Broadcastwell Fix one answer, $490
Menu

2026-09.1 record

Which radiology tools did AI tools name? 22 Sep 2026 record

Most named checked vendor

87 of 150 valid answers named Sectra

87 of 150 valid answers, 58.0% (Wilson 95% interval 50.0% to 65.6%)

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09, version 2026-09.1. Method v1.1. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695

Software a hospital, imaging center, or teleradiology group buys to store, view, route, and report medical images and run the radiology workflow around them (PACS, RIS, enterprise imaging).

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Vendor-selection source dates: 2026-09-21. The Index measures observed naming, not service quality or product merit.

Commissioned engagement: no.

Source Map · Dispute policy · Explore the buyer questions

Discuss this category's evidence

Criteria Maps

Observed buyer requirements before the first vendor in source answers captured on 22 and 23 September 2026. 149 valid source answers from 150 scheduled runs. These observations are separate from the original Index release figures.

Each vendor figure uses the median across the five most named vendors in the frozen category release, including zero counts. Adjacency compares distinct source answers for the same criterion; page coverage compares criteria for the same page state. Medians are descriptive and have no confidence interval.

Prepared by the Broadcastwell team. Team review: in progress. Zero analyst verified criteria.

The AI written RFP; Study DOI 10.5281/zenodo.23271935. Source DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695. CC BY 4.0.

Observed source answer frequencies. Wilson intervals describe the calculation, not independent population inference. Repeated runs are not independent performance tests. Page comparisons cover only the dated page and stated scope. An unstated claim is not an absent product feature.

Any named company may request one no-cost re-run at index@broadcastwell.com; both results are published.

Fix one answer, $490. Every figure comes from the published method, v1.1.

Read the full list of observed buyer requirements.

  1. Fit with stated practice needs or workflows

    25 of 149; 16.8%; Wilson 95% interval 11.6% to 23.6%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q1: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q2: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q10: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q3: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q2: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q2: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://healthmanagement.org/c/hospital/News/structured-pacs-selection-framework-guides-vendor-choice: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13230394/: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 3 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 3 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 2 source answers; No source shown: 22 source answers

    • AbbaDox: 5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Overviews|3

      No source shown: 5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%

    • Agfa: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|1

      No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%

    • Candelis: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2

      No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%

    • Carestream: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|3

      No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%

    • DeepHealth: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Overviews|3

      No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%

    • Epic: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Overviews|3

      No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%

    • Exa: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|3

      No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%

    • Fujifilm (Synapse): 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|3

      No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%

    • INFINITT: 6 of 149; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.9% to 8.5%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|2

      No source shown: 6 of 149; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.9% to 8.5%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%

    • Intelerad: 7 of 149; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.4%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|3

      No source shown: 7 of 149; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.4%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%

    • Konica: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|3

      No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%

    • MedicsRIS: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Overviews|3

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%

    • Medinformatix: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Overviews|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%

    • MiniPACS: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|3

      https://minipacs.net/affordable-pacs/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/best-cloud-pacs-for-radiology-clinics/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/pacs-cost/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • Nova: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%

    • NovaPACS: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|3

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%

    • Novarad: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Overviews|2

      No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%

    • OmniPACS: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|3

      https://minipacs.net/affordable-pacs/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/pacs-cost/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/pricing/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%

    • OnePACS: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|3

      No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%

    • Orthanc: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|3

      https://minipacs.net/affordable-pacs/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/best-cloud-pacs-for-radiology-clinics/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/pacs-cost/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • Philips: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%

    • PostDICOM: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|3

      https://minipacs.net/affordable-pacs/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/pacs-cost/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/pricing/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%

    • Q/ris: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%

    • RamSoft: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|3

      No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%

    • Roentgen: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|3

      No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%

    • Sectra: 8 of 149; 5.4%; Wilson 95% interval 2.7% to 10.2%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|3

      No source shown: 8 of 149; 5.4%; Wilson 95% interval 2.7% to 10.2%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%

    • Simplirad: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%

    • Visage Imaging: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|2

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%

    • dcm4chee: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|3

      https://minipacs.net/affordable-pacs/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/best-cloud-pacs-for-radiology-clinics/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/pacs-cost/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • eRAD: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%

  2. Cost appropriate to the imaging practice budget

    17 of 149; 11.4%; Wilson 95% interval 7.2% to 17.5%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q1: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q2: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q3: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, q10: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q2: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q3: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q3: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3

    No source shown: 17 source answers

    • AdvaPACS: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|3

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • Candelis: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2

      No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • INFINITT: 4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2

      No source shown: 4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • Konica: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2

      No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • MIMIC: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|3

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • Medicai: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • MiniPACS: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|3

      No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • OmniPACS: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|3

      No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • OnePACS: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2

      No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • Orthanc: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • PicomCloud: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|3

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • PostDICOM: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|3

      No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • ProtonPACS: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|3

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • sepStream: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|3

      No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  3. Fit with the preferred deployment model

    13 of 149; 8.7%; Wilson 95% interval 5.2% to 14.4%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q2: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 2 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 11 source answers

    • RamSoft: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|3

      No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  4. Ease of use

    12 of 149; 8.1%; Wilson 95% interval 4.7% to 13.5%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://healthmanagement.org/c/hospital/News/structured-pacs-selection-framework-guides-vendor-choice: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13230394/: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 2 source answers; https://sarcmediq.com/medical-imaging-software-for-hospitals/: 1 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 2 source answers; https://www.pixeon.com/en/blog/how-to-choose-a-pacs-for-radiology/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 9 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  5. Capacity to grow with practice needs

    11 of 149; 7.4%; Wilson 95% interval 4.2% to 12.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://sarcmediq.com/medical-imaging-software-for-hospitals/: 2 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 3 source answers; https://www.pixeon.com/en/blog/how-to-choose-a-pacs-for-radiology/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 8 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  6. Cloud based deployment

    11 of 149; 7.4%; Wilson 95% interval 4.2% to 12.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q3: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q3: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q3: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q3: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1

    https://minipacs.net/affordable-pacs/: 1 source answers; https://minipacs.net/pacs-cost/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 10 source answers

    • AdvaPACS: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|3

      No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • Intelerad: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Mode|1

      No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • MIMIC: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|3

      No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • Medicai: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|3

      No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • MiniPACS: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • OmniPACS: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • OnePACS: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|1

      No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • Paxera: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Mode|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • PostDICOM: 4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|3

      No source shown: 4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • Radsource: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • RamSoft: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Mode|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • sepStream: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|3

      No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  7. Costs over the system lifecycle

    11 of 149; 7.4%; Wilson 95% interval 4.2% to 12.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://sarcmediq.com/medical-imaging-software-for-hospitals/: 3 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 2 source answers; https://www.pixeon.com/en/blog/how-to-choose-a-pacs-for-radiology/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 8 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  8. Customer support

    11 of 149; 7.4%; Wilson 95% interval 4.2% to 12.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q1: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 3 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 3 source answers; https://www.pixeon.com/en/blog/how-to-choose-a-pacs-for-radiology/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 8 source answers

    • OnePACS: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • Proton: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Mode|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  9. Integration with EHR and RIS systems

    11 of 149; 7.4%; Wilson 95% interval 4.2% to 12.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 2 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 3 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 2 source answers; https://www.science.gov/topicpages/p/pacs+implementation+process: 3 source answers; No source shown: 8 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  10. Interoperability with existing systems

    11 of 149; 7.4%; Wilson 95% interval 4.2% to 12.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 3 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 3 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 8 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  11. Advanced visualization including 3D or image fusion

    10 of 149; 6.7%; Wilson 95% interval 3.7% to 11.9%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 1 source answers; https://www.pixeon.com/en/blog/how-to-choose-a-pacs-for-radiology/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 9 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  12. Configurable hanging protocols

    10 of 149; 6.7%; Wilson 95% interval 3.7% to 11.9%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://healthmanagement.org/c/hospital/News/structured-pacs-selection-framework-guides-vendor-choice: 3 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13230394/: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 2 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 2 source answers; No source shown: 7 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  13. Fast image access or responsive viewing

    10 of 149; 6.7%; Wilson 95% interval 3.7% to 11.9%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://cs.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/Elec-Practice-MedImag.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 3 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 6 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  14. AI tool integration or diagnostic assistance

    9 of 149; 6.0%; Wilson 95% interval 3.2% to 11.1%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2

    No source shown: 9 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  15. Data encryption

    9 of 149; 6.0%; Wilson 95% interval 3.2% to 11.1%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://hhscyber.hhs.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 3 source answers; https://sarcmediq.com/medical-imaging-software-for-hospitals/: 3 source answers; https://worldmetrics.org/best/radiology-pacs-software/: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 5 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  16. Demonstration or evaluation evidence

    9 of 149; 6.0%; Wilson 95% interval 3.2% to 11.1%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://dicom.nema.org/medical/dicom/current/output/chtml/part02/sect_n.3.3.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=59&utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://healthmanagement.org/c/hospital/News/structured-pacs-selection-framework-guides-vendor-choice: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13230394/: 3 source answers; https://sarcmediq.com/medical-imaging-software-for-hospitals/: 3 source answers; https://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/Reporting_Workflow?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/special-topics/health-information-technology/cloud-computing/index.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; https://www.pixeon.com/en/blog/how-to-choose-a-pacs-for-radiology/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 5 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  17. Patient data security safeguards

    9 of 149; 6.0%; Wilson 95% interval 3.2% to 11.1%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://hhscyber.hhs.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 3 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 3 source answers; https://sarcmediq.com/medical-imaging-software-for-hospitals/: 3 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 1 source answers; https://worldmetrics.org/best/radiology-pacs-software/: 1 source answers; https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/special-topics/health-information-technology/cloud-computing/index.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 4 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  18. Backup and disaster recovery arrangements

    8 of 149; 5.4%; Wilson 95% interval 2.7% to 10.2%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 3 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 3 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 1 source answers; https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/special-topics/health-information-technology/cloud-computing/index.html?utm_source=openai: 2 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  19. DICOM compatibility

    8 of 149; 5.4%; Wilson 95% interval 2.7% to 10.2%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 2 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 3 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 2 source answers; https://www.science.gov/topicpages/p/pacs+implementation+process: 3 source answers; No source shown: 5 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  20. Disaster recovery arrangements

    8 of 149; 5.4%; Wilson 95% interval 2.7% to 10.2%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 1 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 7 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  21. Support for required imaging modalities

    8 of 149; 5.4%; Wilson 95% interval 2.7% to 10.2%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3

    No source shown: 8 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  22. Access controls

    7 of 149; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.4%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1

    https://healthsectorcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/tech-vol2-508.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://hhscyber.hhs.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals.html?utm_source=openai: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 1 source answers; https://sarcmediq.com/medical-imaging-software-for-hospitals/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  23. Applicable healthcare and data protection compliance

    7 of 149; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.4%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2

    No source shown: 7 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  24. Audit logging

    7 of 149; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.4%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://healthsectorcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/tech-vol2-508.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://hhscyber.hhs.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 3 source answers; https://sarcmediq.com/medical-imaging-software-for-hospitals/: 3 source answers; https://worldmetrics.org/best/radiology-pacs-software/: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  25. Clear pricing and fees

    7 of 149; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.4%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2

    https://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/Reporting_Workflow?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; No source shown: 6 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  26. Diagnostic image or display quality

    7 of 149; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.4%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://cs.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/Elec-Practice-MedImag.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=59&utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 3 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 3 source answers; https://sarcmediq.com/medical-imaging-software-for-hospitals/: 2 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; https://www.pixeon.com/en/blog/how-to-choose-a-pacs-for-radiology/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  27. HL7 or FHIR interoperability

    7 of 149; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.4%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3

    No source shown: 7 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  28. Pay per study pricing suited to low or variable volume

    7 of 149; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.4%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q3: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q3: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q3: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q3: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|2

    https://minipacs.net/affordable-pacs/: 1 source answers; https://minipacs.net/pacs-cost/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 6 source answers

    • OmniPACS: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|2

      https://minipacs.net/affordable-pacs/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://minipacs.net/pacs-cost/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • OnePACS: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • PicomCloud: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|3

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • ProtonPACS: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|3

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • Radsource: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • sepStream: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|3

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  29. Automatic retrieval of prior studies

    6 of 149; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.9% to 8.5%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2

    No source shown: 6 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  30. Reading worklist management

    6 of 149; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.9% to 8.5%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://healthmanagement.org/c/hospital/News/structured-pacs-selection-framework-guides-vendor-choice: 3 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13230394/: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 2 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 2 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  31. Remote access and reading

    6 of 149; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.9% to 8.5%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1

    No source shown: 6 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  32. Support for clinical subspecialties

    6 of 149; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.9% to 8.5%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3

    https://cs.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/Elec-Practice-MedImag.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; No source shown: 5 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  33. System performance

    6 of 149; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.9% to 8.5%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 3 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 3 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  34. Training and education for operational users

    6 of 149; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.9% to 8.5%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 3 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 3 source answers; https://www.pixeon.com/en/blog/how-to-choose-a-pacs-for-radiology/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  35. Configurable user interface

    5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3

    No source shown: 5 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  36. Encryption of data at rest and in transit

    5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2

    No source shown: 5 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  37. Imaging data migration arrangements

    5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3

    No source shown: 5 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  38. Low local server or infrastructure overhead

    5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q3: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q1: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q2: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q3: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|3

    No source shown: 5 source answers

    • Konica: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • RamSoft: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Mode|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  39. Predictable subscription pricing

    5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q3: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q3: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|2

    https://minipacs.net/affordable-pacs/: 1 source answers; https://minipacs.net/pacs-cost/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 4 source answers

  40. Redundancy and fault tolerance

    5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 2 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 1 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  41. Reliable retrieval of prior studies including older archives

    5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 3 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  42. Subscription pricing

    5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q3: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q3: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q3: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|3

    No source shown: 5 source answers

    • Medicai: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • MiniPACS: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|3

      No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • OmniPACS: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Overviews|3

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • OnePACS: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • PACScribe: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • PostDICOM: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Google AI Mode|3

      No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  43. System reliability

    5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q10: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3

    No source shown: 5 source answers

    • Sectra: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Google AI Mode|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  44. Voice recognition, dictation or transcription

    5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://healthmanagement.org/c/hospital/News/structured-pacs-selection-framework-guides-vendor-choice: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13230394/: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 2 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  45. Access controls and role based permissions

    4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 1 source answers; https://sarcmediq.com/medical-imaging-software-for-hospitals/: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  46. Compatibility with existing or vendor neutral archives

    4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1

    https://dicom.nema.org/medical/dicom/current/output/chtml/part02/sect_n.3.3.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  47. Continuous system or network performance monitoring

    4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 3 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 3 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  48. Image manipulation tools

    4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 3 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 3 source answers; https://sarcmediq.com/medical-imaging-software-for-hospitals/: 2 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; https://www.pixeon.com/en/blog/how-to-choose-a-pacs-for-radiology/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  49. Multifactor authentication

    4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://healthsectorcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/tech-vol2-508.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://hhscyber.hhs.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 1 source answers; https://sarcmediq.com/medical-imaging-software-for-hospitals/: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  50. Patient identification or demographic handling

    4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1

    No source shown: 4 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  51. References or evidence from comparable facilities

    4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2

    No source shown: 4 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  52. Reporting functionality

    4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2

    https://healthmanagement.org/c/hospital/News/structured-pacs-selection-framework-guides-vendor-choice: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13230394/: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 1 source answers; https://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/Reporting_Workflow?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  53. Usable data export

    4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3

    https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/special-topics/health-information-technology/cloud-computing/index.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  54. Ability to self host the imaging system

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Perplexity, q3: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|3

    https://minipacs.net/affordable-pacs/: 1 source answers; https://minipacs.net/pacs-cost/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers

  55. Access to prior studies

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3

    https://cs.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/Elec-Practice-MedImag.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  56. After hours or round the clock support

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3

    No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  57. Automation of repetitive imaging workflows

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2

    No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  58. Contractual terms

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  59. DICOM compatibility and conformance evidence

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3

    https://dicom.nema.org/medical/dicom/2022b/output/chtml/part18/chapter_6.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://dicom.nema.org/medical/dicom/current/output/chtml/part02/chapter_6.html: 1 source answers; https://dicom.nema.org/medical/dicom/current/output/chtml/part02/sect_n.3.3.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  60. Defined maximum acceptable data loss

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3

    No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  61. Defined maximum recovery time

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3

    No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  62. Documented service availability commitments

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2

    https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/special-topics/health-information-technology/cloud-computing/index.html?utm_source=openai: 2 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  63. Evidence of successful restoration or failover tests

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3

    https://healthsectorcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/tech-vol2-508.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://hhscyber.hhs.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  64. Migration data validation

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1

    No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  65. Order or examination status handling

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  66. Patient identity matching and demographic reconciliation

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  67. Reliable service and business continuity

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 3 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 3 source answers; https://spie.org/Publications/Proceedings/Volume/3662: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  68. Remote access to imaging information

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q1: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2

    No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  69. Security patching and vulnerability management commitments

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3

    https://healthsectorcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/tech-vol2-508.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://hhscyber.hhs.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals.html?utm_source=openai: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  70. Software upgrade support

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 3 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 3 source answers; https://www.pixeon.com/en/blog/how-to-choose-a-pacs-for-radiology/: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  71. Structured reporting

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://healthmanagement.org/c/hospital/News/structured-pacs-selection-framework-guides-vendor-choice: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13230394/: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 2 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 2 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  72. Support for required imaging modalities and clinical specialties

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 3 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 3 source answers; https://sarcmediq.com/medical-imaging-software-for-hospitals/: 2 source answers; https://www.pixeon.com/en/blog/how-to-choose-a-pacs-for-radiology/: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  73. Usable bulk data export with defined formats, throughput and fees

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  74. Usable interface and efficient navigation

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3

    No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  75. Usable workflows during network, server or site outages

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 3 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  76. User authentication controls

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Perplexity, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 2 source answers; https://sarcmediq.com/medical-imaging-software-for-hospitals/: 2 source answers; https://worldmetrics.org/best/radiology-pacs-software/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  77. Working connections with existing modalities, RIS, EHR and reporting systems

    3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3

    https://dicom.nema.org/medical/dicom/current/output/chtml/part02/sect_n.3.3.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  78. API access for data exchange

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  79. Access to prior studies during transition and defined cutover handling

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  80. Applicable IHE workflow integration evidence

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3

    https://dicom.nema.org/medical/dicom/2022b/output/chtml/part18/chapter_6.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://profiles.ihe.net/RAD/?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/Scheduled_Workflow?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  81. Business associate agreement

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3

    https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/special-topics/health-information-technology/cloud-computing/index.html?utm_source=openai: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  82. DICOMweb interfaces

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  83. Data backup arrangements

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  84. Data return or access after termination

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3

    https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/faq/may-a-hipaa-covered-entity-or-business-associate-use-cloud-service-to-store-or-process-ephi/index.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/special-topics/health-information-technology/cloud-computing/index.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  85. Demonstrated performance on representative studies and workflows

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  86. Efficient patient and examination scheduling

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Mode, q2: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|3

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    • RamSoft: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|3

      No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  87. Fit with the preferred EHR alignment, workflow, multisite standardization or consolidation priority

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q2: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|3

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    • AbbaDox: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|3

      No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • Epic: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|3

      No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • Intelerad: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|3

      No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • MedicsRIS: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|3

      No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • RISynergy: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|2

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • RamSoft: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Claude|3

      No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  88. Integration with a radiology information system

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q1: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    • RamSoft: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Mode|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  89. Outside image import and reconciliation

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  90. Outside study import or handling

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  91. Performance over the actual remote reading connection

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  92. Performance under realistic concurrent user load

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  93. Reading and workflow coordination across sites

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q10: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Google AI Mode|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    • Intelerad: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Google AI Mode|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  94. Reading worklists and study routing

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  95. Referring clinician access

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  96. Report amendment or update handling

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  97. Reporting integration

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  98. Required functions currently available

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  99. Rights to imaging data

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  100. Rollback arrangements for failed migration or launch

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  101. Shared workspaces, messages and study notes

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  102. Single sign on

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  103. Synchronized study comparison

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2

    No source shown: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  104. Vendor references or reference evidence

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13230394/: 1 source answers; https://sarcmediq.com/medical-imaging-software-for-hospitals/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  105. Vendor viability and continued product development

    2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Perplexity, q9: 2 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1; radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 2 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 2 source answers; https://www.pixeon.com/en/blog/how-to-choose-a-pacs-for-radiology/: 2 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  106. Automated data exchange between connected systems

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|3

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  107. Automatic software installation and updates

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  108. Billing functionality

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Mode, q2: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  109. Billing system integration

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Mode, q2: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|3

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  110. Business associate agreement and security responsibility allocation

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1

    https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/special-topics/health-information-technology/cloud-computing/index.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  111. Clinical collaboration

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://healthmanagement.org/c/hospital/News/structured-pacs-selection-framework-guides-vendor-choice: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  112. Configurable reading worklists and study routing

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|2

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  113. Connected image, clinical information and reporting workflows

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  114. Connected or coordinated radiology workflows

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Mode, q10: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Google AI Mode|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    • Fujifilm (Synapse): 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Google AI Mode|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • Intelerad: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Google AI Mode|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  115. Controlled vendor remote access

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3

    https://healthsectorcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/tech-vol2-508.pdf?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  116. Critical result notifications

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  117. Defined migration cutover handling

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  118. Diagnostic viewer suited to required client architecture

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  119. Ease of deployment

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q1: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    • Candelis: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • INFINITT: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • Konica: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

    • OnePACS: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Claude|2

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  120. Fast image prefetching

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Mode, q10: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Google AI Mode|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  121. Fast remote image viewing

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Mode, q1: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q1|Google AI Mode|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  122. Fit with clinical reading workflows and operational needs

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|3

    https://healthmanagement.org/c/hospital/News/structured-pacs-selection-framework-guides-vendor-choice: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  123. Full lifecycle costs including infrastructure, services and exit

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  124. Image manipulation and measurement tools

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  125. Image measurement tools

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  126. Image sharing

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  127. Implementation assistance and defined launch responsibilities

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  128. Implementation support

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|2

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 1 source answers; https://www.intelerad.com/en/2022/03/04/how-to-choose-a-pacs-system-and-vendor/: 1 source answers; https://www.pixeon.com/en/blog/how-to-choose-a-pacs-for-radiology/: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  129. Incident response and vendor notification arrangements

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1

    https://hhscyber.hhs.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  130. Incident response arrangements

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2

    https://hhscyber.hhs.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  131. Insurance pre authorization tracking

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Mode, q2: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    • RamSoft: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  132. Integration with a picture archiving and communication system

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Mode, q2: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    • RamSoft: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  133. Long term archive capacity planning

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|3

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  134. Manageable implementation and ongoing IT administration

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  135. Migration support

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  136. Open source availability

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Perplexity, q3: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q3|Perplexity|3

    No source shown: 1 source answers

  137. Patient check in

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Mode, q10: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q10|Google AI Mode|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  138. Patient communication and engagement

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Mode, q2: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|3

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    • RamSoft: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|3

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  139. Patient data access and activity audit logs

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Claude|2

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  140. Patient intake or portal access

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Mode, q2: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    • RamSoft: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
      Vendor source evidence

      Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|1

      No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%

  141. Reconciliation of acquisitions and reports after downtime

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  142. Reporting workflow integration and report handling

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  143. Required functions currently delivered and tested

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  144. Responsive support and escalation commitments

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  145. SOC 2 Type II assurance

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  146. Safeguards against duplicate reading

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  147. Structured reporting and report templates

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Overviews|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  148. Study comparison tools

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Google AI Mode|3

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  149. Support for multisite operations

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|Perplexity|1

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3138937/: 1 source answers; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4090402/: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  150. Support for the specific interfaces required by the buyer environment

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  151. Synchronization between PACS and RIS

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    Google AI Mode, q2: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q2|Google AI Mode|3

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  152. Synchronized scrolling and study comparison tools

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|3

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  153. Validation of migration completeness, identity and image integrity

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  154. Vendor incident notifications

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|2

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

  155. Worklists suited to site, specialty and coverage needs

    1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.

    Runs, sources and adjacent vendors

    ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs

    Deposited source answers radiology-medical-imaging|q9|ChatGPT|1

    No source shown: 1 source answers

    No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

Download complete category evidence · Download manifest and source hashes

Full checked set, sorted by observed counts, not a ranking.
VendorNamedVendor domain cited
Sectra87 of 150 valid answers, 58.0% (Wilson 95% interval 50.0% to 65.6%)19 of 150 valid answers, 12.7% (Wilson 95% interval 8.3% to 18.9%)
Intelerad80 of 150 valid answers, 53.3% (Wilson 95% interval 45.4% to 61.1%)31 of 150 valid answers, 20.7% (Wilson 95% interval 15.0% to 27.8%)
Visage Imaging65 of 150 valid answers, 43.3% (Wilson 95% interval 35.7% to 51.3%)18 of 150 valid answers, 12.0% (Wilson 95% interval 7.7% to 18.2%)
Fujifilm (Synapse)51 of 150 valid answers, 34.0% (Wilson 95% interval 26.9% to 41.9%)14 of 150 valid answers, 9.3% (Wilson 95% interval 5.6% to 15.1%)
RamSoft46 of 150 valid answers, 30.7% (Wilson 95% interval 23.8% to 38.5%)18 of 150 valid answers, 12.0% (Wilson 95% interval 7.7% to 18.2%)
Agfa HealthCare41 of 150 valid answers, 27.3% (Wilson 95% interval 20.8% to 35.0%)4 of 150 valid answers, 2.7% (Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%)
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging)27 of 150 valid answers, 18.0% (Wilson 95% interval 12.7% to 24.9%)2 of 150 valid answers, 1.3% (Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%)
GE HealthCare24 of 150 valid answers, 16.0% (Wilson 95% interval 11.0% to 22.7%)6 of 150 valid answers, 4.0% (Wilson 95% interval 1.8% to 8.5%)
INFINITT Healthcare17 of 150 valid answers, 11.3% (Wilson 95% interval 7.2% to 17.4%)1 of 150 valid answers, 0.7% (Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%)
Novarad17 of 150 valid answers, 11.3% (Wilson 95% interval 7.2% to 17.4%)7 of 150 valid answers, 4.7% (Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.3%)
AbbaDox16 of 150 valid answers, 10.7% (Wilson 95% interval 6.7% to 16.6%)8 of 150 valid answers, 5.3% (Wilson 95% interval 2.7% to 10.2%)
Merative (Merge)16 of 150 valid answers, 10.7% (Wilson 95% interval 6.7% to 16.6%)1 of 150 valid answers, 0.7% (Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%)
PostDICOM15 of 150 valid answers, 10.0% (Wilson 95% interval 6.2% to 15.8%)10 of 150 valid answers, 6.7% (Wilson 95% interval 3.7% to 11.8%)
Siemens Healthineers13 of 150 valid answers, 8.7% (Wilson 95% interval 5.1% to 14.3%)0 of 150 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)
eRAD12 of 150 valid answers, 8.0% (Wilson 95% interval 4.6% to 13.5%)7 of 150 valid answers, 4.7% (Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.3%)
OnePACS12 of 150 valid answers, 8.0% (Wilson 95% interval 4.6% to 13.5%)6 of 150 valid answers, 4.0% (Wilson 95% interval 1.8% to 8.5%)
Carestream Health10 of 150 valid answers, 6.7% (Wilson 95% interval 3.7% to 11.8%)0 of 150 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)
MedInformatix6 of 150 valid answers, 4.0% (Wilson 95% interval 1.8% to 8.5%)3 of 150 valid answers, 2.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%)
Pro Medicus6 of 150 valid answers, 4.0% (Wilson 95% interval 1.8% to 8.5%)2 of 150 valid answers, 1.3% (Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%)
AdvaPACS5 of 150 valid answers, 3.3% (Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%)0 of 150 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)
PaxeraHealth4 of 150 valid answers, 2.7% (Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%)1 of 150 valid answers, 0.7% (Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%)
Mach7 Technologies3 of 150 valid answers, 2.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%)1 of 150 valid answers, 0.7% (Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%)
Canon Medical Informatics0 of 150 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)0 of 150 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)
Hyland0 of 150 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)0 of 150 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)

Pair-specific question and engine records

The comparison records are collected here. Each disclosure contains the full dated counts for its pair or alternatives question. Open a disclosure to read its evidence; the text is present without JavaScript.

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) and Sectra

Radiology and medical imaging software · September 2026

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) and Sectra in the observed answers

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) appears in 27 of 150 answers about radiology and medical imaging software; Sectra appears in 87 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) and Sectra have different naming counts on 8 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 2 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) record · Sectra record · Radiology and medical imaging software checked set.

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) beside Sectra

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) and Sectra totals
MeasurePhilips (HealthSuite Imaging)Sectra
Named27/150; 18.0% (95% CI 12.7 to 24.9)87/150; 58.0% (95% CI 50.0 to 65.6)
Own domain cited2/150; 1.3% (95% CI 0.4 to 4.7)19/150; 12.7% (95% CI 8.3 to 18.9)

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra: question q1

What is the best PACS for a small imaging center?

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8).

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) and Sectra on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / ChatGPTPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / ClaudePhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / PerplexityPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / Google AI ModePhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra: question q2

What is the best RIS for an outpatient imaging center?

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) and Sectra on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / ChatGPTPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / ClaudePhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / PerplexityPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / Google AI ModePhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra: question q3

What is the most affordable PACS for a low volume imaging center?

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) and Sectra on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / ChatGPTPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / ClaudePhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / PerplexityPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / Google AI ModePhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra: question q4

What are the best alternatives to Sectra PACS?

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging): 11/15; 73.3% (95% CI 48.0 to 89.1). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) and Sectra on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / ChatGPTPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / ClaudePhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / PerplexityPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 1 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / Google AI ModePhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra: question q5

What are the best alternatives to Intelerad for a teleradiology group?

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) and Sectra on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / ChatGPTPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / ClaudePhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / PerplexityPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / Google AI ModePhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra: question q6

What are the best alternatives to Philips IntelliSpace PACS?

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging): 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) and Sectra on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / ChatGPTPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / ClaudePhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / PerplexityPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / Google AI ModePhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra: question q7

Sectra vs Visage Imaging, which PACS is better for a hospital system?

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging): 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) and Sectra on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / ChatGPTPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / ClaudePhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 1 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / PerplexityPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / Google AI ModePhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra: question q8

Visage vs Intelerad, which is better for a teleradiology firm?

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9).

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) and Sectra on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / ChatGPTPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / ClaudePhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / PerplexityPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / Google AI ModePhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra: question q9

What should I look for when choosing a new radiology PACS?

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) and Sectra on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / ChatGPTPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / ClaudePhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / PerplexityPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / Google AI ModePhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra: question q10

What is the best RIS PACS for an imaging group with five locations?

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) and Sectra on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / ChatGPTPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / ClaudePhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / PerplexityPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Sectra / Google AI ModePhilips (HealthSuite Imaging): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging)'s own-domain citation count is 2 of 150; Sectra's is 19 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Radiology and medical imaging software · Exact Radiology and medical imaging software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

GE HealthCare and Sectra

Radiology and medical imaging software · September 2026

GE HealthCare and Sectra in the observed answers

GE HealthCare appears in 24 of 150 answers about radiology and medical imaging software; Sectra appears in 87 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

GE HealthCare and Sectra have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. GE HealthCare record · Sectra record · Radiology and medical imaging software checked set.

GE HealthCare beside Sectra

GE HealthCare and Sectra totals
MeasureGE HealthCareSectra
Named24/150; 16.0% (95% CI 11.0 to 22.7)87/150; 58.0% (95% CI 50.0 to 65.6)
Own domain cited6/150; 4.0% (95% CI 1.8 to 8.5)19/150; 12.7% (95% CI 8.3 to 18.9)

GE HealthCare / Sectra: question q1

What is the best PACS for a small imaging center?

GE HealthCare: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). Sectra: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8).

GE HealthCare and Sectra on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
GE HealthCare / Sectra / ChatGPTGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / ClaudeGE HealthCare: 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / PerplexityGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI ModeGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

GE HealthCare / Sectra: question q2

What is the best RIS for an outpatient imaging center?

GE HealthCare: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

GE HealthCare and Sectra on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
GE HealthCare / Sectra / ChatGPTGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / ClaudeGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / PerplexityGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI ModeGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

GE HealthCare / Sectra: question q3

What is the most affordable PACS for a low volume imaging center?

GE HealthCare: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

GE HealthCare and Sectra on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
GE HealthCare / Sectra / ChatGPTGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / ClaudeGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / PerplexityGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI ModeGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.

GE HealthCare / Sectra: question q4

What are the best alternatives to Sectra PACS?

GE HealthCare: 5/15; 33.3% (95% CI 15.2 to 58.3). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

GE HealthCare and Sectra on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
GE HealthCare / Sectra / ChatGPTGE HealthCare: 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / ClaudeGE HealthCare: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / PerplexityGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI ModeGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

GE HealthCare / Sectra: question q5

What are the best alternatives to Intelerad for a teleradiology group?

GE HealthCare: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Sectra: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

GE HealthCare and Sectra on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
GE HealthCare / Sectra / ChatGPTGE HealthCare: 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / ClaudeGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / PerplexityGE HealthCare: 1 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI ModeGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

GE HealthCare / Sectra: question q6

What are the best alternatives to Philips IntelliSpace PACS?

GE HealthCare: 9/15; 60.0% (95% CI 35.7 to 80.2). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

GE HealthCare and Sectra on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
GE HealthCare / Sectra / ChatGPTGE HealthCare: 1 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / ClaudeGE HealthCare: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / PerplexityGE HealthCare: 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsGE HealthCare: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI ModeGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

GE HealthCare / Sectra: question q7

Sectra vs Visage Imaging, which PACS is better for a hospital system?

GE HealthCare: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

GE HealthCare and Sectra on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
GE HealthCare / Sectra / ChatGPTGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / ClaudeGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / PerplexityGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI ModeGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

GE HealthCare / Sectra: question q8

Visage vs Intelerad, which is better for a teleradiology firm?

GE HealthCare: 5/15; 33.3% (95% CI 15.2 to 58.3). Sectra: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9).

GE HealthCare and Sectra on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
GE HealthCare / Sectra / ChatGPTGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / ClaudeGE HealthCare: 3 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / PerplexityGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsGE HealthCare: 2 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI ModeGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

GE HealthCare / Sectra: question q9

What should I look for when choosing a new radiology PACS?

GE HealthCare: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

GE HealthCare and Sectra on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
GE HealthCare / Sectra / ChatGPTGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / ClaudeGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / PerplexityGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI ModeGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

GE HealthCare / Sectra: question q10

What is the best RIS PACS for an imaging group with five locations?

GE HealthCare: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

GE HealthCare and Sectra on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
GE HealthCare / Sectra / ChatGPTGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / ClaudeGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / PerplexityGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
GE HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI ModeGE HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

GE HealthCare's own-domain citation count is 6 of 150; Sectra's is 19 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Radiology and medical imaging software · Exact Radiology and medical imaging software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Fujifilm (Synapse) and Sectra

Radiology and medical imaging software · September 2026

Fujifilm (Synapse) and Sectra in the observed answers

Fujifilm (Synapse) appears in 51 of 150 answers about radiology and medical imaging software; Sectra appears in 87 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Fujifilm (Synapse) and Sectra have different naming counts on 8 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 2 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Fujifilm (Synapse) record · Sectra record · Radiology and medical imaging software checked set.

Fujifilm (Synapse) beside Sectra

Fujifilm (Synapse) and Sectra totals
MeasureFujifilm (Synapse)Sectra
Named51/150; 34.0% (95% CI 26.9 to 41.9)87/150; 58.0% (95% CI 50.0 to 65.6)
Own domain cited14/150; 9.3% (95% CI 5.6 to 15.1)19/150; 12.7% (95% CI 8.3 to 18.9)

Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra: question q1

What is the best PACS for a small imaging center?

Fujifilm (Synapse): 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Sectra: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8).

Fujifilm (Synapse) and Sectra on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / ChatGPTFujifilm (Synapse): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / ClaudeFujifilm (Synapse): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / PerplexityFujifilm (Synapse): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsFujifilm (Synapse): 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / Google AI ModeFujifilm (Synapse): 1 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra: question q2

What is the best RIS for an outpatient imaging center?

Fujifilm (Synapse): 6/15; 40.0% (95% CI 19.8 to 64.3). Sectra: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

Fujifilm (Synapse) and Sectra on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / ChatGPTFujifilm (Synapse): 1 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / ClaudeFujifilm (Synapse): 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / PerplexityFujifilm (Synapse): 3 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsFujifilm (Synapse): 1 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / Google AI ModeFujifilm (Synapse): 1 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra: question q3

What is the most affordable PACS for a low volume imaging center?

Fujifilm (Synapse): 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

Fujifilm (Synapse) and Sectra on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / ChatGPTFujifilm (Synapse): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / ClaudeFujifilm (Synapse): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / PerplexityFujifilm (Synapse): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsFujifilm (Synapse): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / Google AI ModeFujifilm (Synapse): 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.

Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra: question q4

What are the best alternatives to Sectra PACS?

Fujifilm (Synapse): 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Fujifilm (Synapse) and Sectra on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / ChatGPTFujifilm (Synapse): 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / ClaudeFujifilm (Synapse): 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / PerplexityFujifilm (Synapse): 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsFujifilm (Synapse): 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / Google AI ModeFujifilm (Synapse): 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra: question q5

What are the best alternatives to Intelerad for a teleradiology group?

Fujifilm (Synapse): 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). Sectra: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Fujifilm (Synapse) and Sectra on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / ChatGPTFujifilm (Synapse): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / ClaudeFujifilm (Synapse): 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / PerplexityFujifilm (Synapse): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsFujifilm (Synapse): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / Google AI ModeFujifilm (Synapse): 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra: question q6

What are the best alternatives to Philips IntelliSpace PACS?

Fujifilm (Synapse): 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Fujifilm (Synapse) and Sectra on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / ChatGPTFujifilm (Synapse): 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / ClaudeFujifilm (Synapse): 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / PerplexityFujifilm (Synapse): 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsFujifilm (Synapse): 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / Google AI ModeFujifilm (Synapse): 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra: question q7

Sectra vs Visage Imaging, which PACS is better for a hospital system?

Fujifilm (Synapse): 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Fujifilm (Synapse) and Sectra on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / ChatGPTFujifilm (Synapse): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / ClaudeFujifilm (Synapse): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / PerplexityFujifilm (Synapse): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsFujifilm (Synapse): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / Google AI ModeFujifilm (Synapse): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra: question q8

Visage vs Intelerad, which is better for a teleradiology firm?

Fujifilm (Synapse): 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9).

Fujifilm (Synapse) and Sectra on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / ChatGPTFujifilm (Synapse): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / ClaudeFujifilm (Synapse): 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / PerplexityFujifilm (Synapse): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsFujifilm (Synapse): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / Google AI ModeFujifilm (Synapse): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra: question q9

What should I look for when choosing a new radiology PACS?

Fujifilm (Synapse): 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Fujifilm (Synapse) and Sectra on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / ChatGPTFujifilm (Synapse): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / ClaudeFujifilm (Synapse): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / PerplexityFujifilm (Synapse): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsFujifilm (Synapse): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / Google AI ModeFujifilm (Synapse): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra: question q10

What is the best RIS PACS for an imaging group with five locations?

Fujifilm (Synapse): 13/15; 86.7% (95% CI 62.1 to 96.3). Sectra: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

Fujifilm (Synapse) and Sectra on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / ChatGPTFujifilm (Synapse): 3 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / ClaudeFujifilm (Synapse): 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / PerplexityFujifilm (Synapse): 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsFujifilm (Synapse): 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Fujifilm (Synapse) / Sectra / Google AI ModeFujifilm (Synapse): 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Fujifilm (Synapse)'s own-domain citation count is 14 of 150; Sectra's is 19 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Radiology and medical imaging software · Exact Radiology and medical imaging software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Agfa HealthCare and Sectra

Radiology and medical imaging software · September 2026

Agfa HealthCare and Sectra in the observed answers

Agfa HealthCare appears in 41 of 150 answers about radiology and medical imaging software; Sectra appears in 87 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Agfa HealthCare and Sectra have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Agfa HealthCare record · Sectra record · Radiology and medical imaging software checked set.

Agfa HealthCare beside Sectra

Agfa HealthCare and Sectra totals
MeasureAgfa HealthCareSectra
Named41/150; 27.3% (95% CI 20.8 to 35.0)87/150; 58.0% (95% CI 50.0 to 65.6)
Own domain cited4/150; 2.7% (95% CI 1.0 to 6.7)19/150; 12.7% (95% CI 8.3 to 18.9)

Agfa HealthCare / Sectra: question q1

What is the best PACS for a small imaging center?

Agfa HealthCare: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Sectra: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8).

Agfa HealthCare and Sectra on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / ChatGPTAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / ClaudeAgfa HealthCare: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / PerplexityAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI ModeAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Agfa HealthCare / Sectra: question q2

What is the best RIS for an outpatient imaging center?

Agfa HealthCare: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

Agfa HealthCare and Sectra on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / ChatGPTAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / ClaudeAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / PerplexityAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI ModeAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Agfa HealthCare / Sectra: question q3

What is the most affordable PACS for a low volume imaging center?

Agfa HealthCare: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

Agfa HealthCare and Sectra on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / ChatGPTAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / ClaudeAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / PerplexityAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI ModeAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.

Agfa HealthCare / Sectra: question q4

What are the best alternatives to Sectra PACS?

Agfa HealthCare: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Agfa HealthCare and Sectra on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / ChatGPTAgfa HealthCare: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / ClaudeAgfa HealthCare: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / PerplexityAgfa HealthCare: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsAgfa HealthCare: 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI ModeAgfa HealthCare: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Agfa HealthCare / Sectra: question q5

What are the best alternatives to Intelerad for a teleradiology group?

Agfa HealthCare: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0). Sectra: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Agfa HealthCare and Sectra on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / ChatGPTAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / ClaudeAgfa HealthCare: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / PerplexityAgfa HealthCare: 1 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI ModeAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Agfa HealthCare / Sectra: question q6

What are the best alternatives to Philips IntelliSpace PACS?

Agfa HealthCare: 13/15; 86.7% (95% CI 62.1 to 96.3). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Agfa HealthCare and Sectra on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / ChatGPTAgfa HealthCare: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / ClaudeAgfa HealthCare: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / PerplexityAgfa HealthCare: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsAgfa HealthCare: 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI ModeAgfa HealthCare: 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Agfa HealthCare / Sectra: question q7

Sectra vs Visage Imaging, which PACS is better for a hospital system?

Agfa HealthCare: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Agfa HealthCare and Sectra on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / ChatGPTAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / ClaudeAgfa HealthCare: 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / PerplexityAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI ModeAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Agfa HealthCare / Sectra: question q8

Visage vs Intelerad, which is better for a teleradiology firm?

Agfa HealthCare: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9).

Agfa HealthCare and Sectra on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / ChatGPTAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / ClaudeAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / PerplexityAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI ModeAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

Agfa HealthCare / Sectra: question q9

What should I look for when choosing a new radiology PACS?

Agfa HealthCare: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Agfa HealthCare and Sectra on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / ChatGPTAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / ClaudeAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / PerplexityAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI ModeAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

Agfa HealthCare / Sectra: question q10

What is the best RIS PACS for an imaging group with five locations?

Agfa HealthCare: 5/15; 33.3% (95% CI 15.2 to 58.3). Sectra: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

Agfa HealthCare and Sectra on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / ChatGPTAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / ClaudeAgfa HealthCare: 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / PerplexityAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsAgfa HealthCare: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Agfa HealthCare / Sectra / Google AI ModeAgfa HealthCare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Agfa HealthCare's own-domain citation count is 4 of 150; Sectra's is 19 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Radiology and medical imaging software · Exact Radiology and medical imaging software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Intelerad and Sectra

Radiology and medical imaging software · September 2026

Intelerad and Sectra in the observed answers

Intelerad appears in 80 of 150 answers about radiology and medical imaging software; Sectra appears in 87 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Intelerad and Sectra have different naming counts on 8 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 2 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Intelerad record · Sectra record · Radiology and medical imaging software checked set.

Intelerad beside Sectra

Intelerad and Sectra totals
MeasureInteleradSectra
Named80/150; 53.3% (95% CI 45.4 to 61.1)87/150; 58.0% (95% CI 50.0 to 65.6)
Own domain cited31/150; 20.7% (95% CI 15.0 to 27.8)19/150; 12.7% (95% CI 8.3 to 18.9)

Intelerad / Sectra: question q1

What is the best PACS for a small imaging center?

Intelerad: 8/15; 53.3% (95% CI 30.1 to 75.2). Sectra: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8).

Intelerad and Sectra on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
Intelerad / Sectra / ChatGPTIntelerad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / ClaudeIntelerad: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / PerplexityIntelerad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsIntelerad: 2 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / Google AI ModeIntelerad: 3 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Intelerad / Sectra: question q2

What is the best RIS for an outpatient imaging center?

Intelerad: 5/15; 33.3% (95% CI 15.2 to 58.3). Sectra: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

Intelerad and Sectra on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
Intelerad / Sectra / ChatGPTIntelerad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / ClaudeIntelerad: 3 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / PerplexityIntelerad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsIntelerad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / Google AI ModeIntelerad: 2 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Intelerad / Sectra: question q3

What is the most affordable PACS for a low volume imaging center?

Intelerad: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

Intelerad and Sectra on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
Intelerad / Sectra / ChatGPTIntelerad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / ClaudeIntelerad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / PerplexityIntelerad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsIntelerad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / Google AI ModeIntelerad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.

Intelerad / Sectra: question q4

What are the best alternatives to Sectra PACS?

Intelerad: 13/15; 86.7% (95% CI 62.1 to 96.3). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Intelerad and Sectra on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
Intelerad / Sectra / ChatGPTIntelerad: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / ClaudeIntelerad: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / PerplexityIntelerad: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsIntelerad: 1 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / Google AI ModeIntelerad: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Intelerad / Sectra: question q5

What are the best alternatives to Intelerad for a teleradiology group?

Intelerad: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0). Sectra: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Intelerad and Sectra on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
Intelerad / Sectra / ChatGPTIntelerad: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / ClaudeIntelerad: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / PerplexityIntelerad: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsIntelerad: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / Google AI ModeIntelerad: 3 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Intelerad / Sectra: question q6

What are the best alternatives to Philips IntelliSpace PACS?

Intelerad: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Intelerad and Sectra on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
Intelerad / Sectra / ChatGPTIntelerad: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / ClaudeIntelerad: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / PerplexityIntelerad: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsIntelerad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / Google AI ModeIntelerad: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Intelerad / Sectra: question q7

Sectra vs Visage Imaging, which PACS is better for a hospital system?

Intelerad: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Intelerad and Sectra on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
Intelerad / Sectra / ChatGPTIntelerad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / ClaudeIntelerad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / PerplexityIntelerad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsIntelerad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / Google AI ModeIntelerad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Intelerad / Sectra: question q8

Visage vs Intelerad, which is better for a teleradiology firm?

Intelerad: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0). Sectra: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9).

Intelerad and Sectra on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
Intelerad / Sectra / ChatGPTIntelerad: 3 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / ClaudeIntelerad: 3 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / PerplexityIntelerad: 3 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsIntelerad: 3 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / Google AI ModeIntelerad: 3 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

Intelerad / Sectra: question q9

What should I look for when choosing a new radiology PACS?

Intelerad: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Intelerad and Sectra on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
Intelerad / Sectra / ChatGPTIntelerad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / ClaudeIntelerad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / PerplexityIntelerad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsIntelerad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / Google AI ModeIntelerad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

Intelerad / Sectra: question q10

What is the best RIS PACS for an imaging group with five locations?

Intelerad: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0). Sectra: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

Intelerad and Sectra on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
Intelerad / Sectra / ChatGPTIntelerad: 3 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / ClaudeIntelerad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / PerplexityIntelerad: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsIntelerad: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Intelerad / Sectra / Google AI ModeIntelerad: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Intelerad's own-domain citation count is 31 of 150; Sectra's is 19 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Radiology and medical imaging software · Exact Radiology and medical imaging software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

RamSoft and Sectra

Radiology and medical imaging software · September 2026

RamSoft and Sectra in the observed answers

RamSoft appears in 46 of 150 answers about radiology and medical imaging software; Sectra appears in 87 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

RamSoft and Sectra have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. RamSoft record · Sectra record · Radiology and medical imaging software checked set.

RamSoft beside Sectra

RamSoft and Sectra totals
MeasureRamSoftSectra
Named46/150; 30.7% (95% CI 23.8 to 38.5)87/150; 58.0% (95% CI 50.0 to 65.6)
Own domain cited18/150; 12.0% (95% CI 7.7 to 18.2)19/150; 12.7% (95% CI 8.3 to 18.9)

RamSoft / Sectra: question q1

What is the best PACS for a small imaging center?

RamSoft: 6/15; 40.0% (95% CI 19.8 to 64.3). Sectra: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8).

RamSoft and Sectra on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
RamSoft / Sectra / ChatGPTRamSoft: 3 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / ClaudeRamSoft: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / PerplexityRamSoft: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsRamSoft: 2 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / Google AI ModeRamSoft: 1 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

RamSoft / Sectra: question q2

What is the best RIS for an outpatient imaging center?

RamSoft: 9/15; 60.0% (95% CI 35.7 to 80.2). Sectra: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

RamSoft and Sectra on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
RamSoft / Sectra / ChatGPTRamSoft: 3 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / ClaudeRamSoft: 2 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / PerplexityRamSoft: 1 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsRamSoft: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / Google AI ModeRamSoft: 3 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

RamSoft / Sectra: question q3

What is the most affordable PACS for a low volume imaging center?

RamSoft: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

RamSoft and Sectra on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
RamSoft / Sectra / ChatGPTRamSoft: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / ClaudeRamSoft: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / PerplexityRamSoft: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsRamSoft: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / Google AI ModeRamSoft: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.

RamSoft / Sectra: question q4

What are the best alternatives to Sectra PACS?

RamSoft: 7/15; 46.7% (95% CI 24.8 to 69.9). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

RamSoft and Sectra on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
RamSoft / Sectra / ChatGPTRamSoft: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / ClaudeRamSoft: 1 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / PerplexityRamSoft: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsRamSoft: 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / Google AI ModeRamSoft: 1 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

RamSoft / Sectra: question q5

What are the best alternatives to Intelerad for a teleradiology group?

RamSoft: 13/15; 86.7% (95% CI 62.1 to 96.3). Sectra: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

RamSoft and Sectra on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
RamSoft / Sectra / ChatGPTRamSoft: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / ClaudeRamSoft: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / PerplexityRamSoft: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsRamSoft: 1 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / Google AI ModeRamSoft: 3 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

RamSoft / Sectra: question q6

What are the best alternatives to Philips IntelliSpace PACS?

RamSoft: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

RamSoft and Sectra on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
RamSoft / Sectra / ChatGPTRamSoft: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / ClaudeRamSoft: 1 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / PerplexityRamSoft: 1 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsRamSoft: 1 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / Google AI ModeRamSoft: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

RamSoft / Sectra: question q7

Sectra vs Visage Imaging, which PACS is better for a hospital system?

RamSoft: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

RamSoft and Sectra on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
RamSoft / Sectra / ChatGPTRamSoft: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / ClaudeRamSoft: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / PerplexityRamSoft: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsRamSoft: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / Google AI ModeRamSoft: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

RamSoft / Sectra: question q8

Visage vs Intelerad, which is better for a teleradiology firm?

RamSoft: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9).

RamSoft and Sectra on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
RamSoft / Sectra / ChatGPTRamSoft: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / ClaudeRamSoft: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / PerplexityRamSoft: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsRamSoft: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / Google AI ModeRamSoft: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

RamSoft / Sectra: question q9

What should I look for when choosing a new radiology PACS?

RamSoft: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

RamSoft and Sectra on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
RamSoft / Sectra / ChatGPTRamSoft: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / ClaudeRamSoft: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / PerplexityRamSoft: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsRamSoft: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / Google AI ModeRamSoft: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

RamSoft / Sectra: question q10

What is the best RIS PACS for an imaging group with five locations?

RamSoft: 8/15; 53.3% (95% CI 30.1 to 75.2). Sectra: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

RamSoft and Sectra on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
RamSoft / Sectra / ChatGPTRamSoft: 3 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / ClaudeRamSoft: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / PerplexityRamSoft: 1 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsRamSoft: 1 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
RamSoft / Sectra / Google AI ModeRamSoft: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

RamSoft's own-domain citation count is 18 of 150; Sectra's is 19 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Radiology and medical imaging software · Exact Radiology and medical imaging software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Novarad and Sectra

Radiology and medical imaging software · September 2026

Novarad and Sectra in the observed answers

Novarad appears in 17 of 150 answers about radiology and medical imaging software; Sectra appears in 87 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Novarad and Sectra have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Novarad record · Sectra record · Radiology and medical imaging software checked set.

Novarad beside Sectra

Novarad and Sectra totals
MeasureNovaradSectra
Named17/150; 11.3% (95% CI 7.2 to 17.4)87/150; 58.0% (95% CI 50.0 to 65.6)
Own domain cited7/150; 4.7% (95% CI 2.3 to 9.3)19/150; 12.7% (95% CI 8.3 to 18.9)

Novarad / Sectra: question q1

What is the best PACS for a small imaging center?

Novarad: 8/15; 53.3% (95% CI 30.1 to 75.2). Sectra: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8).

Novarad and Sectra on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
Novarad / Sectra / ChatGPTNovarad: 2 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / ClaudeNovarad: 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / PerplexityNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsNovarad: 2 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / Google AI ModeNovarad: 2 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Novarad / Sectra: question q2

What is the best RIS for an outpatient imaging center?

Novarad: 5/15; 33.3% (95% CI 15.2 to 58.3). Sectra: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

Novarad and Sectra on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
Novarad / Sectra / ChatGPTNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / ClaudeNovarad: 3 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / PerplexityNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsNovarad: 1 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / Google AI ModeNovarad: 1 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Novarad / Sectra: question q3

What is the most affordable PACS for a low volume imaging center?

Novarad: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

Novarad and Sectra on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
Novarad / Sectra / ChatGPTNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / ClaudeNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / PerplexityNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / Google AI ModeNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.

Novarad / Sectra: question q4

What are the best alternatives to Sectra PACS?

Novarad: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Novarad and Sectra on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
Novarad / Sectra / ChatGPTNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / ClaudeNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / PerplexityNovarad: 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / Google AI ModeNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Novarad / Sectra: question q5

What are the best alternatives to Intelerad for a teleradiology group?

Novarad: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Novarad and Sectra on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
Novarad / Sectra / ChatGPTNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / ClaudeNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / PerplexityNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / Google AI ModeNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Novarad / Sectra: question q6

What are the best alternatives to Philips IntelliSpace PACS?

Novarad: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Novarad and Sectra on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
Novarad / Sectra / ChatGPTNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / ClaudeNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / PerplexityNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / Google AI ModeNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Novarad / Sectra: question q7

Sectra vs Visage Imaging, which PACS is better for a hospital system?

Novarad: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Novarad and Sectra on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
Novarad / Sectra / ChatGPTNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / ClaudeNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / PerplexityNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / Google AI ModeNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Novarad / Sectra: question q8

Visage vs Intelerad, which is better for a teleradiology firm?

Novarad: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9).

Novarad and Sectra on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
Novarad / Sectra / ChatGPTNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / ClaudeNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / PerplexityNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / Google AI ModeNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

Novarad / Sectra: question q9

What should I look for when choosing a new radiology PACS?

Novarad: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Novarad and Sectra on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
Novarad / Sectra / ChatGPTNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / ClaudeNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / PerplexityNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / Google AI ModeNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

Novarad / Sectra: question q10

What is the best RIS PACS for an imaging group with five locations?

Novarad: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). Sectra: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

Novarad and Sectra on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
Novarad / Sectra / ChatGPTNovarad: 2 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / ClaudeNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / PerplexityNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Novarad / Sectra / Google AI ModeNovarad: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Novarad's own-domain citation count is 7 of 150; Sectra's is 19 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Radiology and medical imaging software · Exact Radiology and medical imaging software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Merative (Merge) and Sectra

Radiology and medical imaging software · September 2026

Merative (Merge) and Sectra in the observed answers

Merative (Merge) appears in 16 of 150 answers about radiology and medical imaging software; Sectra appears in 87 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Merative (Merge) and Sectra have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Merative (Merge) record · Sectra record · Radiology and medical imaging software checked set.

Merative (Merge) beside Sectra

Merative (Merge) and Sectra totals
MeasureMerative (Merge)Sectra
Named16/150; 10.7% (95% CI 6.7 to 16.6)87/150; 58.0% (95% CI 50.0 to 65.6)
Own domain cited1/150; 0.7% (95% CI 0.1 to 3.7)19/150; 12.7% (95% CI 8.3 to 18.9)

Merative (Merge) / Sectra: question q1

What is the best PACS for a small imaging center?

Merative (Merge): 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8).

Merative (Merge) and Sectra on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / ChatGPTMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / ClaudeMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / PerplexityMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / Google AI ModeMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Merative (Merge) / Sectra: question q2

What is the best RIS for an outpatient imaging center?

Merative (Merge): 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

Merative (Merge) and Sectra on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / ChatGPTMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / ClaudeMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / PerplexityMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / Google AI ModeMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Merative (Merge) / Sectra: question q3

What is the most affordable PACS for a low volume imaging center?

Merative (Merge): 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

Merative (Merge) and Sectra on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / ChatGPTMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / ClaudeMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / PerplexityMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / Google AI ModeMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.

Merative (Merge) / Sectra: question q4

What are the best alternatives to Sectra PACS?

Merative (Merge): 5/15; 33.3% (95% CI 15.2 to 58.3). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Merative (Merge) and Sectra on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / ChatGPTMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / ClaudeMerative (Merge): 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / PerplexityMerative (Merge): 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / Google AI ModeMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Merative (Merge) / Sectra: question q5

What are the best alternatives to Intelerad for a teleradiology group?

Merative (Merge): 5/15; 33.3% (95% CI 15.2 to 58.3). Sectra: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Merative (Merge) and Sectra on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / ChatGPTMerative (Merge): 1 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / ClaudeMerative (Merge): 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / PerplexityMerative (Merge): 1 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / Google AI ModeMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Merative (Merge) / Sectra: question q6

What are the best alternatives to Philips IntelliSpace PACS?

Merative (Merge): 6/15; 40.0% (95% CI 19.8 to 64.3). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Merative (Merge) and Sectra on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / ChatGPTMerative (Merge): 1 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / ClaudeMerative (Merge): 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / PerplexityMerative (Merge): 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / Google AI ModeMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Merative (Merge) / Sectra: question q7

Sectra vs Visage Imaging, which PACS is better for a hospital system?

Merative (Merge): 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Merative (Merge) and Sectra on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / ChatGPTMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / ClaudeMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / PerplexityMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / Google AI ModeMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Merative (Merge) / Sectra: question q8

Visage vs Intelerad, which is better for a teleradiology firm?

Merative (Merge): 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9).

Merative (Merge) and Sectra on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / ChatGPTMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / ClaudeMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / PerplexityMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / Google AI ModeMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

Merative (Merge) / Sectra: question q9

What should I look for when choosing a new radiology PACS?

Merative (Merge): 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Merative (Merge) and Sectra on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / ChatGPTMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / ClaudeMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / PerplexityMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / Google AI ModeMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

Merative (Merge) / Sectra: question q10

What is the best RIS PACS for an imaging group with five locations?

Merative (Merge): 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

Merative (Merge) and Sectra on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / ChatGPTMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / ClaudeMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / PerplexityMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Merative (Merge) / Sectra / Google AI ModeMerative (Merge): 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Merative (Merge)'s own-domain citation count is 1 of 150; Sectra's is 19 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Radiology and medical imaging software · Exact Radiology and medical imaging software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Canon Medical Informatics and Sectra

Radiology and medical imaging software · September 2026

Canon Medical Informatics and Sectra in the observed answers

Canon Medical Informatics appears in 0 of 150 answers about radiology and medical imaging software; Sectra appears in 87 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Canon Medical Informatics and Sectra have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Canon Medical Informatics record · Sectra record · Radiology and medical imaging software checked set.

Canon Medical Informatics beside Sectra

Canon Medical Informatics and Sectra totals
MeasureCanon Medical InformaticsSectra
Named0/150; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)87/150; 58.0% (95% CI 50.0 to 65.6)
Own domain cited0/150; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)19/150; 12.7% (95% CI 8.3 to 18.9)

Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra: question q1

What is the best PACS for a small imaging center?

Canon Medical Informatics: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8).

Canon Medical Informatics and Sectra on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / ChatGPTCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / ClaudeCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / PerplexityCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / Google AI ModeCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra: question q2

What is the best RIS for an outpatient imaging center?

Canon Medical Informatics: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

Canon Medical Informatics and Sectra on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / ChatGPTCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / ClaudeCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / PerplexityCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / Google AI ModeCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra: question q3

What is the most affordable PACS for a low volume imaging center?

Canon Medical Informatics: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

Canon Medical Informatics and Sectra on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / ChatGPTCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / ClaudeCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / PerplexityCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / Google AI ModeCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.

Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra: question q4

What are the best alternatives to Sectra PACS?

Canon Medical Informatics: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Canon Medical Informatics and Sectra on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / ChatGPTCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / ClaudeCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / PerplexityCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / Google AI ModeCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra: question q5

What are the best alternatives to Intelerad for a teleradiology group?

Canon Medical Informatics: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Canon Medical Informatics and Sectra on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / ChatGPTCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / ClaudeCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / PerplexityCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / Google AI ModeCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra: question q6

What are the best alternatives to Philips IntelliSpace PACS?

Canon Medical Informatics: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Canon Medical Informatics and Sectra on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / ChatGPTCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / ClaudeCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / PerplexityCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / Google AI ModeCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra: question q7

Sectra vs Visage Imaging, which PACS is better for a hospital system?

Canon Medical Informatics: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Canon Medical Informatics and Sectra on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / ChatGPTCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / ClaudeCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / PerplexityCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / Google AI ModeCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra: question q8

Visage vs Intelerad, which is better for a teleradiology firm?

Canon Medical Informatics: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9).

Canon Medical Informatics and Sectra on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / ChatGPTCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / ClaudeCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / PerplexityCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / Google AI ModeCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra: question q9

What should I look for when choosing a new radiology PACS?

Canon Medical Informatics: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Canon Medical Informatics and Sectra on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / ChatGPTCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / ClaudeCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / PerplexityCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / Google AI ModeCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra: question q10

What is the best RIS PACS for an imaging group with five locations?

Canon Medical Informatics: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

Canon Medical Informatics and Sectra on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / ChatGPTCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / ClaudeCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / PerplexityCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Canon Medical Informatics / Sectra / Google AI ModeCanon Medical Informatics: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Canon Medical Informatics's own-domain citation count is 0 of 150; Sectra's is 19 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Radiology and medical imaging software · Exact Radiology and medical imaging software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Siemens Healthineers and Sectra

Radiology and medical imaging software · September 2026

Siemens Healthineers and Sectra in the observed answers

Siemens Healthineers appears in 13 of 150 answers about radiology and medical imaging software; Sectra appears in 87 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Siemens Healthineers and Sectra have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Siemens Healthineers record · Sectra record · Radiology and medical imaging software checked set.

Siemens Healthineers beside Sectra

Siemens Healthineers and Sectra totals
MeasureSiemens HealthineersSectra
Named13/150; 8.7% (95% CI 5.1 to 14.3)87/150; 58.0% (95% CI 50.0 to 65.6)
Own domain cited0/150; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)19/150; 12.7% (95% CI 8.3 to 18.9)

Siemens Healthineers / Sectra: question q1

What is the best PACS for a small imaging center?

Siemens Healthineers: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8).

Siemens Healthineers and Sectra on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / ChatGPTSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / ClaudeSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / PerplexitySiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / Google AI ModeSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Siemens Healthineers / Sectra: question q2

What is the best RIS for an outpatient imaging center?

Siemens Healthineers: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Sectra: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

Siemens Healthineers and Sectra on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / ChatGPTSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / ClaudeSiemens Healthineers: 1 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / PerplexitySiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / Google AI ModeSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Siemens Healthineers / Sectra: question q3

What is the most affordable PACS for a low volume imaging center?

Siemens Healthineers: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

Siemens Healthineers and Sectra on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / ChatGPTSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / ClaudeSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / PerplexitySiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / Google AI ModeSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.

Siemens Healthineers / Sectra: question q4

What are the best alternatives to Sectra PACS?

Siemens Healthineers: 6/15; 40.0% (95% CI 19.8 to 64.3). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Siemens Healthineers and Sectra on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / ChatGPTSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / ClaudeSiemens Healthineers: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / PerplexitySiemens Healthineers: 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / Google AI ModeSiemens Healthineers: 1 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Siemens Healthineers / Sectra: question q5

What are the best alternatives to Intelerad for a teleradiology group?

Siemens Healthineers: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Siemens Healthineers and Sectra on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / ChatGPTSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / ClaudeSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / PerplexitySiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / Google AI ModeSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Siemens Healthineers / Sectra: question q6

What are the best alternatives to Philips IntelliSpace PACS?

Siemens Healthineers: 6/15; 40.0% (95% CI 19.8 to 64.3). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Siemens Healthineers and Sectra on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / ChatGPTSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / ClaudeSiemens Healthineers: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / PerplexitySiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsSiemens Healthineers: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / Google AI ModeSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Siemens Healthineers / Sectra: question q7

Sectra vs Visage Imaging, which PACS is better for a hospital system?

Siemens Healthineers: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Siemens Healthineers and Sectra on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / ChatGPTSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / ClaudeSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / PerplexitySiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / Google AI ModeSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Siemens Healthineers / Sectra: question q8

Visage vs Intelerad, which is better for a teleradiology firm?

Siemens Healthineers: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9).

Siemens Healthineers and Sectra on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / ChatGPTSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / ClaudeSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / PerplexitySiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / Google AI ModeSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

Siemens Healthineers / Sectra: question q9

What should I look for when choosing a new radiology PACS?

Siemens Healthineers: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Siemens Healthineers and Sectra on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / ChatGPTSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / ClaudeSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / PerplexitySiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / Google AI ModeSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

Siemens Healthineers / Sectra: question q10

What is the best RIS PACS for an imaging group with five locations?

Siemens Healthineers: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

Siemens Healthineers and Sectra on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / ChatGPTSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / ClaudeSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / PerplexitySiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Siemens Healthineers / Sectra / Google AI ModeSiemens Healthineers: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Siemens Healthineers's own-domain citation count is 0 of 150; Sectra's is 19 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Radiology and medical imaging software · Exact Radiology and medical imaging software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Hyland and Sectra

Radiology and medical imaging software · September 2026

Hyland and Sectra in the observed answers

Hyland appears in 0 of 150 answers about radiology and medical imaging software; Sectra appears in 87 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Hyland and Sectra have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Hyland record · Sectra record · Radiology and medical imaging software checked set.

Hyland beside Sectra

Hyland and Sectra totals
MeasureHylandSectra
Named0/150; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)87/150; 58.0% (95% CI 50.0 to 65.6)
Own domain cited0/150; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)19/150; 12.7% (95% CI 8.3 to 18.9)

Hyland / Sectra: question q1

What is the best PACS for a small imaging center?

Hyland: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8).

Hyland and Sectra on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
Hyland / Sectra / ChatGPTHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / ClaudeHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / PerplexityHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / Google AI ModeHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Hyland / Sectra: question q2

What is the best RIS for an outpatient imaging center?

Hyland: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

Hyland and Sectra on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
Hyland / Sectra / ChatGPTHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / ClaudeHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / PerplexityHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / Google AI ModeHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Hyland / Sectra: question q3

What is the most affordable PACS for a low volume imaging center?

Hyland: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

Hyland and Sectra on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
Hyland / Sectra / ChatGPTHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / ClaudeHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / PerplexityHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / Google AI ModeHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.

Hyland / Sectra: question q4

What are the best alternatives to Sectra PACS?

Hyland: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Hyland and Sectra on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
Hyland / Sectra / ChatGPTHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / ClaudeHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / PerplexityHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / Google AI ModeHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Hyland / Sectra: question q5

What are the best alternatives to Intelerad for a teleradiology group?

Hyland: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Hyland and Sectra on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
Hyland / Sectra / ChatGPTHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / ClaudeHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / PerplexityHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / Google AI ModeHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Hyland / Sectra: question q6

What are the best alternatives to Philips IntelliSpace PACS?

Hyland: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Hyland and Sectra on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
Hyland / Sectra / ChatGPTHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / ClaudeHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / PerplexityHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / Google AI ModeHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Hyland / Sectra: question q7

Sectra vs Visage Imaging, which PACS is better for a hospital system?

Hyland: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Hyland and Sectra on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
Hyland / Sectra / ChatGPTHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / ClaudeHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / PerplexityHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / Google AI ModeHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Hyland / Sectra: question q8

Visage vs Intelerad, which is better for a teleradiology firm?

Hyland: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9).

Hyland and Sectra on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
Hyland / Sectra / ChatGPTHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / ClaudeHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / PerplexityHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / Google AI ModeHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

Hyland / Sectra: question q9

What should I look for when choosing a new radiology PACS?

Hyland: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Hyland and Sectra on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
Hyland / Sectra / ChatGPTHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / ClaudeHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / PerplexityHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / Google AI ModeHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

Hyland / Sectra: question q10

What is the best RIS PACS for an imaging group with five locations?

Hyland: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

Hyland and Sectra on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
Hyland / Sectra / ChatGPTHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / ClaudeHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / PerplexityHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Hyland / Sectra / Google AI ModeHyland: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Hyland's own-domain citation count is 0 of 150; Sectra's is 19 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Radiology and medical imaging software · Exact Radiology and medical imaging software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

PaxeraHealth and Sectra

Radiology and medical imaging software · September 2026

PaxeraHealth and Sectra in the observed answers

PaxeraHealth appears in 4 of 150 answers about radiology and medical imaging software; Sectra appears in 87 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

PaxeraHealth and Sectra have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. PaxeraHealth record · Sectra record · Radiology and medical imaging software checked set.

PaxeraHealth beside Sectra

PaxeraHealth and Sectra totals
MeasurePaxeraHealthSectra
Named4/150; 2.7% (95% CI 1.0 to 6.7)87/150; 58.0% (95% CI 50.0 to 65.6)
Own domain cited1/150; 0.7% (95% CI 0.1 to 3.7)19/150; 12.7% (95% CI 8.3 to 18.9)

PaxeraHealth / Sectra: question q1

What is the best PACS for a small imaging center?

PaxeraHealth: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Sectra: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8).

PaxeraHealth and Sectra on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / ChatGPTPaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / ClaudePaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / PerplexityPaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / Google AI ModePaxeraHealth: 1 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

PaxeraHealth / Sectra: question q2

What is the best RIS for an outpatient imaging center?

PaxeraHealth: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

PaxeraHealth and Sectra on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / ChatGPTPaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / ClaudePaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / PerplexityPaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / Google AI ModePaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

PaxeraHealth / Sectra: question q3

What is the most affordable PACS for a low volume imaging center?

PaxeraHealth: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

PaxeraHealth and Sectra on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / ChatGPTPaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / ClaudePaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / PerplexityPaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / Google AI ModePaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.

PaxeraHealth / Sectra: question q4

What are the best alternatives to Sectra PACS?

PaxeraHealth: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

PaxeraHealth and Sectra on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / ChatGPTPaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / ClaudePaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / PerplexityPaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / Google AI ModePaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

PaxeraHealth / Sectra: question q5

What are the best alternatives to Intelerad for a teleradiology group?

PaxeraHealth: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Sectra: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

PaxeraHealth and Sectra on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / ChatGPTPaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / ClaudePaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / PerplexityPaxeraHealth: 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / Google AI ModePaxeraHealth: 1 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

PaxeraHealth / Sectra: question q6

What are the best alternatives to Philips IntelliSpace PACS?

PaxeraHealth: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

PaxeraHealth and Sectra on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / ChatGPTPaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / ClaudePaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / PerplexityPaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / Google AI ModePaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

PaxeraHealth / Sectra: question q7

Sectra vs Visage Imaging, which PACS is better for a hospital system?

PaxeraHealth: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

PaxeraHealth and Sectra on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / ChatGPTPaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / ClaudePaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / PerplexityPaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / Google AI ModePaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

PaxeraHealth / Sectra: question q8

Visage vs Intelerad, which is better for a teleradiology firm?

PaxeraHealth: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9).

PaxeraHealth and Sectra on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / ChatGPTPaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / ClaudePaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / PerplexityPaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / Google AI ModePaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

PaxeraHealth / Sectra: question q9

What should I look for when choosing a new radiology PACS?

PaxeraHealth: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

PaxeraHealth and Sectra on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / ChatGPTPaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / ClaudePaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / PerplexityPaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / Google AI ModePaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

PaxeraHealth / Sectra: question q10

What is the best RIS PACS for an imaging group with five locations?

PaxeraHealth: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

PaxeraHealth and Sectra on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / ChatGPTPaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / ClaudePaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / PerplexityPaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PaxeraHealth / Sectra / Google AI ModePaxeraHealth: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

PaxeraHealth's own-domain citation count is 1 of 150; Sectra's is 19 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Radiology and medical imaging software · Exact Radiology and medical imaging software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Visage Imaging and Sectra

Radiology and medical imaging software · September 2026

Visage Imaging and Sectra in the observed answers

Visage Imaging appears in 65 of 150 answers about radiology and medical imaging software; Sectra appears in 87 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Visage Imaging and Sectra have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Visage Imaging record · Sectra record · Radiology and medical imaging software checked set.

Visage Imaging beside Sectra

Visage Imaging and Sectra totals
MeasureVisage ImagingSectra
Named65/150; 43.3% (95% CI 35.7 to 51.3)87/150; 58.0% (95% CI 50.0 to 65.6)
Own domain cited18/150; 12.0% (95% CI 7.7 to 18.2)19/150; 12.7% (95% CI 8.3 to 18.9)

Visage Imaging / Sectra: question q1

What is the best PACS for a small imaging center?

Visage Imaging: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Sectra: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8).

Visage Imaging and Sectra on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
Visage Imaging / Sectra / ChatGPTVisage Imaging: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / ClaudeVisage Imaging: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / PerplexityVisage Imaging: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsVisage Imaging: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / Google AI ModeVisage Imaging: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Visage Imaging / Sectra: question q2

What is the best RIS for an outpatient imaging center?

Visage Imaging: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Sectra: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

Visage Imaging and Sectra on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
Visage Imaging / Sectra / ChatGPTVisage Imaging: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / ClaudeVisage Imaging: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / PerplexityVisage Imaging: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsVisage Imaging: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / Google AI ModeVisage Imaging: 1 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Visage Imaging / Sectra: question q3

What is the most affordable PACS for a low volume imaging center?

Visage Imaging: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

Visage Imaging and Sectra on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
Visage Imaging / Sectra / ChatGPTVisage Imaging: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / ClaudeVisage Imaging: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / PerplexityVisage Imaging: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsVisage Imaging: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / Google AI ModeVisage Imaging: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.

Visage Imaging / Sectra: question q4

What are the best alternatives to Sectra PACS?

Visage Imaging: 13/15; 86.7% (95% CI 62.1 to 96.3). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Visage Imaging and Sectra on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
Visage Imaging / Sectra / ChatGPTVisage Imaging: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / ClaudeVisage Imaging: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / PerplexityVisage Imaging: 1 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsVisage Imaging: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / Google AI ModeVisage Imaging: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Visage Imaging / Sectra: question q5

What are the best alternatives to Intelerad for a teleradiology group?

Visage Imaging: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0). Sectra: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Visage Imaging and Sectra on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
Visage Imaging / Sectra / ChatGPTVisage Imaging: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / ClaudeVisage Imaging: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / PerplexityVisage Imaging: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsVisage Imaging: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / Google AI ModeVisage Imaging: 3 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Visage Imaging / Sectra: question q6

What are the best alternatives to Philips IntelliSpace PACS?

Visage Imaging: 11/15; 73.3% (95% CI 48.0 to 89.1). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Visage Imaging and Sectra on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
Visage Imaging / Sectra / ChatGPTVisage Imaging: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / ClaudeVisage Imaging: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / PerplexityVisage Imaging: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsVisage Imaging: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / Google AI ModeVisage Imaging: 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Visage Imaging / Sectra: question q7

Sectra vs Visage Imaging, which PACS is better for a hospital system?

Visage Imaging: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Visage Imaging and Sectra on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
Visage Imaging / Sectra / ChatGPTVisage Imaging: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / ClaudeVisage Imaging: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / PerplexityVisage Imaging: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsVisage Imaging: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / Google AI ModeVisage Imaging: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Visage Imaging / Sectra: question q8

Visage vs Intelerad, which is better for a teleradiology firm?

Visage Imaging: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0). Sectra: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9).

Visage Imaging and Sectra on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
Visage Imaging / Sectra / ChatGPTVisage Imaging: 2 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / ClaudeVisage Imaging: 3 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / PerplexityVisage Imaging: 1 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsVisage Imaging: 3 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / Google AI ModeVisage Imaging: 3 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

Visage Imaging / Sectra: question q9

What should I look for when choosing a new radiology PACS?

Visage Imaging: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Visage Imaging and Sectra on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
Visage Imaging / Sectra / ChatGPTVisage Imaging: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / ClaudeVisage Imaging: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / PerplexityVisage Imaging: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsVisage Imaging: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / Google AI ModeVisage Imaging: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

Visage Imaging / Sectra: question q10

What is the best RIS PACS for an imaging group with five locations?

Visage Imaging: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Sectra: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

Visage Imaging and Sectra on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
Visage Imaging / Sectra / ChatGPTVisage Imaging: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / ClaudeVisage Imaging: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / PerplexityVisage Imaging: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsVisage Imaging: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Visage Imaging / Sectra / Google AI ModeVisage Imaging: 1 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Visage Imaging's own-domain citation count is 18 of 150; Sectra's is 19 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Radiology and medical imaging software · Exact Radiology and medical imaging software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Mach7 Technologies and Sectra

Radiology and medical imaging software · September 2026

Mach7 Technologies and Sectra in the observed answers

Mach7 Technologies appears in 3 of 150 answers about radiology and medical imaging software; Sectra appears in 87 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Mach7 Technologies and Sectra have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Mach7 Technologies record · Sectra record · Radiology and medical imaging software checked set.

Mach7 Technologies beside Sectra

Mach7 Technologies and Sectra totals
MeasureMach7 TechnologiesSectra
Named3/150; 2.0% (95% CI 0.7 to 5.7)87/150; 58.0% (95% CI 50.0 to 65.6)
Own domain cited1/150; 0.7% (95% CI 0.1 to 3.7)19/150; 12.7% (95% CI 8.3 to 18.9)

Mach7 Technologies / Sectra: question q1

What is the best PACS for a small imaging center?

Mach7 Technologies: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8).

Mach7 Technologies and Sectra on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / ChatGPTMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / ClaudeMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / PerplexityMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / Google AI ModeMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Mach7 Technologies / Sectra: question q2

What is the best RIS for an outpatient imaging center?

Mach7 Technologies: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

Mach7 Technologies and Sectra on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / ChatGPTMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / ClaudeMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / PerplexityMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / Google AI ModeMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Mach7 Technologies / Sectra: question q3

What is the most affordable PACS for a low volume imaging center?

Mach7 Technologies: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

Mach7 Technologies and Sectra on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / ChatGPTMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / ClaudeMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / PerplexityMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / Google AI ModeMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.

Mach7 Technologies / Sectra: question q4

What are the best alternatives to Sectra PACS?

Mach7 Technologies: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Mach7 Technologies and Sectra on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / ChatGPTMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / ClaudeMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / PerplexityMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / Google AI ModeMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Mach7 Technologies / Sectra: question q5

What are the best alternatives to Intelerad for a teleradiology group?

Mach7 Technologies: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Sectra: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Mach7 Technologies and Sectra on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / ChatGPTMach7 Technologies: 1 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / ClaudeMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / PerplexityMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / Google AI ModeMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Mach7 Technologies / Sectra: question q6

What are the best alternatives to Philips IntelliSpace PACS?

Mach7 Technologies: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Mach7 Technologies and Sectra on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / ChatGPTMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / ClaudeMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / PerplexityMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / Google AI ModeMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Mach7 Technologies / Sectra: question q7

Sectra vs Visage Imaging, which PACS is better for a hospital system?

Mach7 Technologies: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Mach7 Technologies and Sectra on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / ChatGPTMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / ClaudeMach7 Technologies: 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / PerplexityMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / Google AI ModeMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Mach7 Technologies / Sectra: question q8

Visage vs Intelerad, which is better for a teleradiology firm?

Mach7 Technologies: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9).

Mach7 Technologies and Sectra on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / ChatGPTMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / ClaudeMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / PerplexityMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / Google AI ModeMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

Mach7 Technologies / Sectra: question q9

What should I look for when choosing a new radiology PACS?

Mach7 Technologies: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Mach7 Technologies and Sectra on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / ChatGPTMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / ClaudeMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / PerplexityMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / Google AI ModeMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

Mach7 Technologies / Sectra: question q10

What is the best RIS PACS for an imaging group with five locations?

Mach7 Technologies: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

Mach7 Technologies and Sectra on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / ChatGPTMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / ClaudeMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / PerplexityMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Mach7 Technologies / Sectra / Google AI ModeMach7 Technologies: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Mach7 Technologies's own-domain citation count is 1 of 150; Sectra's is 19 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Radiology and medical imaging software · Exact Radiology and medical imaging software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

PostDICOM and Sectra

Radiology and medical imaging software · September 2026

PostDICOM and Sectra in the observed answers

PostDICOM appears in 15 of 150 answers about radiology and medical imaging software; Sectra appears in 87 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

PostDICOM and Sectra have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. PostDICOM record · Sectra record · Radiology and medical imaging software checked set.

PostDICOM beside Sectra

PostDICOM and Sectra totals
MeasurePostDICOMSectra
Named15/150; 10.0% (95% CI 6.2 to 15.8)87/150; 58.0% (95% CI 50.0 to 65.6)
Own domain cited10/150; 6.7% (95% CI 3.7 to 11.8)19/150; 12.7% (95% CI 8.3 to 18.9)

PostDICOM / Sectra: question q1

What is the best PACS for a small imaging center?

PostDICOM: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Sectra: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8).

PostDICOM and Sectra on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
PostDICOM / Sectra / ChatGPTPostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / ClaudePostDICOM: 1 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / PerplexityPostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / Google AI ModePostDICOM: 2 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

PostDICOM / Sectra: question q2

What is the best RIS for an outpatient imaging center?

PostDICOM: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

PostDICOM and Sectra on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
PostDICOM / Sectra / ChatGPTPostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / ClaudePostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / PerplexityPostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / Google AI ModePostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

PostDICOM / Sectra: question q3

What is the most affordable PACS for a low volume imaging center?

PostDICOM: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8). Sectra: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

PostDICOM and Sectra on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
PostDICOM / Sectra / ChatGPTPostDICOM: 3 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / ClaudePostDICOM: 3 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / PerplexityPostDICOM: 3 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / Google AI ModePostDICOM: 1 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.

PostDICOM / Sectra: question q4

What are the best alternatives to Sectra PACS?

PostDICOM: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

PostDICOM and Sectra on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
PostDICOM / Sectra / ChatGPTPostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / ClaudePostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / PerplexityPostDICOM: 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / Google AI ModePostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

PostDICOM / Sectra: question q5

What are the best alternatives to Intelerad for a teleradiology group?

PostDICOM: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

PostDICOM and Sectra on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
PostDICOM / Sectra / ChatGPTPostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / ClaudePostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / PerplexityPostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / Google AI ModePostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

PostDICOM / Sectra: question q6

What are the best alternatives to Philips IntelliSpace PACS?

PostDICOM: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

PostDICOM and Sectra on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
PostDICOM / Sectra / ChatGPTPostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / ClaudePostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / PerplexityPostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / Google AI ModePostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

PostDICOM / Sectra: question q7

Sectra vs Visage Imaging, which PACS is better for a hospital system?

PostDICOM: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

PostDICOM and Sectra on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
PostDICOM / Sectra / ChatGPTPostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / ClaudePostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / PerplexityPostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / Google AI ModePostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

PostDICOM / Sectra: question q8

Visage vs Intelerad, which is better for a teleradiology firm?

PostDICOM: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9).

PostDICOM and Sectra on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
PostDICOM / Sectra / ChatGPTPostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / ClaudePostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / PerplexityPostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / Google AI ModePostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

PostDICOM / Sectra: question q9

What should I look for when choosing a new radiology PACS?

PostDICOM: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

PostDICOM and Sectra on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
PostDICOM / Sectra / ChatGPTPostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / ClaudePostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / PerplexityPostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / Google AI ModePostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

PostDICOM / Sectra: question q10

What is the best RIS PACS for an imaging group with five locations?

PostDICOM: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

PostDICOM and Sectra on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
PostDICOM / Sectra / ChatGPTPostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / ClaudePostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / PerplexityPostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
PostDICOM / Sectra / Google AI ModePostDICOM: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

PostDICOM's own-domain citation count is 10 of 150; Sectra's is 19 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Radiology and medical imaging software · Exact Radiology and medical imaging software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

AdvaPACS and Sectra

Radiology and medical imaging software · September 2026

AdvaPACS and Sectra in the observed answers

AdvaPACS appears in 5 of 150 answers about radiology and medical imaging software; Sectra appears in 87 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

AdvaPACS and Sectra have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. AdvaPACS record · Sectra record · Radiology and medical imaging software checked set.

AdvaPACS beside Sectra

AdvaPACS and Sectra totals
MeasureAdvaPACSSectra
Named5/150; 3.3% (95% CI 1.4 to 7.6)87/150; 58.0% (95% CI 50.0 to 65.6)
Own domain cited0/150; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)19/150; 12.7% (95% CI 8.3 to 18.9)

AdvaPACS / Sectra: question q1

What is the best PACS for a small imaging center?

AdvaPACS: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Sectra: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8).

AdvaPACS and Sectra on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
AdvaPACS / Sectra / ChatGPTAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / ClaudeAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / PerplexityAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / Google AI ModeAdvaPACS: 1 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

AdvaPACS / Sectra: question q2

What is the best RIS for an outpatient imaging center?

AdvaPACS: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

AdvaPACS and Sectra on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
AdvaPACS / Sectra / ChatGPTAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / ClaudeAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / PerplexityAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / Google AI ModeAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

AdvaPACS / Sectra: question q3

What is the most affordable PACS for a low volume imaging center?

AdvaPACS: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Sectra: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

AdvaPACS and Sectra on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
AdvaPACS / Sectra / ChatGPTAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / ClaudeAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / PerplexityAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsAdvaPACS: 2 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / Google AI ModeAdvaPACS: 1 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.

AdvaPACS / Sectra: question q4

What are the best alternatives to Sectra PACS?

AdvaPACS: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

AdvaPACS and Sectra on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
AdvaPACS / Sectra / ChatGPTAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / ClaudeAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / PerplexityAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / Google AI ModeAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

AdvaPACS / Sectra: question q5

What are the best alternatives to Intelerad for a teleradiology group?

AdvaPACS: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Sectra: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

AdvaPACS and Sectra on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
AdvaPACS / Sectra / ChatGPTAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / ClaudeAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / PerplexityAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsAdvaPACS: 1 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / Google AI ModeAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

AdvaPACS / Sectra: question q6

What are the best alternatives to Philips IntelliSpace PACS?

AdvaPACS: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

AdvaPACS and Sectra on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
AdvaPACS / Sectra / ChatGPTAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / ClaudeAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / PerplexityAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / Google AI ModeAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

AdvaPACS / Sectra: question q7

Sectra vs Visage Imaging, which PACS is better for a hospital system?

AdvaPACS: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

AdvaPACS and Sectra on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
AdvaPACS / Sectra / ChatGPTAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / ClaudeAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / PerplexityAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / Google AI ModeAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

AdvaPACS / Sectra: question q8

Visage vs Intelerad, which is better for a teleradiology firm?

AdvaPACS: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9).

AdvaPACS and Sectra on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
AdvaPACS / Sectra / ChatGPTAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / ClaudeAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / PerplexityAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / Google AI ModeAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

AdvaPACS / Sectra: question q9

What should I look for when choosing a new radiology PACS?

AdvaPACS: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

AdvaPACS and Sectra on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
AdvaPACS / Sectra / ChatGPTAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / ClaudeAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / PerplexityAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / Google AI ModeAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

AdvaPACS / Sectra: question q10

What is the best RIS PACS for an imaging group with five locations?

AdvaPACS: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

AdvaPACS and Sectra on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
AdvaPACS / Sectra / ChatGPTAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / ClaudeAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / PerplexityAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AdvaPACS / Sectra / Google AI ModeAdvaPACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

AdvaPACS's own-domain citation count is 0 of 150; Sectra's is 19 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Radiology and medical imaging software · Exact Radiology and medical imaging software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

MedInformatix and Sectra

Radiology and medical imaging software · September 2026

MedInformatix and Sectra in the observed answers

MedInformatix appears in 6 of 150 answers about radiology and medical imaging software; Sectra appears in 87 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

MedInformatix and Sectra have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. MedInformatix record · Sectra record · Radiology and medical imaging software checked set.

MedInformatix beside Sectra

MedInformatix and Sectra totals
MeasureMedInformatixSectra
Named6/150; 4.0% (95% CI 1.8 to 8.5)87/150; 58.0% (95% CI 50.0 to 65.6)
Own domain cited3/150; 2.0% (95% CI 0.7 to 5.7)19/150; 12.7% (95% CI 8.3 to 18.9)

MedInformatix / Sectra: question q1

What is the best PACS for a small imaging center?

MedInformatix: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8).

MedInformatix and Sectra on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
MedInformatix / Sectra / ChatGPTMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / ClaudeMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / PerplexityMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / Google AI ModeMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

MedInformatix / Sectra: question q2

What is the best RIS for an outpatient imaging center?

MedInformatix: 6/15; 40.0% (95% CI 19.8 to 64.3). Sectra: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

MedInformatix and Sectra on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
MedInformatix / Sectra / ChatGPTMedInformatix: 3 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / ClaudeMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / PerplexityMedInformatix: 2 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsMedInformatix: 1 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / Google AI ModeMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

MedInformatix / Sectra: question q3

What is the most affordable PACS for a low volume imaging center?

MedInformatix: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

MedInformatix and Sectra on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
MedInformatix / Sectra / ChatGPTMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / ClaudeMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / PerplexityMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / Google AI ModeMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.

MedInformatix / Sectra: question q4

What are the best alternatives to Sectra PACS?

MedInformatix: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

MedInformatix and Sectra on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
MedInformatix / Sectra / ChatGPTMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / ClaudeMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / PerplexityMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / Google AI ModeMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

MedInformatix / Sectra: question q5

What are the best alternatives to Intelerad for a teleradiology group?

MedInformatix: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

MedInformatix and Sectra on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
MedInformatix / Sectra / ChatGPTMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / ClaudeMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / PerplexityMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / Google AI ModeMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

MedInformatix / Sectra: question q6

What are the best alternatives to Philips IntelliSpace PACS?

MedInformatix: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

MedInformatix and Sectra on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
MedInformatix / Sectra / ChatGPTMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / ClaudeMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / PerplexityMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / Google AI ModeMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

MedInformatix / Sectra: question q7

Sectra vs Visage Imaging, which PACS is better for a hospital system?

MedInformatix: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

MedInformatix and Sectra on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
MedInformatix / Sectra / ChatGPTMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / ClaudeMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / PerplexityMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / Google AI ModeMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

MedInformatix / Sectra: question q8

Visage vs Intelerad, which is better for a teleradiology firm?

MedInformatix: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9).

MedInformatix and Sectra on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
MedInformatix / Sectra / ChatGPTMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / ClaudeMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / PerplexityMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / Google AI ModeMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

MedInformatix / Sectra: question q9

What should I look for when choosing a new radiology PACS?

MedInformatix: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

MedInformatix and Sectra on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
MedInformatix / Sectra / ChatGPTMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / ClaudeMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / PerplexityMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / Google AI ModeMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

MedInformatix / Sectra: question q10

What is the best RIS PACS for an imaging group with five locations?

MedInformatix: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

MedInformatix and Sectra on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
MedInformatix / Sectra / ChatGPTMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / ClaudeMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / PerplexityMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
MedInformatix / Sectra / Google AI ModeMedInformatix: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

MedInformatix's own-domain citation count is 3 of 150; Sectra's is 19 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Radiology and medical imaging software · Exact Radiology and medical imaging software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

AbbaDox and Sectra

Radiology and medical imaging software · September 2026

AbbaDox and Sectra in the observed answers

AbbaDox appears in 16 of 150 answers about radiology and medical imaging software; Sectra appears in 87 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

AbbaDox and Sectra have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. AbbaDox record · Sectra record · Radiology and medical imaging software checked set.

AbbaDox beside Sectra

AbbaDox and Sectra totals
MeasureAbbaDoxSectra
Named16/150; 10.7% (95% CI 6.7 to 16.6)87/150; 58.0% (95% CI 50.0 to 65.6)
Own domain cited8/150; 5.3% (95% CI 2.7 to 10.2)19/150; 12.7% (95% CI 8.3 to 18.9)

AbbaDox / Sectra: question q1

What is the best PACS for a small imaging center?

AbbaDox: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8).

AbbaDox and Sectra on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
AbbaDox / Sectra / ChatGPTAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / ClaudeAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / PerplexityAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / Google AI ModeAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

AbbaDox / Sectra: question q2

What is the best RIS for an outpatient imaging center?

AbbaDox: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8). Sectra: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

AbbaDox and Sectra on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
AbbaDox / Sectra / ChatGPTAbbaDox: 2 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / ClaudeAbbaDox: 3 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / PerplexityAbbaDox: 3 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsAbbaDox: 2 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / Google AI ModeAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

AbbaDox / Sectra: question q3

What is the most affordable PACS for a low volume imaging center?

AbbaDox: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

AbbaDox and Sectra on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
AbbaDox / Sectra / ChatGPTAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / ClaudeAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / PerplexityAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / Google AI ModeAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.

AbbaDox / Sectra: question q4

What are the best alternatives to Sectra PACS?

AbbaDox: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

AbbaDox and Sectra on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
AbbaDox / Sectra / ChatGPTAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / ClaudeAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / PerplexityAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / Google AI ModeAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

AbbaDox / Sectra: question q5

What are the best alternatives to Intelerad for a teleradiology group?

AbbaDox: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Sectra: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

AbbaDox and Sectra on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
AbbaDox / Sectra / ChatGPTAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / ClaudeAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / PerplexityAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsAbbaDox: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / Google AI ModeAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

AbbaDox / Sectra: question q6

What are the best alternatives to Philips IntelliSpace PACS?

AbbaDox: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

AbbaDox and Sectra on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
AbbaDox / Sectra / ChatGPTAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / ClaudeAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / PerplexityAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / Google AI ModeAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

AbbaDox / Sectra: question q7

Sectra vs Visage Imaging, which PACS is better for a hospital system?

AbbaDox: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

AbbaDox and Sectra on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
AbbaDox / Sectra / ChatGPTAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / ClaudeAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / PerplexityAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / Google AI ModeAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

AbbaDox / Sectra: question q8

Visage vs Intelerad, which is better for a teleradiology firm?

AbbaDox: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9).

AbbaDox and Sectra on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
AbbaDox / Sectra / ChatGPTAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / ClaudeAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / PerplexityAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / Google AI ModeAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

AbbaDox / Sectra: question q9

What should I look for when choosing a new radiology PACS?

AbbaDox: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

AbbaDox and Sectra on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
AbbaDox / Sectra / ChatGPTAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / ClaudeAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / PerplexityAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / Google AI ModeAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

AbbaDox / Sectra: question q10

What is the best RIS PACS for an imaging group with five locations?

AbbaDox: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Sectra: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

AbbaDox and Sectra on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
AbbaDox / Sectra / ChatGPTAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / ClaudeAbbaDox: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / PerplexityAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
AbbaDox / Sectra / Google AI ModeAbbaDox: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

AbbaDox's own-domain citation count is 8 of 150; Sectra's is 19 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Radiology and medical imaging software · Exact Radiology and medical imaging software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Pro Medicus and Sectra

Radiology and medical imaging software · September 2026

Pro Medicus and Sectra in the observed answers

Pro Medicus appears in 6 of 150 answers about radiology and medical imaging software; Sectra appears in 87 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Pro Medicus and Sectra have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Pro Medicus record · Sectra record · Radiology and medical imaging software checked set.

Pro Medicus beside Sectra

Pro Medicus and Sectra totals
MeasurePro MedicusSectra
Named6/150; 4.0% (95% CI 1.8 to 8.5)87/150; 58.0% (95% CI 50.0 to 65.6)
Own domain cited2/150; 1.3% (95% CI 0.4 to 4.7)19/150; 12.7% (95% CI 8.3 to 18.9)

Pro Medicus / Sectra: question q1

What is the best PACS for a small imaging center?

Pro Medicus: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8).

Pro Medicus and Sectra on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
Pro Medicus / Sectra / ChatGPTPro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / ClaudePro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / PerplexityPro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / Google AI ModePro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Pro Medicus / Sectra: question q2

What is the best RIS for an outpatient imaging center?

Pro Medicus: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

Pro Medicus and Sectra on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
Pro Medicus / Sectra / ChatGPTPro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / ClaudePro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / PerplexityPro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / Google AI ModePro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Pro Medicus / Sectra: question q3

What is the most affordable PACS for a low volume imaging center?

Pro Medicus: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

Pro Medicus and Sectra on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
Pro Medicus / Sectra / ChatGPTPro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / ClaudePro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / PerplexityPro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / Google AI ModePro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.

Pro Medicus / Sectra: question q4

What are the best alternatives to Sectra PACS?

Pro Medicus: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Pro Medicus and Sectra on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
Pro Medicus / Sectra / ChatGPTPro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / ClaudePro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / PerplexityPro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / Google AI ModePro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Pro Medicus / Sectra: question q5

What are the best alternatives to Intelerad for a teleradiology group?

Pro Medicus: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Sectra: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Pro Medicus and Sectra on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
Pro Medicus / Sectra / ChatGPTPro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / ClaudePro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / PerplexityPro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / Google AI ModePro Medicus: 1 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Pro Medicus / Sectra: question q6

What are the best alternatives to Philips IntelliSpace PACS?

Pro Medicus: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Pro Medicus and Sectra on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
Pro Medicus / Sectra / ChatGPTPro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / ClaudePro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / PerplexityPro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / Google AI ModePro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Pro Medicus / Sectra: question q7

Sectra vs Visage Imaging, which PACS is better for a hospital system?

Pro Medicus: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Pro Medicus and Sectra on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
Pro Medicus / Sectra / ChatGPTPro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / ClaudePro Medicus: 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / PerplexityPro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / Google AI ModePro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Pro Medicus / Sectra: question q8

Visage vs Intelerad, which is better for a teleradiology firm?

Pro Medicus: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Sectra: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9).

Pro Medicus and Sectra on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
Pro Medicus / Sectra / ChatGPTPro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / ClaudePro Medicus: 1 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / PerplexityPro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPro Medicus: 2 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / Google AI ModePro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

Pro Medicus / Sectra: question q9

What should I look for when choosing a new radiology PACS?

Pro Medicus: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Pro Medicus and Sectra on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
Pro Medicus / Sectra / ChatGPTPro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / ClaudePro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / PerplexityPro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / Google AI ModePro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

Pro Medicus / Sectra: question q10

What is the best RIS PACS for an imaging group with five locations?

Pro Medicus: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

Pro Medicus and Sectra on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
Pro Medicus / Sectra / ChatGPTPro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / ClaudePro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / PerplexityPro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsPro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Pro Medicus / Sectra / Google AI ModePro Medicus: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Pro Medicus's own-domain citation count is 2 of 150; Sectra's is 19 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Radiology and medical imaging software · Exact Radiology and medical imaging software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

INFINITT Healthcare and Sectra

Radiology and medical imaging software · September 2026

INFINITT Healthcare and Sectra in the observed answers

INFINITT Healthcare appears in 17 of 150 answers about radiology and medical imaging software; Sectra appears in 87 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

INFINITT Healthcare and Sectra have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. INFINITT Healthcare record · Sectra record · Radiology and medical imaging software checked set.

INFINITT Healthcare beside Sectra

INFINITT Healthcare and Sectra totals
MeasureINFINITT HealthcareSectra
Named17/150; 11.3% (95% CI 7.2 to 17.4)87/150; 58.0% (95% CI 50.0 to 65.6)
Own domain cited1/150; 0.7% (95% CI 0.1 to 3.7)19/150; 12.7% (95% CI 8.3 to 18.9)

INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra: question q1

What is the best PACS for a small imaging center?

INFINITT Healthcare: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Sectra: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8).

INFINITT Healthcare and Sectra on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / ChatGPTINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / ClaudeINFINITT Healthcare: 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / PerplexityINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsINFINITT Healthcare: 1 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / Google AI ModeINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra: question q2

What is the best RIS for an outpatient imaging center?

INFINITT Healthcare: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Sectra: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

INFINITT Healthcare and Sectra on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / ChatGPTINFINITT Healthcare: 1 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / ClaudeINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / PerplexityINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / Google AI ModeINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra: question q3

What is the most affordable PACS for a low volume imaging center?

INFINITT Healthcare: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

INFINITT Healthcare and Sectra on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / ChatGPTINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / ClaudeINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / PerplexityINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / Google AI ModeINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.

INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra: question q4

What are the best alternatives to Sectra PACS?

INFINITT Healthcare: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

INFINITT Healthcare and Sectra on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / ChatGPTINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / ClaudeINFINITT Healthcare: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / PerplexityINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / Google AI ModeINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra: question q5

What are the best alternatives to Intelerad for a teleradiology group?

INFINITT Healthcare: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Sectra: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

INFINITT Healthcare and Sectra on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / ChatGPTINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / ClaudeINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / PerplexityINFINITT Healthcare: 1 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / Google AI ModeINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra: question q6

What are the best alternatives to Philips IntelliSpace PACS?

INFINITT Healthcare: 7/15; 46.7% (95% CI 24.8 to 69.9). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

INFINITT Healthcare and Sectra on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / ChatGPTINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / ClaudeINFINITT Healthcare: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / PerplexityINFINITT Healthcare: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsINFINITT Healthcare: 1 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / Google AI ModeINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra: question q7

Sectra vs Visage Imaging, which PACS is better for a hospital system?

INFINITT Healthcare: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

INFINITT Healthcare and Sectra on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / ChatGPTINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / ClaudeINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / PerplexityINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / Google AI ModeINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra: question q8

Visage vs Intelerad, which is better for a teleradiology firm?

INFINITT Healthcare: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9).

INFINITT Healthcare and Sectra on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / ChatGPTINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / ClaudeINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / PerplexityINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / Google AI ModeINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra: question q9

What should I look for when choosing a new radiology PACS?

INFINITT Healthcare: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

INFINITT Healthcare and Sectra on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / ChatGPTINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / ClaudeINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / PerplexityINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / Google AI ModeINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra: question q10

What is the best RIS PACS for an imaging group with five locations?

INFINITT Healthcare: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). Sectra: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

INFINITT Healthcare and Sectra on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / ChatGPTINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / ClaudeINFINITT Healthcare: 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / PerplexityINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
INFINITT Healthcare / Sectra / Google AI ModeINFINITT Healthcare: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

INFINITT Healthcare's own-domain citation count is 1 of 150; Sectra's is 19 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Radiology and medical imaging software · Exact Radiology and medical imaging software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

OnePACS and Sectra

Radiology and medical imaging software · September 2026

OnePACS and Sectra in the observed answers

OnePACS appears in 12 of 150 answers about radiology and medical imaging software; Sectra appears in 87 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

OnePACS and Sectra have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. OnePACS record · Sectra record · Radiology and medical imaging software checked set.

OnePACS beside Sectra

OnePACS and Sectra totals
MeasureOnePACSSectra
Named12/150; 8.0% (95% CI 4.6 to 13.5)87/150; 58.0% (95% CI 50.0 to 65.6)
Own domain cited6/150; 4.0% (95% CI 1.8 to 8.5)19/150; 12.7% (95% CI 8.3 to 18.9)

OnePACS / Sectra: question q1

What is the best PACS for a small imaging center?

OnePACS: 5/15; 33.3% (95% CI 15.2 to 58.3). Sectra: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8).

OnePACS and Sectra on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
OnePACS / Sectra / ChatGPTOnePACS: 2 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / ClaudeOnePACS: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / PerplexityOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / Google AI ModeOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

OnePACS / Sectra: question q2

What is the best RIS for an outpatient imaging center?

OnePACS: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Sectra: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

OnePACS and Sectra on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
OnePACS / Sectra / ChatGPTOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / ClaudeOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / PerplexityOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsOnePACS: 1 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / Google AI ModeOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

OnePACS / Sectra: question q3

What is the most affordable PACS for a low volume imaging center?

OnePACS: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). Sectra: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

OnePACS and Sectra on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
OnePACS / Sectra / ChatGPTOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / ClaudeOnePACS: 1 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / PerplexityOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsOnePACS: 1 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / Google AI ModeOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.

OnePACS / Sectra: question q4

What are the best alternatives to Sectra PACS?

OnePACS: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

OnePACS and Sectra on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
OnePACS / Sectra / ChatGPTOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / ClaudeOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / PerplexityOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / Google AI ModeOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

OnePACS / Sectra: question q5

What are the best alternatives to Intelerad for a teleradiology group?

OnePACS: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0). Sectra: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

OnePACS and Sectra on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
OnePACS / Sectra / ChatGPTOnePACS: 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / ClaudeOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / PerplexityOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / Google AI ModeOnePACS: 2 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

OnePACS / Sectra: question q6

What are the best alternatives to Philips IntelliSpace PACS?

OnePACS: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

OnePACS and Sectra on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
OnePACS / Sectra / ChatGPTOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / ClaudeOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / PerplexityOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / Google AI ModeOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

OnePACS / Sectra: question q7

Sectra vs Visage Imaging, which PACS is better for a hospital system?

OnePACS: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

OnePACS and Sectra on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
OnePACS / Sectra / ChatGPTOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / ClaudeOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / PerplexityOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / Google AI ModeOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

OnePACS / Sectra: question q8

Visage vs Intelerad, which is better for a teleradiology firm?

OnePACS: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9).

OnePACS and Sectra on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
OnePACS / Sectra / ChatGPTOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / ClaudeOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / PerplexityOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / Google AI ModeOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

OnePACS / Sectra: question q9

What should I look for when choosing a new radiology PACS?

OnePACS: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

OnePACS and Sectra on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
OnePACS / Sectra / ChatGPTOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / ClaudeOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / PerplexityOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / Google AI ModeOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

OnePACS / Sectra: question q10

What is the best RIS PACS for an imaging group with five locations?

OnePACS: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

OnePACS and Sectra on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
OnePACS / Sectra / ChatGPTOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / ClaudeOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / PerplexityOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
OnePACS / Sectra / Google AI ModeOnePACS: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

OnePACS's own-domain citation count is 6 of 150; Sectra's is 19 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Radiology and medical imaging software · Exact Radiology and medical imaging software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

eRAD and Sectra

Radiology and medical imaging software · September 2026

eRAD and Sectra in the observed answers

eRAD appears in 12 of 150 answers about radiology and medical imaging software; Sectra appears in 87 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

eRAD and Sectra have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. eRAD record · Sectra record · Radiology and medical imaging software checked set.

eRAD beside Sectra

eRAD and Sectra totals
MeasureeRADSectra
Named12/150; 8.0% (95% CI 4.6 to 13.5)87/150; 58.0% (95% CI 50.0 to 65.6)
Own domain cited7/150; 4.7% (95% CI 2.3 to 9.3)19/150; 12.7% (95% CI 8.3 to 18.9)

eRAD / Sectra: question q1

What is the best PACS for a small imaging center?

eRAD: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Sectra: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8).

eRAD and Sectra on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
eRAD / Sectra / ChatGPTeRAD: 1 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / ClaudeeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / PerplexityeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / Google AI OverviewseRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / Google AI ModeeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

eRAD / Sectra: question q2

What is the best RIS for an outpatient imaging center?

eRAD: 8/15; 53.3% (95% CI 30.1 to 75.2). Sectra: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

eRAD and Sectra on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
eRAD / Sectra / ChatGPTeRAD: 3 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / ClaudeeRAD: 1 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / PerplexityeRAD: 3 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / Google AI OverviewseRAD: 1 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / Google AI ModeeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

eRAD / Sectra: question q3

What is the most affordable PACS for a low volume imaging center?

eRAD: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

eRAD and Sectra on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
eRAD / Sectra / ChatGPTeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / ClaudeeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / PerplexityeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / Google AI OverviewseRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / Google AI ModeeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.

eRAD / Sectra: question q4

What are the best alternatives to Sectra PACS?

eRAD: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

eRAD and Sectra on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
eRAD / Sectra / ChatGPTeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / ClaudeeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / PerplexityeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / Google AI OverviewseRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / Google AI ModeeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

eRAD / Sectra: question q5

What are the best alternatives to Intelerad for a teleradiology group?

eRAD: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Sectra: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

eRAD and Sectra on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
eRAD / Sectra / ChatGPTeRAD: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / ClaudeeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / PerplexityeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / Google AI OverviewseRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / Google AI ModeeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

eRAD / Sectra: question q6

What are the best alternatives to Philips IntelliSpace PACS?

eRAD: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

eRAD and Sectra on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
eRAD / Sectra / ChatGPTeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / ClaudeeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / PerplexityeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / Google AI OverviewseRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / Google AI ModeeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

eRAD / Sectra: question q7

Sectra vs Visage Imaging, which PACS is better for a hospital system?

eRAD: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

eRAD and Sectra on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
eRAD / Sectra / ChatGPTeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / ClaudeeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / PerplexityeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / Google AI OverviewseRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / Google AI ModeeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

eRAD / Sectra: question q8

Visage vs Intelerad, which is better for a teleradiology firm?

eRAD: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9).

eRAD and Sectra on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
eRAD / Sectra / ChatGPTeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / ClaudeeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / PerplexityeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / Google AI OverviewseRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / Google AI ModeeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

eRAD / Sectra: question q9

What should I look for when choosing a new radiology PACS?

eRAD: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

eRAD and Sectra on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
eRAD / Sectra / ChatGPTeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / ClaudeeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / PerplexityeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / Google AI OverviewseRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / Google AI ModeeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

eRAD / Sectra: question q10

What is the best RIS PACS for an imaging group with five locations?

eRAD: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

eRAD and Sectra on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
eRAD / Sectra / ChatGPTeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / ClaudeeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / PerplexityeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / Google AI OverviewseRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
eRAD / Sectra / Google AI ModeeRAD: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

eRAD's own-domain citation count is 7 of 150; Sectra's is 19 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Radiology and medical imaging software · Exact Radiology and medical imaging software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Carestream Health and Sectra

Radiology and medical imaging software · September 2026

Carestream Health and Sectra in the observed answers

Carestream Health appears in 10 of 150 answers about radiology and medical imaging software; Sectra appears in 87 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Carestream Health and Sectra have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Carestream Health record · Sectra record · Radiology and medical imaging software checked set.

Carestream Health beside Sectra

Carestream Health and Sectra totals
MeasureCarestream HealthSectra
Named10/150; 6.7% (95% CI 3.7 to 11.8)87/150; 58.0% (95% CI 50.0 to 65.6)
Own domain cited0/150; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)19/150; 12.7% (95% CI 8.3 to 18.9)

Carestream Health / Sectra: question q1

What is the best PACS for a small imaging center?

Carestream Health: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8).

Carestream Health and Sectra on q1
Engine and pairNaming observations
Carestream Health / Sectra / ChatGPTCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / ClaudeCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / PerplexityCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / Google AI ModeCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Carestream Health / Sectra: question q2

What is the best RIS for an outpatient imaging center?

Carestream Health: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Sectra: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

Carestream Health and Sectra on q2
Engine and pairNaming observations
Carestream Health / Sectra / ChatGPTCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / ClaudeCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / PerplexityCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / Google AI ModeCarestream Health: 1 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Carestream Health / Sectra: question q3

What is the most affordable PACS for a low volume imaging center?

Carestream Health: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8).

Carestream Health and Sectra on q3
Engine and pairNaming observations
Carestream Health / Sectra / ChatGPTCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / ClaudeCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / PerplexityCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / Google AI ModeCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 1 of 3.

Carestream Health / Sectra: question q4

What are the best alternatives to Sectra PACS?

Carestream Health: 8/15; 53.3% (95% CI 30.1 to 75.2). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Carestream Health and Sectra on q4
Engine and pairNaming observations
Carestream Health / Sectra / ChatGPTCarestream Health: 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / ClaudeCarestream Health: 2 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / PerplexityCarestream Health: 3 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / Google AI ModeCarestream Health: 1 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Carestream Health / Sectra: question q5

What are the best alternatives to Intelerad for a teleradiology group?

Carestream Health: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Carestream Health and Sectra on q5
Engine and pairNaming observations
Carestream Health / Sectra / ChatGPTCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / ClaudeCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / PerplexityCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / Google AI ModeCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.

Carestream Health / Sectra: question q6

What are the best alternatives to Philips IntelliSpace PACS?

Carestream Health: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Carestream Health and Sectra on q6
Engine and pairNaming observations
Carestream Health / Sectra / ChatGPTCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / ClaudeCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / PerplexityCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / Google AI ModeCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Carestream Health / Sectra: question q7

Sectra vs Visage Imaging, which PACS is better for a hospital system?

Carestream Health: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Carestream Health and Sectra on q7
Engine and pairNaming observations
Carestream Health / Sectra / ChatGPTCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / ClaudeCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / PerplexityCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / Google AI ModeCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Carestream Health / Sectra: question q8

Visage vs Intelerad, which is better for a teleradiology firm?

Carestream Health: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9).

Carestream Health and Sectra on q8
Engine and pairNaming observations
Carestream Health / Sectra / ChatGPTCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / ClaudeCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 2 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / PerplexityCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / Google AI ModeCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

Carestream Health / Sectra: question q9

What should I look for when choosing a new radiology PACS?

Carestream Health: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Sectra: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Carestream Health and Sectra on q9
Engine and pairNaming observations
Carestream Health / Sectra / ChatGPTCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / ClaudeCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / PerplexityCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / Google AI ModeCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.

Carestream Health / Sectra: question q10

What is the best RIS PACS for an imaging group with five locations?

Carestream Health: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Sectra: 12/15; 80.0% (95% CI 54.8 to 93.0).

Carestream Health and Sectra on q10
Engine and pairNaming observations
Carestream Health / Sectra / ChatGPTCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 0 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / ClaudeCarestream Health: 1 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / PerplexityCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.
Carestream Health / Sectra / Google AI ModeCarestream Health: 0 of 3; Sectra: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Carestream Health's own-domain citation count is 0 of 150; Sectra's is 19 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Radiology and medical imaging software · Exact Radiology and medical imaging software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Sectra PACS alternatives

Radiology and medical imaging software · captured 2026-09-22

When the question asks for Sectra PACS alternatives

Sectra PACS alternatives: 13 other checked vendors were named across 15 valid answers.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Exact wording: What are the best alternatives to Sectra PACS?.

Sectra PACS remained in 15 of 15 valid answers, 100.0% (Wilson 95% interval 79.6% to 100.0%).

10 of 24 checked vendors were never named for this exact question. That observation applies to 15 valid answers, rather than to all future answers.

Question record for Sectra PACS · Radiology and medical imaging software checked set.

Sectra PACS alternatives: Sectra

Sectra: 15 of 15 valid answers, 100.0% (Wilson 95% interval 79.6% to 100.0%).

Sectra PACS alternatives naming Sectra
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Sectra PACS / Sectra / ChatGPTSectra named in 3 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Sectra / ClaudeSectra named in 3 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Sectra / PerplexitySectra named in 3 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsSectra named in 3 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Sectra / Google AI ModeSectra named in 3 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.

Sectra across the category questions.

Sectra PACS alternatives: Agfa HealthCare

Agfa HealthCare: 14 of 15 valid answers, 93.3% (Wilson 95% interval 70.2% to 98.8%).

Sectra PACS alternatives naming Agfa HealthCare
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Sectra PACS / Agfa HealthCare / ChatGPTAgfa HealthCare named in 3 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Agfa HealthCare / ClaudeAgfa HealthCare named in 3 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Agfa HealthCare / PerplexityAgfa HealthCare named in 3 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Agfa HealthCare / Google AI OverviewsAgfa HealthCare named in 2 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Agfa HealthCare / Google AI ModeAgfa HealthCare named in 3 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.

Agfa HealthCare across the category questions.

Sectra PACS alternatives: Fujifilm (Synapse)

Fujifilm (Synapse): 14 of 15 valid answers, 93.3% (Wilson 95% interval 70.2% to 98.8%).

Sectra PACS alternatives naming Fujifilm (Synapse)
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Sectra PACS / Fujifilm (Synapse) / ChatGPTFujifilm (Synapse) named in 3 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Fujifilm (Synapse) / ClaudeFujifilm (Synapse) named in 3 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Fujifilm (Synapse) / PerplexityFujifilm (Synapse) named in 3 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Fujifilm (Synapse) / Google AI OverviewsFujifilm (Synapse) named in 2 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Fujifilm (Synapse) / Google AI ModeFujifilm (Synapse) named in 3 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.

Fujifilm (Synapse) across the category questions.

Sectra PACS alternatives: Intelerad

Intelerad: 13 of 15 valid answers, 86.7% (Wilson 95% interval 62.1% to 96.3%).

Sectra PACS alternatives naming Intelerad
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Sectra PACS / Intelerad / ChatGPTIntelerad named in 3 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Intelerad / ClaudeIntelerad named in 3 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Intelerad / PerplexityIntelerad named in 3 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Intelerad / Google AI OverviewsIntelerad named in 1 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Intelerad / Google AI ModeIntelerad named in 3 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.

Intelerad across the category questions.

Sectra PACS alternatives: Visage Imaging

Visage Imaging: 13 of 15 valid answers, 86.7% (Wilson 95% interval 62.1% to 96.3%).

Sectra PACS alternatives naming Visage Imaging
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Sectra PACS / Visage Imaging / ChatGPTVisage Imaging named in 3 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Visage Imaging / ClaudeVisage Imaging named in 3 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Visage Imaging / PerplexityVisage Imaging named in 1 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Visage Imaging / Google AI OverviewsVisage Imaging named in 3 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Visage Imaging / Google AI ModeVisage Imaging named in 3 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.

Visage Imaging across the category questions.

Sectra PACS alternatives: Philips (HealthSuite Imaging)

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging): 11 of 15 valid answers, 73.3% (Wilson 95% interval 48.0% to 89.1%).

Sectra PACS alternatives naming Philips (HealthSuite Imaging)
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Sectra PACS / Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / ChatGPTPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging) named in 2 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / ClaudePhilips (HealthSuite Imaging) named in 2 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / PerplexityPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging) named in 3 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Google AI OverviewsPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging) named in 1 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Google AI ModePhilips (HealthSuite Imaging) named in 3 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) across the category questions.

Sectra PACS alternatives: Carestream Health

Carestream Health: 8 of 15 valid answers, 53.3% (Wilson 95% interval 30.1% to 75.2%).

Sectra PACS alternatives naming Carestream Health
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Sectra PACS / Carestream Health / ChatGPTCarestream Health named in 2 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Carestream Health / ClaudeCarestream Health named in 2 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Carestream Health / PerplexityCarestream Health named in 3 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Carestream Health / Google AI OverviewsCarestream Health named in 0 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Carestream Health / Google AI ModeCarestream Health named in 1 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.

Carestream Health across the category questions.

Sectra PACS alternatives: RamSoft

RamSoft: 7 of 15 valid answers, 46.7% (Wilson 95% interval 24.8% to 69.9%).

Sectra PACS alternatives naming RamSoft
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Sectra PACS / RamSoft / ChatGPTRamSoft named in 0 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / RamSoft / ClaudeRamSoft named in 1 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / RamSoft / PerplexityRamSoft named in 3 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / RamSoft / Google AI OverviewsRamSoft named in 2 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / RamSoft / Google AI ModeRamSoft named in 1 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.

RamSoft across the category questions.

Sectra PACS alternatives: Siemens Healthineers

Siemens Healthineers: 6 of 15 valid answers, 40.0% (Wilson 95% interval 19.8% to 64.3%).

Sectra PACS alternatives naming Siemens Healthineers
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Sectra PACS / Siemens Healthineers / ChatGPTSiemens Healthineers named in 0 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Siemens Healthineers / ClaudeSiemens Healthineers named in 3 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Siemens Healthineers / PerplexitySiemens Healthineers named in 2 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Siemens Healthineers / Google AI OverviewsSiemens Healthineers named in 0 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Siemens Healthineers / Google AI ModeSiemens Healthineers named in 1 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.

Siemens Healthineers across the category questions.

Sectra PACS alternatives: GE HealthCare

GE HealthCare: 5 of 15 valid answers, 33.3% (Wilson 95% interval 15.2% to 58.3%).

Sectra PACS alternatives naming GE HealthCare
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Sectra PACS / GE HealthCare / ChatGPTGE HealthCare named in 2 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / GE HealthCare / ClaudeGE HealthCare named in 3 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / GE HealthCare / PerplexityGE HealthCare named in 0 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / GE HealthCare / Google AI OverviewsGE HealthCare named in 0 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / GE HealthCare / Google AI ModeGE HealthCare named in 0 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.

GE HealthCare across the category questions.

Sectra PACS alternatives: Merative (Merge)

Merative (Merge): 5 of 15 valid answers, 33.3% (Wilson 95% interval 15.2% to 58.3%).

Sectra PACS alternatives naming Merative (Merge)
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Sectra PACS / Merative (Merge) / ChatGPTMerative (Merge) named in 0 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Merative (Merge) / ClaudeMerative (Merge) named in 3 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Merative (Merge) / PerplexityMerative (Merge) named in 2 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Merative (Merge) / Google AI OverviewsMerative (Merge) named in 0 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Merative (Merge) / Google AI ModeMerative (Merge) named in 0 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.

Merative (Merge) across the category questions.

Sectra PACS alternatives: INFINITT Healthcare

INFINITT Healthcare: 3 of 15 valid answers, 20.0% (Wilson 95% interval 7.0% to 45.2%).

Sectra PACS alternatives naming INFINITT Healthcare
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Sectra PACS / INFINITT Healthcare / ChatGPTINFINITT Healthcare named in 0 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / INFINITT Healthcare / ClaudeINFINITT Healthcare named in 3 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / INFINITT Healthcare / PerplexityINFINITT Healthcare named in 0 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / INFINITT Healthcare / Google AI OverviewsINFINITT Healthcare named in 0 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / INFINITT Healthcare / Google AI ModeINFINITT Healthcare named in 0 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.

INFINITT Healthcare across the category questions.

Sectra PACS alternatives: Novarad

Novarad: 2 of 15 valid answers, 13.3% (Wilson 95% interval 3.7% to 37.9%).

Sectra PACS alternatives naming Novarad
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Sectra PACS / Novarad / ChatGPTNovarad named in 0 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Novarad / ClaudeNovarad named in 0 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Novarad / PerplexityNovarad named in 2 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Novarad / Google AI OverviewsNovarad named in 0 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / Novarad / Google AI ModeNovarad named in 0 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.

Novarad across the category questions.

Sectra PACS alternatives: PostDICOM

PostDICOM: 2 of 15 valid answers, 13.3% (Wilson 95% interval 3.7% to 37.9%).

Sectra PACS alternatives naming PostDICOM
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Sectra PACS / PostDICOM / ChatGPTPostDICOM named in 0 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / PostDICOM / ClaudePostDICOM named in 0 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / PostDICOM / PerplexityPostDICOM named in 2 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / PostDICOM / Google AI OverviewsPostDICOM named in 0 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.
Sectra PACS / PostDICOM / Google AI ModePostDICOM named in 0 of 3 valid Sectra PACS-alternatives answers.

PostDICOM across the category questions.

Sectra PACS alternatives and the checked set

Not named in this question: AbbaDox, AdvaPACS, Canon Medical Informatics, eRAD, Hyland, Mach7 Technologies, MedInformatix, OnePACS, PaxeraHealth, Pro Medicus. Each has 0 of 15 valid answers for this exact wording.

A question naming Sectra PACS already directs attention toward that product. Read its category discovery questions before comparing this answer with an unbranded shortlist.

Radiology and medical imaging software source mix. The full Sectra PACS answers remain in the release deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Intelerad alternatives

Radiology and medical imaging software · captured 2026-09-22

When the question asks for Intelerad alternatives

Intelerad alternatives: 15 other checked vendors were named across 15 valid answers.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Exact wording: What are the best alternatives to Intelerad for a teleradiology group?.

Intelerad remained in 15 of 15 valid answers, 100.0% (Wilson 95% interval 79.6% to 100.0%).

8 of 24 checked vendors were never named for this exact question. That observation applies to 15 valid answers, rather than to all future answers.

Question record for Intelerad · Radiology and medical imaging software checked set.

Intelerad alternatives: Intelerad

Intelerad: 15 of 15 valid answers, 100.0% (Wilson 95% interval 79.6% to 100.0%).

Intelerad alternatives naming Intelerad
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Intelerad / Intelerad / ChatGPTIntelerad named in 3 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Intelerad / ClaudeIntelerad named in 3 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Intelerad / PerplexityIntelerad named in 3 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Intelerad / Google AI OverviewsIntelerad named in 3 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Intelerad / Google AI ModeIntelerad named in 3 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.

Intelerad across the category questions.

Intelerad alternatives: Sectra

Sectra: 14 of 15 valid answers, 93.3% (Wilson 95% interval 70.2% to 98.8%).

Intelerad alternatives naming Sectra
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Intelerad / Sectra / ChatGPTSectra named in 3 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Sectra / ClaudeSectra named in 3 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Sectra / PerplexitySectra named in 3 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsSectra named in 3 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Sectra / Google AI ModeSectra named in 2 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.

Sectra across the category questions.

Intelerad alternatives: RamSoft

RamSoft: 13 of 15 valid answers, 86.7% (Wilson 95% interval 62.1% to 96.3%).

Intelerad alternatives naming RamSoft
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Intelerad / RamSoft / ChatGPTRamSoft named in 3 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / RamSoft / ClaudeRamSoft named in 3 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / RamSoft / PerplexityRamSoft named in 3 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / RamSoft / Google AI OverviewsRamSoft named in 1 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / RamSoft / Google AI ModeRamSoft named in 3 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.

RamSoft across the category questions.

Intelerad alternatives: Visage Imaging

Visage Imaging: 12 of 15 valid answers, 80.0% (Wilson 95% interval 54.8% to 93.0%).

Intelerad alternatives naming Visage Imaging
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Intelerad / Visage Imaging / ChatGPTVisage Imaging named in 3 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Visage Imaging / ClaudeVisage Imaging named in 3 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Visage Imaging / PerplexityVisage Imaging named in 3 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Visage Imaging / Google AI OverviewsVisage Imaging named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Visage Imaging / Google AI ModeVisage Imaging named in 3 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.

Visage Imaging across the category questions.

Intelerad alternatives: Merative (Merge)

Merative (Merge): 5 of 15 valid answers, 33.3% (Wilson 95% interval 15.2% to 58.3%).

Intelerad alternatives naming Merative (Merge)
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Intelerad / Merative (Merge) / ChatGPTMerative (Merge) named in 1 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Merative (Merge) / ClaudeMerative (Merge) named in 3 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Merative (Merge) / PerplexityMerative (Merge) named in 1 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Merative (Merge) / Google AI OverviewsMerative (Merge) named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Merative (Merge) / Google AI ModeMerative (Merge) named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.

Merative (Merge) across the category questions.

Intelerad alternatives: Agfa HealthCare

Agfa HealthCare: 4 of 15 valid answers, 26.7% (Wilson 95% interval 10.9% to 52.0%).

Intelerad alternatives naming Agfa HealthCare
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Intelerad / Agfa HealthCare / ChatGPTAgfa HealthCare named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Agfa HealthCare / ClaudeAgfa HealthCare named in 3 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Agfa HealthCare / PerplexityAgfa HealthCare named in 1 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Agfa HealthCare / Google AI OverviewsAgfa HealthCare named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Agfa HealthCare / Google AI ModeAgfa HealthCare named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.

Agfa HealthCare across the category questions.

Intelerad alternatives: OnePACS

OnePACS: 4 of 15 valid answers, 26.7% (Wilson 95% interval 10.9% to 52.0%).

Intelerad alternatives naming OnePACS
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Intelerad / OnePACS / ChatGPTOnePACS named in 2 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / OnePACS / ClaudeOnePACS named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / OnePACS / PerplexityOnePACS named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / OnePACS / Google AI OverviewsOnePACS named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / OnePACS / Google AI ModeOnePACS named in 2 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.

OnePACS across the category questions.

Intelerad alternatives: AbbaDox

AbbaDox: 3 of 15 valid answers, 20.0% (Wilson 95% interval 7.0% to 45.2%).

Intelerad alternatives naming AbbaDox
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Intelerad / AbbaDox / ChatGPTAbbaDox named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / AbbaDox / ClaudeAbbaDox named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / AbbaDox / PerplexityAbbaDox named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / AbbaDox / Google AI OverviewsAbbaDox named in 3 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / AbbaDox / Google AI ModeAbbaDox named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.

AbbaDox across the category questions.

Intelerad alternatives: eRAD

eRAD: 3 of 15 valid answers, 20.0% (Wilson 95% interval 7.0% to 45.2%).

Intelerad alternatives naming eRAD
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Intelerad / eRAD / ChatGPTeRAD named in 3 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / eRAD / ClaudeeRAD named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / eRAD / PerplexityeRAD named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / eRAD / Google AI OverviewseRAD named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / eRAD / Google AI ModeeRAD named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.

eRAD across the category questions.

Intelerad alternatives: GE HealthCare

GE HealthCare: 3 of 15 valid answers, 20.0% (Wilson 95% interval 7.0% to 45.2%).

Intelerad alternatives naming GE HealthCare
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Intelerad / GE HealthCare / ChatGPTGE HealthCare named in 2 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / GE HealthCare / ClaudeGE HealthCare named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / GE HealthCare / PerplexityGE HealthCare named in 1 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / GE HealthCare / Google AI OverviewsGE HealthCare named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / GE HealthCare / Google AI ModeGE HealthCare named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.

GE HealthCare across the category questions.

Intelerad alternatives: PaxeraHealth

PaxeraHealth: 3 of 15 valid answers, 20.0% (Wilson 95% interval 7.0% to 45.2%).

Intelerad alternatives naming PaxeraHealth
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Intelerad / PaxeraHealth / ChatGPTPaxeraHealth named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / PaxeraHealth / ClaudePaxeraHealth named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / PaxeraHealth / PerplexityPaxeraHealth named in 2 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / PaxeraHealth / Google AI OverviewsPaxeraHealth named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / PaxeraHealth / Google AI ModePaxeraHealth named in 1 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.

PaxeraHealth across the category questions.

Intelerad alternatives: Fujifilm (Synapse)

Fujifilm (Synapse): 2 of 15 valid answers, 13.3% (Wilson 95% interval 3.7% to 37.9%).

Intelerad alternatives naming Fujifilm (Synapse)
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Intelerad / Fujifilm (Synapse) / ChatGPTFujifilm (Synapse) named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Fujifilm (Synapse) / ClaudeFujifilm (Synapse) named in 2 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Fujifilm (Synapse) / PerplexityFujifilm (Synapse) named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Fujifilm (Synapse) / Google AI OverviewsFujifilm (Synapse) named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Fujifilm (Synapse) / Google AI ModeFujifilm (Synapse) named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.

Fujifilm (Synapse) across the category questions.

Intelerad alternatives: AdvaPACS

AdvaPACS: 1 of 15 valid answers, 6.7% (Wilson 95% interval 1.2% to 29.8%).

Intelerad alternatives naming AdvaPACS
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Intelerad / AdvaPACS / ChatGPTAdvaPACS named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / AdvaPACS / ClaudeAdvaPACS named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / AdvaPACS / PerplexityAdvaPACS named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / AdvaPACS / Google AI OverviewsAdvaPACS named in 1 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / AdvaPACS / Google AI ModeAdvaPACS named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.

AdvaPACS across the category questions.

Intelerad alternatives: INFINITT Healthcare

INFINITT Healthcare: 1 of 15 valid answers, 6.7% (Wilson 95% interval 1.2% to 29.8%).

Intelerad alternatives naming INFINITT Healthcare
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Intelerad / INFINITT Healthcare / ChatGPTINFINITT Healthcare named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / INFINITT Healthcare / ClaudeINFINITT Healthcare named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / INFINITT Healthcare / PerplexityINFINITT Healthcare named in 1 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / INFINITT Healthcare / Google AI OverviewsINFINITT Healthcare named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / INFINITT Healthcare / Google AI ModeINFINITT Healthcare named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.

INFINITT Healthcare across the category questions.

Intelerad alternatives: Mach7 Technologies

Mach7 Technologies: 1 of 15 valid answers, 6.7% (Wilson 95% interval 1.2% to 29.8%).

Intelerad alternatives naming Mach7 Technologies
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Intelerad / Mach7 Technologies / ChatGPTMach7 Technologies named in 1 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Mach7 Technologies / ClaudeMach7 Technologies named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Mach7 Technologies / PerplexityMach7 Technologies named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Mach7 Technologies / Google AI OverviewsMach7 Technologies named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Mach7 Technologies / Google AI ModeMach7 Technologies named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.

Mach7 Technologies across the category questions.

Intelerad alternatives: Pro Medicus

Pro Medicus: 1 of 15 valid answers, 6.7% (Wilson 95% interval 1.2% to 29.8%).

Intelerad alternatives naming Pro Medicus
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Intelerad / Pro Medicus / ChatGPTPro Medicus named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Pro Medicus / ClaudePro Medicus named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Pro Medicus / PerplexityPro Medicus named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Pro Medicus / Google AI OverviewsPro Medicus named in 0 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.
Intelerad / Pro Medicus / Google AI ModePro Medicus named in 1 of 3 valid Intelerad-alternatives answers.

Pro Medicus across the category questions.

Intelerad alternatives and the checked set

Not named in this question: Canon Medical Informatics, Carestream Health, Hyland, MedInformatix, Novarad, Philips (HealthSuite Imaging), PostDICOM, Siemens Healthineers. Each has 0 of 15 valid answers for this exact wording.

A question naming Intelerad already directs attention toward that product. Read its category discovery questions before comparing this answer with an unbranded shortlist.

Radiology and medical imaging software source mix. The full Intelerad answers remain in the release deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Philips IntelliSpace PACS alternatives

Radiology and medical imaging software · captured 2026-09-22

When the question asks for Philips IntelliSpace PACS alternatives

Philips IntelliSpace PACS alternatives: 10 other checked vendors were named across 15 valid answers.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Exact wording: What are the best alternatives to Philips IntelliSpace PACS?.

Philips IntelliSpace PACS remained in 15 of 15 valid answers, 100.0% (Wilson 95% interval 79.6% to 100.0%).

13 of 24 checked vendors were never named for this exact question. That observation applies to 15 valid answers, rather than to all future answers.

Question record for Philips IntelliSpace PACS · Radiology and medical imaging software checked set.

Philips IntelliSpace PACS alternatives: Fujifilm (Synapse)

Fujifilm (Synapse): 15 of 15 valid answers, 100.0% (Wilson 95% interval 79.6% to 100.0%).

Philips IntelliSpace PACS alternatives naming Fujifilm (Synapse)
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Fujifilm (Synapse) / ChatGPTFujifilm (Synapse) named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Fujifilm (Synapse) / ClaudeFujifilm (Synapse) named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Fujifilm (Synapse) / PerplexityFujifilm (Synapse) named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Fujifilm (Synapse) / Google AI OverviewsFujifilm (Synapse) named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Fujifilm (Synapse) / Google AI ModeFujifilm (Synapse) named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.

Fujifilm (Synapse) across the category questions.

Philips IntelliSpace PACS alternatives: Philips (HealthSuite Imaging)

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging): 15 of 15 valid answers, 100.0% (Wilson 95% interval 79.6% to 100.0%).

Philips IntelliSpace PACS alternatives naming Philips (HealthSuite Imaging)
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / ChatGPTPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging) named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / ClaudePhilips (HealthSuite Imaging) named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / PerplexityPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging) named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Google AI OverviewsPhilips (HealthSuite Imaging) named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) / Google AI ModePhilips (HealthSuite Imaging) named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.

Philips (HealthSuite Imaging) across the category questions.

Philips IntelliSpace PACS alternatives: Sectra

Sectra: 15 of 15 valid answers, 100.0% (Wilson 95% interval 79.6% to 100.0%).

Philips IntelliSpace PACS alternatives naming Sectra
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Sectra / ChatGPTSectra named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Sectra / ClaudeSectra named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Sectra / PerplexitySectra named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Sectra / Google AI OverviewsSectra named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Sectra / Google AI ModeSectra named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.

Sectra across the category questions.

Philips IntelliSpace PACS alternatives: Agfa HealthCare

Agfa HealthCare: 13 of 15 valid answers, 86.7% (Wilson 95% interval 62.1% to 96.3%).

Philips IntelliSpace PACS alternatives naming Agfa HealthCare
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Agfa HealthCare / ChatGPTAgfa HealthCare named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Agfa HealthCare / ClaudeAgfa HealthCare named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Agfa HealthCare / PerplexityAgfa HealthCare named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Agfa HealthCare / Google AI OverviewsAgfa HealthCare named in 2 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Agfa HealthCare / Google AI ModeAgfa HealthCare named in 2 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.

Agfa HealthCare across the category questions.

Philips IntelliSpace PACS alternatives: Intelerad

Intelerad: 12 of 15 valid answers, 80.0% (Wilson 95% interval 54.8% to 93.0%).

Philips IntelliSpace PACS alternatives naming Intelerad
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Intelerad / ChatGPTIntelerad named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Intelerad / ClaudeIntelerad named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Intelerad / PerplexityIntelerad named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Intelerad / Google AI OverviewsIntelerad named in 0 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Intelerad / Google AI ModeIntelerad named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.

Intelerad across the category questions.

Philips IntelliSpace PACS alternatives: Visage Imaging

Visage Imaging: 11 of 15 valid answers, 73.3% (Wilson 95% interval 48.0% to 89.1%).

Philips IntelliSpace PACS alternatives naming Visage Imaging
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Visage Imaging / ChatGPTVisage Imaging named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Visage Imaging / ClaudeVisage Imaging named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Visage Imaging / PerplexityVisage Imaging named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Visage Imaging / Google AI OverviewsVisage Imaging named in 0 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Visage Imaging / Google AI ModeVisage Imaging named in 2 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.

Visage Imaging across the category questions.

Philips IntelliSpace PACS alternatives: GE HealthCare

GE HealthCare: 9 of 15 valid answers, 60.0% (Wilson 95% interval 35.7% to 80.2%).

Philips IntelliSpace PACS alternatives naming GE HealthCare
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / GE HealthCare / ChatGPTGE HealthCare named in 1 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / GE HealthCare / ClaudeGE HealthCare named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / GE HealthCare / PerplexityGE HealthCare named in 2 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / GE HealthCare / Google AI OverviewsGE HealthCare named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / GE HealthCare / Google AI ModeGE HealthCare named in 0 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.

GE HealthCare across the category questions.

Philips IntelliSpace PACS alternatives: INFINITT Healthcare

INFINITT Healthcare: 7 of 15 valid answers, 46.7% (Wilson 95% interval 24.8% to 69.9%).

Philips IntelliSpace PACS alternatives naming INFINITT Healthcare
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / INFINITT Healthcare / ChatGPTINFINITT Healthcare named in 0 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / INFINITT Healthcare / ClaudeINFINITT Healthcare named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / INFINITT Healthcare / PerplexityINFINITT Healthcare named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / INFINITT Healthcare / Google AI OverviewsINFINITT Healthcare named in 1 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / INFINITT Healthcare / Google AI ModeINFINITT Healthcare named in 0 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.

INFINITT Healthcare across the category questions.

Philips IntelliSpace PACS alternatives: Merative (Merge)

Merative (Merge): 6 of 15 valid answers, 40.0% (Wilson 95% interval 19.8% to 64.3%).

Philips IntelliSpace PACS alternatives naming Merative (Merge)
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Merative (Merge) / ChatGPTMerative (Merge) named in 1 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Merative (Merge) / ClaudeMerative (Merge) named in 2 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Merative (Merge) / PerplexityMerative (Merge) named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Merative (Merge) / Google AI OverviewsMerative (Merge) named in 0 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Merative (Merge) / Google AI ModeMerative (Merge) named in 0 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.

Merative (Merge) across the category questions.

Philips IntelliSpace PACS alternatives: Siemens Healthineers

Siemens Healthineers: 6 of 15 valid answers, 40.0% (Wilson 95% interval 19.8% to 64.3%).

Philips IntelliSpace PACS alternatives naming Siemens Healthineers
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Siemens Healthineers / ChatGPTSiemens Healthineers named in 0 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Siemens Healthineers / ClaudeSiemens Healthineers named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Siemens Healthineers / PerplexitySiemens Healthineers named in 0 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Siemens Healthineers / Google AI OverviewsSiemens Healthineers named in 3 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / Siemens Healthineers / Google AI ModeSiemens Healthineers named in 0 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.

Siemens Healthineers across the category questions.

Philips IntelliSpace PACS alternatives: RamSoft

RamSoft: 3 of 15 valid answers, 20.0% (Wilson 95% interval 7.0% to 45.2%).

Philips IntelliSpace PACS alternatives naming RamSoft
Engine, subject, and vendorValid answers naming this vendor
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / RamSoft / ChatGPTRamSoft named in 0 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / RamSoft / ClaudeRamSoft named in 1 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / RamSoft / PerplexityRamSoft named in 1 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / RamSoft / Google AI OverviewsRamSoft named in 1 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.
Philips IntelliSpace PACS / RamSoft / Google AI ModeRamSoft named in 0 of 3 valid Philips IntelliSpace PACS-alternatives answers.

RamSoft across the category questions.

Philips IntelliSpace PACS alternatives and the checked set

Not named in this question: AbbaDox, AdvaPACS, Canon Medical Informatics, Carestream Health, eRAD, Hyland, Mach7 Technologies, MedInformatix, Novarad, OnePACS, PaxeraHealth, PostDICOM, Pro Medicus. Each has 0 of 15 valid answers for this exact wording.

A question naming Philips IntelliSpace PACS already directs attention toward that product. Read its category discovery questions before comparing this answer with an unbranded shortlist.

Radiology and medical imaging software source mix. The full Philips IntelliSpace PACS answers remain in the release deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

The ten buyer questions

Each question was put to every engine 3 times on the stated dates. Counts are over valid answers to the exact question.

What is the best PACS for a small imaging center?

Question q1. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: best option.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPTPerplexityClaude

What is the best RIS for an outpatient imaging center?

Question q2. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: best option.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPTPerplexityClaude

What is the most affordable PACS for a low volume imaging center?

Question q3. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: best option.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPTPerplexityClaude

What are the best alternatives to Sectra PACS?

Question q4. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: alternative.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPTPerplexityClaude

What are the best alternatives to Intelerad for a teleradiology group?

Question q5. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: alternative.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPTPerplexityClaude

What are the best alternatives to Philips IntelliSpace PACS?

Question q6. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: alternative.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPTPerplexityClaude

Sectra vs Visage Imaging, which PACS is better for a hospital system?

Question q7. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: buyer evaluation.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPTPerplexityClaude

Visage vs Intelerad, which is better for a teleradiology firm?

Question q8. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: buyer evaluation.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPTPerplexityClaude

What should I look for when choosing a new radiology PACS?

Question q9. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: buyer evaluation.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPTPerplexityClaude

What is the best RIS PACS for an imaging group with five locations?

Question q10. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: specific workflow.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPTPerplexityClaude

Release and method

Release
2026-09, version 2026-09.1
Published
2026-09-23
Answer capture date
2026-09-22
Source capture dates
2026-09-21
Engines
ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode
Configuration
10 fixed target questions, 5 engines, 3 repeats. No controls were run for this category.
Method version
v1.1
Excluded answers
0 target answers excluded; exact reasons are listed. No controls were run for this category.
Commissioned engagement
No commissioned engagement is declared for this category.

Exact names and listed aliases are matched without case sensitivity at word boundaries. Plain word names require a listed qualifier nearby in the same sentence or the canonical domain among cited URLs. A vendor citation counts only when that answer also names the vendor under this rule.

Answer text for releases before 2026-09 was not retained. For release 2026-09 and later, the full answer text is kept and published in the release's Zenodo deposit and on the receipt pages, except Perplexity, where the method keeps a scored excerpt of at most 60 words and the share link.

Download and cite

Release JSON · Category CSV · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695

How to cite: Broadcastwell. The Absence Index, Radiology and medical imaging software, version 2026-09.1. Permanent record. CC BY 4.0 with attribution to Broadcastwell.

The Absence Report

A monthly letter on who AI names when buyers ask for software. Published observations, source links and the limits of each release.

Subscribe free

Delivered by Substack. Unsubscribe any time.

About this page

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

This public record reports the checked set, fixed questions and stated dates. Claim a vendor page, file a dispute or ask for a re-run, or read the dispute policy and log.

Read this page as JSON · Dataset and page metadata