Head to head · Insurance agency management systems · release 2026-09

HawkSoft vs Applied Systems

Name: HawkSoft and Applied Systems in AI answers about insurance agency management systems
Creator: Broadcastwell
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

30 answers separate HawkSoft from Applied Systems across 150 answers about insurance agency management systems: 97 against 127. There was no question where HawkSoft was named and Applied Systems was not. All five engines named HawkSoft at least once.

Applied Systems is the most named checked vendor in insurance agency management systems in this release, so every other vendor in the category is compared with it.

One capture on 22 September 2026, ten fixed questions, three runs per engine. Not a ranking, and an engine can answer differently on a refresh.

The HawkSoft record · The Applied Systems record

Side by side

All ten buyer questions, five engines, three runs. Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.
Measure	HawkSoft	Applied Systems
Named	97 of 150 (64.7%, Wilson 95% interval 56.7% to 71.9%)	127 of 150 (84.7%, Wilson 95% interval 78.0% to 89.6%)
Own domain cited	34 of 150 (22.7%, Wilson 95% interval 16.7% to 30.0%)	54 of 150 (36.0%, Wilson 95% interval 28.8% to 43.9%)

By question

Counts per question, over that question's valid answers.

HawkSoft and Applied Systems, named per buyer question.
Buyer question	HawkSoft	Applied Systems
What is the best agency management system for a small independent P&C agency?	15 of 15	15 of 15
What is the best agency management system for a growing commercial lines brokerage?	15 of 15	15 of 15
What is the best agency management system for a life and health benefits agency?	1 of 15	7 of 15
What are the best alternatives to EZLynx?	15 of 15	15 of 15
What are the best alternatives to Applied Epic?	13 of 15	15 of 15
What are the best alternatives to AgencyZoom?	12 of 15	15 of 15
HawkSoft vs EZLynx: which agency management system is better?	15 of 15	15 of 15
Applied Epic vs EZLynx: which one is worth the price?	0 of 15	15 of 15
What should I look for when choosing an agency management system?	0 of 15	0 of 15
Which AMS should a new scratch agency with two producers start with?	11 of 15	15 of 15

By engine

Each engine's count over its valid answers to all ten questions.

HawkSoft and Applied Systems, named per engine.
Vendor	ChatGPT	Claude	Perplexity	Google AI Overviews	Google AI Mode
HawkSoft	18 of 30	22 of 30	18 of 30	18 of 30	21 of 30
Applied Systems	27 of 30	25 of 30	24 of 30	26 of 30	25 of 30

Measured head to head

No question in this release asked the engines to choose between HawkSoft and Applied Systems; the counts above come from the ten buyer questions.

What the engines said about each

I’d start with HawkSoft and EZLynx.

ChatGPT, 22 September 2026. Full answer text in the deposit.

I’d start with HawkSoft and EZLynx.

ChatGPT, 22 September 2026. Full answer text in the deposit.

One sentence per engine at most, chosen by a fixed rule: the first full sentence naming a checked vendor, read in run order. Every answer in full: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22907695.

What to do with this

HawkSoft claims its record, free, and runs the free check on its own name. The widest gap is on “Applied Epic vs EZLynx: which one is worth the price?”: that is the question to fix with Answer Repair, $490.
Applied Systems claims its record, free: claim the Applied Systems record.
Buyers: both figures are observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. Ask each vendor for a dated record.

Free 10-question check (one engine)

No email is needed; runs are limited per network and per day, and by the site's daily allowance.

Claim or correct this record

Fix one answer, $490 Answer Repair: one source-backed page or fix for one agreed buyer question, due 48 elapsed hours after recorded Ready. Agency Deadline Audit, $490 per client report. Both carry the published full-refund terms.

Choosing an agency for this? The GEO agencies compared, with sources.

Every figure comes from the published method, v1.1.

Claiming or correcting your record is free and never depends on a purchase. No payment changes any number on the Index.

Delivery lead: Priya Nair, Management Consultant.

Receipt

Release: 2026-09, published 23 September 2026
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22907695
Method: v1.1: ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode; ten fixed buyer questions per category; three runs per engine
Captured: 22 September 2026
Base: 150 valid answers across ten questions; 0 excluded
Licence: CC BY 4.0, attribution to Broadcastwell
Disputes: Dispute policy and log

Any named company may request one no-cost re-run at index@broadcastwell.com; both results are published.

Prepared by the Broadcastwell team.

Page owner: Vikram Patel, AI Architect. Corrections: index@broadcastwell.com

Observed answers on stated dates, not a ranking. This is not a judgment of product quality.

About this page