Head to head · Loan origination and lending software · release 2026-09

LendingWise vs nCino

Of 150 answers about loan origination and lending software, 92 named nCino and 13 named LendingWise. There was no question where LendingWise was named and nCino was not. All five engines named LendingWise at least once.

nCino is the most named checked vendor in loan origination and lending software in this release, so every other vendor in the category is compared with it.

One capture on 22 September 2026, ten fixed questions, three runs per engine. Not a ranking, and an engine can answer differently on a refresh.

The LendingWise record · The nCino record

Side by side

All ten buyer questions, five engines, three runs. Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.
MeasureLendingWisenCino
Named13 of 150 (8.7%, Wilson 95% interval 5.1% to 14.3%)92 of 150 (61.3%, Wilson 95% interval 53.3% to 68.8%)
Own domain cited5 of 150 (3.3%, Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%)29 of 150 (19.3%, Wilson 95% interval 13.8% to 26.4%)

By question

Counts per question, over that question's valid answers.

By engine

Each engine's count over its valid answers to all ten questions.

LendingWise and nCino, named per engine.
VendorChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI OverviewsGoogle AI Mode
LendingWise2 of 302 of 305 of 302 of 302 of 30
nCino15 of 3021 of 3017 of 3020 of 3019 of 30

Measured head to head

No question in this release asked the engines to choose between LendingWise and nCino; the counts above come from the ten buyer questions.

What the engines said about each

LendingWise gives lean teams an accessible all-in-one solution.

Claude, . Full answer text in the deposit.

nCino is a top choice if your bank runs on Salesforce.

Claude, . Full answer text in the deposit.

One sentence per engine at most, chosen by a fixed rule: the first full sentence naming a checked vendor, read in run order. Every answer in full: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695.

What to do with this

Free 10-question check (one engine)

No email is needed; runs are limited per network and per day, and by the site's daily allowance.

Claim or correct this record

Fix one answer, $490 Answer Repair: one source-backed page or fix for one agreed buyer question, due 48 elapsed hours after recorded Ready. Agency Deadline Audit, $490 per client report. Both carry the published full-refund terms.

Choosing an agency for this? The GEO agencies compared, with sources.

Every figure comes from the published method, v1.1.

Claiming or correcting your record is free and never depends on a purchase. No payment changes any number on the Index.

Delivery lead: Priya Nair, Management Consultant.

Receipt

Release
2026-09, published
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.22907695
Method
v1.1: ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode; ten fixed buyer questions per category; three runs per engine
Captured
Base
150 valid answers across ten questions; 0 excluded
Licence
CC BY 4.0, attribution to Broadcastwell
Disputes
Dispute policy and log

Any named company may request one no-cost re-run at index@broadcastwell.com; both results are published.

Prepared by the Broadcastwell team.

Page owner: Vikram Patel, AI Architect. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

About this page

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Buyer questions · What AI names instead · Head to head · Statement records · Method · Dispute policy