Head to head · Legal practice management software · release 2026-09

Filevine vs Clio

Name: Filevine and Clio in AI answers about legal practice management software
Creator: Broadcastwell
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Put the same ten legal practice management software questions to five engines three times each and Filevine is named 74 times; Clio, 126. There was no question where Filevine was named and Clio was not. All five engines named Filevine at least once.

Clio is the most named checked vendor in legal practice management software in this release, so every other vendor in the category is compared with it.

One capture on 22 September 2026, ten fixed questions, three runs per engine. Not a ranking, and an engine can answer differently on a refresh.

The Filevine record · The Clio record

Side by side

All ten buyer questions, five engines, three runs. Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.
Measure	Filevine	Clio
Named	74 of 150 (49.3%, Wilson 95% interval 41.4% to 57.3%)	126 of 150 (84.0%, Wilson 95% interval 77.3% to 89.0%)
Own domain cited	17 of 150 (11.3%, Wilson 95% interval 7.2% to 17.4%)	53 of 150 (35.3%, Wilson 95% interval 28.1% to 43.3%)

By question

Counts per question, over that question's valid answers.

Filevine and Clio, named per buyer question.
Buyer question	Filevine	Clio
what is the best legal practice management software for a solo attorney	8 of 15	15 of 15
what is the best practice management software for a small firm of 3 to 5 attorneys	3 of 15	15 of 15
what is the best case management software for a personal injury firm	14 of 15	15 of 15
what are the best alternatives to Clio for a solo attorney	7 of 15	15 of 15
what are the best alternatives to PracticePanther	12 of 15	15 of 15
what are the best alternatives to Smokeball	12 of 15	15 of 15
Clio vs MyCase, which is better for a small firm	0 of 15	15 of 15
CosmoLex vs Rocket Matter	0 of 15	2 of 15
what should I look for in law practice management software	3 of 15	4 of 15
best practice management platform for a mid-size litigation firm moving off on-premise software	15 of 15	15 of 15

By engine

Each engine's count over its valid answers to all ten questions.

Filevine and Clio, named per engine.
Vendor	ChatGPT	Claude	Perplexity	Google AI Overviews	Google AI Mode
Filevine	11 of 30	19 of 30	16 of 30	11 of 30	17 of 30
Clio	25 of 30	25 of 30	24 of 30	27 of 30	25 of 30

Measured head to head

No question in this release asked the engines to choose between Filevine and Clio; the counts above come from the ten buyer questions.

What the engines said about each

Filevine is the best choice for personal injury and plaintiff-side litigation firms.

Claude, 22 September 2026. Full answer text in the deposit.

My default recommendation for a U.S. solo attorney is Clio, but I’d compare Clio Core with MyCase Pro before buying.

ChatGPT, 22 September 2026. Full answer text in the deposit. Dash punctuation normalized.

One sentence per engine at most, chosen by a fixed rule: the first full sentence naming a checked vendor, read in run order. Every answer in full: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695.

What to do with this

Filevine claims its record, free, and runs the free check on its own name. The widest gap is on “Clio vs MyCase, which is better for a small firm”: that is the question to fix with Answer Repair, $490.
Clio claims its record, free: claim the Clio record.
Buyers: both figures are observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. Ask each vendor for a dated record.

Free 10-question check (one engine)

No email is needed; runs are limited per network and per day, and by the site's daily allowance.

Claim or correct this record

Fix one answer, $490 Answer Repair: one source-backed page or fix for one agreed buyer question, due 48 elapsed hours after recorded Ready. Agency Deadline Audit, $490 per client report. Both carry the published full-refund terms.

Choosing an agency for this? The GEO agencies compared, with sources.

Every figure comes from the published method, v1.1.

Claiming or correcting your record is free and never depends on a purchase. No payment changes any number on the Index.

Delivery lead: Priya Nair, Management Consultant.

Receipt

Release: 2026-09, published 23 September 2026
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22907695
Method: v1.1: ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode; ten fixed buyer questions per category; three runs per engine
Captured: 22 September 2026
Base: 150 valid answers across ten questions; 0 excluded
Licence: CC BY 4.0, attribution to Broadcastwell
Disputes: Dispute policy and log

Any named company may request one no-cost re-run at index@broadcastwell.com; both results are published.

Prepared by the Broadcastwell team.

Page owner: Vikram Patel, AI Architect. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

About this page