Head to head · Transportation management systems · release 2026-09

Descartes vs AscendTMS

Descartes: 32 of 150. AscendTMS: 64 of 150. Same ten buyer questions, same five engines, same day. Descartes was named and AscendTMS was not on one question: “What is the best TMS for a large enterprise shipper?”. All five engines named Descartes at least once.

AscendTMS is the most named checked vendor in transportation management systems in this release, so every other vendor in the category is compared with it.

One capture on 22 September 2026, ten fixed questions, three runs per engine. Not a ranking, and an engine can answer differently on a refresh.

The Descartes record · The AscendTMS record

Side by side

All ten buyer questions, five engines, three runs. Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.
MeasureDescartesAscendTMS
Named32 of 150 (21.3%, Wilson 95% interval 15.5% to 28.6%)64 of 150 (42.7%, Wilson 95% interval 35.0% to 50.7%)
Own domain cited5 of 150 (3.3%, Wilson 95% interval 1.4% to 7.6%)9 of 150 (6.0%, Wilson 95% interval 3.2% to 11.0%)

By question

Counts per question, over that question's valid answers.

By engine

Each engine's count over its valid answers to all ten questions.

Descartes and AscendTMS, named per engine.
VendorChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI OverviewsGoogle AI Mode
Descartes12 of 307 of 307 of 303 of 303 of 30
AscendTMS8 of 3016 of 3015 of 3011 of 3014 of 30

Measured head to head

No question in this release asked the engines to choose between Descartes and AscendTMS; the counts above come from the ten buyer questions.

What the engines said about each

MercuryGate / 3Gtms / Descartes, good enterprise alternatives when you want a more shipper-focused TMS without committing to a specific ERP stack.

Perplexity, . Full answer text in the deposit. Dash punctuation normalized.

Platform fit depends on brokerage size and load volume, from entry-level tools like AscendTMS to enterprise platforms like McLeod PowerBroker.

Claude, . Full answer text in the deposit.

One sentence per engine at most, chosen by a fixed rule: the first full sentence naming a checked vendor, read in run order. Every answer in full: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695.

What to do with this

Free 10-question check (one engine)

No email is needed; runs are limited per network and per day, and by the site's daily allowance.

Claim or correct this record

Fix one answer, $490 Answer Repair: one source-backed page or fix for one agreed buyer question, due 48 elapsed hours after recorded Ready. Agency Deadline Audit, $490 per client report. Both carry the published full-refund terms.

Choosing an agency for this? The GEO agencies compared, with sources.

Every figure comes from the published method, v1.1.

Claiming or correcting your record is free and never depends on a purchase. No payment changes any number on the Index.

Delivery lead: Priya Nair, Management Consultant.

Receipt

Release
2026-09, published
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.22907695
Method
v1.1: ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode; ten fixed buyer questions per category; three runs per engine
Captured
Base
150 valid answers across ten questions; 0 excluded
Licence
CC BY 4.0, attribution to Broadcastwell
Disputes
Dispute policy and log

Any named company may request one no-cost re-run at index@broadcastwell.com; both results are published.

Prepared by the Broadcastwell team.

Page owner: Vikram Patel, AI Architect. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

About this page

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

Buyer questions · What AI names instead · Head to head · Statement records · Method · Dispute policy