Head to head · Transportation management systems · release 2026-09
Princeton TMX vs AscendTMS No engine named Princeton TMX in 150 answers about transportation management systems; AscendTMS came up in 64.
AscendTMS is the most named checked vendor in transportation management systems in this release, so every other vendor in the category is compared with it.
One capture on 22 September 2026, ten fixed questions, three runs per engine. Not a ranking, and an engine can answer differently on a refresh.
The Princeton TMX record · The AscendTMS record
Side by side All ten buyer questions, five engines, three runs. Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality. Measure Princeton TMX AscendTMS Named 0 of 150 (0.0%, Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%) 64 of 150 (42.7%, Wilson 95% interval 35.0% to 50.7%) Own domain cited 0 of 150 (0.0%, Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%) 9 of 150 (6.0%, Wilson 95% interval 3.2% to 11.0%)
By question Counts per question, over that question's valid answers.
By engine Each engine's count over its valid answers to all ten questions.
Princeton TMX and AscendTMS, named per engine. Vendor ChatGPT Claude Perplexity Google AI Overviews Google AI Mode Princeton TMX 0 of 30 0 of 30 0 of 30 0 of 30 0 of 30 AscendTMS 8 of 30 16 of 30 15 of 30 11 of 30 14 of 30
Measured head to head No question in this release asked the engines to choose between Princeton TMX and AscendTMS; the counts above come from the ten buyer questions.
What the engines said about each Platform fit depends on brokerage size and load volume, from entry-level tools like AscendTMS to enterprise platforms like McLeod PowerBroker.
Claude, 22 September 2026 . Full answer text in the deposit . One sentence per engine at most, chosen by a fixed rule: the first full sentence naming a checked vendor, read in run order. Every answer in full: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 .
What to do with this Princeton TMX claims its record, free, and runs the free check on its own name. The widest gap is on “What are the best alternatives to AscendTMS?”: that is the question to fix with Answer Repair, $490. AscendTMS claims its record, free: claim the AscendTMS record . Buyers: both figures are observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. Ask each vendor for a dated record. Free 10-question check (one engine)
No email is needed; runs are limited per network and per day, and by the site's daily allowance.
Claim or correct this record
Fix one answer, $490 Answer Repair : one source-backed page or fix for one agreed buyer question, due 48 elapsed hours after recorded Ready. Agency Deadline Audit, $490 per client report. Both carry the published full-refund terms .
Choosing an agency for this? The GEO agencies compared, with sources.
Every figure comes from the published method, v1.1.
Claiming or correcting your record is free and never depends on a purchase. No payment changes any number on the Index.
Delivery lead: Priya Nair, Management Consultant.
Receipt Release 2026-09, published 23 September 2026 DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695 Method v1.1 : ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode; ten fixed buyer questions per category; three runs per engineCaptured 22 September 2026 Base 150 valid answers across ten questions; 0 excluded Licence CC BY 4.0 , attribution to BroadcastwellDisputes Dispute policy and log Any named company may request one no-cost re-run at index@broadcastwell.com; both results are published.
Prepared by the Broadcastwell team.
Page owner: Vikram Patel, AI Architect. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com
Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.
About this page Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.
Buyer questions · What AI names instead · Head to head · Statement records · Method · Dispute policy