Head to head · Insurance agency management systems · release 2026-09
NASA (Eclipse): 0 of 150. Applied Systems: 127 of 150.
Applied Systems is the most named checked vendor in insurance agency management systems in this release, so every other vendor in the category is compared with it.
One capture on 22 September 2026, ten fixed questions, three runs per engine. Not a ranking, and an engine can answer differently on a refresh.
| Measure | NASA (Eclipse) | Applied Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Named | 0 of 150 (0.0%, Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%) | 127 of 150 (84.7%, Wilson 95% interval 78.0% to 89.6%) |
| Own domain cited | 0 of 150 (0.0%, Wilson 95% interval 0.0% to 2.5%) | 54 of 150 (36.0%, Wilson 95% interval 28.8% to 43.9%) |
Counts per question, over that question's valid answers.
| Buyer question | NASA (Eclipse) | Applied Systems |
|---|---|---|
| What is the best agency management system for a small independent P&C agency? | 0 of 15 | 15 of 15 |
| What is the best agency management system for a growing commercial lines brokerage? | 0 of 15 | 15 of 15 |
| What is the best agency management system for a life and health benefits agency? | 0 of 15 | 7 of 15 |
| What are the best alternatives to EZLynx? | 0 of 15 | 15 of 15 |
| What are the best alternatives to Applied Epic? | 0 of 15 | 15 of 15 |
| What are the best alternatives to AgencyZoom? | 0 of 15 | 15 of 15 |
| HawkSoft vs EZLynx: which agency management system is better? | 0 of 15 | 15 of 15 |
| Applied Epic vs EZLynx: which one is worth the price? | 0 of 15 | 15 of 15 |
| What should I look for when choosing an agency management system? | 0 of 15 | 0 of 15 |
| Which AMS should a new scratch agency with two producers start with? | 0 of 15 | 15 of 15 |
Each engine's count over its valid answers to all ten questions.
| Vendor | ChatGPT | Claude | Perplexity | Google AI Overviews | Google AI Mode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NASA (Eclipse) | 0 of 30 | 0 of 30 | 0 of 30 | 0 of 30 | 0 of 30 |
| Applied Systems | 27 of 30 | 25 of 30 | 24 of 30 | 26 of 30 | 25 of 30 |
No question in this release asked the engines to choose between NASA (Eclipse) and Applied Systems; the counts above come from the ten buyer questions.
I’d start with HawkSoft and EZLynx.
One sentence per engine at most, chosen by a fixed rule: the first full sentence naming a checked vendor, read in run order. Every answer in full: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695.
Free 10-question check (one engine)
No email is needed; runs are limited per network and per day, and by the site's daily allowance.
Fix one answer, $490 Answer Repair: one source-backed page or fix for one agreed buyer question, due 48 elapsed hours after recorded Ready. Agency Deadline Audit, $490 per client report. Both carry the published full-refund terms.
Choosing an agency for this? The GEO agencies compared, with sources.
Every figure comes from the published method, v1.1.
Claiming or correcting your record is free and never depends on a purchase. No payment changes any number on the Index.
Delivery lead: Priya Nair, Management Consultant.
Any named company may request one no-cost re-run at index@broadcastwell.com; both results are published.
Prepared by the Broadcastwell team.
Page owner: Vikram Patel, AI Architect. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com
Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.
Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.
Buyer questions · What AI names instead · Head to head · Statement records · Method · Dispute policy