pulse alternatives

Covetrus Pulse alternatives: 13 other checked vendors were named across 15 valid answers.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Exact wording: what are the best alternatives to Covetrus Pulse.

Covetrus Pulse remained in 15 of 15 valid answers, 100.0% (Wilson 95% interval 79.6% to 100.0%).

5 of 19 checked vendors were never named for this exact question. That observation applies to 15 valid answers, rather than to all future answers.

Question record for Covetrus Pulse · Veterinary practice management software checked set.

Covetrus Pulse alternatives: Covetrus Pulse

Covetrus Pulse: 15 of 15 valid answers, 100.0% (Wilson 95% interval 79.6% to 100.0%).

Covetrus Pulse alternatives naming Covetrus Pulse
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Covetrus Pulse / Covetrus Pulse / ChatGPTCovetrus Pulse named in 3 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / Covetrus Pulse / ClaudeCovetrus Pulse named in 3 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / Covetrus Pulse / PerplexityCovetrus Pulse named in 3 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / Covetrus Pulse / Google AI OverviewsCovetrus Pulse named in 3 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / Covetrus Pulse / Google AI ModeCovetrus Pulse named in 3 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.

Covetrus Pulse across the category questions.

Covetrus Pulse alternatives: ezyVet

ezyVet: 15 of 15 valid answers, 100.0% (Wilson 95% interval 79.6% to 100.0%).

Covetrus Pulse alternatives naming ezyVet
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / ChatGPTezyVet named in 3 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / ClaudeezyVet named in 3 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / PerplexityezyVet named in 3 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / Google AI OverviewsezyVet named in 3 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / ezyVet / Google AI ModeezyVet named in 3 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.

ezyVet across the category questions.

Covetrus Pulse alternatives: DaySmart Vet

DaySmart Vet: 14 of 15 valid answers, 93.3% (Wilson 95% interval 70.2% to 98.8%).

Covetrus Pulse alternatives naming DaySmart Vet
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Covetrus Pulse / DaySmart Vet / ChatGPTDaySmart Vet named in 2 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / DaySmart Vet / ClaudeDaySmart Vet named in 3 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / DaySmart Vet / PerplexityDaySmart Vet named in 3 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / DaySmart Vet / Google AI OverviewsDaySmart Vet named in 3 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / DaySmart Vet / Google AI ModeDaySmart Vet named in 3 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.

DaySmart Vet across the category questions.

Covetrus Pulse alternatives: Shepherd

Shepherd: 10 of 15 valid answers, 66.7% (Wilson 95% interval 41.7% to 84.8%).

Covetrus Pulse alternatives naming Shepherd
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Covetrus Pulse / Shepherd / ChatGPTShepherd named in 3 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / Shepherd / ClaudeShepherd named in 3 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / Shepherd / PerplexityShepherd named in 2 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / Shepherd / Google AI OverviewsShepherd named in 1 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / Shepherd / Google AI ModeShepherd named in 1 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.

Shepherd across the category questions.

Covetrus Pulse alternatives: IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo)

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo): 9 of 15 valid answers, 60.0% (Wilson 95% interval 35.7% to 80.2%).

Covetrus Pulse alternatives naming IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo)
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Covetrus Pulse / IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ChatGPTIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) named in 0 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / ClaudeIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) named in 3 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / PerplexityIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) named in 3 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / Google AI OverviewsIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) named in 0 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) / Google AI ModeIDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) named in 3 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.

IDEXX (Cornerstone, Neo) across the category questions.

Covetrus Pulse alternatives: Digitail

Digitail: 7 of 15 valid answers, 46.7% (Wilson 95% interval 24.8% to 69.9%).

Covetrus Pulse alternatives naming Digitail
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Covetrus Pulse / Digitail / ChatGPTDigitail named in 3 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / Digitail / ClaudeDigitail named in 2 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / Digitail / PerplexityDigitail named in 0 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / Digitail / Google AI OverviewsDigitail named in 1 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / Digitail / Google AI ModeDigitail named in 1 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.

Digitail across the category questions.

Covetrus Pulse alternatives: Instinct

Instinct: 6 of 15 valid answers, 40.0% (Wilson 95% interval 19.8% to 64.3%).

Covetrus Pulse alternatives naming Instinct
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Covetrus Pulse / Instinct / ChatGPTInstinct named in 3 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / Instinct / ClaudeInstinct named in 0 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / Instinct / PerplexityInstinct named in 1 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / Instinct / Google AI OverviewsInstinct named in 2 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / Instinct / Google AI ModeInstinct named in 0 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.

Instinct across the category questions.

Covetrus Pulse alternatives: Provet

Provet: 6 of 15 valid answers, 40.0% (Wilson 95% interval 19.8% to 64.3%).

Covetrus Pulse alternatives naming Provet
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Covetrus Pulse / Provet / ChatGPTProvet named in 3 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / Provet / ClaudeProvet named in 2 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / Provet / PerplexityProvet named in 0 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / Provet / Google AI OverviewsProvet named in 0 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / Provet / Google AI ModeProvet named in 1 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.

Provet across the category questions.

Covetrus Pulse alternatives: AVImark

AVImark: 5 of 15 valid answers, 33.3% (Wilson 95% interval 15.2% to 58.3%).

Covetrus Pulse alternatives naming AVImark
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Covetrus Pulse / AVImark / ChatGPTAVImark named in 0 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / AVImark / ClaudeAVImark named in 1 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / AVImark / PerplexityAVImark named in 0 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / AVImark / Google AI OverviewsAVImark named in 2 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / AVImark / Google AI ModeAVImark named in 2 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.

AVImark across the category questions.

Covetrus Pulse alternatives: VetBadger

VetBadger: 3 of 15 valid answers, 20.0% (Wilson 95% interval 7.0% to 45.2%).

Covetrus Pulse alternatives naming VetBadger
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Covetrus Pulse / VetBadger / ChatGPTVetBadger named in 0 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / VetBadger / ClaudeVetBadger named in 3 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / VetBadger / PerplexityVetBadger named in 0 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / VetBadger / Google AI OverviewsVetBadger named in 0 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / VetBadger / Google AI ModeVetBadger named in 0 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.

VetBadger across the category questions.

Covetrus Pulse alternatives: IntraVet

IntraVet: 2 of 15 valid answers, 13.3% (Wilson 95% interval 3.7% to 37.9%).

Covetrus Pulse alternatives naming IntraVet
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Covetrus Pulse / IntraVet / ChatGPTIntraVet named in 0 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / IntraVet / ClaudeIntraVet named in 0 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / IntraVet / PerplexityIntraVet named in 2 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / IntraVet / Google AI OverviewsIntraVet named in 0 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / IntraVet / Google AI ModeIntraVet named in 0 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.

IntraVet across the category questions.

Covetrus Pulse alternatives: NaVetor

NaVetor: 2 of 15 valid answers, 13.3% (Wilson 95% interval 3.7% to 37.9%).

Covetrus Pulse alternatives naming NaVetor
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Covetrus Pulse / NaVetor / ChatGPTNaVetor named in 0 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / NaVetor / ClaudeNaVetor named in 0 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / NaVetor / PerplexityNaVetor named in 2 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / NaVetor / Google AI OverviewsNaVetor named in 0 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / NaVetor / Google AI ModeNaVetor named in 0 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.

NaVetor across the category questions.

Covetrus Pulse alternatives: Vetport

Vetport: 2 of 15 valid answers, 13.3% (Wilson 95% interval 3.7% to 37.9%).

Covetrus Pulse alternatives naming Vetport
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Covetrus Pulse / Vetport / ChatGPTVetport named in 0 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / Vetport / ClaudeVetport named in 0 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / Vetport / PerplexityVetport named in 2 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / Vetport / Google AI OverviewsVetport named in 0 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / Vetport / Google AI ModeVetport named in 0 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.

Vetport across the category questions.

Covetrus Pulse alternatives: ImproMed

ImproMed: 1 of 15 valid answers, 6.7% (Wilson 95% interval 1.2% to 29.8%).

Covetrus Pulse alternatives naming ImproMed
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Covetrus Pulse / ImproMed / ChatGPTImproMed named in 0 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / ImproMed / ClaudeImproMed named in 1 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / ImproMed / PerplexityImproMed named in 0 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / ImproMed / Google AI OverviewsImproMed named in 0 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.
Covetrus Pulse / ImproMed / Google AI ModeImproMed named in 0 of 3 valid Covetrus Pulse-alternatives answers.

ImproMed across the category questions.

Covetrus Pulse alternatives and the checked set

Not named in this question: ClienTrax, Onward Vet, VetlinkPRO, Vetspire, VIA. Each has 0 of 15 valid answers for this exact wording.

A question naming Covetrus Pulse already directs attention toward that product. Read its category discovery questions before comparing this answer with an unbranded shortlist.

Veterinary practice management software source mix. The full Covetrus Pulse answers remain in the release deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

The ten buyer questions

Each question was put to every engine 3 times on the stated dates. Counts are over valid answers to the exact question.

what is the best veterinary practice management software for a new clinic

Question q1. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: best option.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPTPerplexityClaude

what is the best vet practice management software for a small 1 to 3 doctor practice

Question q2. 14 valid answers. Excluded answers: 1. Type: best option.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPTPerplexityClaude

what is the best veterinary software for a large multi doctor hospital

Question q3. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: best option.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPTPerplexityClaude

what are the best alternatives to IDEXX Cornerstone

Question q4. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: alternative.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPTPerplexityClaude

what are the best alternatives to ezyVet

Question q5. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: alternative.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPTPerplexityClaude

what are the best alternatives to Covetrus Pulse

Question q6. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: alternative.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPTPerplexityClaude

ezyVet vs Cornerstone, which is better for a growing practice

Question q7. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: buyer evaluation.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPTPerplexityClaude

Shepherd vs Digitail for a small animal clinic

Question q8. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: buyer evaluation.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPTPerplexityClaude

what should I look for in veterinary practice management software

Question q9. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: buyer evaluation.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPTPerplexityClaude

best vet software for a multi location emergency hospital

Question q10. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: specific workflow.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPTPerplexityClaude

Release and method

Release
2026-09, version 2026-09.1
Published
2026-09-23
Answer capture date
2026-09-22
Source capture dates
2026-09-21
Engines
ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode
Configuration
10 fixed target questions, 5 engines, 3 repeats. No controls were run for this category.
Method version
v1.1
Excluded answers
1 target answers excluded; exact reasons are listed. No controls were run for this category.
Commissioned engagement
No commissioned engagement is declared for this category.

Exact names and listed aliases are matched without case sensitivity at word boundaries. Plain word names require a listed qualifier nearby in the same sentence or the canonical domain among cited URLs. A vendor citation counts only when that answer also names the vendor under this rule.

Answer text for releases before 2026-09 was not retained. For release 2026-09 and later, the full answer text is kept and published in the release's Zenodo deposit and on the receipt pages, except Perplexity, where the method keeps a scored excerpt of at most 60 words and the share link.

Download and cite

Release JSON · Category CSV · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695

How to cite: Broadcastwell. The Absence Index, Veterinary practice management software, version 2026-09.1. Permanent record. CC BY 4.0 with attribution to Broadcastwell.

The Absence Report

A monthly letter on who AI names when buyers ask for software. Published observations, source links and the limits of each release.

Subscribe free

Delivered by Substack. Unsubscribe any time.

About this page

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

This public record reports the checked set, fixed questions and stated dates. Claim a vendor page, file a dispute or ask for a re-run, or read the dispute policy and log.

Read this page as JSON · Dataset and page metadata