2026-09.1 record

Which construction tools did AI tools name? 22 Sep 2026 record

Most named checked vendor

109 of 150 valid answers named Procore

109 of 150 valid answers, 72.7% (Wilson 95% interval 65.0% to 79.2%)

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09, version 2026-09.1. Method v1.1. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695

Software a general contractor, home builder, remodeler or specialty subcontractor uses to run projects end to end: estimating, scheduling, budgets and job costing, RFIs and submittals, daily logs, change orders and client or subcontractor communication.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Vendor-selection source dates: 2026-09-21. The Index measures observed naming, not service quality or product merit.

Commissioned engagement: no.

Source Map · Dispute policy · Explore the buyer questions

Discuss this category's evidence

Criteria Maps

Observed buyer requirements before the first vendor in source answers captured on 22 and 23 September 2026. 149 valid source answers from 150 scheduled runs. These observations are separate from the original Index release figures.

Each vendor figure uses the median across the five most named vendors in the frozen category release, including zero counts. Adjacency compares distinct source answers for the same criterion; page coverage compares criteria for the same page state. Medians are descriptive and have no confidence interval.

Prepared by the Broadcastwell team. Team review: in progress. Zero analyst verified criteria.

The AI written RFP; Study DOI 10.5281/zenodo.23271935. Source DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695. CC BY 4.0.

Observed source answer frequencies. Wilson intervals describe the calculation, not independent population inference. Repeated runs are not independent performance tests. Page comparisons cover only the dated page and stated scope. An unstated claim is not an absent product feature.

Any named company may request one no-cost re-run at index@broadcastwell.com; both results are published.

Fix one answer, $490. Every figure comes from the published method, v1.1.

Read the full list of observed buyer requirements.

Fit with the buyer’s construction workflows
17 of 149; 11.4%; Wilson 95% interval 7.2% to 17.5%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q3: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q8: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q2: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q3: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q2|Google AI Overviews|3; construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Overviews|2; construction-project-management|q3|Perplexity|1; construction-project-management|q3|Perplexity|2; construction-project-management|q3|Perplexity|3; construction-project-management|q8|Perplexity|2; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|1; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|2; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|3; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|1; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|2; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|3
https://banamind.ai/construction-progress-tracking/construction-project-management-software: 2 source answers; https://construction.autodesk.com/workflows/construction-project-management/: 2 source answers; https://learn.g2.com/best-construction-management-software: 1 source answers; https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-construction-project-management-software/: 3 source answers; https://www.bluebeam.com/resources/glossary/construction-project-management-software/: 2 source answers; https://www.capterra.com/resources/project-management-software-for-construction/: 3 source answers; https://www.thecontractormatrix.com/project-job-management-software/construction-project-management-software-features: 2 source answers; No source shown: 14 source answers
- Buildertrend: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q2|Google AI Overviews|3; construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Overviews|2; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 2 of 149; 1.3%
- BuildingConnected: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q3|Perplexity|1; construction-project-management|q3|Perplexity|2; construction-project-management|q3|Perplexity|3
  https://provision.com/blog/best-subcontractor-management-software-for-general-contractors-2026: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://www.capterra.com/resources/best-contractor-management-software/: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- CoConstruct: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 2 of 149; 1.3%
- Constructable: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q2|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 2 of 149; 1.3%
- Contractor Foreman: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q3|Perplexity|1; construction-project-management|q3|Perplexity|2; construction-project-management|q3|Perplexity|3
  https://project-management.com/top-construction-project-management-software/: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://www.cloudwards.net/subcontractor-management-software/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://www.permitflow.com/blog/subcontractor-management-software: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- Fieldwire: 5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q2|Google AI Overviews|3; construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Overviews|2; construction-project-management|q3|Perplexity|1; construction-project-management|q3|Perplexity|2; construction-project-management|q3|Perplexity|3
  https://kahua.com/articles/best-construction-management-software/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-subcontractor-project-management-software/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://worldmetrics.org/best/subcontractor-management-software/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://www.fieldwire.com/solutions/subcontractor/: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 2 of 149; 1.3%
- GCPay: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q3|Perplexity|2; construction-project-management|q3|Perplexity|3
  https://learn.g2.com/best-construction-management-software: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://provision.com/blog/best-subcontractor-management-software-for-general-contractors-2026: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- Kahua: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q8|Perplexity|2
  https://kahua.com/articles/5-best-e-builder-alternatives-for-construction-projects/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://kahua.com/articles/kahua-vs-e-builder/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://www.ingenious.build/blog-posts/kahua-alternatives: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- Knowify: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Overviews|2; construction-project-management|q3|Perplexity|2; construction-project-management|q3|Perplexity|3
  https://worldmetrics.org/best/subcontractor-management-software/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 2 of 149; 1.3%
- OneCrew: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q3|Perplexity|1
  https://www.getonecrew.com/post/construction-management-software-for-subcontractors: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- Procore: 5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q2|Google AI Overviews|3; construction-project-management|q3|Perplexity|1; construction-project-management|q3|Perplexity|2; construction-project-management|q3|Perplexity|3; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3
  https://kahua.com/articles/best-construction-management-software/: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://www.getonecrew.com/post/construction-management-software-for-subcontractors: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://www.procore.com/subcontractors: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 2 of 149; 1.3%
- Trimble Unity Construct: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q8|Perplexity|2
  https://kahua.com/articles/best-construction-management-software/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://kahua.com/articles/kahua-vs-e-builder/: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- eSUB: 4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Overviews|2; construction-project-management|q3|Perplexity|1; construction-project-management|q3|Perplexity|2; construction-project-management|q3|Perplexity|3
  https://blog.redteam.com/the-12-best-construction-management-software-solutions-for-2026/: 3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; https://www.getonecrew.com/post/construction-management-software-for-subcontractors: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%; No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 2 of 149; 1.3%
- monday.com: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 3 of 149; 2.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 2 of 149; 1.3%
Mobile access for field work
16 of 149; 10.7%; Wilson 95% interval 6.7% to 16.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q3: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Mode|3; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|1; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|2; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|3; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|1; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|1; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|2; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|3
https://construction.autodesk.com/workflows/construction-project-management/: 2 source answers; https://help.autodesk.com/cloudhelp/ENU/Build-Mobile/files/Download_Project_Mobile.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-construction-project-management-software/: 3 source answers; https://www.bluebeam.com/resources/glossary/construction-project-management-software/: 2 source answers; https://www.capterra.com/resources/project-management-software-for-construction/: 3 source answers; https://www.procore.com/project-management?msockid=1bd03288879b6936085c240d868f6880&utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.sage.com/en-us/products/sage-construction-management/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 11 source answers
- Fieldwire: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- Raken: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Job cost and budget tracking
14 of 149; 9.4%; Wilson 95% interval 5.7% to 15.2%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|1; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|2; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|3; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|1; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|1; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|2; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|3
https://banamind.ai/construction-progress-tracking/construction-project-management-software: 1 source answers; https://construction.autodesk.com/workflows/construction-project-management/: 1 source answers; https://learn.g2.com/best-construction-management-software: 3 source answers; https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-construction-project-management-software/: 3 source answers; https://www.bluebeam.com/resources/glossary/construction-project-management-software/: 3 source answers; https://www.capterra.com/resources/project-management-software-for-construction/: 3 source answers; https://www.procore.com/financial-management?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.procore.com/project-management?msockid=1bd03288879b6936085c240d868f6880&utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.softwareadvice.com/construction/project-management-software-comparison/: 1 source answers; https://www.thecontractormatrix.com/project-job-management-software/construction-project-management-software-features: 1 source answers; No source shown: 9 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Project and task scheduling
14 of 149; 9.4%; Wilson 95% interval 5.7% to 15.2%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|1; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|2; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|3; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|1; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|1; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|2; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|3
https://banamind.ai/construction-progress-tracking/construction-project-management-software: 1 source answers; https://construction.autodesk.com/workflows/construction-project-management/: 1 source answers; https://learn.g2.com/best-construction-management-software: 2 source answers; https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-construction-project-management-software/: 3 source answers; https://www.bluebeam.com/resources/glossary/construction-project-management-software/: 2 source answers; https://www.capterra.com/resources/project-management-software-for-construction/: 3 source answers; https://www.procore.com/project-management?msockid=03e264c6e35d60790a2c7288e282613d&utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.thecontractormatrix.com/project-job-management-software/construction-project-management-software-features: 2 source answers; No source shown: 10 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Drawing and document version control
13 of 149; 8.7%; Wilson 95% interval 5.2% to 14.4%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|1; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|2; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|1; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|1; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|2; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|3
https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-construction-project-management-software/: 3 source answers; https://www.bluebeam.com/resources/glossary/construction-project-management-software/: 2 source answers; https://www.capterra.com/resources/project-management-software-for-construction/: 3 source answers; https://www.procore.com/project-management?msockid=1bd03288879b6936085c240d868f6880&utm_source=openai: 2 source answers; https://www.thecontractormatrix.com/project-job-management-software/construction-project-management-software-features: 2 source answers; No source shown: 8 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Project communication and collaboration
12 of 149; 8.1%; Wilson 95% interval 4.7% to 13.5%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q2: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q3: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q2|Google AI Mode|3; construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Mode|1; construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Mode|3; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|1; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|3; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|1; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|2; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|3
https://banamind.ai/construction-progress-tracking/construction-project-management-software: 1 source answers; https://construction.autodesk.com/workflows/construction-project-management/: 1 source answers; https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-construction-project-management-software/: 3 source answers; https://www.bluebeam.com/resources/glossary/construction-project-management-software/: 2 source answers; https://www.capterra.com/resources/project-management-software-for-construction/: 3 source answers; https://www.sage.com/en-us/products/sage-construction-management/: 2 source answers; https://www.thecontractormatrix.com/project-job-management-software/construction-project-management-software-features: 1 source answers; https://www.zoho.com/projects/construction-project-management.html: 2 source answers; No source shown: 9 source answers
- Fieldwire: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q2|Google AI Mode|3; construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- Procore: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Project document storage and management
11 of 149; 7.4%; Wilson 95% interval 4.2% to 12.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|1; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|2; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|3; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|1; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|1; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|2; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|3
https://banamind.ai/construction-progress-tracking/construction-project-management-software: 1 source answers; https://construction.autodesk.com/workflows/construction-project-management/: 1 source answers; https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-construction-project-management-software/: 3 source answers; https://www.bluebeam.com/resources/glossary/construction-project-management-software/: 3 source answers; https://www.capterra.com/resources/project-management-software-for-construction/: 3 source answers; https://www.procore.com/project-management?msockid=1bd03288879b6936085c240d868f6880&utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.thecontractormatrix.com/project-job-management-software/construction-project-management-software-features: 2 source answers; No source shown: 7 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Cost forecasting
10 of 149; 6.7%; Wilson 95% interval 3.7% to 11.9%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|1; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|2; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|3; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|1; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|2; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|3
https://construction.autodesk.com/workflows/construction-project-management/: 1 source answers; https://learn.g2.com/best-construction-management-software: 3 source answers; https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-construction-project-management-software/: 3 source answers; https://www.bluebeam.com/resources/glossary/construction-project-management-software/: 3 source answers; https://www.procore.com/financial-management?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.procore.com/project-management?msockid=1bd03288879b6936085c240d868f6880&utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.softwareadvice.com/construction/project-management-software-comparison/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 5 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Construction workflow tracking for RFIs, submittals and field reports
9 of 149; 6.0%; Wilson 95% interval 3.2% to 11.1%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|1; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|1; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|3
https://banamind.ai/construction-progress-tracking/construction-project-management-software: 1 source answers; https://construction.autodesk.com/workflows/construction-project-management/: 2 source answers; https://help.autodesk.com/cloudhelp/ENG/Build-About/files/What_is_Build.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://help.autodesk.com/cloudhelp/ENU/Build-Mobile/files/Download_Project_Mobile.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://learn.g2.com/best-construction-management-software: 1 source answers; https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-construction-project-management-software/: 2 source answers; https://www.bluebeam.com/resources/glossary/construction-project-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://www.capterra.com/resources/project-management-software-for-construction/: 1 source answers; https://www.procore.com/project-management/rfis?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.procore.com/project-management?msockid=1bd03288879b6936085c240d868f6880&utm_source=openai: 2 source answers; https://www.sage.com/en-us/products/sage-construction-management/: 1 source answers; https://www.thecontractormatrix.com/project-job-management-software/construction-project-management-software-features: 2 source answers; No source shown: 4 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Total cost including implementation and related charges
9 of 149; 6.0%; Wilson 95% interval 3.2% to 11.1%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|1; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|2; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|3; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|1; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|2; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|3
https://banamind.ai/construction-progress-tracking/construction-project-management-software: 3 source answers; No source shown: 6 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Audit and activity history
8 of 149; 5.4%; Wilson 95% interval 2.7% to 10.2%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|1; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|2; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|1; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|2; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|3
https://help.autodesk.com/cloudhelp/ENG/Build-About/files/What_is_Build.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-construction-project-management-software/: 2 source answers; https://www.bluebeam.com/resources/glossary/construction-project-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://www.capterra.com/resources/project-management-software-for-construction/: 2 source answers; https://www.procore.com/project-management/rfis?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.procore.com/project-management?msockid=1bd03288879b6936085c240d868f6880&utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.thecontractormatrix.com/project-job-management-software/construction-project-management-software-features: 3 source answers; https://www.zoho.com/projects/construction-project-management.html: 1 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Change order tracking
8 of 149; 5.4%; Wilson 95% interval 2.7% to 10.2%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q3: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Mode|1; construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Mode|3; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|1; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|2; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2
No source shown: 8 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Integration with existing accounting and project systems
8 of 149; 5.4%; Wilson 95% interval 2.7% to 10.2%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|1; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|2; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|3
https://banamind.ai/construction-progress-tracking/construction-project-management-software: 1 source answers; https://construction.autodesk.com/?utm_source=openai: 2 source answers; https://construction.autodesk.com/partners/integrate-with-autodesk-construction-cloud/?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://learn.g2.com/best-construction-management-software: 3 source answers; https://www.bluebeam.com/resources/glossary/construction-project-management-software/: 3 source answers; https://www.capterra.com/resources/project-management-software-for-construction/: 3 source answers; https://www.procore.com/financial-management?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.procore.com/project-management?msockid=03e264c6e35d60790a2c7288e282613d&utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.thecontractormatrix.com/project-job-management-software/construction-project-management-software-features: 1 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
An interface field staff can use easily
7 of 149; 4.7%; Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.4%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|1; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|1
https://construction.autodesk.com/workflows/construction-project-management/: 1 source answers; https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-construction-project-management-software/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 6 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Change order tracking and approval
6 of 149; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.9% to 8.5%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|1; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|2; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|3
https://banamind.ai/construction-progress-tracking/construction-project-management-software: 1 source answers; https://construction.autodesk.com/workflows/construction-project-management/: 3 source answers; https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-construction-project-management-software/: 3 source answers; https://www.bluebeam.com/resources/glossary/construction-project-management-software/: 3 source answers; https://www.capterra.com/resources/project-management-software-for-construction/: 3 source answers; https://www.procore.com/financial-management?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.procore.com/project-management?msockid=1bd03288879b6936085c240d868f6880&utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.softwareadvice.com/construction/project-management-software-comparison/: 3 source answers; https://www.thecontractormatrix.com/project-job-management-software/construction-project-management-software-features: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Implementation and onboarding support
6 of 149; 4.0%; Wilson 95% interval 1.9% to 8.5%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|1; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|2; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|3; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1
No source shown: 6 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Clear pricing basis and included features
5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|1; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|2; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|3
No source shown: 5 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Offline access for field work
5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|1; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2
No source shown: 5 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Project dashboards and reporting
5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Perplexity, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|1; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|1; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|2; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|3
https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-construction-project-management-software/: 3 source answers; https://www.bluebeam.com/resources/glossary/construction-project-management-software/: 3 source answers; https://www.capterra.com/resources/project-management-software-for-construction/: 3 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Project document control
5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q2: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q2|Google AI Mode|3; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2
https://www.procore.com/project-management?msockid=1bd03288879b6936085c240d868f6880&utm_source=openai: 2 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers
- Procore: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q2|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Training and learning resources
5 of 149; 3.4%; Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|1; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|2; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|3; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1
No source shown: 5 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
An easy to use interface
4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Claude|1; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|2; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|3; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3
No source shown: 4 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Capacity for growing project volumes
4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Claude|1; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|2; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|3; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|3
https://construction.autodesk.com/workflows/construction-project-management/: 1 source answers; https://www.capterra.com/resources/key-construction-management-software-features/: 1 source answers; No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Change order handling
4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q2: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q3: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q2|Google AI Mode|1; construction-project-management|q2|Google AI Mode|2; construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Mode|2; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 4 source answers
- Knowify: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Mode|2
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- Procore: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q2|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Field progress tracking
4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q3: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Overviews|2; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|1; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|2; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|3
No source shown: 4 source answers
- Fieldwire: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Overviews|2
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Integration with the buyer’s existing software
4 of 149; 2.7%; Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Claude|1; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|2; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|3; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3
No source shown: 4 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
No cost evaluation access for fit and usability
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Claude|1; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|2; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Access to customer support
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Claude|1; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|2; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
An interface field and office staff can use easily
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q2: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q2|Google AI Mode|2; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1
https://help.autodesk.com/cloudhelp/ENU/Build-Mobile/files/Download_Project_Mobile.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; No source shown: 2 source answers
- Fieldwire: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q2|Google AI Mode|2
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Assigned approvals, reminders and responsibility
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|3
https://help.autodesk.com/cloudhelp/ENG/Build-About/files/What_is_Build.html?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.procore.com/project-management/rfis?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://www.procore.com/project-management?msockid=1bd03288879b6936085c240d868f6880&utm_source=openai: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Complete project data export
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Demonstrated performance on a representative project
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Deployment model suited to remote access and site conditions
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Claude|1; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|2; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Experience in the buyer’s construction segment
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Claude|1; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|2; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Integration with existing accounting or ERP software
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|1; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Multifactor authentication
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Offline access and synchronization
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|3
https://help.autodesk.com/cloudhelp/ENU/Build-Mobile/files/Download_Project_Mobile.html?utm_source=openai: 2 source answers; https://www.procore.com/project-management?msockid=1bd03288879b6936085c240d868f6880&utm_source=openai: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Required compliance documentation and reporting
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 3 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Claude|1; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|2; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|3
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Role based access for project participants
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|3; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|2
https://learn.g2.com/best-construction-management-software: 1 source answers; https://old.construction.autodesk.com/tools/construction-team-and-user-permissions/?utm_source=openai: 1 source answers; https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-construction-project-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://www.capterra.com/resources/project-management-software-for-construction/: 1 source answers; https://www.thecontractormatrix.com/project-job-management-software/construction-project-management-software-features: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Searchable project documents
3 of 149; 2.0%; Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2
No source shown: 3 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
AIA billing
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q2: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q3: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q2|Google AI Mode|2; construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Mode|2
No source shown: 2 source answers
- Knowify: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Mode|2
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Access permissions
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|2; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|3
https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-construction-project-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://www.bluebeam.com/resources/glossary/construction-project-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://www.capterra.com/resources/project-management-software-for-construction/: 1 source answers; https://www.thecontractormatrix.com/project-job-management-software/construction-project-management-software-features: 1 source answers; https://www.zoho.com/projects/construction-project-management.html: 1 source answers; No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Approval workflows
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Claude|1; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Clear licensing basis and external user costs
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Overviews, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Clear renewal and cancellation terms
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|2
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Client communication portals
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Claude|3; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
- Buildertrend: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- CoConstruct: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Cost appropriate to the buyer’s scale
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q2: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q2|Google AI Mode|1; construction-project-management|q2|Google AI Mode|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
- Contractor Foreman: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q2|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Data backups
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|2
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Defined synchronization direction, records and error handling
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|1; construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Evidence of successful adoption in other projects
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Claude|2; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Field time tracking
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q3: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Mode|2; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2
No source shown: 2 source answers
- Contractor Foreman: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Mode|2
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Job costing
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Overviews, q3: 1 of 3 runs; Google AI Mode, q3: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Mode|2; construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Overviews|2
No source shown: 2 source answers
- JobTread: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Mode|2
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
- Knowify: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Mode|2; construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Overviews|2
  No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Labor, equipment and material allocation
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Perplexity, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|1; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|3
https://banamind.ai/construction-progress-tracking/construction-project-management-software: 1 source answers; https://construction.autodesk.com/workflows/construction-project-management/: 1 source answers; https://learn.g2.com/best-construction-management-software: 2 source answers; https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-construction-project-management-software/: 2 source answers; https://www.bluebeam.com/resources/glossary/construction-project-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://www.capterra.com/resources/project-management-software-for-construction/: 2 source answers; https://www.thecontractormatrix.com/project-job-management-software/construction-project-management-software-features: 1 source answers; https://www.zoho.com/projects/construction-project-management.html: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Secure document storage
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Claude, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Claude|1; construction-project-management|q9|Claude|2
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Setup without excessive administrative overhead
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q2: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q2|Google AI Mode|2; construction-project-management|q2|Google AI Mode|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
- Fieldwire: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q2|Google AI Mode|2; construction-project-management|q2|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Subcontract management
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q2: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q2|Google AI Mode|1; construction-project-management|q2|Google AI Mode|2
No source shown: 2 source answers
- Procore: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q2|Google AI Mode|2
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Subcontractor insurance and lien waiver tracking
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2; construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3
No source shown: 2 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Workflow automation
2 of 149; 1.3%; Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.8%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Perplexity, q9: 2 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|1; construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|2
https://learn.g2.com/best-construction-management-software: 2 source answers; https://www.bluebeam.com/resources/glossary/construction-project-management-software/: 2 source answers; https://www.capterra.com/resources/project-management-software-for-construction/: 2 source answers; https://www.thecontractormatrix.com/project-job-management-software/construction-project-management-software-features: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Access limited appropriately for subcontractors and clients
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|1
https://www.bluebeam.com/resources/glossary/construction-project-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://www.sage.com/en-us/products/sage-construction-management/: 1 source answers; https://www.thecontractormatrix.com/project-job-management-software/construction-project-management-software-features: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Backup and recovery
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Bid invitation distribution
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Billing
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Capacity for growing projects, crews and locations
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|2
https://construction.autodesk.com/workflows/construction-project-management/: 1 source answers; https://www.capterra.com/resources/key-construction-management-software-features/: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Capacity for larger teams and more complex projects
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|2
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Capacity for multiple simultaneous projects
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|1
https://construction.autodesk.com/workflows/construction-project-management/: 1 source answers; https://www.capterra.com/resources/key-construction-management-software-features/: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Clear pricing as project volumes grow
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Customer support during working hours
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Daily field reports
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Data access after cancellation
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Data access and retention after cancellation
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Defined synchronization records, direction and frequency
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|2
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Drawing markup linked to issues and RFIs
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Drawing markups linked to issues or RFIs
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|2
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Drawing viewing and markup
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Equipment and crew scheduling and dispatch
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Estimating and takeoff tools
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q3: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Mode|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Estimating tools
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q3: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
- Procore: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Financial visibility
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q2: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q2|Google AI Mode|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
- Procore: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q2|Google AI Mode|3
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Labor, equipment and material tracking
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|2
https://learn.g2.com/best-construction-management-software: 1 source answers; https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-construction-project-management-software/: 1 source answers; https://www.capterra.com/resources/project-management-software-for-construction/: 1 source answers; https://www.zoho.com/projects/construction-project-management.html: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Links between drawings, RFIs and submittals
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|3
https://www.procore.com/project-management?msockid=1bd03288879b6936085c240d868f6880&utm_source=openai: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Margin and labor cost control
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q3: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
- eSUB: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q3|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Progress billing and retainage
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Purchase order and subcontract management
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Purchase order tracking
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|2
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
RFI and daily report workflows
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Perplexity, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Perplexity|2
https://banamind.ai/construction-progress-tracking/construction-project-management-software: 1 source answers; https://construction.autodesk.com/workflows/construction-project-management/: 1 source answers; https://www.bluebeam.com/resources/glossary/construction-project-management-software/: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
RFI and submittal tracking
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
RFI handling
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q2: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q2|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
- Procore: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%.
  Vendor source evidence
  Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q2|Google AI Mode|1
  No source shown: 1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Category median 0 of 149; 0.0%
Responsive customer support
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Security documentation
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|3
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Security incident response
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
ChatGPT, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|ChatGPT|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Support from people who understand construction
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Overviews, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Overviews|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.
Two way integration with accounting software
1 of 149; 0.7%; Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%. Team review: in progress.
Runs, sources and adjacent vendors
Google AI Mode, q9: 1 of 3 runs
Deposited source answers construction-project-management|q9|Google AI Mode|1
No source shown: 1 source answers
No adjacent vendor passage coded for this criterion.

Download complete category evidence · Download manifest and source hashes

Full checked set, sorted by observed counts, not a ranking.
Vendor	Named	Vendor domain cited
Procore	109 of 150 valid answers, 72.7% (Wilson 95% interval 65.0% to 79.2%)	30 of 150 valid answers, 20.0% (Wilson 95% interval 14.4% to 27.1%)
Buildertrend	83 of 150 valid answers, 55.3% (Wilson 95% interval 47.3% to 63.1%)	34 of 150 valid answers, 22.7% (Wilson 95% interval 16.7% to 30.0%)
Contractor Foreman	77 of 150 valid answers, 51.3% (Wilson 95% interval 43.4% to 59.2%)	31 of 150 valid answers, 20.7% (Wilson 95% interval 15.0% to 27.8%)
Fieldwire	57 of 150 valid answers, 38.0% (Wilson 95% interval 30.6% to 46.0%)	37 of 150 valid answers, 24.7% (Wilson 95% interval 18.5% to 32.1%)
JobTread	50 of 150 valid answers, 33.3% (Wilson 95% interval 26.3% to 41.2%)	23 of 150 valid answers, 15.3% (Wilson 95% interval 10.4% to 22.0%)
Autodesk Construction Cloud	44 of 150 valid answers, 29.3% (Wilson 95% interval 22.6% to 37.1%)	17 of 150 valid answers, 11.3% (Wilson 95% interval 7.2% to 17.4%)
Buildxact	22 of 150 valid answers, 14.7% (Wilson 95% interval 9.9% to 21.2%)	13 of 150 valid answers, 8.7% (Wilson 95% interval 5.1% to 14.3%)
Kahua	22 of 150 valid answers, 14.7% (Wilson 95% interval 9.9% to 21.2%)	22 of 150 valid answers, 14.7% (Wilson 95% interval 9.9% to 21.2%)
CMiC	19 of 150 valid answers, 12.7% (Wilson 95% interval 8.3% to 18.9%)	2 of 150 valid answers, 1.3% (Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%)
Oracle Construction and Engineering	14 of 150 valid answers, 9.3% (Wilson 95% interval 5.6% to 15.1%)	5 of 150 valid answers, 3.3% (Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%)
eSUB	11 of 150 valid answers, 7.3% (Wilson 95% interval 4.1% to 12.7%)	3 of 150 valid answers, 2.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%)
Foundation Software	11 of 150 valid answers, 7.3% (Wilson 95% interval 4.1% to 12.7%)	0 of 150 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)
Trimble Viewpoint	11 of 150 valid answers, 7.3% (Wilson 95% interval 4.1% to 12.7%)	0 of 150 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)
InEight	8 of 150 valid answers, 5.3% (Wilson 95% interval 2.7% to 10.2%)	0 of 150 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)
RedTeam	8 of 150 valid answers, 5.3% (Wilson 95% interval 2.7% to 10.2%)	7 of 150 valid answers, 4.7% (Wilson 95% interval 2.3% to 9.3%)
Sage 300 CRE	4 of 150 valid answers, 2.7% (Wilson 95% interval 1.0% to 6.7%)	0 of 150 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)
ConstructionOnline	3 of 150 valid answers, 2.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.7% to 5.7%)	0 of 150 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)
Raken	2 of 150 valid answers, 1.3% (Wilson 95% interval 0.4% to 4.7%)	1 of 150 valid answers, 0.7% (Wilson 95% interval 0.1% to 3.7%)
Jonas Construction	0 of 150 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)	0 of 150 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)
Leap	0 of 150 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)	0 of 150 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)
Linarc	0 of 150 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)	0 of 150 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)
Penta Software	0 of 150 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)	0 of 150 valid answers, 0.0% (Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%)

Pair-specific question and engine records

The comparison records are collected here. Each disclosure contains the full dated counts for its pair or alternatives question. Open a disclosure to read its evidence; the text is present without JavaScript.

Autodesk Construction Cloud and Procore

Construction project management software · September 2026

Autodesk Construction Cloud and Procore in the observed answers

Autodesk Construction Cloud appears in 44 of 150 answers about construction project management software; Procore appears in 109 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Autodesk Construction Cloud and Procore have different naming counts on 7 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 3 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Autodesk Construction Cloud record · Procore record · Construction project management software checked set.

Autodesk Construction Cloud beside Procore

Autodesk Construction Cloud and Procore totals
Measure	Autodesk Construction Cloud	Procore
Named	44/150; 29.3% (95% CI 22.6 to 37.1)	109/150; 72.7% (95% CI 65.0 to 79.2)
Own domain cited	17/150; 11.3% (95% CI 7.2 to 17.4)	30/150; 20.0% (95% CI 14.4 to 27.1)

Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore: question q1

best construction management software for a small residential builder

Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

Autodesk Construction Cloud and Procore on q1
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / ChatGPT	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Claude	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Perplexity	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Google AI Mode	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore: question q2

best construction project management software for a mid sized general contractor

Autodesk Construction Cloud: 11/15; 73.3% (95% CI 48.0 to 89.1). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Autodesk Construction Cloud and Procore on q2
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / ChatGPT	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Claude	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Perplexity	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 2 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Google AI Mode	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore: question q3

best construction management software for subcontractors

Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Autodesk Construction Cloud and Procore on q3
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / ChatGPT	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Claude	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Perplexity	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Google AI Mode	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore: question q4

what are the best alternatives to Procore

Autodesk Construction Cloud: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Autodesk Construction Cloud and Procore on q4
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / ChatGPT	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Claude	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Perplexity	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Google AI Mode	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore: question q5

what are the best alternatives to Buildertrend

Autodesk Construction Cloud: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Autodesk Construction Cloud and Procore on q5
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / ChatGPT	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Claude	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Perplexity	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Google AI Mode	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Autodesk Construction Cloud

Autodesk Construction Cloud: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Autodesk Construction Cloud and Procore on q6
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / ChatGPT	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Claude	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Perplexity	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Google AI Mode	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore: question q7

Procore vs Buildertrend, which is better for a small GC

Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Autodesk Construction Cloud and Procore on q7
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / ChatGPT	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Claude	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Perplexity	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Google AI Mode	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.

Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore: question q8

Kahua vs e-Builder for an owner running capital projects

Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Autodesk Construction Cloud and Procore on q8
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / ChatGPT	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Claude	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Perplexity	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Google AI Mode	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore: question q9

what should I look for when choosing construction project management software

Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

Autodesk Construction Cloud and Procore on q9
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / ChatGPT	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Claude	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Perplexity	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 1 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Google AI Mode	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore: question q10

best construction software for a small GC that needs estimating and scheduling without Procore complexity

Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Autodesk Construction Cloud and Procore on q10
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / ChatGPT	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Claude	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Perplexity	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Google AI Mode	Autodesk Construction Cloud: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Autodesk Construction Cloud's own-domain citation count is 17 of 150; Procore's is 30 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Construction project management software · Exact Construction project management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Buildertrend and Procore

Construction project management software · September 2026

Buildertrend and Procore in the observed answers

Buildertrend appears in 83 of 150 answers about construction project management software; Procore appears in 109 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Buildertrend and Procore have different naming counts on 6 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 4 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Buildertrend record · Procore record · Construction project management software checked set.

Buildertrend beside Procore

Buildertrend and Procore totals
Measure	Buildertrend	Procore
Named	83/150; 55.3% (95% CI 47.3 to 63.1)	109/150; 72.7% (95% CI 65.0 to 79.2)
Own domain cited	34/150; 22.7% (95% CI 16.7 to 30.0)	30/150; 20.0% (95% CI 14.4 to 27.1)

Buildertrend / Procore: question q1

best construction management software for a small residential builder

Buildertrend: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0). Procore: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

Buildertrend and Procore on q1
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Buildertrend / Procore / ChatGPT	Buildertrend: 3 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Claude	Buildertrend: 3 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Perplexity	Buildertrend: 3 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Buildertrend: 3 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Google AI Mode	Buildertrend: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Buildertrend / Procore: question q2

best construction project management software for a mid sized general contractor

Buildertrend: 6/15; 40.0% (95% CI 19.8 to 64.3). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Buildertrend and Procore on q2
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Buildertrend / Procore / ChatGPT	Buildertrend: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Claude	Buildertrend: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Perplexity	Buildertrend: 1 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Buildertrend: 1 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Google AI Mode	Buildertrend: 1 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Buildertrend / Procore: question q3

best construction management software for subcontractors

Buildertrend: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Buildertrend and Procore on q3
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Buildertrend / Procore / ChatGPT	Buildertrend: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Claude	Buildertrend: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Perplexity	Buildertrend: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Buildertrend: 1 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Google AI Mode	Buildertrend: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Buildertrend / Procore: question q4

what are the best alternatives to Procore

Buildertrend: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Buildertrend and Procore on q4
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Buildertrend / Procore / ChatGPT	Buildertrend: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Claude	Buildertrend: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Perplexity	Buildertrend: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Buildertrend: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Google AI Mode	Buildertrend: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Buildertrend / Procore: question q5

what are the best alternatives to Buildertrend

Buildertrend: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Buildertrend and Procore on q5
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Buildertrend / Procore / ChatGPT	Buildertrend: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Claude	Buildertrend: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Perplexity	Buildertrend: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Buildertrend: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Google AI Mode	Buildertrend: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Buildertrend / Procore: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Autodesk Construction Cloud

Buildertrend: 8/15; 53.3% (95% CI 30.1 to 75.2). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Buildertrend and Procore on q6
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Buildertrend / Procore / ChatGPT	Buildertrend: 2 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Claude	Buildertrend: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Perplexity	Buildertrend: 2 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Buildertrend: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Google AI Mode	Buildertrend: 1 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Buildertrend / Procore: question q7

Procore vs Buildertrend, which is better for a small GC

Buildertrend: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Buildertrend and Procore on q7
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Buildertrend / Procore / ChatGPT	Buildertrend: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Claude	Buildertrend: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Perplexity	Buildertrend: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Buildertrend: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Google AI Mode	Buildertrend: 2 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.

Buildertrend / Procore: question q8

Kahua vs e-Builder for an owner running capital projects

Buildertrend: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Buildertrend and Procore on q8
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Buildertrend / Procore / ChatGPT	Buildertrend: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Claude	Buildertrend: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Perplexity	Buildertrend: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Buildertrend: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Google AI Mode	Buildertrend: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

Buildertrend / Procore: question q9

what should I look for when choosing construction project management software

Buildertrend: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Procore: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

Buildertrend and Procore on q9
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Buildertrend / Procore / ChatGPT	Buildertrend: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Claude	Buildertrend: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Perplexity	Buildertrend: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Buildertrend: 1 of 3; Procore: 1 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Google AI Mode	Buildertrend: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

Buildertrend / Procore: question q10

best construction software for a small GC that needs estimating and scheduling without Procore complexity

Buildertrend: 5/15; 33.3% (95% CI 15.2 to 58.3). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Buildertrend and Procore on q10
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Buildertrend / Procore / ChatGPT	Buildertrend: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Claude	Buildertrend: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Perplexity	Buildertrend: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Buildertrend: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildertrend / Procore / Google AI Mode	Buildertrend: 2 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Buildertrend's own-domain citation count is 34 of 150; Procore's is 30 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Construction project management software · Exact Construction project management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Contractor Foreman and Procore

Construction project management software · September 2026

Contractor Foreman and Procore in the observed answers

Contractor Foreman appears in 77 of 150 answers about construction project management software; Procore appears in 109 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Contractor Foreman and Procore have different naming counts on 8 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 2 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Contractor Foreman record · Procore record · Construction project management software checked set.

Contractor Foreman beside Procore

Contractor Foreman and Procore totals
Measure	Contractor Foreman	Procore
Named	77/150; 51.3% (95% CI 43.4 to 59.2)	109/150; 72.7% (95% CI 65.0 to 79.2)
Own domain cited	31/150; 20.7% (95% CI 15.0 to 27.8)	30/150; 20.0% (95% CI 14.4 to 27.1)

Contractor Foreman / Procore: question q1

best construction management software for a small residential builder

Contractor Foreman: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0). Procore: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

Contractor Foreman and Procore on q1
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Contractor Foreman / Procore / ChatGPT	Contractor Foreman: 3 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Claude	Contractor Foreman: 3 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Perplexity	Contractor Foreman: 3 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Contractor Foreman: 3 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Google AI Mode	Contractor Foreman: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Contractor Foreman / Procore: question q2

best construction project management software for a mid sized general contractor

Contractor Foreman: 8/15; 53.3% (95% CI 30.1 to 75.2). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Contractor Foreman and Procore on q2
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Contractor Foreman / Procore / ChatGPT	Contractor Foreman: 1 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Claude	Contractor Foreman: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Perplexity	Contractor Foreman: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Contractor Foreman: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Google AI Mode	Contractor Foreman: 1 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Contractor Foreman / Procore: question q3

best construction management software for subcontractors

Contractor Foreman: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Contractor Foreman and Procore on q3
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Contractor Foreman / Procore / ChatGPT	Contractor Foreman: 2 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Claude	Contractor Foreman: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Perplexity	Contractor Foreman: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Contractor Foreman: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Google AI Mode	Contractor Foreman: 2 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Contractor Foreman / Procore: question q4

what are the best alternatives to Procore

Contractor Foreman: 13/15; 86.7% (95% CI 62.1 to 96.3). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Contractor Foreman and Procore on q4
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Contractor Foreman / Procore / ChatGPT	Contractor Foreman: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Claude	Contractor Foreman: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Perplexity	Contractor Foreman: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Contractor Foreman: 2 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Google AI Mode	Contractor Foreman: 2 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Contractor Foreman / Procore: question q5

what are the best alternatives to Buildertrend

Contractor Foreman: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Contractor Foreman and Procore on q5
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Contractor Foreman / Procore / ChatGPT	Contractor Foreman: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Claude	Contractor Foreman: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Perplexity	Contractor Foreman: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Contractor Foreman: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Google AI Mode	Contractor Foreman: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Contractor Foreman / Procore: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Autodesk Construction Cloud

Contractor Foreman: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Contractor Foreman and Procore on q6
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Contractor Foreman / Procore / ChatGPT	Contractor Foreman: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Claude	Contractor Foreman: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Perplexity	Contractor Foreman: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Contractor Foreman: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Google AI Mode	Contractor Foreman: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Contractor Foreman / Procore: question q7

Procore vs Buildertrend, which is better for a small GC

Contractor Foreman: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Contractor Foreman and Procore on q7
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Contractor Foreman / Procore / ChatGPT	Contractor Foreman: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Claude	Contractor Foreman: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Perplexity	Contractor Foreman: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Contractor Foreman: 1 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Google AI Mode	Contractor Foreman: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.

Contractor Foreman / Procore: question q8

Kahua vs e-Builder for an owner running capital projects

Contractor Foreman: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Contractor Foreman and Procore on q8
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Contractor Foreman / Procore / ChatGPT	Contractor Foreman: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Claude	Contractor Foreman: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Perplexity	Contractor Foreman: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Contractor Foreman: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Google AI Mode	Contractor Foreman: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

Contractor Foreman / Procore: question q9

what should I look for when choosing construction project management software

Contractor Foreman: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

Contractor Foreman and Procore on q9
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Contractor Foreman / Procore / ChatGPT	Contractor Foreman: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Claude	Contractor Foreman: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Perplexity	Contractor Foreman: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Contractor Foreman: 0 of 3; Procore: 1 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Google AI Mode	Contractor Foreman: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

Contractor Foreman / Procore: question q10

best construction software for a small GC that needs estimating and scheduling without Procore complexity

Contractor Foreman: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Contractor Foreman and Procore on q10
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Contractor Foreman / Procore / ChatGPT	Contractor Foreman: 3 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Claude	Contractor Foreman: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Perplexity	Contractor Foreman: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Contractor Foreman: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Contractor Foreman / Procore / Google AI Mode	Contractor Foreman: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Contractor Foreman's own-domain citation count is 31 of 150; Procore's is 30 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Construction project management software · Exact Construction project management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Sage 300 CRE and Procore

Construction project management software · September 2026

Sage 300 CRE and Procore in the observed answers

Sage 300 CRE appears in 4 of 150 answers about construction project management software; Procore appears in 109 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Sage 300 CRE and Procore have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Sage 300 CRE record · Procore record · Construction project management software checked set.

Sage 300 CRE beside Procore

Sage 300 CRE and Procore totals
Measure	Sage 300 CRE	Procore
Named	4/150; 2.7% (95% CI 1.0 to 6.7)	109/150; 72.7% (95% CI 65.0 to 79.2)
Own domain cited	0/150; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)	30/150; 20.0% (95% CI 14.4 to 27.1)

Sage 300 CRE / Procore: question q1

best construction management software for a small residential builder

Sage 300 CRE: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

Sage 300 CRE and Procore on q1
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / ChatGPT	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Claude	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Perplexity	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Google AI Mode	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Sage 300 CRE / Procore: question q2

best construction project management software for a mid sized general contractor

Sage 300 CRE: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Sage 300 CRE and Procore on q2
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / ChatGPT	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Claude	Sage 300 CRE: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Perplexity	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Google AI Mode	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Sage 300 CRE / Procore: question q3

best construction management software for subcontractors

Sage 300 CRE: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Sage 300 CRE and Procore on q3
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / ChatGPT	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Claude	Sage 300 CRE: 1 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Perplexity	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Google AI Mode	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Sage 300 CRE / Procore: question q4

what are the best alternatives to Procore

Sage 300 CRE: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Sage 300 CRE and Procore on q4
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / ChatGPT	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Claude	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Perplexity	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Google AI Mode	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Sage 300 CRE / Procore: question q5

what are the best alternatives to Buildertrend

Sage 300 CRE: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Sage 300 CRE and Procore on q5
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / ChatGPT	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Claude	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Perplexity	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Google AI Mode	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Sage 300 CRE / Procore: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Autodesk Construction Cloud

Sage 300 CRE: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Sage 300 CRE and Procore on q6
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / ChatGPT	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Claude	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Perplexity	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Google AI Mode	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Sage 300 CRE / Procore: question q7

Procore vs Buildertrend, which is better for a small GC

Sage 300 CRE: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Sage 300 CRE and Procore on q7
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / ChatGPT	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Claude	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Perplexity	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Google AI Mode	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.

Sage 300 CRE / Procore: question q8

Kahua vs e-Builder for an owner running capital projects

Sage 300 CRE: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Sage 300 CRE and Procore on q8
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / ChatGPT	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Claude	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Perplexity	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Google AI Mode	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

Sage 300 CRE / Procore: question q9

what should I look for when choosing construction project management software

Sage 300 CRE: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

Sage 300 CRE and Procore on q9
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / ChatGPT	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Claude	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Perplexity	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 1 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Google AI Mode	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

Sage 300 CRE / Procore: question q10

best construction software for a small GC that needs estimating and scheduling without Procore complexity

Sage 300 CRE: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Sage 300 CRE and Procore on q10
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / ChatGPT	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Claude	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Perplexity	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Sage 300 CRE / Procore / Google AI Mode	Sage 300 CRE: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Sage 300 CRE's own-domain citation count is 0 of 150; Procore's is 30 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Construction project management software · Exact Construction project management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Trimble Viewpoint and Procore

Construction project management software · September 2026

Trimble Viewpoint and Procore in the observed answers

Trimble Viewpoint appears in 11 of 150 answers about construction project management software; Procore appears in 109 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Trimble Viewpoint and Procore have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Trimble Viewpoint record · Procore record · Construction project management software checked set.

Trimble Viewpoint beside Procore

Trimble Viewpoint and Procore totals
Measure	Trimble Viewpoint	Procore
Named	11/150; 7.3% (95% CI 4.1 to 12.7)	109/150; 72.7% (95% CI 65.0 to 79.2)
Own domain cited	0/150; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)	30/150; 20.0% (95% CI 14.4 to 27.1)

Trimble Viewpoint / Procore: question q1

best construction management software for a small residential builder

Trimble Viewpoint: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

Trimble Viewpoint and Procore on q1
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / ChatGPT	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Claude	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Perplexity	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Google AI Mode	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Trimble Viewpoint / Procore: question q2

best construction project management software for a mid sized general contractor

Trimble Viewpoint: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Trimble Viewpoint and Procore on q2
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / ChatGPT	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Claude	Trimble Viewpoint: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Perplexity	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Google AI Mode	Trimble Viewpoint: 1 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Trimble Viewpoint / Procore: question q3

best construction management software for subcontractors

Trimble Viewpoint: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Trimble Viewpoint and Procore on q3
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / ChatGPT	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Claude	Trimble Viewpoint: 1 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Perplexity	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Google AI Mode	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Trimble Viewpoint / Procore: question q4

what are the best alternatives to Procore

Trimble Viewpoint: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Trimble Viewpoint and Procore on q4
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / ChatGPT	Trimble Viewpoint: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Claude	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Perplexity	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Google AI Mode	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Trimble Viewpoint / Procore: question q5

what are the best alternatives to Buildertrend

Trimble Viewpoint: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Trimble Viewpoint and Procore on q5
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / ChatGPT	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Claude	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Perplexity	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Google AI Mode	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Trimble Viewpoint / Procore: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Autodesk Construction Cloud

Trimble Viewpoint: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Trimble Viewpoint and Procore on q6
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / ChatGPT	Trimble Viewpoint: 2 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Claude	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Perplexity	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Google AI Mode	Trimble Viewpoint: 1 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Trimble Viewpoint / Procore: question q7

Procore vs Buildertrend, which is better for a small GC

Trimble Viewpoint: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Trimble Viewpoint and Procore on q7
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / ChatGPT	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Claude	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Perplexity	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Google AI Mode	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.

Trimble Viewpoint / Procore: question q8

Kahua vs e-Builder for an owner running capital projects

Trimble Viewpoint: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Trimble Viewpoint and Procore on q8
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / ChatGPT	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Claude	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Perplexity	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Google AI Mode	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

Trimble Viewpoint / Procore: question q9

what should I look for when choosing construction project management software

Trimble Viewpoint: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

Trimble Viewpoint and Procore on q9
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / ChatGPT	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Claude	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Perplexity	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 1 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Google AI Mode	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

Trimble Viewpoint / Procore: question q10

best construction software for a small GC that needs estimating and scheduling without Procore complexity

Trimble Viewpoint: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Trimble Viewpoint and Procore on q10
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / ChatGPT	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Claude	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Perplexity	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Trimble Viewpoint / Procore / Google AI Mode	Trimble Viewpoint: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Trimble Viewpoint's own-domain citation count is 0 of 150; Procore's is 30 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Construction project management software · Exact Construction project management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

CMiC and Procore

Construction project management software · September 2026

CMiC and Procore in the observed answers

CMiC appears in 19 of 150 answers about construction project management software; Procore appears in 109 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

CMiC and Procore have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. CMiC record · Procore record · Construction project management software checked set.

CMiC beside Procore

CMiC and Procore totals
Measure	CMiC	Procore
Named	19/150; 12.7% (95% CI 8.3 to 18.9)	109/150; 72.7% (95% CI 65.0 to 79.2)
Own domain cited	2/150; 1.3% (95% CI 0.4 to 4.7)	30/150; 20.0% (95% CI 14.4 to 27.1)

CMiC / Procore: question q1

best construction management software for a small residential builder

CMiC: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

CMiC and Procore on q1
Engine and pair	Naming observations
CMiC / Procore / ChatGPT	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Claude	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Perplexity	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Google AI Overviews	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Google AI Mode	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

CMiC / Procore: question q2

best construction project management software for a mid sized general contractor

CMiC: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

CMiC and Procore on q2
Engine and pair	Naming observations
CMiC / Procore / ChatGPT	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Claude	CMiC: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Perplexity	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Google AI Overviews	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Google AI Mode	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

CMiC / Procore: question q3

best construction management software for subcontractors

CMiC: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

CMiC and Procore on q3
Engine and pair	Naming observations
CMiC / Procore / ChatGPT	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Claude	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Perplexity	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Google AI Overviews	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Google AI Mode	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

CMiC / Procore: question q4

what are the best alternatives to Procore

CMiC: 13/15; 86.7% (95% CI 62.1 to 96.3). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

CMiC and Procore on q4
Engine and pair	Naming observations
CMiC / Procore / ChatGPT	CMiC: 2 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Claude	CMiC: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Perplexity	CMiC: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Google AI Overviews	CMiC: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Google AI Mode	CMiC: 2 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

CMiC / Procore: question q5

what are the best alternatives to Buildertrend

CMiC: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

CMiC and Procore on q5
Engine and pair	Naming observations
CMiC / Procore / ChatGPT	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Claude	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Perplexity	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Google AI Overviews	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Google AI Mode	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

CMiC / Procore: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Autodesk Construction Cloud

CMiC: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

CMiC and Procore on q6
Engine and pair	Naming observations
CMiC / Procore / ChatGPT	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Claude	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Perplexity	CMiC: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Google AI Overviews	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Google AI Mode	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

CMiC / Procore: question q7

Procore vs Buildertrend, which is better for a small GC

CMiC: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

CMiC and Procore on q7
Engine and pair	Naming observations
CMiC / Procore / ChatGPT	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Claude	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Perplexity	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Google AI Overviews	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Google AI Mode	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.

CMiC / Procore: question q8

Kahua vs e-Builder for an owner running capital projects

CMiC: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

CMiC and Procore on q8
Engine and pair	Naming observations
CMiC / Procore / ChatGPT	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Claude	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Perplexity	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Google AI Overviews	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Google AI Mode	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

CMiC / Procore: question q9

what should I look for when choosing construction project management software

CMiC: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

CMiC and Procore on q9
Engine and pair	Naming observations
CMiC / Procore / ChatGPT	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Claude	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Perplexity	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Google AI Overviews	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 1 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Google AI Mode	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

CMiC / Procore: question q10

best construction software for a small GC that needs estimating and scheduling without Procore complexity

CMiC: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

CMiC and Procore on q10
Engine and pair	Naming observations
CMiC / Procore / ChatGPT	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Claude	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Perplexity	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Google AI Overviews	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
CMiC / Procore / Google AI Mode	CMiC: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

CMiC's own-domain citation count is 2 of 150; Procore's is 30 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Construction project management software · Exact Construction project management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

InEight and Procore

Construction project management software · September 2026

InEight and Procore in the observed answers

InEight appears in 8 of 150 answers about construction project management software; Procore appears in 109 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

InEight and Procore have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. InEight record · Procore record · Construction project management software checked set.

InEight beside Procore

InEight and Procore totals
Measure	InEight	Procore
Named	8/150; 5.3% (95% CI 2.7 to 10.2)	109/150; 72.7% (95% CI 65.0 to 79.2)
Own domain cited	0/150; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)	30/150; 20.0% (95% CI 14.4 to 27.1)

InEight / Procore: question q1

best construction management software for a small residential builder

InEight: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

InEight and Procore on q1
Engine and pair	Naming observations
InEight / Procore / ChatGPT	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Claude	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Perplexity	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Google AI Overviews	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Google AI Mode	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

InEight / Procore: question q2

best construction project management software for a mid sized general contractor

InEight: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

InEight and Procore on q2
Engine and pair	Naming observations
InEight / Procore / ChatGPT	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Claude	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Perplexity	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Google AI Overviews	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Google AI Mode	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

InEight / Procore: question q3

best construction management software for subcontractors

InEight: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

InEight and Procore on q3
Engine and pair	Naming observations
InEight / Procore / ChatGPT	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Claude	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Perplexity	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Google AI Overviews	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Google AI Mode	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

InEight / Procore: question q4

what are the best alternatives to Procore

InEight: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

InEight and Procore on q4
Engine and pair	Naming observations
InEight / Procore / ChatGPT	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Claude	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Perplexity	InEight: 2 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Google AI Overviews	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Google AI Mode	InEight: 1 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

InEight / Procore: question q5

what are the best alternatives to Buildertrend

InEight: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

InEight and Procore on q5
Engine and pair	Naming observations
InEight / Procore / ChatGPT	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Claude	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Perplexity	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Google AI Overviews	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Google AI Mode	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

InEight / Procore: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Autodesk Construction Cloud

InEight: 5/15; 33.3% (95% CI 15.2 to 58.3). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

InEight and Procore on q6
Engine and pair	Naming observations
InEight / Procore / ChatGPT	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Claude	InEight: 2 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Perplexity	InEight: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Google AI Overviews	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Google AI Mode	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

InEight / Procore: question q7

Procore vs Buildertrend, which is better for a small GC

InEight: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

InEight and Procore on q7
Engine and pair	Naming observations
InEight / Procore / ChatGPT	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Claude	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Perplexity	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Google AI Overviews	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Google AI Mode	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.

InEight / Procore: question q8

Kahua vs e-Builder for an owner running capital projects

InEight: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

InEight and Procore on q8
Engine and pair	Naming observations
InEight / Procore / ChatGPT	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Claude	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Perplexity	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Google AI Overviews	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Google AI Mode	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

InEight / Procore: question q9

what should I look for when choosing construction project management software

InEight: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

InEight and Procore on q9
Engine and pair	Naming observations
InEight / Procore / ChatGPT	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Claude	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Perplexity	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Google AI Overviews	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 1 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Google AI Mode	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

InEight / Procore: question q10

best construction software for a small GC that needs estimating and scheduling without Procore complexity

InEight: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

InEight and Procore on q10
Engine and pair	Naming observations
InEight / Procore / ChatGPT	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Claude	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Perplexity	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Google AI Overviews	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
InEight / Procore / Google AI Mode	InEight: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

InEight's own-domain citation count is 0 of 150; Procore's is 30 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Construction project management software · Exact Construction project management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Kahua and Procore

Construction project management software · September 2026

Kahua and Procore in the observed answers

Kahua appears in 22 of 150 answers about construction project management software; Procore appears in 109 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Kahua and Procore have different naming counts on 10 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 0 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Kahua record · Procore record · Construction project management software checked set.

Kahua beside Procore

Kahua and Procore totals
Measure	Kahua	Procore
Named	22/150; 14.7% (95% CI 9.9 to 21.2)	109/150; 72.7% (95% CI 65.0 to 79.2)
Own domain cited	22/150; 14.7% (95% CI 9.9 to 21.2)	30/150; 20.0% (95% CI 14.4 to 27.1)

Kahua / Procore: question q1

best construction management software for a small residential builder

Kahua: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

Kahua and Procore on q1
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Kahua / Procore / ChatGPT	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Claude	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Perplexity	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Google AI Mode	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Kahua / Procore: question q2

best construction project management software for a mid sized general contractor

Kahua: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Kahua and Procore on q2
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Kahua / Procore / ChatGPT	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Claude	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Perplexity	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Google AI Mode	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Kahua / Procore: question q3

best construction management software for subcontractors

Kahua: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Kahua and Procore on q3
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Kahua / Procore / ChatGPT	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Claude	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Perplexity	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Google AI Mode	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Kahua / Procore: question q4

what are the best alternatives to Procore

Kahua: 7/15; 46.7% (95% CI 24.8 to 69.9). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Kahua and Procore on q4
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Kahua / Procore / ChatGPT	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Claude	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Perplexity	Kahua: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Kahua: 2 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Google AI Mode	Kahua: 2 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Kahua / Procore: question q5

what are the best alternatives to Buildertrend

Kahua: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Kahua and Procore on q5
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Kahua / Procore / ChatGPT	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Claude	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Perplexity	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Google AI Mode	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Kahua / Procore: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Autodesk Construction Cloud

Kahua: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Kahua and Procore on q6
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Kahua / Procore / ChatGPT	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Claude	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Perplexity	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Google AI Mode	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Kahua / Procore: question q7

Procore vs Buildertrend, which is better for a small GC

Kahua: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Kahua and Procore on q7
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Kahua / Procore / ChatGPT	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Claude	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Perplexity	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Google AI Mode	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.

Kahua / Procore: question q8

Kahua vs e-Builder for an owner running capital projects

Kahua: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0). Procore: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Kahua and Procore on q8
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Kahua / Procore / ChatGPT	Kahua: 3 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Claude	Kahua: 3 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Perplexity	Kahua: 3 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Kahua: 3 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Google AI Mode	Kahua: 3 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

Kahua / Procore: question q9

what should I look for when choosing construction project management software

Kahua: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

Kahua and Procore on q9
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Kahua / Procore / ChatGPT	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Claude	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Perplexity	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 1 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Google AI Mode	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

Kahua / Procore: question q10

best construction software for a small GC that needs estimating and scheduling without Procore complexity

Kahua: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Kahua and Procore on q10
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Kahua / Procore / ChatGPT	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Claude	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Perplexity	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Kahua / Procore / Google AI Mode	Kahua: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Kahua's own-domain citation count is 22 of 150; Procore's is 30 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Construction project management software · Exact Construction project management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Oracle Construction and Engineering and Procore

Construction project management software · September 2026

Oracle Construction and Engineering and Procore in the observed answers

Oracle Construction and Engineering appears in 14 of 150 answers about construction project management software; Procore appears in 109 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Oracle Construction and Engineering and Procore have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Oracle Construction and Engineering record · Procore record · Construction project management software checked set.

Oracle Construction and Engineering beside Procore

Oracle Construction and Engineering and Procore totals
Measure	Oracle Construction and Engineering	Procore
Named	14/150; 9.3% (95% CI 5.6 to 15.1)	109/150; 72.7% (95% CI 65.0 to 79.2)
Own domain cited	5/150; 3.3% (95% CI 1.4 to 7.6)	30/150; 20.0% (95% CI 14.4 to 27.1)

Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore: question q1

best construction management software for a small residential builder

Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

Oracle Construction and Engineering and Procore on q1
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / ChatGPT	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Claude	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Perplexity	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Google AI Mode	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore: question q2

best construction project management software for a mid sized general contractor

Oracle Construction and Engineering: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Oracle Construction and Engineering and Procore on q2
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / ChatGPT	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Claude	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 2 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Perplexity	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Google AI Mode	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore: question q3

best construction management software for subcontractors

Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Oracle Construction and Engineering and Procore on q3
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / ChatGPT	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Claude	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Perplexity	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Google AI Mode	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore: question q4

what are the best alternatives to Procore

Oracle Construction and Engineering: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Oracle Construction and Engineering and Procore on q4
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / ChatGPT	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Claude	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Perplexity	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 1 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Google AI Mode	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore: question q5

what are the best alternatives to Buildertrend

Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Oracle Construction and Engineering and Procore on q5
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / ChatGPT	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Claude	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Perplexity	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Google AI Mode	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Autodesk Construction Cloud

Oracle Construction and Engineering: 11/15; 73.3% (95% CI 48.0 to 89.1). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Oracle Construction and Engineering and Procore on q6
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / ChatGPT	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Claude	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 2 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Perplexity	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Google AI Mode	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore: question q7

Procore vs Buildertrend, which is better for a small GC

Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Oracle Construction and Engineering and Procore on q7
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / ChatGPT	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Claude	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Perplexity	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Google AI Mode	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.

Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore: question q8

Kahua vs e-Builder for an owner running capital projects

Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Oracle Construction and Engineering and Procore on q8
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / ChatGPT	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Claude	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Perplexity	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Google AI Mode	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore: question q9

what should I look for when choosing construction project management software

Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

Oracle Construction and Engineering and Procore on q9
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / ChatGPT	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Claude	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Perplexity	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 1 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Google AI Mode	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore: question q10

best construction software for a small GC that needs estimating and scheduling without Procore complexity

Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Oracle Construction and Engineering and Procore on q10
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / ChatGPT	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Claude	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Perplexity	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Oracle Construction and Engineering / Procore / Google AI Mode	Oracle Construction and Engineering: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Oracle Construction and Engineering's own-domain citation count is 5 of 150; Procore's is 30 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Construction project management software · Exact Construction project management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

RedTeam and Procore

Construction project management software · September 2026

RedTeam and Procore in the observed answers

RedTeam appears in 8 of 150 answers about construction project management software; Procore appears in 109 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

RedTeam and Procore have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. RedTeam record · Procore record · Construction project management software checked set.

RedTeam beside Procore

RedTeam and Procore totals
Measure	RedTeam	Procore
Named	8/150; 5.3% (95% CI 2.7 to 10.2)	109/150; 72.7% (95% CI 65.0 to 79.2)
Own domain cited	7/150; 4.7% (95% CI 2.3 to 9.3)	30/150; 20.0% (95% CI 14.4 to 27.1)

RedTeam / Procore: question q1

best construction management software for a small residential builder

RedTeam: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

RedTeam and Procore on q1
Engine and pair	Naming observations
RedTeam / Procore / ChatGPT	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Claude	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Perplexity	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Google AI Overviews	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Google AI Mode	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

RedTeam / Procore: question q2

best construction project management software for a mid sized general contractor

RedTeam: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

RedTeam and Procore on q2
Engine and pair	Naming observations
RedTeam / Procore / ChatGPT	RedTeam: 2 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Claude	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Perplexity	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Google AI Overviews	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Google AI Mode	RedTeam: 2 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

RedTeam / Procore: question q3

best construction management software for subcontractors

RedTeam: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

RedTeam and Procore on q3
Engine and pair	Naming observations
RedTeam / Procore / ChatGPT	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Claude	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Perplexity	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Google AI Overviews	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Google AI Mode	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

RedTeam / Procore: question q4

what are the best alternatives to Procore

RedTeam: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

RedTeam and Procore on q4
Engine and pair	Naming observations
RedTeam / Procore / ChatGPT	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Claude	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Perplexity	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Google AI Overviews	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Google AI Mode	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

RedTeam / Procore: question q5

what are the best alternatives to Buildertrend

RedTeam: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

RedTeam and Procore on q5
Engine and pair	Naming observations
RedTeam / Procore / ChatGPT	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Claude	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Perplexity	RedTeam: 1 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Google AI Overviews	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Google AI Mode	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

RedTeam / Procore: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Autodesk Construction Cloud

RedTeam: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

RedTeam and Procore on q6
Engine and pair	Naming observations
RedTeam / Procore / ChatGPT	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Claude	RedTeam: 1 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Perplexity	RedTeam: 2 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Google AI Overviews	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Google AI Mode	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

RedTeam / Procore: question q7

Procore vs Buildertrend, which is better for a small GC

RedTeam: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

RedTeam and Procore on q7
Engine and pair	Naming observations
RedTeam / Procore / ChatGPT	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Claude	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Perplexity	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Google AI Overviews	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Google AI Mode	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.

RedTeam / Procore: question q8

Kahua vs e-Builder for an owner running capital projects

RedTeam: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

RedTeam and Procore on q8
Engine and pair	Naming observations
RedTeam / Procore / ChatGPT	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Claude	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Perplexity	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Google AI Overviews	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Google AI Mode	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

RedTeam / Procore: question q9

what should I look for when choosing construction project management software

RedTeam: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

RedTeam and Procore on q9
Engine and pair	Naming observations
RedTeam / Procore / ChatGPT	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Claude	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Perplexity	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Google AI Overviews	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 1 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Google AI Mode	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

RedTeam / Procore: question q10

best construction software for a small GC that needs estimating and scheduling without Procore complexity

RedTeam: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

RedTeam and Procore on q10
Engine and pair	Naming observations
RedTeam / Procore / ChatGPT	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Claude	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Perplexity	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Google AI Overviews	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
RedTeam / Procore / Google AI Mode	RedTeam: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

RedTeam's own-domain citation count is 7 of 150; Procore's is 30 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Construction project management software · Exact Construction project management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

eSUB and Procore

Construction project management software · September 2026

eSUB and Procore in the observed answers

eSUB appears in 11 of 150 answers about construction project management software; Procore appears in 109 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

eSUB and Procore have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. eSUB record · Procore record · Construction project management software checked set.

eSUB beside Procore

eSUB and Procore totals
Measure	eSUB	Procore
Named	11/150; 7.3% (95% CI 4.1 to 12.7)	109/150; 72.7% (95% CI 65.0 to 79.2)
Own domain cited	3/150; 2.0% (95% CI 0.7 to 5.7)	30/150; 20.0% (95% CI 14.4 to 27.1)

eSUB / Procore: question q1

best construction management software for a small residential builder

eSUB: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

eSUB and Procore on q1
Engine and pair	Naming observations
eSUB / Procore / ChatGPT	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Claude	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Perplexity	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Google AI Overviews	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Google AI Mode	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

eSUB / Procore: question q2

best construction project management software for a mid sized general contractor

eSUB: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

eSUB and Procore on q2
Engine and pair	Naming observations
eSUB / Procore / ChatGPT	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Claude	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Perplexity	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Google AI Overviews	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Google AI Mode	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

eSUB / Procore: question q3

best construction management software for subcontractors

eSUB: 10/15; 66.7% (95% CI 41.7 to 84.8). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

eSUB and Procore on q3
Engine and pair	Naming observations
eSUB / Procore / ChatGPT	eSUB: 2 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Claude	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Perplexity	eSUB: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Google AI Overviews	eSUB: 3 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Google AI Mode	eSUB: 2 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

eSUB / Procore: question q4

what are the best alternatives to Procore

eSUB: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

eSUB and Procore on q4
Engine and pair	Naming observations
eSUB / Procore / ChatGPT	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Claude	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Perplexity	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Google AI Overviews	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Google AI Mode	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

eSUB / Procore: question q5

what are the best alternatives to Buildertrend

eSUB: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

eSUB and Procore on q5
Engine and pair	Naming observations
eSUB / Procore / ChatGPT	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Claude	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Perplexity	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Google AI Overviews	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Google AI Mode	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

eSUB / Procore: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Autodesk Construction Cloud

eSUB: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

eSUB and Procore on q6
Engine and pair	Naming observations
eSUB / Procore / ChatGPT	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Claude	eSUB: 1 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Perplexity	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Google AI Overviews	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Google AI Mode	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

eSUB / Procore: question q7

Procore vs Buildertrend, which is better for a small GC

eSUB: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

eSUB and Procore on q7
Engine and pair	Naming observations
eSUB / Procore / ChatGPT	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Claude	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Perplexity	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Google AI Overviews	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Google AI Mode	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.

eSUB / Procore: question q8

Kahua vs e-Builder for an owner running capital projects

eSUB: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

eSUB and Procore on q8
Engine and pair	Naming observations
eSUB / Procore / ChatGPT	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Claude	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Perplexity	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Google AI Overviews	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Google AI Mode	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

eSUB / Procore: question q9

what should I look for when choosing construction project management software

eSUB: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

eSUB and Procore on q9
Engine and pair	Naming observations
eSUB / Procore / ChatGPT	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Claude	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Perplexity	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Google AI Overviews	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 1 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Google AI Mode	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

eSUB / Procore: question q10

best construction software for a small GC that needs estimating and scheduling without Procore complexity

eSUB: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

eSUB and Procore on q10
Engine and pair	Naming observations
eSUB / Procore / ChatGPT	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Claude	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Perplexity	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Google AI Overviews	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
eSUB / Procore / Google AI Mode	eSUB: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

eSUB's own-domain citation count is 3 of 150; Procore's is 30 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Construction project management software · Exact Construction project management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Raken and Procore

Construction project management software · September 2026

Raken and Procore in the observed answers

Raken appears in 2 of 150 answers about construction project management software; Procore appears in 109 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Raken and Procore have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Raken record · Procore record · Construction project management software checked set.

Raken beside Procore

Raken and Procore totals
Measure	Raken	Procore
Named	2/150; 1.3% (95% CI 0.4 to 4.7)	109/150; 72.7% (95% CI 65.0 to 79.2)
Own domain cited	1/150; 0.7% (95% CI 0.1 to 3.7)	30/150; 20.0% (95% CI 14.4 to 27.1)

Raken / Procore: question q1

best construction management software for a small residential builder

Raken: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

Raken and Procore on q1
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Raken / Procore / ChatGPT	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Claude	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Perplexity	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Google AI Mode	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Raken / Procore: question q2

best construction project management software for a mid sized general contractor

Raken: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Raken and Procore on q2
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Raken / Procore / ChatGPT	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Claude	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Perplexity	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Google AI Mode	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Raken / Procore: question q3

best construction management software for subcontractors

Raken: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Raken and Procore on q3
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Raken / Procore / ChatGPT	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Claude	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Perplexity	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Raken: 1 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Google AI Mode	Raken: 1 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Raken / Procore: question q4

what are the best alternatives to Procore

Raken: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Raken and Procore on q4
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Raken / Procore / ChatGPT	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Claude	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Perplexity	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Google AI Mode	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Raken / Procore: question q5

what are the best alternatives to Buildertrend

Raken: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Raken and Procore on q5
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Raken / Procore / ChatGPT	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Claude	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Perplexity	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Google AI Mode	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Raken / Procore: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Autodesk Construction Cloud

Raken: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Raken and Procore on q6
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Raken / Procore / ChatGPT	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Claude	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Perplexity	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Google AI Mode	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Raken / Procore: question q7

Procore vs Buildertrend, which is better for a small GC

Raken: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Raken and Procore on q7
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Raken / Procore / ChatGPT	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Claude	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Perplexity	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Google AI Mode	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.

Raken / Procore: question q8

Kahua vs e-Builder for an owner running capital projects

Raken: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Raken and Procore on q8
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Raken / Procore / ChatGPT	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Claude	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Perplexity	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Google AI Mode	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

Raken / Procore: question q9

what should I look for when choosing construction project management software

Raken: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

Raken and Procore on q9
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Raken / Procore / ChatGPT	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Claude	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Perplexity	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 1 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Google AI Mode	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

Raken / Procore: question q10

best construction software for a small GC that needs estimating and scheduling without Procore complexity

Raken: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Raken and Procore on q10
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Raken / Procore / ChatGPT	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Claude	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Perplexity	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Raken / Procore / Google AI Mode	Raken: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Raken's own-domain citation count is 1 of 150; Procore's is 30 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Construction project management software · Exact Construction project management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Fieldwire and Procore

Construction project management software · September 2026

Fieldwire and Procore in the observed answers

Fieldwire appears in 57 of 150 answers about construction project management software; Procore appears in 109 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Fieldwire and Procore have different naming counts on 8 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 2 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Fieldwire record · Procore record · Construction project management software checked set.

Fieldwire beside Procore

Fieldwire and Procore totals
Measure	Fieldwire	Procore
Named	57/150; 38.0% (95% CI 30.6 to 46.0)	109/150; 72.7% (95% CI 65.0 to 79.2)
Own domain cited	37/150; 24.7% (95% CI 18.5 to 32.1)	30/150; 20.0% (95% CI 14.4 to 27.1)

Fieldwire / Procore: question q1

best construction management software for a small residential builder

Fieldwire: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

Fieldwire and Procore on q1
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Fieldwire / Procore / ChatGPT	Fieldwire: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Claude	Fieldwire: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Perplexity	Fieldwire: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Fieldwire: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Google AI Mode	Fieldwire: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Fieldwire / Procore: question q2

best construction project management software for a mid sized general contractor

Fieldwire: 7/15; 46.7% (95% CI 24.8 to 69.9). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Fieldwire and Procore on q2
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Fieldwire / Procore / ChatGPT	Fieldwire: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Claude	Fieldwire: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Perplexity	Fieldwire: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Fieldwire: 1 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Google AI Mode	Fieldwire: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Fieldwire / Procore: question q3

best construction management software for subcontractors

Fieldwire: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Fieldwire and Procore on q3
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Fieldwire / Procore / ChatGPT	Fieldwire: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Claude	Fieldwire: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Perplexity	Fieldwire: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Fieldwire: 3 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Google AI Mode	Fieldwire: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Fieldwire / Procore: question q4

what are the best alternatives to Procore

Fieldwire: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Fieldwire and Procore on q4
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Fieldwire / Procore / ChatGPT	Fieldwire: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Claude	Fieldwire: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Perplexity	Fieldwire: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Fieldwire: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Google AI Mode	Fieldwire: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Fieldwire / Procore: question q5

what are the best alternatives to Buildertrend

Fieldwire: 7/15; 46.7% (95% CI 24.8 to 69.9). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Fieldwire and Procore on q5
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Fieldwire / Procore / ChatGPT	Fieldwire: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Claude	Fieldwire: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Perplexity	Fieldwire: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Fieldwire: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Google AI Mode	Fieldwire: 1 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Fieldwire / Procore: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Autodesk Construction Cloud

Fieldwire: 13/15; 86.7% (95% CI 62.1 to 96.3). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Fieldwire and Procore on q6
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Fieldwire / Procore / ChatGPT	Fieldwire: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Claude	Fieldwire: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Perplexity	Fieldwire: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Fieldwire: 1 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Google AI Mode	Fieldwire: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Fieldwire / Procore: question q7

Procore vs Buildertrend, which is better for a small GC

Fieldwire: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Fieldwire and Procore on q7
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Fieldwire / Procore / ChatGPT	Fieldwire: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Claude	Fieldwire: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Perplexity	Fieldwire: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Fieldwire: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Google AI Mode	Fieldwire: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.

Fieldwire / Procore: question q8

Kahua vs e-Builder for an owner running capital projects

Fieldwire: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Fieldwire and Procore on q8
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Fieldwire / Procore / ChatGPT	Fieldwire: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Claude	Fieldwire: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Perplexity	Fieldwire: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Fieldwire: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Google AI Mode	Fieldwire: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

Fieldwire / Procore: question q9

what should I look for when choosing construction project management software

Fieldwire: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

Fieldwire and Procore on q9
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Fieldwire / Procore / ChatGPT	Fieldwire: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Claude	Fieldwire: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Perplexity	Fieldwire: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Fieldwire: 0 of 3; Procore: 1 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Google AI Mode	Fieldwire: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

Fieldwire / Procore: question q10

best construction software for a small GC that needs estimating and scheduling without Procore complexity

Fieldwire: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Fieldwire and Procore on q10
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Fieldwire / Procore / ChatGPT	Fieldwire: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Claude	Fieldwire: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Perplexity	Fieldwire: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Fieldwire: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Fieldwire / Procore / Google AI Mode	Fieldwire: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Fieldwire's own-domain citation count is 37 of 150; Procore's is 30 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Construction project management software · Exact Construction project management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Foundation Software and Procore

Construction project management software · September 2026

Foundation Software and Procore in the observed answers

Foundation Software appears in 11 of 150 answers about construction project management software; Procore appears in 109 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Foundation Software and Procore have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Foundation Software record · Procore record · Construction project management software checked set.

Foundation Software beside Procore

Foundation Software and Procore totals
Measure	Foundation Software	Procore
Named	11/150; 7.3% (95% CI 4.1 to 12.7)	109/150; 72.7% (95% CI 65.0 to 79.2)
Own domain cited	0/150; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)	30/150; 20.0% (95% CI 14.4 to 27.1)

Foundation Software / Procore: question q1

best construction management software for a small residential builder

Foundation Software: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Procore: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

Foundation Software and Procore on q1
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Foundation Software / Procore / ChatGPT	Foundation Software: 3 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Claude	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Perplexity	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Google AI Mode	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Foundation Software / Procore: question q2

best construction project management software for a mid sized general contractor

Foundation Software: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Foundation Software and Procore on q2
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Foundation Software / Procore / ChatGPT	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Claude	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Perplexity	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Google AI Mode	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Foundation Software / Procore: question q3

best construction management software for subcontractors

Foundation Software: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Foundation Software and Procore on q3
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Foundation Software / Procore / ChatGPT	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Claude	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Perplexity	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Foundation Software: 1 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Google AI Mode	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Foundation Software / Procore: question q4

what are the best alternatives to Procore

Foundation Software: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Foundation Software and Procore on q4
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Foundation Software / Procore / ChatGPT	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Claude	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Perplexity	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Google AI Mode	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Foundation Software / Procore: question q5

what are the best alternatives to Buildertrend

Foundation Software: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Foundation Software and Procore on q5
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Foundation Software / Procore / ChatGPT	Foundation Software: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Claude	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Perplexity	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Google AI Mode	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Foundation Software / Procore: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Autodesk Construction Cloud

Foundation Software: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Foundation Software and Procore on q6
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Foundation Software / Procore / ChatGPT	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Claude	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Perplexity	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Google AI Mode	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Foundation Software / Procore: question q7

Procore vs Buildertrend, which is better for a small GC

Foundation Software: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Foundation Software and Procore on q7
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Foundation Software / Procore / ChatGPT	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Claude	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Perplexity	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Google AI Mode	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.

Foundation Software / Procore: question q8

Kahua vs e-Builder for an owner running capital projects

Foundation Software: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Procore: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Foundation Software and Procore on q8
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Foundation Software / Procore / ChatGPT	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Claude	Foundation Software: 1 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Perplexity	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Google AI Mode	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

Foundation Software / Procore: question q9

what should I look for when choosing construction project management software

Foundation Software: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

Foundation Software and Procore on q9
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Foundation Software / Procore / ChatGPT	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Claude	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Perplexity	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 1 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Google AI Mode	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

Foundation Software / Procore: question q10

best construction software for a small GC that needs estimating and scheduling without Procore complexity

Foundation Software: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Foundation Software and Procore on q10
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Foundation Software / Procore / ChatGPT	Foundation Software: 3 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Claude	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Perplexity	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Foundation Software / Procore / Google AI Mode	Foundation Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Foundation Software's own-domain citation count is 0 of 150; Procore's is 30 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Construction project management software · Exact Construction project management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Jonas Construction and Procore

Construction project management software · September 2026

Jonas Construction and Procore in the observed answers

Jonas Construction appears in 0 of 150 answers about construction project management software; Procore appears in 109 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Jonas Construction and Procore have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Jonas Construction record · Procore record · Construction project management software checked set.

Jonas Construction beside Procore

Jonas Construction and Procore totals
Measure	Jonas Construction	Procore
Named	0/150; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)	109/150; 72.7% (95% CI 65.0 to 79.2)
Own domain cited	0/150; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)	30/150; 20.0% (95% CI 14.4 to 27.1)

Jonas Construction / Procore: question q1

best construction management software for a small residential builder

Jonas Construction: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

Jonas Construction and Procore on q1
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Jonas Construction / Procore / ChatGPT	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Claude	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Perplexity	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Google AI Mode	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Jonas Construction / Procore: question q2

best construction project management software for a mid sized general contractor

Jonas Construction: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Jonas Construction and Procore on q2
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Jonas Construction / Procore / ChatGPT	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Claude	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Perplexity	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Google AI Mode	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Jonas Construction / Procore: question q3

best construction management software for subcontractors

Jonas Construction: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Jonas Construction and Procore on q3
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Jonas Construction / Procore / ChatGPT	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Claude	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Perplexity	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Google AI Mode	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Jonas Construction / Procore: question q4

what are the best alternatives to Procore

Jonas Construction: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Jonas Construction and Procore on q4
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Jonas Construction / Procore / ChatGPT	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Claude	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Perplexity	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Google AI Mode	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Jonas Construction / Procore: question q5

what are the best alternatives to Buildertrend

Jonas Construction: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Jonas Construction and Procore on q5
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Jonas Construction / Procore / ChatGPT	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Claude	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Perplexity	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Google AI Mode	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Jonas Construction / Procore: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Autodesk Construction Cloud

Jonas Construction: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Jonas Construction and Procore on q6
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Jonas Construction / Procore / ChatGPT	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Claude	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Perplexity	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Google AI Mode	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Jonas Construction / Procore: question q7

Procore vs Buildertrend, which is better for a small GC

Jonas Construction: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Jonas Construction and Procore on q7
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Jonas Construction / Procore / ChatGPT	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Claude	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Perplexity	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Google AI Mode	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.

Jonas Construction / Procore: question q8

Kahua vs e-Builder for an owner running capital projects

Jonas Construction: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Jonas Construction and Procore on q8
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Jonas Construction / Procore / ChatGPT	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Claude	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Perplexity	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Google AI Mode	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

Jonas Construction / Procore: question q9

what should I look for when choosing construction project management software

Jonas Construction: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

Jonas Construction and Procore on q9
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Jonas Construction / Procore / ChatGPT	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Claude	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Perplexity	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 1 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Google AI Mode	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

Jonas Construction / Procore: question q10

best construction software for a small GC that needs estimating and scheduling without Procore complexity

Jonas Construction: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Jonas Construction and Procore on q10
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Jonas Construction / Procore / ChatGPT	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Claude	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Perplexity	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Jonas Construction / Procore / Google AI Mode	Jonas Construction: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Jonas Construction's own-domain citation count is 0 of 150; Procore's is 30 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Construction project management software · Exact Construction project management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Penta Software and Procore

Construction project management software · September 2026

Penta Software and Procore in the observed answers

Penta Software appears in 0 of 150 answers about construction project management software; Procore appears in 109 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Penta Software and Procore have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Penta Software record · Procore record · Construction project management software checked set.

Penta Software beside Procore

Penta Software and Procore totals
Measure	Penta Software	Procore
Named	0/150; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)	109/150; 72.7% (95% CI 65.0 to 79.2)
Own domain cited	0/150; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)	30/150; 20.0% (95% CI 14.4 to 27.1)

Penta Software / Procore: question q1

best construction management software for a small residential builder

Penta Software: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

Penta Software and Procore on q1
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Penta Software / Procore / ChatGPT	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Claude	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Perplexity	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Google AI Mode	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Penta Software / Procore: question q2

best construction project management software for a mid sized general contractor

Penta Software: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Penta Software and Procore on q2
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Penta Software / Procore / ChatGPT	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Claude	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Perplexity	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Google AI Mode	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Penta Software / Procore: question q3

best construction management software for subcontractors

Penta Software: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Penta Software and Procore on q3
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Penta Software / Procore / ChatGPT	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Claude	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Perplexity	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Google AI Mode	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Penta Software / Procore: question q4

what are the best alternatives to Procore

Penta Software: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Penta Software and Procore on q4
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Penta Software / Procore / ChatGPT	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Claude	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Perplexity	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Google AI Mode	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Penta Software / Procore: question q5

what are the best alternatives to Buildertrend

Penta Software: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Penta Software and Procore on q5
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Penta Software / Procore / ChatGPT	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Claude	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Perplexity	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Google AI Mode	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Penta Software / Procore: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Autodesk Construction Cloud

Penta Software: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Penta Software and Procore on q6
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Penta Software / Procore / ChatGPT	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Claude	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Perplexity	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Google AI Mode	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Penta Software / Procore: question q7

Procore vs Buildertrend, which is better for a small GC

Penta Software: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Penta Software and Procore on q7
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Penta Software / Procore / ChatGPT	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Claude	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Perplexity	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Google AI Mode	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.

Penta Software / Procore: question q8

Kahua vs e-Builder for an owner running capital projects

Penta Software: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Penta Software and Procore on q8
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Penta Software / Procore / ChatGPT	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Claude	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Perplexity	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Google AI Mode	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

Penta Software / Procore: question q9

what should I look for when choosing construction project management software

Penta Software: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

Penta Software and Procore on q9
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Penta Software / Procore / ChatGPT	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Claude	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Perplexity	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 1 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Google AI Mode	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

Penta Software / Procore: question q10

best construction software for a small GC that needs estimating and scheduling without Procore complexity

Penta Software: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Penta Software and Procore on q10
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Penta Software / Procore / ChatGPT	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Claude	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Perplexity	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Penta Software / Procore / Google AI Mode	Penta Software: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Penta Software's own-domain citation count is 0 of 150; Procore's is 30 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Construction project management software · Exact Construction project management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Buildxact and Procore

Construction project management software · September 2026

Buildxact and Procore in the observed answers

Buildxact appears in 22 of 150 answers about construction project management software; Procore appears in 109 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Buildxact and Procore have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Buildxact record · Procore record · Construction project management software checked set.

Buildxact beside Procore

Buildxact and Procore totals
Measure	Buildxact	Procore
Named	22/150; 14.7% (95% CI 9.9 to 21.2)	109/150; 72.7% (95% CI 65.0 to 79.2)
Own domain cited	13/150; 8.7% (95% CI 5.1 to 14.3)	30/150; 20.0% (95% CI 14.4 to 27.1)

Buildxact / Procore: question q1

best construction management software for a small residential builder

Buildxact: 6/15; 40.0% (95% CI 19.8 to 64.3). Procore: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

Buildxact and Procore on q1
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Buildxact / Procore / ChatGPT	Buildxact: 3 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Claude	Buildxact: 3 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Perplexity	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Google AI Mode	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Buildxact / Procore: question q2

best construction project management software for a mid sized general contractor

Buildxact: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Buildxact and Procore on q2
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Buildxact / Procore / ChatGPT	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Claude	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Perplexity	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Google AI Mode	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Buildxact / Procore: question q3

best construction management software for subcontractors

Buildxact: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Buildxact and Procore on q3
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Buildxact / Procore / ChatGPT	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Claude	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Perplexity	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Google AI Mode	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Buildxact / Procore: question q4

what are the best alternatives to Procore

Buildxact: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Buildxact and Procore on q4
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Buildxact / Procore / ChatGPT	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Claude	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Perplexity	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Buildxact: 1 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Google AI Mode	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Buildxact / Procore: question q5

what are the best alternatives to Buildertrend

Buildxact: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Buildxact and Procore on q5
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Buildxact / Procore / ChatGPT	Buildxact: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Claude	Buildxact: 1 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Perplexity	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Google AI Mode	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Buildxact / Procore: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Autodesk Construction Cloud

Buildxact: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Buildxact and Procore on q6
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Buildxact / Procore / ChatGPT	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Claude	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Perplexity	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Google AI Mode	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Buildxact / Procore: question q7

Procore vs Buildertrend, which is better for a small GC

Buildxact: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Buildxact and Procore on q7
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Buildxact / Procore / ChatGPT	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Claude	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Perplexity	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Google AI Mode	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.

Buildxact / Procore: question q8

Kahua vs e-Builder for an owner running capital projects

Buildxact: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Buildxact and Procore on q8
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Buildxact / Procore / ChatGPT	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Claude	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Perplexity	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Google AI Mode	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

Buildxact / Procore: question q9

what should I look for when choosing construction project management software

Buildxact: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

Buildxact and Procore on q9
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Buildxact / Procore / ChatGPT	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Claude	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Perplexity	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 1 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Google AI Mode	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

Buildxact / Procore: question q10

best construction software for a small GC that needs estimating and scheduling without Procore complexity

Buildxact: 11/15; 73.3% (95% CI 48.0 to 89.1). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Buildxact and Procore on q10
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Buildxact / Procore / ChatGPT	Buildxact: 3 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Claude	Buildxact: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Perplexity	Buildxact: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Buildxact: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Buildxact / Procore / Google AI Mode	Buildxact: 2 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Buildxact's own-domain citation count is 13 of 150; Procore's is 30 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Construction project management software · Exact Construction project management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

JobTread and Procore

Construction project management software · September 2026

JobTread and Procore in the observed answers

JobTread appears in 50 of 150 answers about construction project management software; Procore appears in 109 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

JobTread and Procore have different naming counts on 8 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 2 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. JobTread record · Procore record · Construction project management software checked set.

JobTread beside Procore

JobTread and Procore totals
Measure	JobTread	Procore
Named	50/150; 33.3% (95% CI 26.3 to 41.2)	109/150; 72.7% (95% CI 65.0 to 79.2)
Own domain cited	23/150; 15.3% (95% CI 10.4 to 22.0)	30/150; 20.0% (95% CI 14.4 to 27.1)

JobTread / Procore: question q1

best construction management software for a small residential builder

JobTread: 13/15; 86.7% (95% CI 62.1 to 96.3). Procore: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

JobTread and Procore on q1
Engine and pair	Naming observations
JobTread / Procore / ChatGPT	JobTread: 3 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Claude	JobTread: 3 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Perplexity	JobTread: 3 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Google AI Overviews	JobTread: 2 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Google AI Mode	JobTread: 2 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

JobTread / Procore: question q2

best construction project management software for a mid sized general contractor

JobTread: 5/15; 33.3% (95% CI 15.2 to 58.3). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

JobTread and Procore on q2
Engine and pair	Naming observations
JobTread / Procore / ChatGPT	JobTread: 2 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Claude	JobTread: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Perplexity	JobTread: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Google AI Overviews	JobTread: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Google AI Mode	JobTread: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

JobTread / Procore: question q3

best construction management software for subcontractors

JobTread: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

JobTread and Procore on q3
Engine and pair	Naming observations
JobTread / Procore / ChatGPT	JobTread: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Claude	JobTread: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Perplexity	JobTread: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Google AI Overviews	JobTread: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Google AI Mode	JobTread: 1 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

JobTread / Procore: question q4

what are the best alternatives to Procore

JobTread: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

JobTread and Procore on q4
Engine and pair	Naming observations
JobTread / Procore / ChatGPT	JobTread: 2 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Claude	JobTread: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Perplexity	JobTread: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Google AI Overviews	JobTread: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Google AI Mode	JobTread: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

JobTread / Procore: question q5

what are the best alternatives to Buildertrend

JobTread: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

JobTread and Procore on q5
Engine and pair	Naming observations
JobTread / Procore / ChatGPT	JobTread: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Claude	JobTread: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Perplexity	JobTread: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Google AI Overviews	JobTread: 2 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Google AI Mode	JobTread: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

JobTread / Procore: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Autodesk Construction Cloud

JobTread: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

JobTread and Procore on q6
Engine and pair	Naming observations
JobTread / Procore / ChatGPT	JobTread: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Claude	JobTread: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Perplexity	JobTread: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Google AI Overviews	JobTread: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Google AI Mode	JobTread: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

JobTread / Procore: question q7

Procore vs Buildertrend, which is better for a small GC

JobTread: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

JobTread and Procore on q7
Engine and pair	Naming observations
JobTread / Procore / ChatGPT	JobTread: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Claude	JobTread: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Perplexity	JobTread: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Google AI Overviews	JobTread: 1 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Google AI Mode	JobTread: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.

JobTread / Procore: question q8

Kahua vs e-Builder for an owner running capital projects

JobTread: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

JobTread and Procore on q8
Engine and pair	Naming observations
JobTread / Procore / ChatGPT	JobTread: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Claude	JobTread: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Perplexity	JobTread: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Google AI Overviews	JobTread: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Google AI Mode	JobTread: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

JobTread / Procore: question q9

what should I look for when choosing construction project management software

JobTread: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

JobTread and Procore on q9
Engine and pair	Naming observations
JobTread / Procore / ChatGPT	JobTread: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Claude	JobTread: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Perplexity	JobTread: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Google AI Overviews	JobTread: 0 of 3; Procore: 1 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Google AI Mode	JobTread: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

JobTread / Procore: question q10

best construction software for a small GC that needs estimating and scheduling without Procore complexity

JobTread: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

JobTread and Procore on q10
Engine and pair	Naming observations
JobTread / Procore / ChatGPT	JobTread: 3 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Claude	JobTread: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Perplexity	JobTread: 2 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Google AI Overviews	JobTread: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
JobTread / Procore / Google AI Mode	JobTread: 3 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

JobTread's own-domain citation count is 23 of 150; Procore's is 30 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Construction project management software · Exact Construction project management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Leap and Procore

Construction project management software · September 2026

Leap and Procore in the observed answers

Leap appears in 0 of 150 answers about construction project management software; Procore appears in 109 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Leap and Procore have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Leap record · Procore record · Construction project management software checked set.

Leap beside Procore

Leap and Procore totals
Measure	Leap	Procore
Named	0/150; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)	109/150; 72.7% (95% CI 65.0 to 79.2)
Own domain cited	0/150; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)	30/150; 20.0% (95% CI 14.4 to 27.1)

Leap / Procore: question q1

best construction management software for a small residential builder

Leap: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

Leap and Procore on q1
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Leap / Procore / ChatGPT	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Claude	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Perplexity	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Google AI Mode	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Leap / Procore: question q2

best construction project management software for a mid sized general contractor

Leap: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Leap and Procore on q2
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Leap / Procore / ChatGPT	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Claude	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Perplexity	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Google AI Mode	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Leap / Procore: question q3

best construction management software for subcontractors

Leap: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Leap and Procore on q3
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Leap / Procore / ChatGPT	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Claude	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Perplexity	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Google AI Mode	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Leap / Procore: question q4

what are the best alternatives to Procore

Leap: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Leap and Procore on q4
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Leap / Procore / ChatGPT	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Claude	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Perplexity	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Google AI Mode	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Leap / Procore: question q5

what are the best alternatives to Buildertrend

Leap: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Leap and Procore on q5
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Leap / Procore / ChatGPT	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Claude	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Perplexity	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Google AI Mode	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Leap / Procore: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Autodesk Construction Cloud

Leap: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Leap and Procore on q6
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Leap / Procore / ChatGPT	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Claude	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Perplexity	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Google AI Mode	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Leap / Procore: question q7

Procore vs Buildertrend, which is better for a small GC

Leap: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Leap and Procore on q7
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Leap / Procore / ChatGPT	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Claude	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Perplexity	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Google AI Mode	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.

Leap / Procore: question q8

Kahua vs e-Builder for an owner running capital projects

Leap: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Leap and Procore on q8
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Leap / Procore / ChatGPT	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Claude	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Perplexity	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Google AI Mode	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

Leap / Procore: question q9

what should I look for when choosing construction project management software

Leap: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

Leap and Procore on q9
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Leap / Procore / ChatGPT	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Claude	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Perplexity	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 1 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Google AI Mode	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

Leap / Procore: question q10

best construction software for a small GC that needs estimating and scheduling without Procore complexity

Leap: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Leap and Procore on q10
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Leap / Procore / ChatGPT	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Claude	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Perplexity	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Leap / Procore / Google AI Mode	Leap: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Leap's own-domain citation count is 0 of 150; Procore's is 30 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Construction project management software · Exact Construction project management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

ConstructionOnline and Procore

Construction project management software · September 2026

ConstructionOnline and Procore in the observed answers

ConstructionOnline appears in 3 of 150 answers about construction project management software; Procore appears in 109 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

ConstructionOnline and Procore have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. ConstructionOnline record · Procore record · Construction project management software checked set.

ConstructionOnline beside Procore

ConstructionOnline and Procore totals
Measure	ConstructionOnline	Procore
Named	3/150; 2.0% (95% CI 0.7 to 5.7)	109/150; 72.7% (95% CI 65.0 to 79.2)
Own domain cited	0/150; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)	30/150; 20.0% (95% CI 14.4 to 27.1)

ConstructionOnline / Procore: question q1

best construction management software for a small residential builder

ConstructionOnline: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

ConstructionOnline and Procore on q1
Engine and pair	Naming observations
ConstructionOnline / Procore / ChatGPT	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Claude	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Perplexity	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Google AI Overviews	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Google AI Mode	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

ConstructionOnline / Procore: question q2

best construction project management software for a mid sized general contractor

ConstructionOnline: 2/15; 13.3% (95% CI 3.7 to 37.9). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

ConstructionOnline and Procore on q2
Engine and pair	Naming observations
ConstructionOnline / Procore / ChatGPT	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Claude	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Perplexity	ConstructionOnline: 2 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Google AI Overviews	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Google AI Mode	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

ConstructionOnline / Procore: question q3

best construction management software for subcontractors

ConstructionOnline: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

ConstructionOnline and Procore on q3
Engine and pair	Naming observations
ConstructionOnline / Procore / ChatGPT	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Claude	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Perplexity	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Google AI Overviews	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Google AI Mode	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

ConstructionOnline / Procore: question q4

what are the best alternatives to Procore

ConstructionOnline: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

ConstructionOnline and Procore on q4
Engine and pair	Naming observations
ConstructionOnline / Procore / ChatGPT	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Claude	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Perplexity	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Google AI Overviews	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Google AI Mode	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

ConstructionOnline / Procore: question q5

what are the best alternatives to Buildertrend

ConstructionOnline: 1/15; 6.7% (95% CI 1.2 to 29.8). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

ConstructionOnline and Procore on q5
Engine and pair	Naming observations
ConstructionOnline / Procore / ChatGPT	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Claude	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Perplexity	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Google AI Overviews	ConstructionOnline: 1 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Google AI Mode	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

ConstructionOnline / Procore: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Autodesk Construction Cloud

ConstructionOnline: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

ConstructionOnline and Procore on q6
Engine and pair	Naming observations
ConstructionOnline / Procore / ChatGPT	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Claude	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Perplexity	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Google AI Overviews	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Google AI Mode	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

ConstructionOnline / Procore: question q7

Procore vs Buildertrend, which is better for a small GC

ConstructionOnline: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

ConstructionOnline and Procore on q7
Engine and pair	Naming observations
ConstructionOnline / Procore / ChatGPT	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Claude	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Perplexity	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Google AI Overviews	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Google AI Mode	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.

ConstructionOnline / Procore: question q8

Kahua vs e-Builder for an owner running capital projects

ConstructionOnline: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

ConstructionOnline and Procore on q8
Engine and pair	Naming observations
ConstructionOnline / Procore / ChatGPT	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Claude	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Perplexity	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Google AI Overviews	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Google AI Mode	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

ConstructionOnline / Procore: question q9

what should I look for when choosing construction project management software

ConstructionOnline: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

ConstructionOnline and Procore on q9
Engine and pair	Naming observations
ConstructionOnline / Procore / ChatGPT	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Claude	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Perplexity	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Google AI Overviews	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 1 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Google AI Mode	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

ConstructionOnline / Procore: question q10

best construction software for a small GC that needs estimating and scheduling without Procore complexity

ConstructionOnline: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

ConstructionOnline and Procore on q10
Engine and pair	Naming observations
ConstructionOnline / Procore / ChatGPT	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Claude	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Perplexity	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Google AI Overviews	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
ConstructionOnline / Procore / Google AI Mode	ConstructionOnline: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

ConstructionOnline's own-domain citation count is 0 of 150; Procore's is 30 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Construction project management software · Exact Construction project management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Linarc and Procore

Construction project management software · September 2026

Linarc and Procore in the observed answers

Linarc appears in 0 of 150 answers about construction project management software; Procore appears in 109 of 150.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Linarc and Procore have different naming counts on 9 of 10 buyer questions; their counts match on 1 of 10. The question and engine breakdowns below describe this pair. They do not test either product.

Captured 2026-09-22. Linarc record · Procore record · Construction project management software checked set.

Linarc beside Procore

Linarc and Procore totals
Measure	Linarc	Procore
Named	0/150; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)	109/150; 72.7% (95% CI 65.0 to 79.2)
Own domain cited	0/150; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 2.5)	30/150; 20.0% (95% CI 14.4 to 27.1)

Linarc / Procore: question q1

best construction management software for a small residential builder

Linarc: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 3/15; 20.0% (95% CI 7.0 to 45.2).

Linarc and Procore on q1
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Linarc / Procore / ChatGPT	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Claude	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Perplexity	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Google AI Mode	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Linarc / Procore: question q2

best construction project management software for a mid sized general contractor

Linarc: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Linarc and Procore on q2
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Linarc / Procore / ChatGPT	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Claude	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Perplexity	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Google AI Mode	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Linarc / Procore: question q3

best construction management software for subcontractors

Linarc: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Linarc and Procore on q3
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Linarc / Procore / ChatGPT	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Claude	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Perplexity	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Google AI Mode	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Linarc / Procore: question q4

what are the best alternatives to Procore

Linarc: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Linarc and Procore on q4
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Linarc / Procore / ChatGPT	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Claude	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Perplexity	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Google AI Mode	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Linarc / Procore: question q5

what are the best alternatives to Buildertrend

Linarc: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Linarc and Procore on q5
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Linarc / Procore / ChatGPT	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Claude	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Perplexity	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Google AI Mode	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Linarc / Procore: question q6

what are the best alternatives to Autodesk Construction Cloud

Linarc: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 15/15; 100.0% (95% CI 79.6 to 100.0).

Linarc and Procore on q6
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Linarc / Procore / ChatGPT	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Claude	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Perplexity	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Google AI Mode	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Linarc / Procore: question q7

Procore vs Buildertrend, which is better for a small GC

Linarc: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Linarc and Procore on q7
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Linarc / Procore / ChatGPT	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Claude	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Perplexity	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Google AI Mode	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.

Linarc / Procore: question q8

Kahua vs e-Builder for an owner running capital projects

Linarc: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4).

Linarc and Procore on q8
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Linarc / Procore / ChatGPT	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Claude	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Perplexity	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Google AI Mode	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

Linarc / Procore: question q9

what should I look for when choosing construction project management software

Linarc: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 4/15; 26.7% (95% CI 10.9 to 52.0).

Linarc and Procore on q9
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Linarc / Procore / ChatGPT	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Claude	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Perplexity	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 1 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Google AI Mode	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 0 of 3.

Linarc / Procore: question q10

best construction software for a small GC that needs estimating and scheduling without Procore complexity

Linarc: 0/15; 0.0% (95% CI 0.0 to 20.4). Procore: 14/15; 93.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 98.8).

Linarc and Procore on q10
Engine and pair	Naming observations
Linarc / Procore / ChatGPT	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 2 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Claude	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Perplexity	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.
Linarc / Procore / Google AI Mode	Linarc: 0 of 3; Procore: 3 of 3.

Read the pair in context

Linarc's own-domain citation count is 0 of 150; Procore's is 30 of 150. Naming and citation are different observations. Counts sharing an answer base can co-occur, so subtracting them does not give the number of answers naming one alone.

Cited sources for Construction project management software · Exact Construction project management software buyer questions. Full answer evidence is in the dated deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Procore alternatives

Construction project management software · captured 2026-09-22

When the question asks for Procore alternatives

Procore alternatives: 11 other checked vendors were named across 15 valid answers.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Exact wording: what are the best alternatives to Procore.

Procore remained in 15 of 15 valid answers, 100.0% (Wilson 95% interval 79.6% to 100.0%).

10 of 22 checked vendors were never named for this exact question. That observation applies to 15 valid answers, rather than to all future answers.

Question record for Procore · Construction project management software checked set.

Procore alternatives: Autodesk Construction Cloud

Autodesk Construction Cloud: 15 of 15 valid answers, 100.0% (Wilson 95% interval 79.6% to 100.0%).

Procore alternatives naming Autodesk Construction Cloud
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Procore / Autodesk Construction Cloud / ChatGPT	Autodesk Construction Cloud named in 3 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Autodesk Construction Cloud / Claude	Autodesk Construction Cloud named in 3 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Autodesk Construction Cloud / Perplexity	Autodesk Construction Cloud named in 3 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Autodesk Construction Cloud / Google AI Overviews	Autodesk Construction Cloud named in 3 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Autodesk Construction Cloud / Google AI Mode	Autodesk Construction Cloud named in 3 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.

Autodesk Construction Cloud across the category questions.

Procore alternatives: Buildertrend

Buildertrend: 15 of 15 valid answers, 100.0% (Wilson 95% interval 79.6% to 100.0%).

Procore alternatives naming Buildertrend
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Procore / Buildertrend / ChatGPT	Buildertrend named in 3 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Buildertrend / Claude	Buildertrend named in 3 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Buildertrend / Perplexity	Buildertrend named in 3 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Buildertrend / Google AI Overviews	Buildertrend named in 3 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Buildertrend / Google AI Mode	Buildertrend named in 3 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.

Buildertrend across the category questions.

Procore alternatives: Fieldwire

Fieldwire: 15 of 15 valid answers, 100.0% (Wilson 95% interval 79.6% to 100.0%).

Procore alternatives naming Fieldwire
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Procore / Fieldwire / ChatGPT	Fieldwire named in 3 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Fieldwire / Claude	Fieldwire named in 3 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Fieldwire / Perplexity	Fieldwire named in 3 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Fieldwire / Google AI Overviews	Fieldwire named in 3 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Fieldwire / Google AI Mode	Fieldwire named in 3 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.

Fieldwire across the category questions.

Procore alternatives: Procore

Procore: 15 of 15 valid answers, 100.0% (Wilson 95% interval 79.6% to 100.0%).

Procore alternatives naming Procore
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Procore / Procore / ChatGPT	Procore named in 3 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Procore / Claude	Procore named in 3 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Procore / Perplexity	Procore named in 3 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Procore named in 3 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Procore / Google AI Mode	Procore named in 3 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.

Procore across the category questions.

Procore alternatives: CMiC

CMiC: 13 of 15 valid answers, 86.7% (Wilson 95% interval 62.1% to 96.3%).

Procore alternatives naming CMiC
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Procore / CMiC / ChatGPT	CMiC named in 2 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / CMiC / Claude	CMiC named in 3 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / CMiC / Perplexity	CMiC named in 3 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / CMiC / Google AI Overviews	CMiC named in 3 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / CMiC / Google AI Mode	CMiC named in 2 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.

CMiC across the category questions.

Procore alternatives: Contractor Foreman

Contractor Foreman: 13 of 15 valid answers, 86.7% (Wilson 95% interval 62.1% to 96.3%).

Procore alternatives naming Contractor Foreman
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Procore / Contractor Foreman / ChatGPT	Contractor Foreman named in 3 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Contractor Foreman / Claude	Contractor Foreman named in 3 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Contractor Foreman / Perplexity	Contractor Foreman named in 3 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Contractor Foreman / Google AI Overviews	Contractor Foreman named in 2 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Contractor Foreman / Google AI Mode	Contractor Foreman named in 2 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.

Contractor Foreman across the category questions.

Procore alternatives: Kahua

Kahua: 7 of 15 valid answers, 46.7% (Wilson 95% interval 24.8% to 69.9%).

Procore alternatives naming Kahua
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Procore / Kahua / ChatGPT	Kahua named in 0 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Kahua / Claude	Kahua named in 0 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Kahua / Perplexity	Kahua named in 3 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Kahua / Google AI Overviews	Kahua named in 2 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Kahua / Google AI Mode	Kahua named in 2 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.

Kahua across the category questions.

Procore alternatives: InEight

InEight: 3 of 15 valid answers, 20.0% (Wilson 95% interval 7.0% to 45.2%).

Procore alternatives naming InEight
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Procore / InEight / ChatGPT	InEight named in 0 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / InEight / Claude	InEight named in 0 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / InEight / Perplexity	InEight named in 2 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / InEight / Google AI Overviews	InEight named in 0 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / InEight / Google AI Mode	InEight named in 1 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.

InEight across the category questions.

Procore alternatives: Trimble Viewpoint

Trimble Viewpoint: 3 of 15 valid answers, 20.0% (Wilson 95% interval 7.0% to 45.2%).

Procore alternatives naming Trimble Viewpoint
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Procore / Trimble Viewpoint / ChatGPT	Trimble Viewpoint named in 3 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Trimble Viewpoint / Claude	Trimble Viewpoint named in 0 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Trimble Viewpoint / Perplexity	Trimble Viewpoint named in 0 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Trimble Viewpoint / Google AI Overviews	Trimble Viewpoint named in 0 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Trimble Viewpoint / Google AI Mode	Trimble Viewpoint named in 0 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.

Trimble Viewpoint across the category questions.

Procore alternatives: JobTread

JobTread: 2 of 15 valid answers, 13.3% (Wilson 95% interval 3.7% to 37.9%).

Procore alternatives naming JobTread
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Procore / JobTread / ChatGPT	JobTread named in 2 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / JobTread / Claude	JobTread named in 0 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / JobTread / Perplexity	JobTread named in 0 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / JobTread / Google AI Overviews	JobTread named in 0 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / JobTread / Google AI Mode	JobTread named in 0 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.

JobTread across the category questions.

Procore alternatives: Buildxact

Buildxact: 1 of 15 valid answers, 6.7% (Wilson 95% interval 1.2% to 29.8%).

Procore alternatives naming Buildxact
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Procore / Buildxact / ChatGPT	Buildxact named in 0 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Buildxact / Claude	Buildxact named in 0 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Buildxact / Perplexity	Buildxact named in 0 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Buildxact / Google AI Overviews	Buildxact named in 1 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Buildxact / Google AI Mode	Buildxact named in 0 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.

Buildxact across the category questions.

Procore alternatives: Oracle Construction and Engineering

Oracle Construction and Engineering: 1 of 15 valid answers, 6.7% (Wilson 95% interval 1.2% to 29.8%).

Procore alternatives naming Oracle Construction and Engineering
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Procore / Oracle Construction and Engineering / ChatGPT	Oracle Construction and Engineering named in 0 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Oracle Construction and Engineering / Claude	Oracle Construction and Engineering named in 0 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Oracle Construction and Engineering / Perplexity	Oracle Construction and Engineering named in 1 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Oracle Construction and Engineering / Google AI Overviews	Oracle Construction and Engineering named in 0 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.
Procore / Oracle Construction and Engineering / Google AI Mode	Oracle Construction and Engineering named in 0 of 3 valid Procore-alternatives answers.

Oracle Construction and Engineering across the category questions.

Procore alternatives and the checked set

Not named in this question: ConstructionOnline, eSUB, Foundation Software, Jonas Construction, Leap, Linarc, Penta Software, Raken, RedTeam, Sage 300 CRE. Each has 0 of 15 valid answers for this exact wording.

A question naming Procore already directs attention toward that product. Read its category discovery questions before comparing this answer with an unbranded shortlist.

Construction project management software source mix. The full Procore answers remain in the release deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Buildertrend alternatives

Construction project management software · captured 2026-09-22

When the question asks for Buildertrend alternatives

Buildertrend alternatives: 9 other checked vendors were named across 15 valid answers.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Exact wording: what are the best alternatives to Buildertrend.

Buildertrend remained in 15 of 15 valid answers, 100.0% (Wilson 95% interval 79.6% to 100.0%).

12 of 22 checked vendors were never named for this exact question. That observation applies to 15 valid answers, rather than to all future answers.

Question record for Buildertrend · Construction project management software checked set.

Buildertrend alternatives: Buildertrend

Buildertrend: 15 of 15 valid answers, 100.0% (Wilson 95% interval 79.6% to 100.0%).

Buildertrend alternatives naming Buildertrend
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Buildertrend / Buildertrend / ChatGPT	Buildertrend named in 3 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / Buildertrend / Claude	Buildertrend named in 3 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / Buildertrend / Perplexity	Buildertrend named in 3 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / Buildertrend / Google AI Overviews	Buildertrend named in 3 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / Buildertrend / Google AI Mode	Buildertrend named in 3 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.

Buildertrend across the category questions.

Buildertrend alternatives: Contractor Foreman

Contractor Foreman: 15 of 15 valid answers, 100.0% (Wilson 95% interval 79.6% to 100.0%).

Buildertrend alternatives naming Contractor Foreman
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Buildertrend / Contractor Foreman / ChatGPT	Contractor Foreman named in 3 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / Contractor Foreman / Claude	Contractor Foreman named in 3 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / Contractor Foreman / Perplexity	Contractor Foreman named in 3 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / Contractor Foreman / Google AI Overviews	Contractor Foreman named in 3 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / Contractor Foreman / Google AI Mode	Contractor Foreman named in 3 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.

Contractor Foreman across the category questions.

Buildertrend alternatives: Procore

Procore: 15 of 15 valid answers, 100.0% (Wilson 95% interval 79.6% to 100.0%).

Buildertrend alternatives naming Procore
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Buildertrend / Procore / ChatGPT	Procore named in 3 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / Procore / Claude	Procore named in 3 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / Procore / Perplexity	Procore named in 3 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Procore named in 3 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / Procore / Google AI Mode	Procore named in 3 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.

Procore across the category questions.

Buildertrend alternatives: JobTread

JobTread: 14 of 15 valid answers, 93.3% (Wilson 95% interval 70.2% to 98.8%).

Buildertrend alternatives naming JobTread
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Buildertrend / JobTread / ChatGPT	JobTread named in 3 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / JobTread / Claude	JobTread named in 3 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / JobTread / Perplexity	JobTread named in 3 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / JobTread / Google AI Overviews	JobTread named in 2 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / JobTread / Google AI Mode	JobTread named in 3 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.

JobTread across the category questions.

Buildertrend alternatives: Fieldwire

Fieldwire: 7 of 15 valid answers, 46.7% (Wilson 95% interval 24.8% to 69.9%).

Buildertrend alternatives naming Fieldwire
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Buildertrend / Fieldwire / ChatGPT	Fieldwire named in 0 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / Fieldwire / Claude	Fieldwire named in 3 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / Fieldwire / Perplexity	Fieldwire named in 3 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / Fieldwire / Google AI Overviews	Fieldwire named in 0 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / Fieldwire / Google AI Mode	Fieldwire named in 1 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.

Fieldwire across the category questions.

Buildertrend alternatives: Buildxact

Buildxact: 4 of 15 valid answers, 26.7% (Wilson 95% interval 10.9% to 52.0%).

Buildertrend alternatives naming Buildxact
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Buildertrend / Buildxact / ChatGPT	Buildxact named in 3 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / Buildxact / Claude	Buildxact named in 1 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / Buildxact / Perplexity	Buildxact named in 0 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / Buildxact / Google AI Overviews	Buildxact named in 0 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / Buildxact / Google AI Mode	Buildxact named in 0 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.

Buildxact across the category questions.

Buildertrend alternatives: Autodesk Construction Cloud

Autodesk Construction Cloud: 3 of 15 valid answers, 20.0% (Wilson 95% interval 7.0% to 45.2%).

Buildertrend alternatives naming Autodesk Construction Cloud
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Buildertrend / Autodesk Construction Cloud / ChatGPT	Autodesk Construction Cloud named in 0 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / Autodesk Construction Cloud / Claude	Autodesk Construction Cloud named in 0 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / Autodesk Construction Cloud / Perplexity	Autodesk Construction Cloud named in 3 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / Autodesk Construction Cloud / Google AI Overviews	Autodesk Construction Cloud named in 0 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / Autodesk Construction Cloud / Google AI Mode	Autodesk Construction Cloud named in 0 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.

Autodesk Construction Cloud across the category questions.

Buildertrend alternatives: Foundation Software

Foundation Software: 3 of 15 valid answers, 20.0% (Wilson 95% interval 7.0% to 45.2%).

Buildertrend alternatives naming Foundation Software
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Buildertrend / Foundation Software / ChatGPT	Foundation Software named in 3 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / Foundation Software / Claude	Foundation Software named in 0 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / Foundation Software / Perplexity	Foundation Software named in 0 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / Foundation Software / Google AI Overviews	Foundation Software named in 0 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / Foundation Software / Google AI Mode	Foundation Software named in 0 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.

Foundation Software across the category questions.

Buildertrend alternatives: ConstructionOnline

ConstructionOnline: 1 of 15 valid answers, 6.7% (Wilson 95% interval 1.2% to 29.8%).

Buildertrend alternatives naming ConstructionOnline
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Buildertrend / ConstructionOnline / ChatGPT	ConstructionOnline named in 0 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / ConstructionOnline / Claude	ConstructionOnline named in 0 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / ConstructionOnline / Perplexity	ConstructionOnline named in 0 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / ConstructionOnline / Google AI Overviews	ConstructionOnline named in 1 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / ConstructionOnline / Google AI Mode	ConstructionOnline named in 0 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.

ConstructionOnline across the category questions.

Buildertrend alternatives: RedTeam

RedTeam: 1 of 15 valid answers, 6.7% (Wilson 95% interval 1.2% to 29.8%).

Buildertrend alternatives naming RedTeam
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Buildertrend / RedTeam / ChatGPT	RedTeam named in 0 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / RedTeam / Claude	RedTeam named in 0 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / RedTeam / Perplexity	RedTeam named in 1 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / RedTeam / Google AI Overviews	RedTeam named in 0 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.
Buildertrend / RedTeam / Google AI Mode	RedTeam named in 0 of 3 valid Buildertrend-alternatives answers.

RedTeam across the category questions.

Buildertrend alternatives and the checked set

Not named in this question: CMiC, eSUB, InEight, Jonas Construction, Kahua, Leap, Linarc, Oracle Construction and Engineering, Penta Software, Raken, Sage 300 CRE, Trimble Viewpoint. Each has 0 of 15 valid answers for this exact wording.

A question naming Buildertrend already directs attention toward that product. Read its category discovery questions before comparing this answer with an unbranded shortlist.

Construction project management software source mix. The full Buildertrend answers remain in the release deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

Autodesk Construction Cloud alternatives

Construction project management software · captured 2026-09-22

When the question asks for Autodesk Construction Cloud alternatives

Autodesk Construction Cloud alternatives: 9 other checked vendors were named across 15 valid answers.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Exact wording: what are the best alternatives to Autodesk Construction Cloud.

Autodesk Construction Cloud remained in 15 of 15 valid answers, 100.0% (Wilson 95% interval 79.6% to 100.0%).

12 of 22 checked vendors were never named for this exact question. That observation applies to 15 valid answers, rather than to all future answers.

Question record for Autodesk Construction Cloud · Construction project management software checked set.

Autodesk Construction Cloud alternatives: Autodesk Construction Cloud

Autodesk Construction Cloud: 15 of 15 valid answers, 100.0% (Wilson 95% interval 79.6% to 100.0%).

Autodesk Construction Cloud alternatives naming Autodesk Construction Cloud
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Autodesk Construction Cloud / ChatGPT	Autodesk Construction Cloud named in 3 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Autodesk Construction Cloud / Claude	Autodesk Construction Cloud named in 3 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Autodesk Construction Cloud / Perplexity	Autodesk Construction Cloud named in 3 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Autodesk Construction Cloud / Google AI Overviews	Autodesk Construction Cloud named in 3 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Autodesk Construction Cloud / Google AI Mode	Autodesk Construction Cloud named in 3 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.

Autodesk Construction Cloud across the category questions.

Autodesk Construction Cloud alternatives: Procore

Procore: 15 of 15 valid answers, 100.0% (Wilson 95% interval 79.6% to 100.0%).

Autodesk Construction Cloud alternatives naming Procore
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / ChatGPT	Procore named in 3 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Claude	Procore named in 3 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Perplexity	Procore named in 3 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Google AI Overviews	Procore named in 3 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Procore / Google AI Mode	Procore named in 3 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.

Procore across the category questions.

Autodesk Construction Cloud alternatives: Fieldwire

Fieldwire: 13 of 15 valid answers, 86.7% (Wilson 95% interval 62.1% to 96.3%).

Autodesk Construction Cloud alternatives naming Fieldwire
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Fieldwire / ChatGPT	Fieldwire named in 3 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Fieldwire / Claude	Fieldwire named in 3 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Fieldwire / Perplexity	Fieldwire named in 3 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Fieldwire / Google AI Overviews	Fieldwire named in 1 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Fieldwire / Google AI Mode	Fieldwire named in 3 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.

Fieldwire across the category questions.

Autodesk Construction Cloud alternatives: Oracle Construction and Engineering

Oracle Construction and Engineering: 11 of 15 valid answers, 73.3% (Wilson 95% interval 48.0% to 89.1%).

Autodesk Construction Cloud alternatives naming Oracle Construction and Engineering
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Oracle Construction and Engineering / ChatGPT	Oracle Construction and Engineering named in 3 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Oracle Construction and Engineering / Claude	Oracle Construction and Engineering named in 2 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Oracle Construction and Engineering / Perplexity	Oracle Construction and Engineering named in 3 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Oracle Construction and Engineering / Google AI Overviews	Oracle Construction and Engineering named in 0 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Oracle Construction and Engineering / Google AI Mode	Oracle Construction and Engineering named in 3 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.

Oracle Construction and Engineering across the category questions.

Autodesk Construction Cloud alternatives: Buildertrend

Buildertrend: 8 of 15 valid answers, 53.3% (Wilson 95% interval 30.1% to 75.2%).

Autodesk Construction Cloud alternatives naming Buildertrend
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Buildertrend / ChatGPT	Buildertrend named in 2 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Buildertrend / Claude	Buildertrend named in 3 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Buildertrend / Perplexity	Buildertrend named in 2 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Buildertrend / Google AI Overviews	Buildertrend named in 0 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Buildertrend / Google AI Mode	Buildertrend named in 1 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.

Buildertrend across the category questions.

Autodesk Construction Cloud alternatives: InEight

InEight: 5 of 15 valid answers, 33.3% (Wilson 95% interval 15.2% to 58.3%).

Autodesk Construction Cloud alternatives naming InEight
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Autodesk Construction Cloud / InEight / ChatGPT	InEight named in 0 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / InEight / Claude	InEight named in 2 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / InEight / Perplexity	InEight named in 3 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / InEight / Google AI Overviews	InEight named in 0 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / InEight / Google AI Mode	InEight named in 0 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.

InEight across the category questions.

Autodesk Construction Cloud alternatives: CMiC

CMiC: 3 of 15 valid answers, 20.0% (Wilson 95% interval 7.0% to 45.2%).

Autodesk Construction Cloud alternatives naming CMiC
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Autodesk Construction Cloud / CMiC / ChatGPT	CMiC named in 0 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / CMiC / Claude	CMiC named in 0 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / CMiC / Perplexity	CMiC named in 3 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / CMiC / Google AI Overviews	CMiC named in 0 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / CMiC / Google AI Mode	CMiC named in 0 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.

CMiC across the category questions.

Autodesk Construction Cloud alternatives: RedTeam

RedTeam: 3 of 15 valid answers, 20.0% (Wilson 95% interval 7.0% to 45.2%).

Autodesk Construction Cloud alternatives naming RedTeam
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Autodesk Construction Cloud / RedTeam / ChatGPT	RedTeam named in 0 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / RedTeam / Claude	RedTeam named in 1 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / RedTeam / Perplexity	RedTeam named in 2 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / RedTeam / Google AI Overviews	RedTeam named in 0 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / RedTeam / Google AI Mode	RedTeam named in 0 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.

RedTeam across the category questions.

Autodesk Construction Cloud alternatives: Trimble Viewpoint

Trimble Viewpoint: 3 of 15 valid answers, 20.0% (Wilson 95% interval 7.0% to 45.2%).

Autodesk Construction Cloud alternatives naming Trimble Viewpoint
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Trimble Viewpoint / ChatGPT	Trimble Viewpoint named in 2 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Trimble Viewpoint / Claude	Trimble Viewpoint named in 0 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Trimble Viewpoint / Perplexity	Trimble Viewpoint named in 0 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Trimble Viewpoint / Google AI Overviews	Trimble Viewpoint named in 0 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / Trimble Viewpoint / Google AI Mode	Trimble Viewpoint named in 1 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.

Trimble Viewpoint across the category questions.

Autodesk Construction Cloud alternatives: eSUB

eSUB: 1 of 15 valid answers, 6.7% (Wilson 95% interval 1.2% to 29.8%).

Autodesk Construction Cloud alternatives naming eSUB
Engine, subject, and vendor	Valid answers naming this vendor
Autodesk Construction Cloud / eSUB / ChatGPT	eSUB named in 0 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / eSUB / Claude	eSUB named in 1 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / eSUB / Perplexity	eSUB named in 0 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / eSUB / Google AI Overviews	eSUB named in 0 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.
Autodesk Construction Cloud / eSUB / Google AI Mode	eSUB named in 0 of 3 valid Autodesk Construction Cloud-alternatives answers.

eSUB across the category questions.

Autodesk Construction Cloud alternatives and the checked set

Not named in this question: Buildxact, ConstructionOnline, Contractor Foreman, Foundation Software, JobTread, Jonas Construction, Kahua, Leap, Linarc, Penta Software, Raken, Sage 300 CRE. Each has 0 of 15 valid answers for this exact wording.

A question naming Autodesk Construction Cloud already directs attention toward that product. Read its category discovery questions before comparing this answer with an unbranded shortlist.

Construction project management software source mix. The full Autodesk Construction Cloud answers remain in the release deposit.

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Release 2026-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 · CC BY 4.0. Disputes and same-configuration re-runs. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com.

The ten buyer questions

Each question was put to every engine 3 times on the stated dates. Counts are over valid answers to the exact question.

best construction management software for a small residential builder

Question q1. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: best option.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPT Perplexity Claude

best construction project management software for a mid sized general contractor

Question q2. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: best option.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPT Perplexity Claude

best construction management software for subcontractors

Question q3. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: best option.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPT Perplexity Claude

what are the best alternatives to Procore

Question q4. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: alternative.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPT Perplexity Claude

what are the best alternatives to Buildertrend

Question q5. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: alternative.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPT Perplexity Claude

what are the best alternatives to Autodesk Construction Cloud

Question q6. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: alternative.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPT Perplexity Claude

Procore vs Buildertrend, which is better for a small GC

Question q7. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: buyer evaluation.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPT Perplexity Claude

Kahua vs e-Builder for an owner running capital projects

Question q8. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: buyer evaluation.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPT Perplexity Claude

what should I look for when choosing construction project management software

Question q9. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: buyer evaluation.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPT Perplexity Claude

best construction software for a small GC that needs estimating and scheduling without Procore complexity

Question q10. 15 valid answers. Excluded answers: 0. Type: specific workflow.

Ask the engine yourself; answers vary by run.ChatGPT Perplexity Claude

The ten buyer questions

Alternatives questions

Compared with Procore

Release and method

Release: 2026-09, version 2026-09.1
Published: 2026-09-23
Answer capture date: 2026-09-22
Source capture dates: 2026-09-21
Engines: ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode
Configuration: 10 fixed target questions, 5 engines, 3 repeats. Five controls were run outside the scored base.
Method version: v1.1
Excluded answers: 0 target answers excluded; exact reasons are listed. Controls were run outside the scored base.
Commissioned engagement: No commissioned engagement is declared for this category.

Exact names and listed aliases are matched without case sensitivity at word boundaries. Plain word names require a listed qualifier nearby in the same sentence or the canonical domain among cited URLs. A vendor citation counts only when that answer also names the vendor under this rule.

Answer text for releases before 2026-09 was not retained. For release 2026-09 and later, the full answer text is kept and published in the release's Zenodo deposit and on the receipt pages, except Perplexity, where the method keeps a scored excerpt of at most 60 words and the share link.

Download and cite

Release JSON · Category CSV · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695

How to cite: Broadcastwell. The Absence Index, Construction project management software, version 2026-09.1. Permanent record. CC BY 4.0 with attribution to Broadcastwell.

About this page

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

This public record reports the checked set, fixed questions and stated dates. Claim a vendor page, file a dispute or ask for a re-run, or read the dispute policy and log.

Read this page as JSON · Dataset and page metadata

Which construction tools did AI tools name? 22 Sep 2026 record

Criteria Maps

Fit with the buyer’s construction workflows

Mobile access for field work

Job cost and budget tracking

Project and task scheduling

Drawing and document version control

Project communication and collaboration

Project document storage and management

Cost forecasting

Construction workflow tracking for RFIs, submittals and field reports

Total cost including implementation and related charges

Audit and activity history

Change order tracking

Integration with existing accounting and project systems

An interface field staff can use easily

Change order tracking and approval

Implementation and onboarding support

Clear pricing basis and included features

Offline access for field work

Project dashboards and reporting

Project document control

Training and learning resources

An easy to use interface

Capacity for growing project volumes

Change order handling

Field progress tracking

Integration with the buyer’s existing software

No cost evaluation access for fit and usability

Access to customer support

An interface field and office staff can use easily

Assigned approvals, reminders and responsibility

Complete project data export

Demonstrated performance on a representative project

Deployment model suited to remote access and site conditions

Experience in the buyer’s construction segment

Integration with existing accounting or ERP software

Multifactor authentication

Offline access and synchronization

Required compliance documentation and reporting

Role based access for project participants

Searchable project documents

AIA billing

Access permissions

Approval workflows

Clear licensing basis and external user costs

Clear renewal and cancellation terms

Client communication portals

Cost appropriate to the buyer’s scale

Data backups

Defined synchronization direction, records and error handling

Evidence of successful adoption in other projects

Field time tracking

Job costing

Labor, equipment and material allocation

Secure document storage

Setup without excessive administrative overhead

Subcontract management

Subcontractor insurance and lien waiver tracking

Workflow automation

Access limited appropriately for subcontractors and clients

Backup and recovery

Bid invitation distribution

Billing

Capacity for growing projects, crews and locations

Capacity for larger teams and more complex projects

Capacity for multiple simultaneous projects

Clear pricing as project volumes grow

Customer support during working hours

Daily field reports

Data access after cancellation

Data access and retention after cancellation

Defined synchronization records, direction and frequency

Drawing markup linked to issues and RFIs

Drawing markups linked to issues or RFIs

Drawing viewing and markup

Equipment and crew scheduling and dispatch

Estimating and takeoff tools

Estimating tools

Financial visibility